Abstract
This chapter will attempt to describe microporous and mesoporous materials, such as zeolites, and ordered mesoporous materials, which are versatile solids that are used for the environmental remediation and energetic efficiency and the applications in wastewater treatment and nuclear waste, purification and separation, medicine and catalysis. These materials are constructed from tetrahedral units, TO4 (where T is silicon and aluminum, usually), which are usually obtained from commercial sources. Furthermore, strategies and green approaches are described to contribute to the reduction of the cost production using cheaper and renewable raw materials such as rice husk, diatoms, coal ash, and clay minerals, which are potential and attractive sources of silicon and aluminum for the synthesis of zeolite and ordered mesoporous materials.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Micro- and mesoporous materials are high-performance solids, and their pore sizes and unique structures allow interaction with atoms and ions as well as separation, processing or hosting of molecules of high scientific and technological interest. In general, porous materials must have two characteristics: many pores and pores that provide an optimized action for the performance of the material [1]. Since pores of different sizes exist, the IUPAC classified them according to their size range. Materials with pore sizes up to 50 nm are called macroporous. Materials with pore sizes between 2 and 50 nm are called mesoporous, and materials with pores sizes smaller than 2 nm are called microporous. In addition, the term nanoporous material covers materials that have pores up to 100 nm [2].
The best-known class of microporous materials is called zeolites, and the class of materials with pore sizes in the mesoporous region is called ordered mesoporous materials. The channels and cavities of these materials are able to separate molecules according to their different sizes, showing shape selectivity (molecular sieving), attractive capacity of adsorption, ionic exchange, and catalytic properties applied in environmental remediation and energy efficiency.
Both zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials are constructed from tetrahedral units (TO4, where T is silicon and aluminum, usually), and the different spatial orientations of these units and their connections generate channels and cavities. This chapter will discuss the importance of these materials for reducing environmental problems, and how they can be synthesized via an eco-friendly synthesis using renewable, abundant, and cheap silicon and aluminum sources.
Zeolites
The term zeolites is derived from the Greek Zeo (boiling) and Lithos (stone), referring to the interesting observation made by Crönstedt of the natural mineral stilbite, the first zeolite discovered by him, which releases steam when subjected to heating in a flame [3]. Today, it is known that the effect occurred due to desorption of water, which is present inside its channels and cavities. Zeolites are crystalline materials that are composed of tetrahedral TO4 (T = Si, Al, among others such as P, Ge, Ti, Fe, Ga) interconnected by oxygen atoms. The combination of tetrahedral units of silicon (Si4+) leads to a neutral structure, while the substitution of a Si4+ atom for an aluminum (Al3+) atom causes an unbalanced charge that needs to be compensated by cations, such as Na+, Ca2+, K+, and organic cations such as tetramethylammonium TMA+.
Zeolites have uni-, bi-, or tridimensional channels, which can be interconnected in various ways to generate solids with higher internal surfaces compared to their external surface. These channels are occupied by water molecules, which are present during the synthesis, and by the hydrated cations, which can be removed using thermal or chemical processes. In zeolites, intracrystalline voids are maintained and, consequently, its structure. This is different from other hydrated porous materials such as CaSO4 [4].
The size of the pores is what limits the ingress of ions or molecules into the intracrystalline voids of the channels and cavities. Thus, molecules that are larger than the channels and cavities cannot diffuse into zeolite. The pore opening size is dependent on the amount of bridged TO4 units, which are also called MR (membered rings), in which the molecules or ions have access to the zeolite interior. These may have the extra-large pores (>12 MR), large (12 MR), medium (10 MR), and small (8 MR) pore, which form the pore aperture. Figure 1 shows some types of zeolitic framework structures and their pore sizes.
Each framework topology is assigned a three-letter code, which usually represents the initials of the type of framework structure, or acronyms of the university or research center where they were discovered. For example, LTA (Zeolite A) means Linde Type A, MFI (zeolite ZSM-5 and Silicalite-1) means Mobil Five, FAU (zeolites X and Y) means faujasite, and the CLO code is derived from the initials of the cloverite zeolite. Actually, there are 232 different zeolite framework codes, 67 zeolites are naturally available, and the others can be obtained via synthetic routes [5].
The way to observe zeolite construction is from their TO4 connections. The connection of the primary units of TO4 generates secondary building units (SBUs), which form a polyhedral that connects until the final formation of the final zeolite structure. Figure 2 illustrates this formation, starting from the primary units of TO4 connecting to form a 4-membered ring (4 MR). In these representations, the tetrahedron is characterized by four vertices, and oxygen atoms that connect the tetrahedron are located in the middle of each vertex. The formation of double 4-membered rings (D4R) is described in terms of their faces, in this case, six faces of four units (46). The β-cavity (cancrinite or sodalite cage) is formed via the union of six 4 MR and eight 6 MR (46 68). The α-cavity is formed via the union of twelve 4 MR, eight 6 MR, and six 8 MR (412 68 86). If four sodalite cages connect each other by their 4 MR faces, the zeolite sodalite (SOD, channel size of 2.6 Å) is formed. If four sodalite cages connect via D4R using their 4 MR faces, the zeolite A (LTA) is formed. This structure contains an α-cavity with an aperture of 8 MR, which allows the adsorption of molecules with sizes up to 4 Å. In zeolite A, the Si/Al ratio of 1 indicates that to balance the charges, extra cations are required, which will be distributed in the α-cage and β-cage. If these cations are close to the 8 MR window of the α-cage, they can influence the pore size. If the compensation cation is potassium, the zeolite (zeolite 3A or KA) will have its windows restricted. If the compensation cation is sodium (zeolite 4A or NaA), its small size will facilitate the entry of molecules. In contrast, when calcium (Ca2+) acts as a compensating cation (zeolite 5A or CaA), it will counterbalance two charges, and the zeolite will have smaller window apertures than zeolites KA or NaA.
In general, the Si/Al ratio can determine the type of structure, which produced chemical and thermal stability, as well as the purpose of the application. Zeolites with a low Si/Al ratio, which have more aluminum in the structure (Si/Al = 1–1.5), will have a high number of charge-compensating cations and lead the material to an application such as an ion exchanger (zeolite A, X). The increase of this ratio generates zeolites with Si/Al = 2–5 (intermediates) ratios such as clinoptilolite, mordenite, and chabazite. Zeolites with Si/Al = 10–100 (high) will produce zeolites that are more thermally stable (MCM-22, ZSM-5). Zeolites with only silicon tetrahedra in their composition are called pure silica zeolites (Silicalite-1, Silicalite-2, ITQ-1, etc.) and have increased their hydrophobicity. For zeolites formed using silicon and aluminum, the exchange of compensation cations for zeolites by protons (H+) will generate strong Brønsted sites, which are fundamental in the catalysis field [6].
Zeolite formation is a complex process, and factors such as the mode of preparation, nature, and order of the added reactants and the molar composition influence the final product. Thus, it is not wrong to say that most of the zeolites obtained via synthetic routes were based on trial and error. Several mechanisms of zeolite synthesis are proposed, but they all converge on one main idea: the formation of zeolites occurs via phase transformation of the initial reactants in amorphous form into a crystalline microporous product using solution-mediated crystallization or solid transformation [7].
The reactants used for the synthesis of zeolites comprise TO4 sources such as inorganic silica and alumina (or other heteroatom source), a mineralizing agent (OH− or F−) to increase the solubility of silicon and aluminum sources, a solvent such as water (hydrothermal synthesis), an organic solvent (solvothermal synthesis) or ionic liquid (ionothermal synthesis) and a structure-directing agent (SDA). Structure agents may be cations (Na+, for example) for zeolites with a low Si/Al ratio (Zeolite A, X) or organic structure-directing agents (OSDA), such as amines and quaternary ammonium salts, which fill the void volume by inserting a less positive charge on the final solid, thus generating zeolites that contain higher amounts of silica (ZSM-5, ZSM-22, MCM-22, etc.).
The use of large organic molecules, such as OSDA, is also a strategy for obtaining zeolites with large pore sizes. For example, the zeolite ITQ-53 (germanosilicate) has a tridirectionally interconnected pore system, which is formed via 14 MR using the cation tri-tertbutylmethylphosphonium as OSDA [8]. After mixing the reactants, the gel is placed in a sealed polytetrafluoroethene PTFE-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated to temperatures that are usually higher than 100 °C and crystallized for specified times, which may vary from hours to days or even months. At the end of the process, the material is recovered via filtration and is washed and dried, and the mass of the initial amorphous material is approximately equal to that of the zeolitic formed product. Figure 3 presents a synthesis procedure under hydrothermal conditions.
Ordered Mesoporous Materials
The ordered mesoporous materials arise from the efforts to obtain materials with larger pores, which can process larger molecules than the microporous channels of the zeolites synthesized thus far. This strategy was first developed by the Mobil group in 1992, which presented three materials synthesized from silica named MCM-41 (hexagonal), MCM-48 (cubic), and MCM-50 (lamellar) [9, 10]. These three materials belong to the M41S family (Fig. 4), and their structures are formed via amorphous silica walls.
Among the members of this group, MCM-41 received the most attention and is the most studied material; it has controllable pores between 1.5 and 20 nm, wall thicknesses of 1–1.5 nm, and a surface area of approximately 1200 m2 g−1 [11]. After the discovery of M41S family, other mesoporous materials were synthesized, as observed in Fig. 5 for SBA-15 (hexagonal, which has controllable pore size from 5 to 30 nm, micropores connecting the mesoporous channels and wall thicknesses of 3–6 nm) [12], SBA-16 (cubic) [13], HMS (hexagonal) [14], KIT-6 (cubic with a mesophase similar to MCM-48) [15], MSU-X (structure with disordered channels) [16], and others. The acronyms for the mesoporous materials generally represent the research institutes that discovered these materials and/or some peculiarity of each material. For example, MCM is the acronym for a series of Mobil Composition of Matter type materials, the acronym SBA means Santa Barbara Amorphous, KIT indicates the Korea Institute of Technology, HMS means hexagonal mesoporous silica, and MSU means Michigan State University.
Like zeolites, these materials rapidly received significant interest for applications such as adsorption, catalysis, separation, and medical use such as drug release.
The synthesis of mesoporous material type M41S shares (basically) the same reactants as zeolite synthesis with one exception. The organic molecules used are surfactants with larger chain sizes such as the quaternary ammonium salt type [CnH2n+1(CmH2m+1)3NX with n = 6–22, m = 1–4 and X = OH/Cl, OH, Cl, Br or HSO4]. The change in the size of alkyl chain allows to control the size of the generated pore. Among the cationic surfactants, the most known and used is hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTABr). Usually, synthesis involves the dissolution of organic surfactant in the solvent (together with a basic or acidic pH), followed by the addition of a silica source (and the heteroatoms). After the stirring period at a certain temperature that permits hydrolysis and pre-condensation, the temperature can be increased and often directed toward a hydrothermal step (in autoclaves) to favor the direct condensation of silica. The synthesis of ordered mesoporous materials is generally faster than the synthesis of zeolites, and the formation of materials may take from minutes to days. The main difference is because the ordered mesoporous materials depend on the electrostatic interactions between inorganic silica precursors and surfactants, which will form amorphous silica walls. In the case of zeolites, an induction time (period between the start of the reaction and the point where the crystalline product is first observed) is required for complete crystallization.
The formation of M41S mesoporous materials is based on the interactions that occur (in basic media) between positively charged species of surfactants (S+) in the micelles and the negatively charged inorganic silica (I−) species that form electrostatic interactions (S+I−), as shown in Fig. 5 for the MCM-41 case. Three mechanisms are suggested for the formation of mesoporous materials, which are called liquid crystal templating (LCT), self-assembly and cooperative self-assembly [10, 17,18,19].
For the ordered mesoporous material type SBA-15, the type of interaction is different. The most known triblock polymers are called Pluronic-123, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and poly(propylene oxide) (PPO), which are used as surfactants. In this case, the interaction is a result of an indirect reaction between the polymer and the positively charged silica species in an acidic medium [(S0H+)(X−I+)]. In this case, the counter ion (X− = Cl−, Br−) represents the strongly acidic conditions, Fig. 5. In addition, a neutral interaction (S0I0) can also occur, which leads to the formation of HMS and MSU-X material types. The channels of ordered mesoporous materials become accessible when the surfactants are removed via calcination or solvent extraction processes. Calcination, in addition to removing the surfactant, promotes additional condensation of the silica structure [20, 21]. The calcined SBA-15 has micropores (represented by the white dots) that connect mesoporous channels due to the PEO chains of Pluronic-123 within the silica walls. For the case of MCM-50, which is shown in Fig. 4, calcination of the surfactant causes the collapse of silica lamellae.
Applications of Zeolites and Ordered Mesoporous Materials
Due to the properties of adsorption, ion exchange capacity, molecular sieving and acidity, zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials have applications in several areas, as follows:
Wastewater Treatment
Wastewater is usually composed of cationic pollutants, anionic compounds, organic compounds, and oils that can have toxic effects on the environment. Zeolites are versatile materials, which are used to treat these pollutants. An example of cationic pollutant is ammonia, which is derived from agricultural wastes, fertilizers, municipal factories, and sewers. Thus, when zeolite is added, it exchanges its extra-framework cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, usually) with NH4+ ions. The efficiency of zeolite (clinoptilolite) is increased when it is converted to its sodium form [22]. Many heavy metals, which are present in polluted waters that contain Ag+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Cr3+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Pb2+ ions, can be treated with zeolites, which can yield better adsorption results than activated carbons in some cases [23, 24].
The mesoporous type MCM-41 and magnetic SBA-15 materials functionalized with thiol groups are also efficient in removing Hg2+ from wastewater, showing a 97% removal after 7 h in the case of SBA-15. In addition, the material can be separated from the solution by applying magnetic field [25, 26].
Inorganic anions, such as F−, CN−, NO3−, SO42−, PO43−, ClO4−, CrO42−, and Cr2O72−, are also present in large quantities in wastewater and can be removed with zeolites via ion exchange or surface modification of zeolites with surfactants. For acid anions, this removal is caused by the occlusion and adsorption of the anions in zeolite [27]. For chromate anions, a modification of the surface of zeolites with surfactants increases the adsorption of these anions [28].
Mesoporous material types MCM-41 and SBA-1 modified with amino groups are also efficient in the removal of arsenate and chromate ions. For the MCM-41 type material, the maximum adsorption capacities of CrO42− and HAsO42− are 115.2 and 109.9 mg g−1, respectively. For the SBA-1 material, the maximum adsorption capacities of CrO42− and HAsO42− are 210.8 and 262.7 mg g−1, respectively [29].
Organic dyes generated by the textile, food, and printing industries can be removed from wastewater. Zeolites can adsorb cationic dyes (methylene blue, Rhodamine B), whereas the surface modification of zeolites with surfactants also increases the removal of anionic dyes (such as Reactive Black 5, Reactive Red 239, Reactive Yellow 176). In this case, the mechanism of adsorption involves electrostatic interactions between the amine molecules (in the bilayer form) on the zeolite surface [30, 31]. The MCM-41 type mesoporous materials are also effective for the removal of Rhodamine B. The adsorption capacity of this dye, according to the authors, is related to the interaction between this dye and the MCM-41 surface [32]. The noncalcined Al-MCM-41 is also effective for the removal of Yellow Dye (Acid Yellow 49) with adsorption of 92% [33].
Nuclear Waste and Fallout
Due to the cation exchange capacity, zeolites have a certain selectivity for radionuclides (137Cs, 90Sr, 51Cr, and 60Co). Zeolites played an important role in neutralizing the effects of the Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986. Zeolites added to the soil decreased the absorption of 137Cs by plants [34]. The mordenite zeolite was added to feed contaminated ruminant, once the extra-framework cations of zeolites (Na+, K+, and Ca2+, etc.) can be exchanged for 137Cs and excreted, which decreased assimilation with their body [35]. Mixtures of zeolite A and chabazite were used to treat contaminated water containing 137Cs and 90Sr, and herschelite zeolite (CHA) in a sodium form was used to remove 137Cs in the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011 [36, 37]. The MCM-41-type mesoporous materials functionalized with thiol groups are also effective in removing 137Cs, 90Sr, and 60Co in waters demonstrating a maximum adsorption capacity of 30 mg g−1 and selectivity of 137Cs, which is greater than that of 90Sr and 60Co [38].
Medical
In the medical field, zeolites are applied as artificial kidneys. Due to their adsorption properties, zeolites are active for the adsorption of uremic toxins, such as urea, uric acid, creatinine, and p-cresol, and demonstrated that it is possible to eliminate 75% of creatinine using the mordenite zeolite in its acid form and 60% of p-cresol using the silicalite-1 zeolite. These results are better than those demonstrated with traditional membrane-based dialysis systems in which the elimination of creatinine and p-cresol is 67% and 29%, respectively [39]. It is known that zeolites with a low Si/Al ratio can adsorb water, and this property was exploited as a blood coagulation agent leading to the creation of a product that consists of a dehydrated zeolite (FAU), which is used as component of dressings that are already used in military and personal emergency [40, 41].
The ordered mesoporous materials have well defined pores, which are able to host molecules that are used for controlled drug release. MCM-41 with pore sizes of 3.6 nm was used for the controlled release of anti-inflammatory drugs such as Ibuprofen (molecular size of 15 × 6 Å) [42]. MCM-41 with pore sizes of 2.7 nm was used as the release system for Captopril (molecular size of 9 × 5.7 Å), which is a drug used to treat hypertension and heart failure [43]. SBA-15 functionalized with amino groups was used for controlled release of Gemcitabine, an anticancer drug [44].
Purification and Separation of Gases
Zeolites are used for the separation of gases. For example, lithium-exchanged chabazite zeolite can separate N2 from air or other components of other gases such as O2, Ar, H2, He, Kr, Ne, and Xe. This zeolite can also separate CH4 from other gases such as H, He, and their mixtures. In these cases, the extra-framework cations are the adsorption sites in zeolites for the weakly interacting adsorbates, and the increase in adsorptive capacity is directly related to the interaction force between the resulting adsorption sites and the adsorbate gas. Therefore, Li+ is a small cation and favors strong interaction with the N2 molecules inside the chabazite structure [45]. The clinoptilolite zeolite was used to improve the natural gas by separating CH4 from N2 [46]. The silver-exchanged mordenite separates 95% of oxygen and 5% of argon mixtures to a 99.7% oxygen purity [47]. The silver-exchanged zeolite Y (FAU) was used as a filter material in hospitals for the control of bacteria and fungi, thus increasing the internal quality of air [48]. Zeolites may also be present as oxygen concentrators for the delivery of supplemental oxygen in remote high-altitude areas, saving costs by 75% compared with oxygen cylinders [49]. MCM-41 functionalized with amino groups was used for air purification, demonstrating CO2 selectivity in the presence of N2, O2, CH4, and H2 at low partial pressure of CO2, which can also be applied in closed-circuit breathing systems such as air, natural gas, and H2 purification [50]. MCM-41 was used for the adsorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [51].
Catalysis
The development of synthetic FAU zeolites (zeolites X and Y) and their use on an industrial scale for the cracking of heavy petroleum fractions in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking) plants in 1962 is considered one of the most important worldwide chemical processes [6]. Zeolites are more active and produce a higher gasoline yield (higher value product in an FCC plant) than the previously used amorphous silica-alumina catalysts. After 1962, within the petrochemical industry, the use of zeolites as catalysts reached other processes, such as isomerization, to increase the octanes in light gasoline, disproportionation of toluene in benzene and xylene and zeolite-based catalysts for the control of NOx emission, and removal of sulfur from fuels [6, 52, 53]. In catalysis, zeolites represent more than 40% of the solids used in the chemical industry [54].
Several efforts have been made for the ordered mesoporous material types MCM-41 and SBA-15 that contain aluminum, which have the same characteristics of hydrothermal stability and acidity as zeolites and are mainly used in FCC. However, from the point of view of stability and catalytic behavior, these materials are more similar to amorphous materials than zeolites [55]. However, their moderate acidity may offer advantages over zeolites when used in reactions that involve large molecules (e.g., in fine chemistry, specifically during the production of acetals [56] and pyrolysis of biomass) to obtain useful products such as phenolic compounds [57]. Due to their high surface areas, ordered mesoporous materials are used as catalyst supports of metals (e.g., Au, Pd, Au-Pd, and others) for the oxidation of VOCs, such as benzene, toluene, and o-xylene (BTX), and for the reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production [58].
Sources of Silicon and Aluminum Used for the Synthesis of Zeolites and Mesoporous Materials
The choice of silicon and aluminum sources for the synthesis of zeolites and mesoporous materials has a significant effect on the formation of final materials since they differ in reactivity and solubility. In general, amorphous silicon sources with higher surface areas dissolved more rapidly in the basic medium than the sources with lower surface area, and this factor directly influences the rate of nucleation and crystallization in zeolites, crystal size, and size distribution of particles.
One example of commercial silica source with a high surface area that is extensively used for the production of zeolite and ordered mesoporous silica materials is fumed silica, which is composed of submicron-sized spheres as primary particles that form branched chain-like aggregates forming agglomerates with a rough-like morphology (see Fig. 6, image a). The other commercial sources that are used for the synthesis of zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials are colloidal silica, tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS), tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), silicic acid, and silicon. The sources of aluminum may be aluminum sulfate Al2(SO4)3, aluminum nitrate Al(NO3)3, and aluminium isopropoxide Al(O-i-Pr)3. These sources are not considered environmentally beneficial because they require different treatments or may generate residues at the end of their processes [59].
Within the class of inorganic sources of silicon considered environmentally beneficial, there are clay minerals (kaolin, smectite, sepiolite, palygorskite, etc.), rice husk silica, diatomite, fly coal ash, and sodium silicate, and aluminum sources include Al2O3, Al(OH)3, clay minerals, fly coal ash, bio-waste, and sodium aluminate, which are abundant, cheap, renewable or are residues of some process types.
It is important to mention that natural or abundant sources may contain associated impurities, and a study of physicochemical properties of the raw material should be performed. For example, many raw materials that contain more stable phases (quartz, cristobalite) are difficult to dissolve, and silica may not be fully available for the synthesis. Other raw materials that contain oxides of other elements, such as Ti, Fe, and Ca, may not participate in the zeolitic structure. Other inexpensive sources have octahedral aluminum (especially in clay minerals), which has transformed into tetrahedral aluminum to be more reactive and participate in the zeolitic structure. The pretreatment (mechanical, thermic, or chemical) of raw materials will depend on silicon and aluminum sources. In general, the raw materials and their pretreatments are monitored via X-ray diffraction as a way of observing the absence or decrease of certain impurities or amorphous phases as well as the relative crystallinity after the synthesis. The elemental analyses are used for the quantification of impurities before and after each pretreatment, whereas using magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (27Al MAS NMR), it is possible to analyze the transformation of octahedral aluminum into tetrahedral. In general, the zeolitic structure to be formed must respect the composition of the gel, and the Si/Al ratio is directly associated with this.
Silica from Rice Husk
According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), the world rice production in 2016 was 751.9 million tons [60]. Approximately 20% of this value in mass corresponds to the rice husk, which is considered the largest agro industrial waste [61]. Rice husk is composed of approximately 20% ash, and the rest is organic material (lignin, cellulose, and other organics). Approximately 95% of the ash is silica, while the remaining 5% is impurities, such as alkaline metals and carbonaceous residues, which are removed using chemical treatments (acid or basic leaching) and thermal treatments. In most cases, thermal treatments use temperatures up to 600 °C, thus generating amorphous silica of high purity, while temperatures higher than 700 °C favor the formation of crystalline silica structures such as cristobalite and tridimite [62]. Figure 6 (image b) shows the amorphous silica particles that are obtained after the thermal treatment of rice husk up to 600 °C for 4 h.
The results using rice husk as silica source for the synthesis of zeolite A are shown in Fig. 7, where the micrographs show zeolite A, which was synthesized using silica from rice husk calcined at 600 °C (image a), and zeolite A, which was obtained using fumed silica (image b). It was observed that the natural source of silica promotes the formation of larger crystals than the zeolite A produced using commercial silica. However, the relative crystallinity of zeolite A from rice husk and its surface area are similar to those of zeolite A obtained using commercial silica [63].
Other zeolites were synthesized using silica from rice husk such as Beta [64], NaX [65], NaY [66], ZSM-48 [67], and MCM-22 [68]. The synthesized mesoporous materials are MCM-41 (surface area of 468 m2 g−1) [69], MCM-48 (1024 m2 g−1) [70], SBA-15 (780 m2 g−1) [71], and SBA-16 (820 m2 g−1) [72].
Diatoms
Diatoms are sedimentary rocks that consist of the accumulation of carapaces of microscopic diatomaceous algae fossilized since the Precambrian period. They are mainly found in freshwater and are formed of macroporous irregular structures of hydrated amorphous silica (SiO2·nH2O), opaline and impurities (e.g., quartz), oxides (e.g., iron, aluminum, sodium potassium, calcium, magnesium, and titanium), and organic content (Fig. 6c). Thus, the diatoms are abundant and cheap raw materials and have been used as a source of silicon and/or aluminum for the synthesis of zeolites NaA [73], Y [74], mordenite [75], and MFI [76]. In the case of the MFI-type zeolite, the diatomite was pretreated with an aqua regia solution to improve their physicochemical properties such as purity, porosity, and quartz/amorphous silica ratio. XRD patterns of synthesized zeolites with diatomite at different times are shown in Fig. 8. According to the authors, a relative crystallinity of 76% was obtained after 24 days with a yield of 82.5 wt%. In addition, SEM analysis in Fig. 8 shows the transformation of diatomite into prismatic crystals of MFI zeolite after 6 and 24 days, and the quartz content was reduced significantly during the formation of zeolite using diatomite. In addition, the synthesis of mesoporous materials of the MCM-41 type (743 m2 g−1) was also reported [77].
Clay Minerals
Smectites (Fig. 6d) are clay minerals that are considered to be lamellar oxides of the group 2:1 (two layers formed by silicon tetrahedra, and a central layer is formed by aluminum octahedra). Due to isomorphic substitutions of Si by Al in the tetrahedral layers and Al by Mg and Fe, or Mg by Li at the octahedral positions, there is an excess of negative charge in the structure, which is compensated by hydrated cations (Na+, Ca2+) between interlamellar regions. Thus, smectites can act as sources of silicon and aluminum for the synthesis of micro- and mesoporous materials. However, thermal activation at temperatures of 700–850 °C is necessary to increase its reactivity. This reactivity can be understood as the destruction of the lamellar structure of the clay to obtain the phases of SiO2∙Al2O3∙Na2O and/or silicon and aluminum in amorphous and tetrahedral form, which is more reactive. The addition of fondants, such as sodium carbonate and bicarbonate, in this heat treatment step also improves the conversion of quartz to more reactive phases. For the formation of zeolites with a low Si/Al ratio such as zeolites A and X, a supplementation of aluminum is required [78].
Kaolinite is a member of clay minerals 1:1 (one layer is formed by silicon tetrahedra and one layer is aluminum octahedra) with a lamellar structure. The most reactive form of kaolin is thermally activated at temperatures between 600 °C and 800 °C and is known as “meta-kaolin.” Among the clay minerals, kaolin was more prominent in the synthesis of zeolites because they do not have compensating cations between the lamellae and have a low Si/Al ratio, similar to the zeolite A [79] and X [80]. This raw materials was used for the synthesis of other zeolites, such as P [81], Y and ZSM-5 [82], and mordenite [83]. Mesoporous material type Al-MCM-41 (494 m2 g−1) has already been synthesized using clay minerals such as bentonite [84], meta-kaolin and TEOS (753 m2 g−1) [85], attapulgite (1030 m2 g−1) [86], halloisite (509 m2 g−1) [87], and chrysotile (698 m2 g−1) [88].
Recently, a new strategy called “direct synthesis” has been reported for the formation of zeolites from clay minerals (in this case, attapulgite, ATP) [89]. In this approach, no activation (high temperatures associated with acidic or basic treatments) is necessary for the destruction of clay mineral structure. This approach uses a vapor-induced transformation (VIT), where the vapor diffuses in the ATP interacting with its structure to form an MFI-type zeolite. Figure 9 shows XRD patterns and SEM micrograph of ATP and the formed ZSM-5 zeolite, where the obtained yield was 96%, and the relative crystallinity is similar to that of ZSM-5 zeolite, which is used as a reference. Other zeolite structures, such as TON, MOR, and BEA, are also obtained using this approach. This strategy provides a new green and economical route for the synthesis of zeolites from clay minerals.
Coal Ash
Coal ash is a residue from the combustion of coal in coal-fired power plants. Large amounts of ash are produced, which can have harmful effects on the environment. The percentage of silica and alumina present in coal ash is approximately 60–70% and 16–20%, respectively. Thus, its conversion to advanced materials, such as zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials, represents an economical strategy for the reduction of environmental impact. In most cases, an alkaline fusion stage of coal ash is applied to increase silica extraction and accelerate the formation rate of the materials. The use of this residue for the synthesis of materials, such as zeolites NaP (pure), A, X, has been reported [90]. The mesoporous materials, MCM-41 and SBA-15, have already been synthesized using fly coal ash, showing surface areas of 1157 m2 g−1 and 483 m2 g−1, respectively [91, 92].
Conclusions and Further Outlook
Zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials attract significant attention due to their unique structural properties. These materials are used and modified to reach a wide range of applications related to reducing environmental problems and increasing energy efficiency. In addition, both zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials can be synthesized using renewable, abundant, and inexpensive sources of silicon and aluminum from rice husk, clay minerals, diatomite, and fly coal ash to achieve dual protection to the environment: zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials synthesized from renewable and waste sources and applied to the reduction of environmental impact. New synthesis approaches for zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials have been reported. Among these methodologies, direct synthesis via VIT using clay minerals is notable for dispensing the stages of activation (using temperatures and/or acid or basic treatments) that are commonly used. There are many silica sources, such as electronic (packaging resins) and domestic (glassware) wastes, which still represent a significant opportunity for the synthesis of zeolites and ordered mesoporous materials. In addition, inexpensive sources can be combined with other green synthesis strategies, such as the reuse of mother liquors from the synthesis, seed-assisted crystallization, microwave synthesis, free-template synthesis, and use of biosurfactants or biopolymers, to obtain microporous and mesoporous materials. It is well known that the discovery of new zeolites and mesoporous materials for advanced applications increases every day, and the use and search for inexpensive sources for their synthesis must follow in the same proportion.
References
Liu PS, Chen GF (2014) General introduction to porous materials. In: Liu P, Chen GF (eds) Porous materials, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407788-1.00001-0
Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KWS (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
Cronstedt AF (1756) Kong Vet Acad Handlingar 17:120
Payra P, Dutta PK (2003) Zeolites: a primer. In: Auerbach SM, Carrado KA, Dutta PK (eds) Handbook of zeolite science and technology, vol 2. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–19
IZA – International Zeolite Association. http://www.iza-structure.org. Accessed 22 July 2017
Weitkamp J (2000) Zeolites and catalysis. Solid State Ionics 131:175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00632-9
Cundy CS, Cox PA (2005) The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: precursors, intermediates and reaction mechanism. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 82:1–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.02.016
Yun Y, Hernandez M, Wan W, Zou X, Jorda JL, Cantin A, Rey F, Corma A (2015) The first zeolite with a tri-directional extra-large 14-ring pore system derived using a phosphonium-based organic molecule. Chem Commun 51:7602–7605. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC10317C
Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck JS (1992) Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 359:710–712
Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CTW, Olson DH, Sheppard EW (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114:10834–10843. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00053a020
Meynen V, Cool P, Vansant EF (2009) Verified syntheses of mesoporous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 125:170–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.03.046
Zhao D, Feng J, Huo Q, Melosh N, Fredrickson GH, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD (1998) Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 279:548–552. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.548
Zhao D, Huo Q, Feng J, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD (1998) Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J Am Chem Soc 120:6024–6036. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja974025i
Tanev PT, Pinnavaia TJ (1995) A neutral templating route to mesoporous molecular sieves. Science 267:865–867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5199.865
Kleitz F, Hei Choi S, Ryoo R (2003) Cubic Ia3d large mesoporous silica: synthesis and replication to platinum nanowires, carbon nanorods and carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun 2136–2137. https://doi.org/10.1039/B306504A
Bagshaw SA, Prouzet E, Pinnavaia TJ (1995) Templating of mesoporous molecular sieves by nonionic polyethylene oxide surfactants. Science 269:1242–1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5228.1242
Monnier A, Schüth F, Huo Q, Kumar D, Margolese D, Maxwell RS, Stucky GD, Krishnamurty M, Petroff P, Firouzi A, Janicke M, Chmelka BF (1993) Cooperative formation of inorganic-organic interfaces in the synthesis of silicate mesostructures. Science 261:1299–1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5126.1299
Firouzi A, Kumar D, Bull L, Besier T, Sieger P, Huo Q, Walker S, Zasadzinski J, Glinka C, Nicol J et al (1995) Cooperative organization of inorganic-surfactant and biomimetic assemblies. Science 267:1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7855591
Huo Q, Margolese DI, Ciesla U, Demuth DG, Feng P, Gier TE, Sieger P, Firouzi A, Chmelka BF (1994) Organization of organic molecules with inorganic molecular species into nanocomposite biphase arrays. Chem Mater 6:1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00044a016
Lai T-L, Shu Y-Y, Lin Y-C, Chen W-N, Wang C-B (2009) Rapid removal of organic template from SBA-15 with microwave assisted extraction. Mater Lett 63:1693–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.014
Bagshaw SA, Bruce IJ (2008) Rapid calcination of high quality mesostructured MCM-41, MSU-X, and SBA-15 silicate materials: a step towards continuous processing? Microporous Mesoporous Mater 109:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.042
Cooney EL, Booker NA, Shallcross DC, Stevens GW (1999) Ammonia removal from wastewaters using natural Australian zeolite. I. Characterization of the zeolite. Sep Sci Technol 34:2307–2327. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-100100774
Álvarez-Ayuso E, Garcıa-Sánchez A, Querol X (2003) Purification of metal electroplating waste waters using zeolites. Water Res 37:4855–4862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.009
Payne KB, Abdel-Fattah TM (2004) Adsorption of divalent lead ions by zeolites and activated carbon: effects of pH, temperature, and ionic strength. J Environ Sci Health A 39:2275–2291. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-200026265
Mercier L, Pinnavaia TJ (1998) Heavy metal ion adsorbents formed by the grafting of a thiol functionality to mesoporous silica molecular sieves: factors affecting Hg(II) uptake. Environ Sci Technol 32:2749–2754. https://doi.org/10.1021/es970622t
Kim BC, Lee J, Um W, Kim J, Joo J, Lee JH, Kwak JH, Kim JH, Lee C, Lee H, Addleman RS, Hyeon T, MB G, Kim J (2011) Magnetic mesoporous materials for removal of environmental wastes. J Hazard Mater 192:1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.022
Díaz-Nava C, Olguín MT, Solache-Ríos M (2002) Water defluoridation by mexican heulandite–clinoptilolite. Sep Sci Technol 37:3109–3128. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-120005662
Ghiaci M, Kia R, Abbaspur A, Seyedeyn-Azad F (2004) Adsorption of chromate by surfactant-modified zeolites and MCM-41 molecular sieve. Sep Purif Technol 4:285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2004.03.009
Yoshitake H, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T (2002) Adsorption of chromate and arsenate by amino-functionalized MCM-41 and SBA-1. Chem Mater 14:4603–4610. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0202355
Armaǧan B, Özdemir O, Turan M, Çelik MS (2003) The removal of reactive azo dyes by natural and modified zeolites. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:725–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.844
Wang S, Zhu ZH (2006) Characterisation and environmental application of an Australian natural zeolite for basic dye removal from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 136:946–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.038
Lee C-K, Liu S-S, Juang L-C, Wang C-C, Lin K-S, Lyu M-D (2007) Application of MCM-41 for dyes removal from wastewater. J Hazard Mater 147:997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.130
Boukoussa B, Hamacha R, Morsli A, Bengueddach A (2017) Adsorption of yellow dye on calcined or uncalcined Al-MCM-41 mesoporous materials. Arab J Chem 10:2160–2169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.049
Shenber MA, Johanson KJ (1992) Influence of zeolite on the availability of radiocaesium in soil to plants. Sci Total Environ 113:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(92)90007-F
Forberg S, Jones B, Westermark T (1989) Can zeolites decrease the uptake and accelerate the excretion of radio-caesium in ruminants? Sci Total Environ 79:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(89)90051-X
Yamagishi I, Nagaishi R, Kato C, Morita K, Terada A, Kamiji Y, Hino R, Sato H, Nishihara K, Tsubata Y, Tashiro S, Saito R, Satoh T, Nakano J, Ji W, Fukushima H, Sato S, Denton M (2014) Characterization and storage of radioactive zeolite waste. J Nucl Sci Technol 51:1044–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2014.924446
Hofstetter KJ, Hitz CG (1983) The use of the submerged demineralizer system at three mile island. Sep Sci Technol 18:1747–1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496398308056125
Guo K, Han F, Arslan Z, McComb J, Mao X, Zhang R, Sudarson S, Yu H (2015) Adsorption of Cs from water on surface-modified MCM-41 mesosilicate. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2565-5
Wernert V, Schäf O, Ghobarkar H, Denoyel R (2005) Adsorption properties of zeolites for artificial kidney applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 83:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.03.018
QuickClot (2016) http://www.quikclot.com. Accessed 22 July 2017
Li J, Cao W, Lv X-X, Jiang L, Li Y-J, Li W-Z, Chen S-Z, Li X-Y (2013) Zeolite-based hemostat QuikClot releases calcium into blood and promotes blood coagulation in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin 34:367–372. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2012.159
Vallet-Regi M, Rámila A, Del Real RP, Pérez-Pariente J (2001) A new property of MCM-41: drug delivery system. Chem Mater 13:308–311. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0011559
Qu F, Zhu G, Huang S, Li S, Qiu S (2006) Effective controlled release of captopril by silylation of mesoporous MCM-41. ChemPhysChem 7:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200500294
Bahrami Z, Badiei A, Atyabi F (2014) Surface functionalization of SBA-15 nanorods for anticancer drug delivery. Chem Eng Res Des 92:1296–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.11.007
Coe CG, Gaffney TR, Srinivasan RS (1990) Chabazite for gas separation. EP Patent 0409135 B1
Frankiewicz TC, Donnelly RG (1983) Methane/nitrogen gas separation over the zeolite clinoptilolite by the selective adsorption of nitrogen. In: Industrial gas separations. ACS symposium series, vol 223. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1983-0223.ch011
Knaebel KS, Kandybin A (1993) Pressure swing adsorption system to purify oxygen. US Patent US5226933 A
Shen J-H, Wang Y-S, Lin J-P, Wu S-H, Horng J-J (2014) Improving the indoor air quality of respiratory type of medical facility by zeolite filtering. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 64:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.831798
Litch JA, Bishop RA (2000) Oxygen concentrators for the delivery of supplemental oxygen in remote high-altitude areas. Wilderness Environ Med 11:189–191. https://doi.org/10.1580/1080-6032(2000)011[0189:OCFTDO]2.3.CO;2
Belmabkhout Y, Serna-Guerrero R, Sayari A (2010) Adsorption of CO2-containing gas mixtures over amine-bearing pore-expanded MCM-41 silica: application for gas purification. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:359–365. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900837t
Hung C, Bai H, Karthik M (2009) Ordered mesoporous silica particles and Si-MCM-41 for the adsorption of acetone: a comparative study. Sep Purif Technol 64:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.10.020
Yahiro H, Iwamoto M (2001) Copper ion-exchanged zeolite catalysts in deNOx reaction. Appl Catal A Gen 222:163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00823-7
Yang RT, Hernández-Maldonado AJ, Yang FH (2003) Desulfurization of transportation fuels with zeolites under ambient conditions. Science 301:79–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085088
Rinaldi R, Schuth F (2009) Design of solid catalysts for the conversion of biomass. Energy Environ Sci 2(6):610–626. https://doi.org/10.1039/B902668A
Roth WJ, Vartuli JC (2005) Synthesis of mesoporous molecular sieves. In: Ĉejka J, Bekkum HV (eds) Studies in surface science and catalysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(05)80007-2
Climent MJ, Corma A, Iborra S, Navarro MC, Primo J (1996) Use of mesoporous MCM-41 aluminosilicates as catalysts in the production of fine chemicals: preparation of dimethylacetals. J Catal 161:783–789. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.0241
Antonakou E, Lappas A, Nilsen MH, Bouzga A, Stöcker M (2006) Evaluation of various types of Al-MCM-41 materials as catalysts in biomass pyrolysis for the production of bio-fuels and chemicals. Fuel 85(14):2202–2212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.03.021
da Silva AGM, Fajardo HV, Balzer R, Probst LFD, Lovón ASP, Lovón-Quintana JJ, Valença GP, Schreine WH, Robles-Dutenhefner PA (2015) Versatile and efficient catalysts for energy and environmental processes: mesoporous silica containing Au, Pd and Au-Pd. J Power Sources 285:460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.066
Ng E-P, Zou X, Mintova S (2013) Chapter 12 – Environmental synthesis concerns of zeolites. In: Suib S (ed) New and future developments in catalysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53876-5.00013-1
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017) Rice Mark Monit XX(1)
James J, Rao MS (1986) Silica from rice husk through thermal decomposition. Thermochim Acta 97:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(86)87035-6
Conradt R, Pimkhaokham P, Leela-Adisorn U (1992) Nano-structured silica from rice husk. J Non-Cryst Solids 145:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80433-8
Petkowicz DI, Rigo RT, Radtke C, Pergher SB, dos Santos JHZ (2008) Zeolite NaA from Brazilian chrysotile and rice husk. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 116:548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.05.014
Prasetyoko D, Ramli Z, Endud S, Hamdan H, Sulikowski B (2006) Conversion of rice husk ash to zeolite beta. Waste Manag 26(10):1173–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.009
Dalai AK, Rao MS, Gokhale KVGK (1985) Synthesis of NaX zeolite using silica from rice husk ash. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 24:465–468. https://doi.org/10.1021/i300019a026
Wittayakun J, Khemthong P, Prayoonpokarach S (2008) Synthesis and characterization of zeolite NaY from rice husk silica. Korean J Chem Eng 25:861–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-008-0142-y
Wang HP, Lin KS, Huang YJ, Li MC, Tsaur LK (1998) Synthesis of zeolite ZSM-48 from rice husk ash. J Hazard Mater 58:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00127-1
Cheng Y, Lu M, Li J, Su X, Pan S, Jiao C, Feng M (2012) Synthesis of MCM-22 zeolite using rice husk as a silica source under varying-temperature conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 369:388–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.024
Schwanke AJ, Melo DMA, Silva AO, Pergher SBC (2013) Use of rice husk ash as only source of silica in the formation of mesoporous materials. Cerâmica 59:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0366-69132013000100022
Jang HT, Park Y, Ko YS, Lee JY, Margandan B (2009) Highly siliceous MCM-48 from rice husk ash for CO2 adsorption. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3:545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.02.008
Bhagiyalakshmi M, Yun LJ, Anuradha R, Jang HT (2010) Synthesis of chloropropylamine grafted mesoporous MCM-41, MCM-48 and SBA-15 from rice husk ash: their application to CO2 chemisorption. J Porous Mater 17:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-009-9310-7
Ho S-T, Dinh Q-K, Tran T-H, Nguyen H-P, Nguyen T-D (2013) One-step synthesis of ordered Sn-substituted SBA-16 mesoporous materials using prepared silica source of rice husk and their selectively catalytic activity. Can J Chem Eng 91:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20693
Nascimento CR, Sobrinho EMO, Assis RB, Fagundes RF, Bieseki L, Pergher SBC (2014) Síntese da zeólita A utilizando diatomita como fonte de sílicio e alumínio. Cerâmica 60:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0366-69132014000100009
Hernandez-Ramirez O, Hill PI, Doocey DJ, Holmes SM (2007) Removal and immobilisation of cobalt ions by a novel, hierarchically structured, diatomite/zeolite Y composite. J Mater Chem 17:1804–1808. https://doi.org/10.1039/B700048K
Sanhueza V, Kelm U, Cid R (2003) Synthesis of mordenite from diatomite: a case of zeolite synthesis from natural material. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:485–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.801
Ahmad Alyosef H, Roggendorf H, Schneider D, Inayat A, Welscher J, Schwieger W, Münster T, Kloess G, Ibrahim S, Enke D (2016) MFI-type zeolites from natural materials: a comparative study of MFI-type zeolites generated from different diatomite species (part I). J Porous Mater 23:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-016-0222-z
Jin J, Ouyang J, Yang H (2014) One-step synthesis of highly ordered Pt/MCM-41 from natural diatomite and the superior capacity in hydrogen storage. Appl Clay Sci 99:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.07.001
Abdmeziem-Hamoudi K, Siffert B (1989) Synthesis of molecular sieve zeolites from a smectite-type clay material. Appl Clay Sci 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(89)90010-0
Ríos CA, Williams CD, Fullen MA (2009) Nucleation and growth history of zeolite LTA synthesized from kaolinite by two different methods. Appl Clay Sci 42:446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.05.006
Akolekar D, Chaffee A, Howe RF (1997) The transformation of kaolin to low-silica X zeolite. Zeolites 19:359–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-2449(97)00132-2
Hildebrando EA, Andrade CGB, Rocha Junior CAFd, Angélica RS, Valenzuela-Diaz FR, Neves RdF (2014) Synthesis and characterization of zeolite NaP using kaolin waste as a source of silicon and aluminum. Mater Res 17:174–179
Kovo AS, Hernandez O, Holmes SM (2009) Synthesis and characterization of zeolite Y and ZSM-5 from Nigerian Ahoko Kaolin using a novel, lower temperature, metakaolinization technique. J Mater Chem 19(34):6207–6212. https://doi.org/10.1039/B907554B
Mignoni M, Petkowicz DI, Machado NRCF, Pergher SBC (2008) Synthesis of mordenite using kaolin as Si and Al source. Appl Clay Sci 41:99–104
Ali-dahmane T, Adjdir M, Hamacha R, Villieras F, Bengueddach A, Weidler PG (2014) The synthesis of MCM-41 nanomaterial from Algerian bentonite: the effect of the mineral phase contents of clay on the structure properties of MCM-41. C R Chim 17:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2012.12.017
Wang G, Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu Z, Guo Y, Liu G, Yang Z, Xu M, Wang L (2009) Synthesis of highly regular mesoporous Al-MCM-41 from metakaolin. Appl Clay Sci 44:185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.12.002
Yang H, Tang A, Ouyang J, Li M, Mann S (2010) From natural attapulgite to mesoporous materials: methodology, characterization and structural evolution. J Phys Chem B 114:2390–2398. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911516b
Xie Y, Zhang Y, Ouyang J, Yang H (2014) Mesoporous material Al-MCM-41 from natural halloysite. Phys Chem Miner 41:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-014-0660-6
Schwanke AJ, Wittee C, Pergher SBC (2013) Synthesis of mesoporous material from chrysotile-derived silica. Mater Sci Appl 4:68–72. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2013.48A009
Li X-Y, Jiang Y, Liu X-Q, Shi L-Y, Zhang D-Y, Sun L-B (2017) Direct synthesis of zeolites from a natural clay, attapulgite. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:6124–6130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01001
Hollman GG, Steenbruggen G, Janssen-Jurkovičová M (1999) A two-step process for the synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash. Fuel 78:1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00030-7
Kumar P, Mal N, Oumi Y, Yamana K, Sano T (2001) Mesoporous materials prepared using coal fly ash as the silicon and aluminium source. J Mater Chem 11:3285–3290. https://doi.org/10.1039/B104810B
Yan F, Jiang J, Tian S, Liu Z, Shi J, Li K, Chen X, Xu Y (2016) A green and facile synthesis of ordered mesoporous nanosilica using coal fly ash. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:4654–4661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00793
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schwanke, A.J., Balzer, R., Pergher, S. (2019). Microporous and Mesoporous Materials from Natural and Inexpensive Sources. In: Martínez, L., Kharissova, O., Kharisov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ecomaterials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68255-6_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68255-6_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68254-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68255-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering