Skip to main content

Decentralisation, Democratisation and Delivery: English Sub-municipal Devolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe

Part of the book series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

Local government in England has a long tradition of experimentation with decentralisation and devolution within its own territorial boundaries. Those experiments have partly been driven by political values that favour passing functions and responsibilities from the town hall to local communities and partly by the need to compensate for the large scale of English local government. The creation of sub-municipal units takes a range of forms and purposes most of which are controlled, shaped and organised by the council which formed them and which can abolition them if it chooses. Parish and own councils stand unique among the sub-municipal units in English local government as they are statutory bodies with their own set of roles, powers and functions which are not the property of another municipality. The chapter explores the diverse nature of the types of sub-municipal units that exist in English local government and examines the contribution they make to service delivery, decision-making and local democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulich, C., Gibbs, M., Gooding, A., McKinlay, P., Pillora, S., & Sansom, G. (2011). Consolidation in Local Government: A Fresh Look. Ultimo: Open Publications of UTS Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N. (2003). Local Strategic Partnerships in England: The Continuing Search for Collaborative Advantage, Leadership and Strategy in Urban Governance. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Constituting ‘The Public’ in Public Participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Melhuish, E., & Barnes, J. (Eds.). (2007). The National Evaluation of Sure Start: Does Area-based Early Intervention Work? Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, T. (1995). Urban Policy in Practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boaden, N., Goldsmith, M., Hampton, W., & Stringer, P. (1982). Public Participation in Local Services. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D., Hambleton, R., & Hoggett, P. (1994). The Politics of Decentralisation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, M., & Leach, S. (2008). Botched Business: The Damaging Process of Re-Organising Local Government, 2006–2008. Coleford: Douglas McLean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1999). Community Governance, Community Leadership and the New Local Government. York: York Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copus, C. (2011). English Local Government: Reflecting a Nation’s Past or Merely an Administrative Convenience? In A. Aughey & C. Berberich (Eds.), These Englands (pp. 193–213). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Chap. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copus, C. (2016). In Defence of Councillors. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard, B., & Lewis, J. (2014). Involving Citizens in Accountability: Why and How. In Bovens, Goodin, & Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 258–272). Oxford: OUP. Chap. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, L. (1992). City Challenge: Competing in the Urban Regeneration Game. Local Economy, 7(3), 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. (2014). Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) and Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE). (2010). Guidance on Community Governance Reviews. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egner, B., Sweeting, D., & Klok, P.-J. (Eds.). (2013). Local Councillors in Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. (2001). On the Nature of Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2111–2124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Stewart, J. (2009). New Development: Accountability in Public Partnerships—The case of Local Strategic Partnerships. Public Money and Management, 29(1), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N., Caulfield, J., Nickson, A., Olowu, D., & Wollmann, H. (2009). Local Governance Reform in Global Perspective. Urban and Regional Research International. Wiesbaden: VS–Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2005). Governing as Governance. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How Low Can You Go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, X., Carpini, D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlan, R. (1982). Sub-Municipal Governance in Practice: The Rotterdam Experience. The Western Political Quarterly, 35(3), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphet, J. (1987). Local Authority Decentralisation—Tower Hamlets goes all the way. Policy and Politics, 15(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, P. (2005). The Impact of Sure Start. The Political Quarterly, 76, 565–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A. (1994). Providing Complex Local Authority Services in Competitive Markets—the Role of Arms-Length Organisations. Local Government Studies, 20(1), 78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (2014). What is Multi-level Governance. In R. E. Goodin, M. Bovens, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 273–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chap. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, S., & Van Ryzin, G. (2007). Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pounds, N. (2000). A History of the English Parish: The Culture of Religion from Augustine to Victoria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood Governance: Leadership, Trust and Social Capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, M. (2015). Parish and Town Councils: Recent Issues, Standard. Note 04827. House of Commons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R., & Birchall, J. (2007). Tenant Participation and Social Housing in the UK: Applying a Theoretical Model. Housing Studies, 22(4), 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I., Lepine, E., & Taylor, M. (Eds.). (2007). Disadvantaged by Where You Live?: Neighbourhood Governance in Contemporary Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somervile, P. (2011). Multiscalarity and Neighbourhood Governance. Public Policy and Administration, 6(1), 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2003). Neighbourhood Governance: Holy Grail or Poisoned Chalice? Local Economy, 18(3), 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers, T. (2015). London’s Boroughs at 50. London: Biteback Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J., & Duyvendak, J. (2008). Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighbourhood Governance in The Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighbourhood Decline. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 17–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2000). The Changing Management of Social Housing: The Impact of Externalisation and Managerialisation. Housing Studies, 15(2), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Game, C. (2011). Local Government in the United Kingdom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. (1976). The Process of Local Government Reform 1966–74. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Copus, C. (2018). Decentralisation, Democratisation and Delivery: English Sub-municipal Devolution. In: Hlepas, NK., Kersting, N., Kuhlmann, S., Swianiewicz, P., Teles, F. (eds) Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64725-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics