Abstract
This chapter explores how to quantitatively measure women’s social movements: women who draw on their identities as women and engage in collective action to target national governments and their laws and policies. Drawing on previous qualitative and quantitative studies of politically influential social movements addressing women’s rights across developing countries, the authors examine what aspects of women’s collective action must be addressed to create a meaningful variable. The chapter concludes with a call for new methods to measure women’s movements, which can provide a more meaningful way to quantify the circumstances that lead to mobilization, the intricacies of women’s movements, and the ways women’s collective action leads to women’s political empowerment and gender equality in both the developing world and a global context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We do, however, discuss the existing literature in developed countries when we turn to existing quantitative measures.
- 2.
The Smith and Wiest dataset includes all TSMO in a nation during a given year. The authors code organizations by the organization’s goal, such as “human rights,” “environmental protection,” “ethnic unity,” or “women’s rights.” Smith and Wiest assign multiple codes to organizations with multiple goals and organize them by goal priority.
- 3.
Alternatively, the authors used data from the Yearbook to create new variables.
- 4.
Paxton et al. designed their sample to be representative of the growth of WINGOs and country-level associations over time, and therefore, the measure of WINGOs for a single year may not be representative of all country-level associations in a given year.
- 5.
Most quantitative studies create separate variables for WINGOs/TSMOs, conference participation, and CEDAW ratification. However, True and Mintrom measure “transnational networks” by combining WINGOs with conference participation. The authors count all INGOs that attended the four UN conferences on women with the goal of advancing women and women’s issues. In addition, the authors accounted for local presence by determining if the included organizations had members or affiliate organizations in a nation during a given year.
- 6.
Yoo uses INGOs rather than WINGOs as an indicator of world polity influence. Future research could look more specifically to WINGOs as a proxy for women’s issues within the world polity.
- 7.
The relationship between WINGOs, UN conference participation, and CEDAW ratification has led some research to focus specifically on state feminism and women’s movements (Lovenduski 2008). Although Lovenduski’s research takes a unique approach to the study of women’s mobilization and politics by reflecting on the results of the Research Network on Gender and the State project, the dataset only includes a small number of European nations.
- 8.
Htun and Weldon created an original dataset of feminist movements from 70 nations between 1975–2005 by gathering data on activities and organizations and coding historical and other narrative accounts as well as other documents including dictionaries of organizations, web-based materials, and human rights reports on the women’s movement in each country. The authors defined a women’s movement as a social movement comprised primarily of women and women in leadership positions, where women organize as women. While most feminist movements are women’s movements, Htun and Weldon defined a feminist movement as a collective rooted in the idea of improving women’s status, and/or promoting equality, and/or ending patriarchy.
- 9.
Of note, as part of a project with the Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem), researchers created an index for civil society participation. This variable measures if women are prevented from participating in civil society organizations (such as NGOs) and if such organizations pursuing women’s concerns are prevented from taking part in the larger associational sphere. Although this does not serve as a proxy for women’s movements, it does capture the general social environment, which helps to determine whether movements can form. Additionally, Sundtröm et al. (2017) created a Women’s Political Empowerment Index (WPEI), which captures women’s civil liberties, civil society participation, and political participation from the V-Dem dataset. Again, although this does not capture all the needed women’s movement assessments as outlined in the qualitative literature, it might serve as an alternative proxy in future works.
References
Akchurin, M., & Lee, C. S. (2013). Pathways to Empowerment: Repertoires of Women’s Activism and Gender Earnings Equality. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 679–701.
Alvarez, S. E. (1990). Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Arfaoui, K., & Moghadam, V. M. (2016). Violence Against Women and Tunisian Feminism: Advocacy, Policy, and Politics in an Arab Context. Current Sociology, 64(4), 637–653.
Bauer, G. (2012). ‘Let There Be a Balance’: Women in African Parliaments. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 370–384.
Beckwith, K. (2001). Women’s Movements at Century’s End: Excavation and Advances in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 371–390.
Berkovitch, N. (1999). From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Borland, E. (2004a). Cultural Opportunities and Tactical Choice in the Argentine and Chilean Reproductive Rights Movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(3), 327–339.
Borland, E. L. (2004b). Growth, Decay, and Change: Organizations in the Contemporary Women’s Movement in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Britton, H. E. (2006). Organizing Against Gender Violence. Journal of Southern African Studies, 32, 145–163.
Brownhill, L. (2007). Gendered Struggles for the Commons-Food Sovereignty, Tree-Planting and Climate Change. Women and Environments International Magazine, 74, 34.
Carroll, W. K., & Ratner, R. S. (1996). Master Framing and Cross-Movement Networking in Contemporary Social Movements. The Sociological Quarterly, 37(4), 601–625.
Caul, M. (1999). Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties. Party Politics, 5(1), 79–98.
Chaudhuri, S. (2010). The Fight for Property Rights: How Changes in Movement Actors and History Brought about the Changes in Frames in a Single Movement. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 30(3), 633–643.
Chowdhury, E. H. (2009). ‘Transnationalism Reversed’: Engaging Religion, Development and Women’s Organizing in Bangladesh. Women’s Studies International Forum, 32(6), 414–423.
Crocker, A. (2007). Gender Quota Laws in Latin America: Innovation, Diffusion, and the End of a Wave. Cena Internacional, 9(2), 95–124.
El-Bushra, J. (2007). Feminism, Gender, and Women’s Peace Activism. Development and Change, 38(1), 131–147.
Fallon, K. M., Swiss, L., & Viterna, J. (2012). Resolving the Democracy Paradox Democratization and Women’s Legislative Representation in Developing Nations, 1975–2009. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 380–408.
Feijoó, M. D. C., & Nari, M. M. A. (1994). Women and Democracy in Argentina. In J. S. Jaquette (Ed.), The Women’s Movement in Latin America: Participation and Democracy (pp. 109–129). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Franceschet, S. (2010). Explaining Domestic Violence Policy Outcomes in Chile and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society, 52(3), 1–29.
Gbowee, L. (2011). Mighty Be Our Powers: How Sisterhood, Prayer, and Sex Changed a Nation at War. New York: Beast Books.
Geisler, G. (2006). ‘A Second Liberation’: Lobbying for Women’s Political Representation in Zambia, Botswana and Namibia. Journal of Southern African Studies, 32(1), 69–84.
Goetz, A. M., & Hassim, S. (2003). No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. London: Zed Books.
Gouws, A. (2014). Recognition and Redistribution: State of the Women’s Movement in South Africa 20 Years After Democratic Transition. Agenda, 28(2), 19–32.
Gray, T. (2003). Electoral Gender Quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21(1), 52–78.
Guzmán, V., Seibert, U., & Staab, S. (2010). Democracy in the Country but Not in the Home? Religion, Politics and Women’s Rights in Chile. Third World Quarterly, 31(6), 971–988.
Hassim, S. (2002). “A conspiracy of women”: The Women’s Movement in South Africa’s Transition to Democracy. Social Research, 69, 693–732.
Hassim, S. (2006). Women’s Organizations and Democracy in South Africa: Contesting Authority. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hewitt, L., & McCammon, H. (2004). Explaining Suffrage Mobilization: Balance, Neutralization, and Range in Collective Action Frames, 1892–1919. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(2), 149–166.
Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2012). The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence Against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548–569.
Htun, M. N., & Jones, M. P. (2002). Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women’s Leadership in Latin America. In M. Molyneux & N. Craske (Eds.), Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America (pp. 32–56). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, M. M., Krook, M. L., & Paxton, P. (2015). Transnational Women’s Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 357–372.
Jaquette, J. S., & Wolchik, S. L. (1998). Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
King, B. G., Cornwall, M., & Dahlin, E. C. (2005). Winning Woman Suffrage One Step at a Time: Social Movements and the Logic of the Legislative Process. Social Forces, 83(3), 1211–1234.
Lind, A. (2003). Feminist Post-development Thought: “Women in Development” and the Gendered Paradoxes of Survival in Bolivia. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 31(3/4), 227–246.
Lovenduski, J. (2008). State Feminism and Women’s Movements. West European Politics, 31(1-2), 169–194.
Maathai, W. (2004). The Green Belt Movement: Sharing the Approach and the Experience. New York: Lantern Books.
McCammon, H. J. (2003). “Out of the Parlors and into the Streets”: The Changing Tactical Repertoire of the US Women’s Suffrage Movements. Social Forces, 81(3), 787–818.
McCammon, H. J., Campbell, K. E., Granberg, E. M., & Mowery, C. (2001). How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and US Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866–1919. American Sociological Review, 66(1), 49–70.
McEwan, C. (2000). Engendering Citizenship: Gendered Spaces of Democracy in South Africa. Political Geography, 19(5), 627–651.
Meer, S. (2005). Freedom for Women: Mainstreaming Gender in the South African Liberation Struggle and Beyond. Gender & Development, 13(2), 36–45.
Merry, S. E. (2009). Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Milić, A. (2004). The Women’s Movement in Serbia and Montenegro at the Turn of the Millennium: A Sociological Study of Women’s Groups. Feminist Review, 76(1), 65–82.
Minkoff, D. C. (1997). The Sequencing of Social Movements. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 779–799.
Moghadam, V. (2005). Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks. The Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mukenge, M. (2013). The Role of Grassroots Women’s Groups in HIV/AIDS Prevention and Response: Examples of Practice in Post-Conflict Settings. International Peacekeeping, 20(4), 469–485.
Murdie, A., & Peksen, D. (2015). Women and Contentious Politics: A Global Event-Data Approach to Understanding Women’s Protest. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 180–192.
Noonan, R. K. (1995). Women Against the State: Political Opportunities and Collective Action Frames in Chile’s Transition to Democracy. Sociological Forum, 10(1), 81–111.
Paxton, P., & Hughes, M. M. (2015). The Increasing Effectiveness of National Gender Quotas, 1990–2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 331–362.
Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920.
Phillips, L., & Cole, S. (2009). Feminist Flows, Feminist Fault Lines: Women’s Machineries and Women’s Movements in Latin America. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(1), 185–211.
Phillips, S. D. (1991). Meaning and Structure in Social Movements: Mapping the Network of National Canadian Women’s Organizations. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 755–782.
Piatti-Crocker, A. (Ed.). (2011). Diffusion of Gender Quotas in Latin America and Beyond: Advances and Setbacks in the Last Two Decades. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Ramirez, F. O., Soysal, Y., & Shanahan, S. (1997). The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-national Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage Rights, 1890–1990. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 735–745.
Ray, R., & Korteweg, A. C. (1999). Women’s Movements in the Third World: Identity, Mobilization, and Autonomy. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 47–71.
Rinaldo, R. (2013). Mobilizing Piety: Islam and Feminism in Indonesia. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenthal, N., Fingrutd, M., Ethier, M., Karant, R., & McDonald, D. (1985). Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Reform in New York State. American Journal of Sociology, 90(5), 1022–1054.
Salime, Z. (2011). Between Feminism and Islam: Human Rights and Sharia Law in Morocco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shandra, J. M., Shandra, C. L., & London, B. (2008). Women, Non-governmental Organizations, and Deforestation: A Cross-national Study. Population and Environment, 30(1-2), 48–72.
Smith, J., & Wiest, D. (2005). The Uneven Geography of Global Civic Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association. Social Forces, 84(2), 621–652.
Soule, S., McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Su, Y. (1999). Protest Events: Cause or Consequence of State Action? The US Women’s Movement and Federal Congressional Activities, 1956–1979. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4(2), 239–256.
Soule, S. A., & Olzak, S. (2004). When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 473–497.
Steady, F. (2006). Women and Collective Action in Africa: Development, Democratization and Empowerment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Subramaniam, M. (2014). Resisting Gendered Religious Nationalism: The Case of Religious-Based Violence in Gujarat, India. Advances in Gender Research, 18, 73–98.
Sundstrom, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y. T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017). Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012. World Development, 94, 321–335.
Swiss, L. (2012). The Adoption of Women and Gender as Development Assistance Priorities: An Event History Analysis of World Polity Effects. International Sociology, 27(1), 96–119.
Swiss, L., & Fallon, K. M. (2016). Understanding Transnational Influences on Electoral Quota Adoption in the Developing World. Politics and Gender, 1–30. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000477
Tamang, S. (2009). The Politics of Conflict and Difference or the Difference of Conflict in Politics: The Women’s Movement in Nepal. Feminist Review, 91(1), 61–80.
Towns, A. E. (2012). Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion “From Below”. International Organization, 66(2), 179–209.
Tripp, A. M., Casimiro, I., Kwesiga, J., & Mungwa, A. (2009). African Women’s Movements: Transforming Political Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27–57.
Vargas, V. (1991). The Women’s Movement in Peru Streams, Spaces and Knots. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe (European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies), 50, 7–50.
Viterna, J. (2013). Women in War: The Micro-processes of Moblization in El Salvador. New York: Oxford University Press.
Viterna, J., & Fallon, K. M. (2008). Democratization, Women’s Movements, and Gender-Equitable States: A Framework for Comparison. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 668–689.
Walsh, D. (2006). The Liberal Moment: Women and Just Debate in South Africa, 1994–1996. Journal of Southern African Studies, 32(1), 85–105.
Waylen, G. (2000). Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Consolidation in Argentina and Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32, 765–793.
Whitehead, A., & Tsikata, D. (2003). Policy Discourses on Women’s Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Implications of the Return to the Customary. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1-2), 67–112.
Women, A., & Support, P. (2004). Liberian Women Peacemakers: Fighting for the Right to Be Seen, Heard, and Counted. Trenton, NJ: African World Press.
Wotipka, C. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2008). World Society and Human Rights: An Event History Analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In B. A. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garnett (Eds.), Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America (pp. 303–343). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yoo, E. (2011). International Human Rights Regime, Neoliberalism, and Women’s Social Rights, 1984–2004. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(6), 503–528.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fallon, K.M., Rademacher, H.E. (2018). Social Movements as Women’s Political Empowerment: The Case for Measurement. In: Alexander, A., Bolzendahl, C., Jalalzai, F. (eds) Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64006-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64006-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64005-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64006-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)