Abstract
Why and how did a cartographic narrative emerge, which makes empathic emotions irrelevant, encourages resorting to violence, symbolically transforms ‘own troops’ into reified entities that can be sacrificed, and, in general, facilitates war-waging? The analysis of material factors (be they military manpower, defense budgets, and/or weapons available in armed forces’ arsenals) and/or of balances of power is not sufficient to decipher this puzzle. In order to understand war, it is necessary to take into account the existence of social representations, especially those contributing to hush up ‘positive’ (empathic) emotions toward the Other. Using a sociological historical approach inspired by Science and Technology Studies, this chapter aims at exploring the social forces that allowed such dehumanizing representations, thereby making emotions largely irrelevant, to succeed and circulate transnationally in Europe for centuries.
The starkest reality of war is that the enemy is never really a monster, never inhuman. Warriors have often tried to reduce their foes to sub-humans to prop up their denial, but the fact is the enemy is someone who dreams, someone who loves, someone who just needed a job, someone who is just wanting for a break to take a leak or eat his supper: a full-fledged human just like us.
Stan Goff (US Army, retired) ( 2004 , p. 38)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The ‘gaze’ concept is hereafter borrowed from Priya Satia’s book on British imperial warfare (2008). The historian evoked the construction of a coercive ‘state gaze’ by colonial agents and soldiers. Antoine Bousquet later coined the concept of ‘martial gaze’ (Bousquet, 2018).
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
The whole range of STS’s operational concepts could not be adopted and used in this short chapter. For more about them, see: Latour 1988.
- 5.
Lack of space made it impossible to provide all references to these books and treatises in this chapter. More bibliographical information can be found in: Wasinski (2011).
- 6.
In some instances, ‘reaction’ consists in actions aimed at transforming the narrative. In the field of military history, a good example is given by the Vietnam War . This conflict was first assessed by the Americans not as a local nationalist conflict but as a component of the war against communism, a narrative that has some emotional appeal in the United States . After the 1975 Communist victory, a new (and emotionally laden) narrative, based on the myth of the domestic ‘stab in back’ by Liberals, imposed itself about the conflict (Lembcke, 2000). This new narrative contributed to Ronald Reagan’s accession to the presidency and helped justify, among others, its interventionist policy in Latin America in order to ‘kick out the Vietnam syndrome’. To put it more schematically, a possible feedback loop can be drawn between ‘reaction’ and ‘narrative’.
- 7.
It should be stressed that officers of noble origin never completely left the armed forces. Rather, those who remained were inserted in a more binding institutional environment. Moreover, the Restauration, which took place after the end of the Napoleonic era, did not seriously question the military norm of efficiency that was imposed during the Revolutionary wars.
- 8.
In France , Hérodote (founded by Yves Lacoste in 1976) constitutes an important exception. This periodical initially suggested an alternative geopolitics which was highly critical of the imperial projects.
References
Adler, K. (1997). Engineering the Revolution. Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763–1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ashworth, T. (1968). The Sociology of Trench Warfare. British Journal of Sociology, 19(4), 407–423.
Bartov, O. (1991). Hitler’s Army. Soldiers, Nazis, and War in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bataille, G. (1991). The Accursed Share (Vol. 1). London: Zone Books.
Blanchard, A. (1996). Vauban. Paris: Fayard.
Boltanski, L. (2004). La condition foetale. Une sociologie de l’engendrement et de l’avortement. Paris: Gallimard.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On Justification. Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bousquet, A. (2018). The Martial Gaze. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (To Be Published).
Brown, K. (2008). “All They Understand Is Force”: Debating Culture in Operation Iraqi Freedom. American Anthropologist, 110(4), 443–453.
Brown, K., & Lutz, F. (2007). Grunt Lit: The Participant-Observers of Empire. American Ethnologist. American Ethnologist, 34(2), 322–326.
Bucholz, A. (1991). Moltke, Schlieffen, and Prussian War Planning. New York: Berg.
Butler, J. (2010). Frames of War. When Life Is Grievable? Londres: Verso.
Buzzell, C. (2005). My War. Killing Time in Iraq. London: Corgi.
Cameron, C. M. (1994). American Samurai. Myth, Imagination, and the Conduct of Battle in the First Marine Division, 1941–1951. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chagniot, J. (1997). Le chevalier de Folard. La stratégie de l’incertitude. Monaco: Editions du Rocher.
Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs, 12(4), 687–718.
Colson, B. (1993). La culture stratégique américaine. L’influence de Jomini. Paris: Economica.
Colson, B. (1999). L’Art de la guerre de Machiavel à Clausewitz. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
Colson, B., & Coutau-Bégarie, H. (Eds.). (2000). Pensée stratégique et humanisme. De la tactique des Anciens à l’éthique de la stratégie. Paris: Economica.
Corbin, A. (1993). The Village of Cannibals. Rage & Murder in France, 1870. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Croser, C. (2010). The New Spatiality of Warfare. Operational Uncertainty and the US Military in Iraq. London: Routledge.
Debrix, F. (2007). Tabloid Terror. War, Culture, and Geopolitics. London: Routledge.
Der Derian, J. (2009). Virtuous War. Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media Entertainment Network. New York and London: Routledge.
Dodds, K., & Atkinson, D. (Eds.). (2002). Geopolitical Traditions. Critical Histories of a Century of Geopolitical Thought. London: Routledge.
Doubler, M. D. (1994). Clowing with the Enemy. How GIs Fought the War in Europe, 1944–1945. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Dower, J. M. (1987). War Without Mercy. Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon.
Duby, G. (1973). Guerriers et paysans: VIIe-XIIe siècles: Premier essor de l’économie européenne. Paris: Gallimard.
Duffy, C. (1979). Siege Warfare. The Fortress in the Early Modern World 1494–1660. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
Duffy, C. (1985). Fortress in the Age of Vauban and Frederick the Great 1660–1789. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
Duffy, C. (1988). The Military Experience in the Age of Reason. New York: Atheneum.
Echevarria, A. J. (2000). After Clausewitz. German Military Thinkers Before the Great War. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Eden, L. (2004). Whole World on Fire. Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Elias, N. (1983). The Court Society. New York: Pantheon.
Ellis, J. (1986). The Social History of the Machine Gun. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
Gat, A. (2002). A History of Military Thought from Enlightenment to the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goff, S. (2004). Full Spectrum Disorder. The Military in the New American Century. New York: Soft Skull.
Gonzales de Leon, F. (1996). “Doctors of the Military Discipline”: Technical Expertise and the Paradigm of the Spanish Soldier in the Early Modern Period. Sixteenth Century Journal, 27(1), 61–85.
Guerlac, H. (1986). Vauban: The Impact of Science on War. In P. Paret (Ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (pp. 64–90). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gusterson, H. (1998). Nuclear Rites: A Weapon Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Henderson, K. (1995). The Visual Culture of Engineers. In S. Leigh Star (Ed.), The Cultures of Computing (pp. 196–218). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hull, I. V. (2004). Absolute Destruction. Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
James, W. (1884). What Is an Emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205.
James, W. (2003). Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York City: Dover.
Jeismann, M. (1997). La patrie de l’ennemi. La notion d’ennemi national et la représentation de la nation en Allemagne et en France de 1792 à 1918. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kennedy, P. M. (1979). War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kleinschmidt, H. (1999). Using the Gun: Manual Drill and the Proliferation of Portable Firearms. The Journal of Military History, 63(3), 160–170.
Kolko, G. (1994). Century of War. Politics, Conflict, and Society Since 1914. New York City: The New Press.
Latour, B. (1988). Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Lauterbach, A. T. (1944). Militarism in the Western World: A Comparative Study. Journal of the History of Ideas, 5(4), 446–478.
LeBleu, J. (2009). Long Rifle. A Sniper’s Story in Iraq and Afghanistan. Guilford: Lyons Press.
Lembcke, J. (2000). The Spitting Image. Myth, Memory, and the Legacy of Vietnam. New York: New York University Press.
Liulevicius, V. G. (2000). War Land on the Eastern Front. Culture, National Identity, and German Occupation in World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luvaas, J. (1964). The Education of an Army. British Military Thought, 1815–1840. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lynn, J. (1996). Bayonets of the Republic. Motivation and Tactics in the Army of the Revolutionary France, 1791–1794. Boulder: Westview.
Lynn, J. (1997). Giant of the Grand Siècle: The French Army, 1610–1715. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing Accuracy. A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Meridale, C. (2005). Ivan’s War. The Red Army 1939–1945. London: Faber and Faber.
Mort, M. (2001). Building the Trident Network. A Study of the Enrolment of People, Knowledge, and Machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Panofsky, E. (1975). La perspective comme forme symbolique. Paris: Minuit.
Parker, G. (1996). The Military Revolution. Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parrott, D. (2005). Cultures of Combat in the Ancient Régime: Linear Warfare, Noble Values, and Entrepreneurship. The International History Review, 27(3), 518–533.
Pauwels, J. R. (2016). The Great Class War 1914–1918. Halifax: Lorimer.
Pollak, M. D. (1991). Military Architecture Cartography & the Representation of the Early Modern European City. A Checklist of Treatises on Fortification in the Newberry Library. Chicago: The Newberry Library.
Queloz, D. (2009). De la manœuvre napoléonienne à l’offensive à outrance. Paris: Economica.
Raffestin, C. (with Lopreno, D., Pasteur, Y.). 1995. Géopolitique et histoire. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.
Ralston, D. (1990). Importing the European Army. The Introduction of European Military Techniques and Institutions in the Extra-European World, 1600–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rancière, J. (2000). Le partage du sensible. Esthétique et politique. Paris: La Fabrique.
Renda, M. A. (2001). Taking Haiti. Military Occupation & the Culture of U.S. Imperialism (1915–1940). Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Reuter, T. (1985). Plunder and Tribute in the Carolingian Empire. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 35, 75–94.
Ritchie, N. (2010). Relinquishing Nuclear Weapons: Identities, Network and the British Bomb. International Affairs, 86(2), 465–487.
Robbens, A. C. G. M. (2013). The Hostile Gaze: Night Vision and the Immediation of Nocturnal Combat in Vietnam and Iraq. In N. L. Whitehead & S. Finnström (Eds.), Virtual War and Magical Death: Technologies and Imaginaries for Terror and Killing (pp. 132–151).
Ross, S. (1996). American War Plan 1945–1950. London: Frank Cass.
Rothenberg, G. E. (1981). The Art of War in the Age of Napoleonic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Russell, E. P. (1996). “Speaking Annihilation”: Mobilizing for War Against Human and Insect Enemies, 1914–1945. Journal of American History, 82(4), 1505–1529.
Sampson, A. (1977). The Arms Bazaar. From Lebanon to Lockheed. New York: Bantam Books.
Satia, P. (2008). Spies in Arabia. The Great War and the Cultural Foundations of Britain’s Covert Empire in the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, M. (1997). Violent Cartographies. Mapping the Cultures of War. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Sherry, M. (1989). The Rise of American Air Power. The Creation of Armageddon. Yale: Yale University Press.
Sofsky, W. (2003). Violence: Terrorism, Genocide, War. London: Granta.
Tilly, C. (Ed.). (1975). The Formation of the National State in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Travers, T. H. E. (1979). Technology, Tactics, and Morale: Jean de Bloch, the Boer War, and British Military Theory, 1900–1914. Journal of Modern History, 51(2), 264–286.
Vasquez, J. A. (1992). The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Virilio, P. (1989). War and Cinema. The Logistics of Perception. London: Verso.
Virilio, P. (1994). Vision Machine: Perspectives. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Wasinski, C. (2011). On Making War Possible. Soldiers, Strategy, and Military Grand Narrative. Security Dialogue, 42(1), 57–76.
Weber, M. (1965). Politics as a Vocation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
White, R. K. (1966). Misperception and the Vietnam War. The Journal of Social Issues, XXII(3), 1–169.
Zuber, T. (2002). Inventing the Schlieffen Plan: German War Planning 1871–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to address special thanks to Constance de Lannoy, Maéva Clément, and Eric Sangar for their kind assistance during the writing of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wasinski, C. (2018). The Formation of the ‘Western’ Strategic Gaze: A Case Study on Emotional Irrelevance in International Politics. In: Clément, M., Sangar, E. (eds) Researching Emotions in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65574-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65575-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)