Abstract
The incidence of wood dermatitis is quite small although it may be greater due to underreporting in countries from which no reports reach the public. The literature concerns commonly only case reports.
Woods cause allergic and irritant dermatitis, often with an airborne pattern. Contact urticaria, photocontact dermatitis, and erythema multiform are uncommon or rare.
In most cases, occupational dermatitis caused by wood occurs in individuals working with raw wood such as cabinetmakers, carpenters, sawmill workers, and lumberjacks. Fine sanding of wood is particularly risky.
The chemical substances responsible for allergic reactions are mostly benzo-, naphtho-, furano-, and phenanthrene quinones, stilbenes, phenolic compounds, and terpenes.
The chemical substances responsible for the majority of nonallergic reactions are alkaloids, glycosides, anthraquinones, saponins, phenols, and flavonoids.
Botanical identification of the suspected wood is essential; otherwise a description of the case is useless and proper advice to the patient often difficult. Trade names are often confusing and misleading. Almost always the help of a wood taxonomist is required for botanical identification.
B. M. Hausen: deceased.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Core Messages
-
The incidence of wood dermatitis is quite small although it may be greater due to underreporting in countries from which no reports reach the public. The literature concerns commonly only case reports.
-
Woods cause allergic and irritant dermatitis, often with an airborne pattern. Contact urticaria, photocontact dermatitis, and erythema multiform are uncommon or rare.
-
In most cases, occupational dermatitis caused by wood occurs in individuals working with raw wood such as cabinetmakers, carpenters, sawmill workers, and lumberjacks. Fine sanding of wood is extra risky.
-
The chemical substances responsible for allergic reactions are mostly benzo-, naphtho-, furano-, and phenanthrene quinones, stilbenes, phenolic compounds, and terpenes.
-
The chemical substances responsible for the majority of nonallergic reactions are alkaloids, glycosides, anthraquinones, saponins, phenols, and flavonoids.
-
Botanical identification of the suspected wood is essential; otherwise a description of the case is useless and proper advice to the patient often difficult. Trade names are often confusing and misleading. Almost always the help of a wood taxonomist is required for botanical identification.
2 Introduction
Besides providing lumber, furniture, plywood, and veneer, wood is the source of pulp board and paper and of hundreds of chemicals derived from cellulose, lignin, and certain resins. Wood is also a major source of the world’s fuel. The global consumption of wood reached a maximum in the 1980s; since then, this level of use has been maintained or may even be decreasing. However, the number of species offered has diminished remarkably. The largest timber resources are in the Amazon Basin, Central Africa, and Southeast Asia.
In most cases, occupational dermatitis caused by wood occurs in individuals working with raw wood, such as cabinetmakers, carpenters, sawmill workers, and lumberjacks (Cabanillas et al. 2006). A special risk arises, however, when fine sanding is done. Allergic dermatitis resulting from contact with finished wood items is seen rarely. It may develop after contact with wooden jewelry, wooden footwear, and especially parts of musical instruments, e.g., mouthpieces and chin rests. For the individual earning a living by playing an instrument, such an allergy is of considerable importance as it can lead to inability to play. The actual incidence of wood dermatitis is quite small, although it might be greater in countries, from which no reports reach the public. Commonly, the literature only records single cases or observations from local regions.
Irritation of the skin may arise from bristles, hair, thorns, or leaves (bamboo, palm) or from constituents of the sap (latex) as well as resins of species belonging to the Anacardiaceae, Apocynaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Moraceae, and Coniferae. Some timbers stain the skin when contact occurs with freshly cut wood, e.g., old fustic. Powders from the bark or heartwood, e.g., of araroba, brigalow, and tagayasan, may evoke rashes, stain the skin, and color the hair. Lesions from splinters of afrormosia, Douglas fir, greenheart, limba, mansonia, and redwood are notoriously slow to heal and commonly become infected. The compounds responsible for the majority of nonallergic reactions are toxic alkaloids, glycosides, anthraquinones, saponins, phenols, flavonoids, coumarins, and other toxic constituents. Some irritant reactions are due to certain timbers that contain strong irritant allergens in very high concentrations, e.g., Pao ferro.
Contact urticaria has been observed from several woods, such as ash, larch, limba, oak, obeche, pine, ramin, spruce, and teak (Schmidt 1978; Beck et al. 1984; Kanerva et al. 1998). A design and technology teacher developed a severe episode of generalized hives, periorbital and lip swelling, throat tightness, rhinitis, and giddiness. Patch testing revealed meranti sawdust (50% pet) to be the cause, in a rare case of occupational contact urticaria caused by wood dust (Koh et al. 2016). Trees may become infected with caterpillars or bear lichens on their bark, which may cause occupational dermatitis in workers trimming and debarking trees or thinning branches (“wood cutter’s disease”) (Katzenellenbogen 1955; Storrs et al. 1976; Aalto-Korte et al. 2005). Photosensitizing furocoumarins are present in wood species of the Rutaceae and Flindersiaceae (Mitchell and Rook 1979; Pires et al. 1999). Cases of photocontact dermatitis are extremely rare (Serrano et al. 2008).
Generally, allergic sensitization comes from the heartwood. The sapwood seldom contains sensitizing constituents. The chemical substances responsible for allergic reactions are mostly benzo-, naphtho-, furano-, and phenanthrene quinones, but stilbenes, phenolic compounds, and terpenes may also induce specific hypersensitivity. A list of genuine wood constituents known to cause allergic contact dermatitis is found in Table 1.
Allergic contact dermatitis from wood dust often resembles airborne contact dermatitis (Fig. 1). Besides, the fine dust, created during the various working processes, may collect in the clothing at the neckline, at the trouser’s ends, and in the tops of the socks. The shoes or boots may become heavily contaminated with dust and are a source of perpetual exposure. Initially, the dermatitis appears on exposed areas of the skin, e.g., the dorsa of hands, the forearms, the neck, and the eyelids. The first symptom is itching. Often these first eruptions are ignored and improve or even disappear during periods away from work. With continued exposure, the dermatitis gradually becomes worse; larger areas of the skin become involved, and the symptom-free periods become shorter. Finally, the dermatitis becomes widespread and resembles other generalized dermatoses, such as chromate and poison ivy dermatitis, mycosis fungoides, actinic reticuloid, and exfoliative dermatitis. In rare cases the clinical picture is not contact dermatitis but erythema multiforme-like (Pao ferro, cocobolo wood) or lymphomatoid contact dermatitis (teak) (Veien and Hausen 2000; Shimizu et al. 2000; Ezzedine et al. 2007).
Diagnosis is made by evaluation of the patient’s occupational history, the clinical appearance of the dermatitis, the botanical nature of the wood, and patch testing. Patch testing with sawdust or filings, mixed 10% by weight in petrolatum, is usually reliable (Mitchell and Rook 1979; Stingeni et al. 2008); the sawdust should be freshly ground. Irritant reactions may occur, especially with teak and Pao ferro. Because of the possible irritant nature, controls are necessary. An appropriate number to use is 20 persons; however, some recommend 50 to be more reliable. The sensitizing constituents named in Table 1 are not commercially available.
Botanical identification of the suspected wood is essential; otherwise, a description of the case is useless. Trade names, especially those of tropical and subtropical species, are often confusing, insufficient, and misleading. For example, a common name, such as rosewood or satinwood, refers to several different and completely unrelated species. Few workers know with any degree of certainty the species they are working with. Almost always, the help of a wood taxonomist is required. In such a case, a solid wood sample, not wood dust, should be available for botanical identification.
Prevention of contact dermatitis caused by woods is difficult. Dust control with proper ventilation is very important. Protective clothing should be worn and must cover the exposed areas. Only seldom can a strong sensitizing species be substituted by a less sensitizing one.
In case a worker has to change his job, retraining should not include occupations that bear the risk of recurrent allergic contact dermatitis. Cross-reactions might occur in woodworkers sensitive to quinonoid wood constituents. After changing job to that of a gardener, florist, nursery worker, or even pharmacy assistant, relapses may occur resulting from related quinones in ornamental plants or extracts handled occupationally.
New observations on dermatitis caused by woods have been reported. In several instances, the use of saunas constructed with western red cedar (Thuja plicata) was found to cause irritant contact dermatitis (Huilaja et al. 2016). A teacher who worked with cocobolo wood (Dalbergia retusa) developed irritant contact dermatitis (Jensen et al. 2016). African ebony (Diospyros crassiflora) elicited irritant contact dermatitis of the neck and arms in a 52-year-old woodworker. The woodworker was also diagnosed with episodic facial eczema and periorbital edema (Wlodek and Lovell 2014). A list of allergic contact dermatitis cases is found in Table 2.
The following description concerns the most common wood species that may cause dermatitis. For more extensive information, the reader is referred to the books by Mitchell and Rook (1979), Hausen (1981), the treatise by Woods and Calnan (1976), the chapter on wood by Cronin (1980) and Zug and Marks (1999), and the literature survey of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (Anonymous 1987).
3 Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. (Leg.-Mimosaceae) Australian Blackwood
Australian blackwood ( Acacia melanoxylon ) is the most important timber for almost every purpose in Australia. Even fences and musical instruments are manufactured from it. Cases of allergic contact dermatitis in joiners, furniture makers, and house- and boatbuilders have been reported since 1925. Besides acamelin and 2,6-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone functioning as minor allergens, the main sensitizer is a new hydroxyflavan named melacacidin (Hausen et al. 1990a). In Australia, even the wife of a joiner who was making cabinets in his house suffered from allergic contact dermatitis, although the working room was in the basement (Tilsley 1990). Occasionally the wood is exported to Europe (Correira et al. 1992). Melacacidin is also responsible for occupational dermatitis seen in the workers handling koa wood (Acacia koa) (Knight and Hausen 1992).
4 Bowdichia nitida Benth (Leg.-Papilionaceae) Sucupira
Sucupira from Brazil is best suited for structural purposes and is mostly used in Europe for flooring. It gains some interest for turned articles and as a veneer for inlays in high-class furniture. Cases of occupational contact dermatitis have been described by Freise (1932), Dantin-Gallego et al. (1952), Heyl (1966), and Gonccedilalo (1992) in joiners and flooring manufacturers. The heartwood contains at least five quinonoid constituents, of which two could be identified: dimethoxy-benzoquinone and bowdichione (Hausen et al. 1972; Brown et al. 1974). A third, still unknown, quinone seems to be related to the dalbergiones, as cross-reactivities have been observed in a sucupira-sensitive patient (Hausen 1981).
5 Brya ebenus Benth (Leg.-Papilionaceae) Cocus
Cocus is a small tree from the West Indies used for making musical instruments, particularly flutes, recorders, and clarinets. It also serves for making interior turnery, cutlery handles, fancy articles, sawn veneers, and wooden breakfast platters. Although of small diameter, it has been imported from Jamaica and Cuba for more than a century as one of the most valuable woods.
Occupational contact dermatitis has been observed not only in flute makers who saw and sandpaper the wood but also in flutists playing instruments manufactured with this wood. Typically, the allergic lesions of the latter are swollen lips and mouths (Crocker 1903; White 1903; Meister 1934).
A reinvestigation of the wood was prompted by the recurrent lesions (swollen lips) developing in a young girl studying the flute. Two hydroxyisoflavans were identified eliciting ++ to +++ reactions at a 1% test concentration (Hausen et al. 1991).
6 Calocedrus decurrens (Torr.) Florin (Cupressaceae). Incense Cedar
The incense cedar tree, native to California and Oregon, is used for the manufacture of pencils, fence posts, boarding, venetian blinds, chests, and toys. Cases of contact dermatitis have been described by Calnan (1972). Positive reactions were obtained with thymoquinone; β-thujaplicin remained negative. Incense cedar contains up to 4% of thymoquinone (for structure, see Thuja plicata).
7 Chlorophora excelsa Benth and Hook. (Moraceae). Iroko, Kambala
The West African timber, iroko, kambala, is used frequently as a substitute for teak because it possesses many of the desirable features of Tectona grandis. For decades it has been in demand due to its strength and durability for construction work, especially in making windows and door frames and in shipbuilding.
Occupational contact dermatitis has been described since 1910 (Schulz 1957; Jung 1967; Beer 1970; Pereira Marques 1989; Hinnen et al. 1995). In 1949, King and Grundon isolated a hydroxy stilbene, named chlorophorin, which was revealed to be a moderate sensitizer (Schmidt 1963; Hausen 1981). Its structure, first elucidated by King and Grundon (1950), was corroborated in 1986 by Krohn et al.
8 Cordia millenii Baker. Cordia
8.1 Cordia gerascanthus R. BR. (Boraginaceae). Canalete
8.2 Cordia goeldiana Huber. Freijo
Cordia goeldiana from Brazil, also often called Brazilian walnut, and Cordia gerascanthus derived from Venezuela form together with Cordia millenii and Cordia platythyrsa Baker from tropical Africa a group of valuable timbers with moderate durability. Due to their lightweight, softness, and low strength, they are used mainly for interior work, furniture, and joinery. Only the Brazilian species are also suitable for boatbuilding and exterior constructions.
Although used abundantly, only two published reports of occupational contact dermatitis are known (Schwartz 1931; Rackett and Zug 1997). However, the author has also seen four cases, which remain unpublished. In these cases, a typical airborne contact dermatitis developed due to bad air exhaust conditions in workers who manufactured balcony breastwork and moldings. Cordiachromes A and E, both 0.1% in petrolatum, were positive.
9 Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. East Indian Rosewood
9.1 Dalbergia melanoxylon Guill. and Perr. Grenadill
9.1.1 Dalbergia nigra All. Brazilian Rosewood
9.1.1.1 Dalbergia retusa Hemsl. (D. Obtusa Lec.) Cocobolo (Leg.-Papilionaceae)
The different Dalbergia species provide most valuable woods used for high-class furniture, cabinetwork, inlay work, and parts of musical instruments.
9.1.1.1.1 Cocobolo
Cocobolo derives from Central America; it is strong, hard, compact, fairly heavy, easy to work with, and of extreme durability. It holds a supreme position in the cutlery trade, especially in knife handles, but also serves for brush backs, chessmen, scientific instruments, bulbs of billiard cues, wooden bracelets, wooden jewelry, and interior turnery. Cocobolo is especially used for musical instruments; 90% of all recorders manufactured before World War II were made from cocobolo. Descriptions of occupational dermatitis occurring in workers manufacturing hairbrushes, knife handles, and recorders have been published just as often as allergic reactions of the lips and fingertips in those playing the instruments (Neisser 1907; MacKee 1913; Modlmayer 1931; Steinbrink 1950; Schulz and Dietrichs 1962; Hausen and Muumlnster 1983; Rackett and Zug 1997; Correale and Marks 2002; Guanche and Prawer 2003; Moratinos et al. 2005). The responsible allergens belong to the class of neo-flavonoids, named dalbergiones. In cocobolo, obtusaquinone and (R)-4-methoxydalbergion play a major role, while (S)-4′-hydroxy-4-methoxydalbergion plays only a minor role (Hausen 1997; Rojas-Hijazo et al. 2007).
9.1.1.1.2 Grenadill
As a hard and heavy blue-black colored wood, grenadill or African blackwood is mainly imported from Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Togo, and Senegal. Its use comprises knife handles, brush backs, chessmen, truncheons, flutes, clarinets, oboes, chanters of bagpipes, and some types of recorders.
Cases of dermatitis have been described since 1934 and have been observed in clarinet makers and in knife-handle turners (Meister 1934; Woods and Calnan 1976; Hausen et al. 1984). The responsible allergens are (S)-4-methoxydalbergion, (S)-4′-hydroxy-4-methoxydalbergion, and (S)-3′-hydroxy-4,4′-dimethoxydalbergione (Schulz et al. 1979).
9.1.1.1.3 East Indian and Brazilian Rosewood
Although of different origins, both rosewoods are used for similar purposes and contain the same main sensitizers. The timbers are of attractive appearance when cut from old stems. Imports are few but steady. This wood is used for high-class furniture and cabinetwork, handles, decorative veneers, wooden jewelry (bracelets, necklaces), inlay work, and especially musical instruments, such as flutes, recorders, piano cases, pegs, bridges of violins, and chin rests (Fig. 2). Occupational contact dermatitis has been observed in cabinetmakers, knife grinders, as well as by the use of knives, e.g., in butchers, and chin rests by professional violinists (Gougerot and Blamoutier 1929; Pontes de Carvalho 1956; Findlay 1972; Cronin and Calnan 1975; Holst et al. 1976; Woods and Calnan 1976; Martin et al. 1980; Haustein 1982; Hausen 1985; Gallo et al. 1996; Athavale et al. 2003; Viardot-Helmer et al. 2008; Gomez-Muga et al. 2009).
The responsible sensitizers (R) and (S)-4-methoxydalbergion, (S)-4,4′-dimethoxydalbergion, and (S)-4′-hydroxy-4-methoxdalbergion do not only occur in the species named above, but also in Dalbergia stevensonii STANDLEY, which has been found also to cause occupational contact dermatitis (Woods and Calnan 1976; Bottenbruch et al. 1988). Hinf3D.
10 Diospyros celebica Bakh. Macassar
10.1 Diospyros crassifolia Hiern. African Ebony
10.1.1 Diospyros ebenum Koenig. Ceylon Ebony
10.1.1.1 Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb. Coromandel (Ebenaceae)
Ebony is the name for wood species belonging to the genus Diospyros. Most prized are those with a deep black heartwood, extreme hardness, and durability. Ebony species are used for cabinet and inlay work, piano and organ keys, organ stops, violin fingerboards and pegs, parts of string bows (“frogs”), and bagpipes.
