Skip to main content

Social Justice in Educational Policy and Practice with Particular Reference to Early Childhood

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education
  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to raise awareness about the importance of social justice in Education, particularly in Early Childhood Education as it is in the early years that social attitudes and behavior have their foundation in the process of cultural transmission. The chapter begins by outlining the basic principles of social justice: fairness, respect, and opportunity by drawing on the philosophical theories of Rawls and Sandel. It then addresses the contexts where social injustice is most acute, viz.: gender, “race,” and social class by drawing on data from such diverse countries and territories as Scotland and Taiwan. The chapter then turns to the five main areas of Education where children’s social attitudes and behavior take shape: access to services, curriculum, hidden curriculum, pedagogy, and communication with families. It highlights the problem of access to early childhood education services and the disparity that can exist between public and private providers. By drawing on examples at the micro level from current national curriculum frameworks, it attempts to show that contemporary learning outcomes are largely inadequate in promoting social justice in a meaningful way. The chapter then maintains that both the hidden curriculum and the organization of the learning environment have a major role to play in social justice education as it is in these domains that individual teachers and child-care workers have considerable influence over what children informally learn about the social world through value-loaded discourse and the implementation of democratic critical pedagogies such as those implemented in the Nordic countries. Last but not least, the chapter underscores the vital importance of communication between families and early years settings and argues that contracts and conditions of service for early years teachers and child-care workers should be formally extended partly to persuade parents about the importance of putting the principles of social justice into practice and to engage parents in the work of the kindergarten through more meaningful interaction. In the Conclusion, the author recognizes that embracing social justice education is not without its critics but maintains that our social institutions have an important responsibility to aspire to a fairer world for all. For this reason, policy-makers and practitioners should engage in a root-and-branch reform of current early childhood practices including both initial education of teachers (and child-care workers) and continuing professional development courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsubaie, M. A. (2015). Hidden curriculum as one issue of curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(33), 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (2006). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), An anthropology of the state- a reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichman, A., Martino, A., & Minogue, K. (1982). Three myths. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berruetta-Clement, J. R., Schweinhart, L. J., Barnett, W. S., Epstein, A. S., & Weikhart, D. P. (1984). Changed lives: The effects of the Perry pre-school program on youths through age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: The High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. P. (2009). Confronting the contradictions: A case study of early childhood teacher development in neoliberal times. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(3), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children. London, England: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., Moss, P., Petrie, P., & Wallace, J. (2004). A new deal for children? Bristol, UK: The Polity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • David, T., Powell, S., & Goouch, K. (2010). The world picture. In G. Pugh & B. Duffy (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the early years (5th ed.). London, England: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Science (DfES). (2007). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. Nottingham, UK: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2007). Practice guidelines for the early years foundation stage. Nottingham, UK: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Scotland. (2004). Curriculum for excellence: Health and well-being. Edinburgh: Scottish Government, HMIe, SQA, Learning+Teaching Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emilson, A. (2011). Democracy learning in preschool context. In N. Pramling & I. P. Samuelsson (Eds.), Educational encounters: Nordic studies in early childhood didactics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment. London, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. (C. Gordon, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2000). Boys, girls and achievement. London, England: Routledge-Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillborn, D., & Gipps, C. (1996). Recent research on the achievement of ethnic minority pupils. London, England: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries. Albany, NY: State of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2018). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture and schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2006). Emotional regulation: Conceptual foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, G. L. (1995). A history of western educational experience. Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. E. (2004). Subjectivity. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (Ed.). (1972). Educational priority vol.1; EPA problems and policies. London, England: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2006). Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawker, D. (2010). Children’s trusts and early years services: Integration in action. In G. Pugh & B. Duffy (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the early years. London, England: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2005). Neo-Liberalism, markets and accountability: Transforming education and undermining democracy in the United States and England. Policy Futures in Education, 3, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerald, C. D. (2006). School culture: The hidden curriculum. Washington, DC: The Centre for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & Emilson, A. (2016). Conflicts and resistance: Potentials for democracy learning in preschools. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Y. P. (2010). Listening to children: Enabling children to be seen. In G. Pugh & B. Duffy (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the early years. (5th edn. London, England: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learning and Teaching Scotland (LTS). (2006). A curriculum framework for children 3 to 5 (7th imp.). Glasgow, UK: Learning and Teaching Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Krappmann, L., & Aidoo, A. A. (2015). Understanding ECCE as a right and development imperative. In P. T. M. Marope & Y. Kaga (Eds.), Investing in evidence: The Glabal state of early childhood care and education. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. (2012). School context in the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marope, P. T. M., & Kaga, Y. (Eds.). (2015). Investigating against evidence: The global state of early childhood care and education. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2008). Gender and education. In D. Mathieson (Ed.), An introduction to the study of education (3rd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, C. (2008). Ideology in education in the United Kingdom. In D. Matheson (Ed.), An introduction to the study of education (3rd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (MoE). (2013). Curriculum outlines for pre-school care-taking activities. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, H. (2006). Hearing children’s voices in the early years. Support for Learning, 19(4), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Penn, H. (1996) Transforming Nursey education. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2007). Bringing politics into the nursery: Early education as a democratic practice. European Early Childhood Educational Research, 15, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From Children’s services to children’s spaces: Public policy, children and childhood. London, England: Routledge-Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, L., & Iannelli, C. (2007). Social class and educational attainment: A comparative study of England, Wales and Scotland. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 330–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, H. (1992). Under fives: The view from Strathclyde. Edinburgh, England: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. B. (2018). 12 rules for life: An antidote to chaos. London, England: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice: Revised edition. New York, NY: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. H., & Diaz, C. J. (2006). Diversity and difference in early childhood education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2009). Liberalism and the limits of justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Office (SO). (1998). Meeting the childcare challenge: A childcare strategy for Scotland. Edinburgh, UK: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Office Education and Industry Department (SOEID). (1997). A curriculum framework for children in their pre-school year. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. New York, NY: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). Diversity, inclusion and learning in the early years. In G. Pugh & B. Duffy (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the early years (5th ed.). London, England: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. (2008). Race’ and education. In D. Mathieson (Ed.), An introduction to the study of education (3rd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., & Edwards, S. (2017). Young children playing and learning in a digital age: A cultural and critical perspective. London, England: Taylor Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. E. (2003). Policy and practice in education: Early childhood education: The new agenda. Edinburgh, UK: Dunedin Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. E., Johnson, S., Watt, J., Napuk, A., & Normand, B. (1995). Baseline assessment in Scotland: An analysis of pilot data. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. E. & Kao, C.-P. (2019). Aspects of socio-emotional learning in Taiwan’s pre-schools: An exploratory study of teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Child care and Education Policy 13(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. E., & Kelly, B. (1995). Integrating pre-school provision: An analysis of aims and objectives. Education, Child Development and Care, 108, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Eric Wilkinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wilkinson, J.E. (2019). Social Justice in Educational Policy and Practice with Particular Reference to Early Childhood. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics