Abstract
Starting with the alternative digital media experiences that have taken place in the last two decades in Latin America, this chapter proposes a theoretical and methodological framework inspired by the critical tradition of participatory communication for social change as it developed in Latin America. The chapter is structured as follows. Firstly, we underline the latest framework of collective action that has characterized the new cycle of struggles in Latin America. Secondly, we delineate our proposal, which will consider three pivotal aspects of the process of appropriating and using digital media. Afterwards, we explore how the bonds that are formed between the media and the protagonists reflect a “new” community of reference distinguished by horizontal processes. Finally, we analyse how the net activism practice leads the participating people to experience a process of empowerment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In Spanish Escuela Latinoamericana de Comunicación.
- 2.
A fundamental episode that marked the end of citizen participation was the repression at the G8 protests in Geneva in 2001, with the murder of a young activist, Carlo Giuliani, by Italian police.
- 3.
This co-option also involved a group of hackers who had helped create dozens of projects and virtual networks, which were then absorbed by defence and military intelligence departments through different companies for creating and managing espionage, surveillance, and remote arms control software.
- 4.
Villeros are people who live in suburbs of large Latin American cities like Buenos Aires or Santiago del Chile. These working-class barrios and neighborhoods are excluded from all sorts of facilities in terms of education, culture, health, etc. Chavos banda are very young people, generally from rural, poor villages, who live like beggars in urban areas such as Oaxaca, Mexico City, Guadalajara. Cartoneros are people who make their living collecting and selling salvaged materials to recycling plants. This movement began in Argentina in 2003 and has since spread to countries throughout Latin America. Most of these people live under the shadow of the informal economy; they do not exist for nor are they represented by the ruling class.
- 5.
“We, the ordinary, working people” was and still is the way in which the people of the Water and Life Defence Coordination Group in Cochabamba, Bolivia, describe themselves.
- 6.
Trueque is the exchange of material or immaterial goods or services for other goods or services, and it is different from normal sale/purchase because money is not involved in the transaction. It is a pre-Hispanic custom common in many Latin American indigenous communities, and is now widespread in urban areas too.
- 7.
Significant data in Latin America on the use of the Twitter and Facebook social networks can be found only for the period after the Spanish language versions were launched: 2008 for Facebook and 2009 for Twitter.
References
Barassi, V., & Treré, E. (2012). Does web 3.0 come after web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice. New Media & Society, 14(8). doi:10.1177/1461444812445878.
Beltrán, L. R. (1974). Communication research in Latin America: The blindfolded inquiry? Paper at conference on the contribution of the mass media to the development of consciousness in a changing world, Leipzig, pp. 1–23.
Beltrán, L. R. (1993). Communication for development in Latin America: A forty-year appraisal. In D. Nostbakken & C. Morrow (Eds.), Cultural expression in the global village (pp. 10–11). Penang: Southbound.
Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
Bey, Hakim. (1985). The temporary autonomous zone, ontological anarchy, poetic terrorism. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.
Bolaño, C., Mastrini, G., & Sierra, F. (2012). Political economy, communication and knowledge. A Latin American perspective. New York: Hampton Press.
Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., & McCurdy, P. (Eds.). (2013). Mediation and protest movements. Bristol: Intellect.
Couldry, N. (2004). Theorizing media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115–132.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Dallago, L. (2006). Che cos’é l’empowerment. Rome: Carocci Editore.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
De Certeau, M., Jamenson, F., & Lovitt, C. (1980). On the oppositional practice of everyday life. Social Text, 3, 3–43.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2010a). Para descolonizar occidente: mas allá del pensamiento abismal. Buenos Aires: CLACSO/Prometeo Libros.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2010b). Refundación del Estado en América Latina: perspectivas desde una epistemología del sur. Buenos Aires: Antropofagia.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder and London: Paradigm.
Del Valle, C., Moreno, J., & Sierra, F. (Eds.). (2010). Cultura latina y revolución digital. Matrices para pensar el espacio iberoamericano de comunicación. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Díaz Gómez, F. (2004). Comunidad y comunalidad. Diálogos en la acción, 2, 365–373.
Escobar, A. (1999). Gender, place and networks. A political ecology of cyberculture. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), Women@Internet. Creating new cultures in cyberspace (pp. 31–54). London: Zed Books.
Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference. Place, movements, life, redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2010). Una minga para el postdesarrollo: lugar, medio ambiente y movimientos sociales en las transformaciones globales. Lima: Programa Democracia y Transformación Global y Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/~aescobar/text/esp/escobar.2010.UnaMinga.pdf.
Esteva, G. (2014, August 19). Punto de flexion. La Jornada. Retrieved from http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2014/08/18/opinion/022a1pol.
Flam, H. (2000). The emotional ‘man’ and the problem of collective action. Berlin and New York: Peter Lang.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Freire, P. (1976). Education, the practice of freedom. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
Fuentes, R. (1999). La investigación de la comunicación en América Latina: condiciones y perspectivas para el Siglo XXI. Diálogos de la Comunicación, 56, 54–67.
García-Canclini, N. (1995). Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Godoy, C. G. (2003). Sitios Mapuches en Internet: Reimaginando la Identidad. Revista Chilena de Antropología Visual, 3. Retrieved from http://www.rchav.cl/imagenes3/imprimir/godoy.pdf.
Gómez, R., & Treré, E. (2014). The #YoSoy132 movement and the struggle for media democratization in Mexico. Convergence, 20(4). doi:10.1177/1354856514541744.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2000). The return of the repressed: The fall and rise of emotions in social movement theory. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5(1), 65–83.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2001). Passionate politics. Emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2004). Emotional dimensions of social movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 413–432). Malden: Blackwell.
González, J. A. (1999). Dark side of the fractal moon communication studies in Latin America: Challenging destiny and confronting complexity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 16(2), 227–232. doi:10.1080/15295039909367088.
González, J. A. (2001). Frentes culturales: Para una comprensión dialógica de las culturas contemporáneas. Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, 8(14), 9–45.
González, J. A. (2010). Understanding telenovelas as a cultural front. A complex analysis of a complex reality. In Ilan Stavans (Ed.), Telenovelas (pp. 69–78). Edition: 1, Chapter: 5, Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Editors.
Gravante, T. (2016). Cuando la gente toma la palabra. Medios digitales y cambio social en la insurgencia de Oaxaca. Quito: CIESPAL.
Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art moral of protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Juris, J. (2008). Networking futures. The movements against corporate globalization. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
León, G. (2007). La nueva hegemonía en el pensamiento latinoamericano de la comunicación. Un acercamiento a la producción científica de la Escuela Latinoamericana de la Comunicación. Hermosillo: Editorial Universidad de Sonora.
León, G. (2008). Escola Latino-Americana de Comunicacão. A nova hegemonía. São Paulo: Catedra UNESCO de Comunicación/Universidade Metodista de São Paulo.
León, G. (2010). Estrategias, posiciones y prácticas científicas en la enseñanza y la Investigación de la Comunicación en América Latina. Miguel Hernández Communication Journal, 1, 53–77.
Marques, J., & Gobbi, M. (2000) (Eds.). Gênese do pensamento comunicacional latino-americano: o protagonismo das instituições pioneiras: CIESPAL, ICINFORM, ININCO. São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brasil: UNESCO—UMESP.
Marques, J., & Gobbi, M. (2004). Pensamento Comunicacional Latino-Americano. São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brasil: UNESCO—UMESP.
Martín-Barbero, J. (1993). Communication, culture and hegemony: From the media to mediations. London: Sage.
Martín-Barbero, J. (2002). Oficio de cartógrafo. Travesías latinoamericanas de la comunicación en la cultura. Santiago del Chile: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Martín-Barbero, J. (2006). A Latin American perspective on communication/cultural mediation. Global Media and Communication, 2(3), 279–297. doi:10.1177/1742766506069579.
Martínez, M., & Sierra, F. (Eds.). (2012). Comunicación y Desarrollo. Prácticas comunicativas y empoderamiento local. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Mattoni, A. (2012). Media practices and protest politics: How precarious workers mobilise. Farnham: Ashgate.
Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), 252–271.
McAnany, E. G., & Atwood, R. (1986). Communication and Latin American society: Trends in critical research, 1960–1985. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
McCurdy, P. (2011). Theorizing activists’ “lay theories of media”: A case study of the dissent! Network at the 2005 G8 Summit. International Journal of Communication, 5, 619–638.
Neuman, de Segan M. I. (2008). La apropiación tecnológica como práctica de resistencia y negociación en la globalización. Paper presented at the IX AICM Conference. Mexico, DF, 9–11 October.
O’Connor, A. (Ed.). (2004). Community radio in Bolivia: The miners’ radio stations. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.
Orozco, G. (1996). Televisión y audiencias. Un enfoque cualitativo. Mexico: Universidad Iberoamericana/Ediciones de la Torre.
Orozco, G. (Ed.). (2007). Un mundo de visiones. Interacciones de las audiencias en múltiples escenarios mediáticos y virtuales. Mexico: Instituto Latinoamericano de la Comunicación Educativa.
Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements. Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books.
Pol Urrútia, E. (1996). La apropiación del espacio. Cognición, representación y apropiación del espacio. Collecció Monografies Psico-Socio-Ambientals, 9, 45–62.
Pol Urrútia, E. (2002). El modelo dual de la apropiación del espacio. In R. Mira, J. M. Sabucedo, & J. Romay (Eds.), Psicología y Medio Ambiente. Aspectos psicosociales, educativos y metodológicos (pp. 123–132). A Coruña, Spain: Asociación Galega de Estudios e Investigación Psicosocial.
Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Poma A., & Gravante, T. (2013). Apropiación y emociones. Una propuesta teórica desde abajo para analizar las prácticas de netactivismo. In F. Sierra (Ed.), Ciudadanía, tecnología y cultura. Nodos conceptuales para pensar la nueva mediación digital (pp. 257–284). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Regalado, J. (2010). Política y acciones colectivas en el Occidente de México. Mexico: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Regalado, J. (2011). Los movimientos sociales en México. La vía autonomista y comunitaria. Paper presented at the Conference Nuevas perspectivas para el estudio de los movimientos sociales en América Latina, UAM-X, DF, 9–11 November.
Regalado, J., & Gravante, T. (2016). Acción colectiva y prácticas políticas emergentes en México. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 4(154), nº154, 113–127.
Rodríguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape. An internacional study of citizens’ media. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Rodríguez, C. (2008). Lo que les vamos quitando a la guerra. Medios ciudadanos en contexto de guerra en Colombia. Bogotá: C3/FES.
Rodriguez, C. (2011). Citizens’ media against armed conflict: Disrupting violence in Colombia. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesotta Press.
Sierra, F. (1997). Comunicación e Insurgencia. La información y la propaganda en la guerra de Chiapas. Guipúzcoa, Spain: Editorial HIRU.
Sierra, F. (1999). Hacia una nueva comunicación política. Ética dialógica y configuración virtual de las redes emergentes. El modelo zapatista como alternativa comunicacional. Madrid: UNED. Retrieved from http://www.uned.es/ntedu/espanol/master/primero/modulos/teoria-de-la-informacion-y-comunicacion-audiovisual/franci.htm.
Sierra, F. (2006). Information society and social movements: Democratic alternatives to the dominant social development model. In A. Gumucio & Th. Tufte (Eds.), Communication for social change anthology: Historical and contemporary readings (pp. 1022–1031). New Jersey: CFSC.
Sierra, F. (2010). Cultura latina y Sociedad de la Información. Pensar lo procomún. In F. Sierra, C. Del Valle, & J. Moreno (Eds.), Cultura latina y revolución digital. Matrices para pensar el espacio iberoamericano de comunicación (pp. 69–93). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Sierra, F., & Gravante, T. (2012). Apropiación tecnológica y mediación. Líneas y fracturas para pensar otra comunicación posible. In J. Encina & Mª Á. Ávila (Eds.), Autogestión de la vida cotidiana (pp. 130–138). Seville: UNILCO.
Sierra, F., & Gravante, T. (2014). Latin America. In K. Harvey (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social media and politics (Vol. 2, pp. 755–760). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sierra, F., & Gravante, T. (Eds.). (2017). Tecnopolítica en América Latina y Caribe. Salamanca: Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones.
Sierra, F., Poma, A., & Gravante, T. (2016). Citizen media and empowerment. An analysis of three experiences of media re-appropriation carried out by women in the popular insurrection of Oaxaca, Mexico (2006). In J. Servaes & T. Oyedemi (Eds.), Social inequalities, media and communication: A global perspective. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Lexington Books.
Thompson, E. P. (1975). Whigs and Hunters. The origin of the black act. London: Allen Lane.
Treré, E. (2012). Social movements as information ecologies: Exploring the coevolution of multiple internet technologies for activism. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2359–2377.
Treré, E. (2013). #YoSoy132: la experiencia de los nuevos movimientos sociales en México y el papel de las redes sociales desde una perspectiva. Educación Social. Revista de Intervención Socioeducativa, 55, 112–121.
Treré, E., & Barranquero, A. (2013). De mitos y sublimes digitales: movimientos sociales y tecnologías de la comunicación desde una perspectiva histórica. Revista de Estudios para el Desarrollo Social de la Comunicación (Redes.com), 8, 27–47.
Treré, E., & Magallanes-Blanco, C. (2015). Special issue: Latin American struggles| battlefields, experiences, debates: Latin American struggles and digital media resistance. International Journal of Communication, 9.
Vinelli, N., & Rodríguez Esperón, C. (Eds.). (2008). Contrainformacion: medios alternativos para la acción política. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Continente, 2ª ed.
Williams, R. (1973). The country and the city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yehia, E. (2007). Descolonización del conocimiento y la práctica: un encuentro dialógico entre el programa de investigación sobre modernidad/colonialidad/decolonialidad latinoamericanas y la teoría del actor-red. Tabula Rasa, 6, 85–115.
Zibechi, R. (2007). Autonomías y emancipaciones. América Latina en movimiento. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales/UNMSM.
Zibechi, R. (2010a). Contrainsurgencia y miseria. Las políticas de combate a la pobreza en América Latina. Mexico: Editorial El Pez en el Árbol.
Zibechi, R. (2010b). Dispersing power. Social movements as anti-state forces. AK Press.
Zibechi, R. (2012). Territoires in resistance: A cartography of Latin American social movements. AK Press.
Zibechi, R. (2014). The new Brazil. Regional imperialism and the new democracy. AK Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caballero, F.S., Gravante, T. (2018). Digital Media Practices and Social Movements. A Theoretical Framework from Latin America. In: Caballero, F., Gravante, T. (eds) Networks, Movements and Technopolitics in Latin America. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65560-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65560-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65559-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65560-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)