Macassar has been long in use for expensive rulers. Occupational dermatitis may occur, but reports are found rarely in the literature. Buschke and Joseph (1927) observed hand eczema in a cabinetmaker due to macassar ebony, while Bleumink and Nater (1974) obtained positive patch tests to an ethanol extract of Dalbergia melanoxylon in 4 of 20 patients suffering from airborne contact dermatitis due to tropical woods.
In Macassar, a precursor of a sensitizing naphtho-ortho-quinone (Macassar quinone) is found as the main constituent. Besides, more than 17 different naphthoquinone derivates (diospyrin derivates) have been isolated, which possess possibly allergy-inducing properties (Zakaria et al. 1984; Zhong et al. 1984).
11 Distemonanthus benthamianus Baill. Ayan (Leg. Caesalpiniaceae)
Movingui or Ayan is used for domestic flooring, frames, windows, and cabinetmaking. It is also imported from West Africa to England, where it is mainly used for coffins. In four carpenters, strong patch test reactions were seen with 2 of the 12 known flavonoids: oxyayanins A and B (Morgan and Thomson 1967). These flavonoid constituents were not tested in 13 other patients mentioned by Orsler (1969) or by Woods and Calnan (1976).
12 Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. Australian Silky Oak (Proteaceae)
Australian silky oak is native to the fifth continent, but it is also grown in Africa, Sri Lanka, India, and the United States. Flooring, furniture, and plywood are the main uses, but the tree is also required for telegraph poles and as a shade tree. Grevillea poisoning is a common term for occupational dermatitis that develops from the sap contracting the skin during sawing (May 1960; Adams and Gimenezarnau 1991; Knight and Whitesell 1992; Cook and Freeman 1997). Bracelets made from grevillea wood grown in India and shipped to the United States and other countries were shown to be the source of allergic contact dermatitis (Hoffman et al. 1985; Larsen et al. 1992). The responsible allergen is grevillol, a phenolic compound with a long side chain, which very much resembles the sensitizing urushiols from poison ivy.
13 Khaya grandiflora DC. African Mahogany
13.1 Khaya ivorensis A. Chev. Kahya Mahogany
13.1.1 Khaya anthotheca C. DC. Krala
13.1.1.1 Khaya senegalensis A. Juss.
13.1.1.1.1 Dry Zone Mahogany (Meliaceae)
All four Khaya species are timbers of West Africa. They serve as a substitute for South American mahogany, especially for cabinets, furniture, boatbuilding, molding, and other purposes for which a good-quality wood is required.
Outbreaks of contact dermatitis caused by these woods have been described by Morgan (Morgan and Wilkinson 1965; Morgan and Thomson 1967; Morgan et al. 1968), Wilkinson and colleagues (Wilkinson 1968, 1971; Wilkinson et al. 1980), Shevljakov (1974), Orsler (1969), and Hjorth (1961). The author also observed two cases in which airborne contact dermatitis developed to the sawdust of African mahogany. Patch tests with a 10% ethanol extract were positive.
The responsible sensitizers are not yet known. One of the allergenic constituents seems to be anthothecol, found in K. anthotheca up to 0.03% (Morgan and Orsler 1967). In addition, K. anthotheca and K. ivorensis contain the weak sensitizer 2,6-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone (see Acacia melanoxylon)
14 Machaerium scleroxylon Tul. Pao Ferro (Leg.-Papilionaceae). “Santos”-Palisander. Caviuna Vermelha
The wood of Pao ferro closely resembles true Brazilian rosewood in appearance and physical properties and, thus, is frequently used as a substitute or often simply mistaken for real rosewood. In Europe, Pao ferro is used for furniture, veneers (Fig. 3), television sets, knife handles, recorders, and multiple other purposes. Occupational contact dermatitis has been reported not only from its native country Brazil but also from Denmark, Great Britain, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Altogether, more than 100 cases have been described in the literature (Miranda Bastos and Matos Filho 1962; Morgan et al. 1968; Conde-Salazar et al. 1980; Hausen 1982; Sak et al. 1983; Beck et al. 1984; Roed-Petersen et al. 1987; Rackett and Zug 1997; Scheman et al. 1999; Shimizu et al. 2000; Correale and Marks 2002; Stingeni et al. 2008). Active sensitization occurred in two nurses who had been used as controls and patch tested with the pure wood dust. The responsible contact allergen is (R)-3,4-dimethoxydalbergion. This constituent is the strongest sensitizer within the group of dalbergiones (Schulz et al. 1979). Its safe patch test concentration is 0.01%!
In some Pao ferro samples collected from different woodworking factories, up to 4.9% were detected in the heartwood (Hausen 1983). Thus, a patch test with the sawdust itself should strictly be avoided. Pao ferro is the most hazardous commercial timber in the woodworking industry. (R)-3,4-dimethoxydalbergion does not occur in the related Dalbergia species.
15 Mansonia altissima A. Chev. Mansonia, Beacuteteacute (Sterculiaceae)
The attractive durable wood of the Mansonia tree is imported from Nigeria and Ghana and is used as a substitute for walnut. Outbreaks of occupational contact dermatitis have been described since 1936 in hundreds of cases, of which only some can be cited (Horner and Wigley 1936; Bourne 1956; Sandermann and Dietrichs 1959; Hanslian and Kadlec 1965; Nava et al. 1975).
The responsible allergens belong to the class of sesquiterpenoid mansonones, of which mansonone A, a red ortho-quinone, is the main (strong) sensitizer (Schulz et al. 1979). Interestingly, some of these quinones, e.g., mansonones E and F, occur in the elm species (Ulmus hollandica), making the tree resistant to Dutch elm disease.
16 Pinus spp. Pine
16.1 Picea spp. Fir, Spruce (Pinaceae)
Pine and spruce are the common names used for hundreds of species of conifers belonging to the genus Pinus and Picea , members of the Pinaceae family. Principally, most of these timbers are found in the northern hemisphere. Pine and spruce species are the source of wood balsam which, after separation of the volatile part (turpentine), yields rosin (colophony). Rosin consists of 90% resin acids and 10% neutral components.
Resin acids such as abietic and dehydroabietic acid oxidize easily under common conditions, e.g., oxygen, daylight, and room temperature, to give (auto) oxidative degradation products, which are more or less strong sensitizers. From more than 30 constituents detected in degraded tall oil resin (by-product in the paper and pulp industry) and colophony of different origins, 8,12-peroxy-Δ 13(14)-dihydroabietic acid and 12 α-hydroxyabietic acid contribute a great deal to colophony allergy by means of both their sensitizing capacity and their determined concentration in the mixture of degradation products (Hausen et al. 1990b).
Occupational contact dermatitis has been seen in numerous cases and may occur, for example, in joiners, woodworkers, farmers (De Cock et al. 2000), clerks handling paper and newspapers, females using epilation wax (O’Reilly and Murphy 1996), handball players using adhesive wax (Hausen and Kuhlwein 1983), and in many other situations (Hinnen et al. 1995; Karlberg et al. 1996; Majamaa and Vijanen 2004; Booken et al. 2006). The importance of occupational contact dermatitis due to colophony is demonstrated by its rank in the hit list of the most common contact allergens where it reached the fifth or sixth place in recent years (Brasch et al. 1996). For further details, see Chap. 41, “Colophony: Rosin in Unmodified and Modified Form”.
17 Tectona grandis L. Teak (Verbenaceae)
Teak wood is one of the most valuable timbers of the world. While native to Burma, India, Thailand, and Malaysia, it also has been planted in South Africa and the West Indies. Due to its strong durability, it is used in furniture, exterior joinery, flooring, fittings, door and window frames, rails, shipbuilding, bridges, and wharves. Teak is resistant to termites and chemicals and, therefore, can be used outdoors and for laboratories too.
Occupational contact hypersensitivity has been observed as early as in Ancient Egypt, where ships were built with teak from India. More recent descriptions dated back to the last century and continue until the 1970s, when it became one of the most common sensitizers in the wood industry (Woods and Calnan 1976; Ezzedine et al. 2007; Rao and Balachandran 2010).
The primary sensitizer is a simple naphthoquinone, named deoxylapachol (Sandermann and Simatupang 1962). Compared with other plant allergens, deoxylapachol is one of the strongest sensitizers found in nature (Schulz 1967). Patch testing with sawdust may produce false-positive reactions due to its highly irritant properties. Deoxylapachol may actively sensitize when not patch tested in its safe concentration of 0.01%. Another major constituent of teak is lapachol, equipped with a blocking hydroxy group at the quinonoid ring which may be tested 1% in petrolatum. Cross-reactions between deoxylapachol and lapachol are obligatory.
18 Thespesia populnea (L.) Sol. Milowood (Malvaceae)
Milowood is a small tropical tree distributed widely throughout the tropics and in many areas of the United States, including California, Florida, and Hawaii. Primarily, it is used for making bowls, bracelets, carved tikis, and furniture. Among the different mansonones that are known sensitizers from Mansonia altissima, milowood contains a new sesquiterpenoidal quinone, named mansonone X (Milbrodt et al. 1997).
Persistent occupational contact dermatitis has been observed in a Hawaiian bowl turner who was shown to be allergic to the mentioned constituent, mansonone X. This compound showed a moderate sensitizing capacity in experiments with guinea pigs (Hausen et al. 1997).
19 Thuja plicata Donn. ex D. Don Western Red Cedar (Cupressaceae)
The western red cedar tree is native to the west coast of the United States but exported all over the world, especially to Australia, Japan, and Europe. It is a timber of good stability useful for constructions, venetian blinds, boatbuilding, planking, paneling, and framing. Besides many cases of bronchial asthma due to the sawdust, observations of occupational allergic contact dermatitis have also been reported (Orsler 1969; Bleumink et al. 1973; Burry et al. 1973). Suskind (1967) succeeded in sensitizing guinea pigs with different extracts of the wood. Thymoquinone must be considered as the main contact sensitizer, showing a high sensitizing capacity in guinea-pig experiments (Hausen 1981). The safe patch test concentration is 0.1% in petrolatum.
References
Aalto-Korte K, Lauerma A, Alanko K (2005) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from lichens in present-day Finland. Contact Dermatitis 52:36–38
Adams RM, Gimenezarnau JM (1991) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the sawdust of Grevillea robusta; A. CUNN. Am J Contact Dermatitis 3:192–193
Anonymous (1987) Health effects of exposure to wood dust: a summary report of the literature. US Department of Health and Human Services/Public Health Service Centers of Disease Control, National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati
Athavale PN, Shum KW, Gasson P, Gawkrodger DJ (2003) Occupational hand dermatitis in a wood turner due to rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia). Contact Dermatitis 48:345–346
Beck MH, Hausen BM, Dave VK (1984) Allergic contact dermatitis from Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. (Pao ferro) in a joinery shop. Clin Exp Dermatol 9:159–166
Beer WE (1970) Sensitizing to Iroko wood in a wood machinist. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 7:159
Bleumink E, Nater JP (1974) Allergic reaction to (tropical) woods. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 16:436
Bleumink E, Mitchell JC, Nater JP (1973) Allergic contact dermatitis from cedar wood (Thuja plicata). Br J Dermatol 88:499–504
Bonny M, Aerts O, Jo L, Julien L, Lapeere H (2013) Occupational contact allergy caused by pao ferro (santos rosewood): a report of two cases. Contact Dermatitis 68:126–128
Booken D, Velten FW, Utikal J, Goerdt S, Bayerl C (2006) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch Kolophonium und terpentin in Harzen unbehandelter Kieferholzmöbel. Hautarzt 57:1013–1015
Bottenbruch S, Hausen BM, Plewig G (1988) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch Honduras-Palisander (Dalbergia stevensonii STANDLEY). Aktuel Dermatol 14:164–166
Bourne LB (1956) Dermatitis from mansonia wood. Br J Ind Med 13:55–58
Brasch J, Geier J, Gefeller O (1996) Dynamic patterns of allergic patch test reactions in 10 European standard allergens. Contact Dermatitis 35:17–22
Brown PM, Thomson RH, Hausen BM (1974) Uumlber die Inhaltstoffe von Bowdichia nitida BENTH. Liebigs Ann Chem 1295–1300
Burry JN, Kirk J, Reid GJ, Turner T (1973) Environmental dermatitis: patch test in 1000 cases of allergic contact dermatitis. Med J Austr 2:681–685
Buschke A, Joseph A (1927) Uumlber Hautentzuumlndung, hervorgerufen durch Makassarholz, mit Beruuml; cksichtigung gewerbehygienischer Fragen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 53:1641–1642
Cabanillas M, Fernández-Redondo V, Toribio J (2006) Allergic contact dermatitis to plants in a Spanish dermatology department: a 7-year review. Contact Dermatitis 55:84–91
Calnan CD (1972) Dermatitis from cedar wood pencils. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 58:43–47
Conde-Salazar L, Garcia Diez A, Rafeensperger F, Hausen BM (1980) Contact allergy to the Brazilian rosewood substitute Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. (Pao ferro). Contact Dermatitis 6:246–250
Cook DK, Freeman S (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis to multiple sawdust allergens. Australas J Dermatol 38:77–79
Correale CE, Marks JG (2002) Contact dermatitis in a woodworker. Am J Contact Dermat 13:42–44
Correira O, Antonio Barros M, Mesquita Guimares J (1992) Airborne contact dermatitis from the woods Acacia melanoxylon and Entandophragma cylindricum. Contact Dermatitis 27:343–344
Crocker HR (1903) Diseases of the skin, 3rd edn. Lewis, London, p 418
Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Cronin E, Calnan CD (1975) Rosewood knife handle. Contact Dermatitis 1:121
Dantin-Gallego J, Armayor AF, Riesco J (1952) Some new toxic woods. Some new manifestations of toxicity. Ind Med Surg 21:41–46
De Cock P, Van Ginkel CJ, Faber WR, Bruynzeel DP (2000) Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from sawdust in livestock. Contact Dermatitis 42:113
Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis eczema caused by obeche and teak dust. Contact Dermatitis 41:164
Ezzedine K, Rafii N, Heenen M (2007) Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis to an exotic wood; a very harmful toilet seat. Contact Dermatitis 57:128–130
Findlay LJ (1972) An unusual case of rosewood dermatitis of the genus Dalbergia (East Indian rosewood). Br J Ind Med 29:343–344
Freise FW (1932) Gesundheitsschaumldigungen durch Arbeiten mit giftigen Houmllzern. Beobachtungen aus brasilianischen Gewerbebetrieben. Arch Gewerbepathol Hyg 3:1–14
Gallo R, Guarrera M, Hausen BM (1996) Airborne contact dermatitis from East Indian rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia Roxb.). Contact Dermatitis 35:60–61
Gómez-Muga S, Ratón-Nieto JA, Ocerin I (2009) An unusual case of contact dermatitis caused by wooden bracelets. Contact Dermatitis 61:351–352
Gonccedilalo S (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis from Bowdichia nitida (Sucupira) wood. Contact Dermatitis 26:205
Gougerot H, Blamoutier J (1929) Dermite eczeacutemateuse professionelle due agrave; la poudre de palissandre. Bull Soc Med Hocircp 15:739–743
Guanche AD, Prawer S (2003) Generalized eczematous contact dermatitis from cocobolo wood. Am J Contact Dermat 14:90–92
Hanslian L, Kadlec K (1965) A contribution to the problem of eczematogenic effect of Mansonia-wood. Prac Lek 17:392–395
Hausen BM (1981) Woods injurious to human health. W de Gruyter, Berlin
Hausen BM (1982) Haumlufigkeit und Bedeutung toxischer und allergischer Kontaktdermatitiden durch Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. (Pao ferro), einem Ersatzholz fuumlr Palisander (Dalbergia nigra). Hautarzt 33:321–328
Hausen BM (1983) Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Allergologie 6:194–197
Hausen BM (1985) Chin rest allergy in a violinist. Contact Dermatitis 12:178–179
Hausen BM (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis from a wooden necklace. Am J Contact Dermat 8:185–187
Hausen BM, Kuhlwein A (1983) Allergisches Kontaktekzem bei einer Handballspielerin. Aktuel Dermatol 9:126–130
Hausen BM, Muumlnster G (1983) Cocobolo-Holz, ein vergessenes Ekzematogen. Dermatosen 31:110–117
Hausen BM, Simatupang MH, Kingreen JC (1972) Untersuchungen zur Uumlberempfindlichkeit gegen Sucipura- und Palisanderholz. Berufsdermatosen 20:1–7
Hausen BM, Kuhlwein A, Schmalle HW (1984) Kontaktallergie auf ein “afrikanisches Ebenholz”, Grenadill-Dalbergia melanoxylon. Aktuel Dermatol 10:221–223
Hausen BM, Bruhn G, Tilsley AD (1990a) Contact allergy to Australian blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon R. Br.): isolation and identification of new hydroxyflavan sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 23:33–39
Hausen BM, Krohn K, Budianto E (1990b) Contact allergy due to colophony. VII–sensitizing studies with oxidation products of abietic and related acids. Contact Dermatitis 23:352–358
Hausen BM, Bruhn G, Koumlnig WA (1991) New hydroxyisoflavans as contact sensitizers in cocus wood Brya ebenus. (Fabaceae). Contact Dermatitis 25:149–155
Hausen BM, Knight TE, Milbrodt M (1997) Thespesia populnea dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 8:225–228
Haustein UF (1982) Violin chin rest eczema due to East Indian rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia ROXB). Contact Dermatitis 8:77–78
Heyl U (1966) Kontaktekzem bei Uumlberempfindlichkeit gegen Sucupira- und Pailsanderholz. Berufsdermatosen 14:239–244
Hinnen U, Willa-Craps C, Elsner P (1995) Allergic contact dermatitis from iroko and pine wood dust. Contact Dermatitis 33:428
Hjorth N (1961) Contact sensitivity to plants and balsams. Acta Derm Venereol 41(Suppl 46):65–79
Hoffman TE, Hausen BM, Adams RM (1985) Allergic contact dermatitis to “silver oak” wooden arm bracelet. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:778–779
Holst R, Kirby J, Magnusson B (1976) Sensitization to tropical woods giving erythema multiforme like eruptions. Contact Dermatitis 2:295–296
Horner S, Wigley JEM (1936) A case of dermatitis venenata due to Mansonia wood (Sterculia altissima). Br J Dermatol 48:26–28
Huilaja L, Kubin M, Riekki R (2016) Contact allergy to finished woods in furniture and furnishings: a small allergic contact dermatitis epidemic to western red cedar in sauna interior decoration. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 30:57–59
Jensen P, Benfeldt E, Menne T, Thyssen J (2016) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis following exposure to the Central American hardwood cocobolo. Contact Dermatitis 74:52–53
Jung HD (1967) Berufliche Kontaktekzeme durch Kambala-Teak-Holz. Dtsch Gesundheitswes 22:2141–2143
Kanerva L, Tuppurainen M, Keskinen H (1998) Contact urticaria caused by obeche wood (Triplochiton scleroxylon). Contact Dermatitis 38:170–171
Karlberg AT, Gaumlfvert E, Meding B, Stenberg B (1996) Airborne contact dermatitis from unexpected exposure to rosin (colophony). Contact Dermatitis 35:272–278
Katzenellenbogen I (1955) Caterpillar dermatitis as an occupational disease. Dermatologica 111:99–106
Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Swierczynska-Machura D, Palczynski C (2004) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by padauk wood (Pterocarpus soyauxii Taub). Contact Dermatitis 50:384–385
King FE, Grundon MF (1949) The constitution of chlorophorin, a constituent of iroko, the timber of Chlorophora excelsa. Part I. J Chem Soc 699:3348–3352
King FE, Grundon MF (1950) The constitution of chlorophorin. Part II. Further oxidation experiments and the completion of the structural problem. J Chem Soc 702:3547–3552
Knight TE, Hausen BM (1992) Koa wood (Acacia koa) dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 3:30–32
Knight TE, Whitesell CD (1992) Grevillea robusta (Silver oak) dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 3:145–149
Koh WL, Ang CC, Lim SPR (2016) A rare case of occupational contact urticaria syndrome caused by meranti wood dust. Wiley Online Libr 75:56–58
Kop E, Van Ginkel C, Rockmann H, Van der Valk P (2012) A case of occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by faveira amargosa, a tropical timber. Contact Dermatitis 66:344–345
Krohn K, Muumlller H, Adiwidjaja G, Jarchow OH, Schmalle HW, Hausen BM, Schulz KH (1986) The structure of the tetra-acetate of the allergen chlorophorin. Z Kristall 174:283–290
Kubin M, Riekki R (2014) Allergic contact eczema caused by exotic wood material in sauna interior decoration. Wiley Online Libr 70:255–256
Larsen WG, Adams RM, Maibach HI (1992) Color text of contact dermatitis. Saunders, Philadelphia
Machado D, Loureiro G, Taveres B, Calado G, Pereira C (2011) Hand contact dermatitis made a patient blind for the second time! J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 21:154
MacKee GM (1913) Dermatitis venenata from cocobolo-wood. J Cutan Dis 31:582–583
Majamaa H, Vijanen P (2004) Occupational facial allergic contact dermatitis caused by Finnish pine and spruce wood dusts. Contact Dermatitis 51:157–158
Martin P, Bergoend H, Piette F (1980) Erythema multiforme – like eruption from Brazilian rosewood. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on contact dermatitis. Barcelona, p 42
May SB (1960) Dermatitis due to Grevillea robusta (Australian silky oak). Arch Dermatol 82:1006
Meister H (1934) Uumlber eine neue Aumlthiologie fuumlr Gesichtsekzeme. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 43:993
Milbrodt M, Koumlnig WA, Hausen BM (1997) 7-hydroxy-2,3,5,6-tetrahydro-3,6,9-trimethylnaphtho[1,8bc]pcyran-4,8-dione from Thespesia populnea (L.) Sol. Phytochemistry 45:1523–1525
Miranda Bastos AD, de Matos Filho A (1962) A “Jacaranda” timber causing dermatitis. In: Proceedings of the 5th world forest congress, vol 3. 29 Aug–10 Sep 1960. Seattle, pp 1414–1416
Mitchell JC, Rook A (1979) Botanical dermatology. Greengrass, Vancouver
Modlmayer H (1931) Palisander-bzw. Cocoboloholz-dermatitis. Zentralbl Haut Geschlechtskrankheiten 36:728
Moratinos MM, Tevar E, Conde-Salazar L (2005) Contact allergy to cocobolo bracelet. Dermatitis 16:139–141
Morgan JWW, Orsler RJ (1967) A simple test to distinguish Khaya anthotheca from Khaya ivorensis and Khaya grandifoliola. J Inst Wood Sci 18:61–64
Morgan JWW, Thomson J (1967) Miscellanea (Ayan dermatitis). Br J Ind Med 24:156–158
Morgan JWW, Wilkinson DS (1965) Sensitization to Khaya anthotheca. Nature 207:1101
Morgan JWW, Orsler RJ, Wilkinson DS (1968) Dermatitis due to the wood dust of Khaya anthotheca and Machaerium scleroxylon. Br J Ind Med 25:119–125
Nava C, Mardisio M, Priatino Vangova G, Arbosti G (1975) Aspetti della malattia di Mansonia altissima. Med Lav 66:574–576
Neisser EJ (1907) Internationale Uumlbersicht uumlber Gewerbehygiene nach den Berichten der Gewerbeinspektionen der Kulturlaumlnder. Bibliothek fuer Soziale Medezin no. 1. Gutenberg, Berlin, p 225
O’Reilly FM, Murphy GM (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis in a beautician. Contact Dermatitis 35:47–48
Orsler RJ (1969) The effect of irritant timbers. Woodworking Ind 26:28–29
Pereira Marques MSJ (1989) Dermite de contacto aacute Cambala. Bol Inf Gruppo Port E Dermatite Contato 3:23–24
Pires MC, Silva M, dos Reis V, Mitelmann R, Moreira F (1999) Pigmented contact dermatitis due to Plathymenia foliosa dust. Contact Dermatitis 40:339
Pontes de Carvalho L (1956) Dos allergenos de contato nas profissotildees. Braz Med 70:77–88
Rackett SC, Zug KA (1997) Contact dermatitis to multiple exotic woods. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8:114–117
Rao R, Balachandran C (2010) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to teak wood. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 76:278–288
Räsänen L, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational contact allergy from beechwood. Contact Dermatitis 38:55
Roed-Petersen J, Menneacute T, Mann Nielsen K, Hjorth N (1987) Is it possible to work with Pao ferro (Machaerium scleroxylon TUL.)? Arch Dermatol Res 279:108–110
Rojas-Hijazo B, Lezaun A, Hausen BM, Segura N, Mar Garcés M, Colás C (2007) Airborne contact dermatitis in gaitas (flageolets) constructors after exposure to sawdust of caviuna. Contact Dermatitis 56:274–277 and Contact Dermatitis 57:68
Sak M, Uhrik J, Fabian J, Stracenska H, Hermanova E (1983) Dermatoacutezy vyvolaneacute drevinon Machaerium scleroxylon. Cesk Dermatol 58:89–91
Sandermann W, Dietrichs HH (1959) Uumlber die Inhaltstoffe von Mansonia altissima und ihre gesundheitsschaumldigende Wirkung. Holz als+Roh Wstoff 17:88–97
Sandermann W, Simatupang MH (1962) Ein toxisches Chinon aus teakholz. Angew Chem 74:782–783
Scheman AJ, Xu Y, Osborne A (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis to Fraxinus americanus and Macherium acutifolium. Am J Contact Dermatitis 10:233–235
Schmidt P (1963) Experimentelle Untersuchungen uumlber die Sensibilisierungsfaumlhigkeit von akzessorischen Inhaltstoffen tropischer Houmllzer. Medical thesis, University of Hamburg
Schmidt H (1978) Contact urticaria to teak with systemic effects. Contact Dermatitis 4:176–177
Schulz KH (1957) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch exotische Houmllzer insbesondere durch Kambala-Teakholz. Berufsdermatosen 5:3–9
Schulz KH (1967) Berufsdermatosen – ausgewaumlhlte Kapitel. Z Haut Geschlechtskrankheiten 42:449–509
Schulz KH, Dietrichs HH (1962) Chinone als sensibilisierende Bestandteile von Rio Palisander (Dalbergia nigra) und Cocobolo (Dalbergia retusa) Holz. Allerg Asthma 8:125–131
Schulz KH, Garbe I, Hausen BM, Simatupang MH (1979) The sensitizing capacity of naturally occurring quinones. Part II. Benzoquinones. Arch Dermatol Res 264:275–286
Schwartz L (1931) Dermatitis venenata due to contact with Brazilian walnut wood. Public Health Rep 46:1938–1943
Serrano P, Medeiros S, Quilhó T, Santos R, Brandão FM (2008) Photoallergic contact dermatitis to brosimum wood. Contact Dermatitis 58:243–245
Shevljakov LV (1974) Occupational skin diseases in the wood industry abroad and in the USSR. Gig Tr Professionalnye Zabolevanija 18:33–36
Shimizu S, Chen KR, Pratchyapruit WO, Shimizu H (2000) Tropical-wood-induced bullous erythema multiforme. Dermatology 200:59–62
Steinbrink W (1950) Besondere Beobachtungen an allergischen Krankheiten. Z Gesamten Inn Med 5:311–314
Stingeni L, Mariotti M, Lisi P (1998) Airborne allergic contact dermatitis from iroko (Chlorophora excelsa). Contact Dermatitis 38:287
Stingeni L, Proietti G, Zeppa L, Lisi P (2008) Occupational airborne contact dermatitis from Machaerium scleroxylon; a simple method for extracting quinones from wood. Contact Dermatitis 58:117–118
Storrs FJ, Mitchell JC, Rasmussen JE (1976) Contact hypersensitivity to liverwort in the compositae family of plants. Cutis 18:681–686
Suskind RR (1967) Dermatitis in the forest product industries. Arch Environ Health 15:322–326
Tanaka S, Matsumoto Y, Tamada Y (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis due to perupok wood. Contact Dermatitis 48:273
Tilsley DA (1990) Australian blackwood dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 23:40–41
Veien NK, Hausen BM (2000) Contact dermatitis associated with an erythema multiforme-like eruption. Am J Contact Dermat 11:235–237
Viardot-Helmer A, Merk HF, Hausen BM (2008) Spättypensensibilisierung gegen Ostindisch-Palisander. Hautarzt 59:465–466
White JC (1903) Dermatitis venenata – a supplement list. J Cutan Dis 21:441–455
Wilkinson DS (1968) Khaya woods. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 3:44
Wilkinson DS (1971) (Patch) tests with different species of Khaya woods. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 9:216
Wilkinson DS, Buddan MG, Hambly EM (1980) A 10-year review of an industrial dermatitis clinic. Contact Dermatitis 6:11–17
Wlodek C, Lovell C (2014) Contact dermatitis caused by ebony wood. Contact Dermatitis 71:376–382
Woods B, Calnan CD (1976) Toxic woods. Br J Dermatol 95(Suppl 13):1–97
Zakaria MB, Jeffreys JAD, Waterman PG, Zhong SM (1984) Naphthoquinones and triterpenes from Asian Diospyros species. Phytochemistry 23:1481–1484
Zhong SM, Watermann PG, Jeffreys JAD (1984) Naphthoquinones and triterpenes from African Diospyros species. Phytochemistry 23:1067–1072
Zug KA, Marks JR (1999) Plants and woods. In: Occupational skin disease, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 547–569
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Levy, Y., Hausen, B.M. (2020). Woods. In: John, S., Johansen, J., Rustemeyer, T., Elsner, P., Maibach, H. (eds) Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_73
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_73
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68615-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68617-2
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine