Abstract
In a short period of time stretching from 2010 to 2012, international guidance was issued, industry guidelines were re-written, and national laws were changed for the purposes of enhancing maritime security through armed private security provision. Having previously been shunned by ship-owners and national government alike, armed private security contractors are today considered legitimate security providers on board ships transiting piracy-infested waters. Recognizing the global shift in practice and perception, the chapter analyses the global governance arrangement surrounding the resort to armed private security in the maritime domain for the purpose of casting new light on private and public governance capacities. By doing so, the chapter also challenges implicit perceptions of maritime governance as distinct from land-based governance. In the maritime governance arrangement under scrutiny, public actors neither row nor steer; rather, they facilitate security governance by carving out privileged spheres for commercial industries through their convening capacities, regulatory infrastructure and legitimizing role. The facilitation by public actors of private actors in the governance arrangement surrounding private maritime security denotes both an active and passive reaction to changes in the globalized security environment in order remain relevant in contemporary security politics, also referred to as the ’globalization paradox’. The findings highlight the truly global impact of evolving governance dynamics, and the changing relationship between private and public governors.
The article was originally published while the author was affiliated with Aarhus University, Department of Political Science. The article reflects the opinions of the author and does not represent NOKUT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
It is important to stress that the use of armed guards is not a new feature in the maritime industry. However, the official recognition of the practice is new (Roundtable of International Shipping Associations 2011), and this very recognition and following legalization created a measurable increase in the number of armed transits as documented by Dutton (2013, p. 108). It is difficult, however, to say exactly how widespread the practice was before the 2010–2012 official recognition (see Cullen 2012).
- 2.
For comprehensive overview of flag-state regulations, see the overview provided by the ICS (2013).
References
Aarstad, Å. K. (2016). Who governs Norwegian maritime security? Public facilitation of private security in a fragmented security environment. Cooperation and Conflict. doi:10.1177/0010836716652425.
Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2007). Security the city: Private security companies and non-state authority in global governance. International Relations, 21(2), 237–253.
Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2009). Security beyond the state: Global security assemblages in international politics. International Political Sociology, 3, 1–17.
Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2011). Security beyond the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aegis. (2015). Services – aegis maritime. Accessed December 01, 2014, from http://www.aegisworld.com/service/maritime/
Agnew, A. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.
Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who governs the globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barrows, S. (2009). Racing to the Top…at Last: The regulation of safety in shipping. In W. Mattli & N. Woods (Eds.), The politics of global regulation (pp. 189–210). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Behr, H. (2008). Deterritorialisation and the transformation of statehood: The paradox of globalisation. Geopolitics, 13(2), 359–382.
Berndtsson, J., & Stern, M. (2011). Private security and the public-private divide: Contested lines of distinction and modes of governance in the Stockholm-Arlanda security assemblage. International Political Sociology, 5, 408–425.
Berube, C., & Cullen, P. (Eds.). (2012). Maritime private security. Market responses to piracy, terrorism, and waterborne security risks in the 21st century. London: Routledge.
Best, J., & Gheciu, A. (Eds.). (2014). The return of the public in global governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Best Management Practice 3. (2010). Best management practice 3. Piracy off the coast of Somali and Arabian Sea area. Version 3, June 2010. Edinburgh: Witherby Seamanship International Ltd..
Best Management Practice 4. (2011). Best management practices for protection against Somali based piracy. Version 4, August 2011. Edinburgh: Witherby Seamanship International Ltd..
Bieling, H.-J.. (2007). On the other side of the coin: Conceptualizing the relationship between business and the state in the age of globalisation. Business and Politics, 9(3), article 5.
Brown, J. (2012, September). Pirates and privateers: Managing the Indian oceans private security Boom. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Accessed October 5, 2014, from http://www.lowyinstitute.org/files/brown_pirates_and_privateers_web.pdf
Bueger, C. (2015). What is maritime security? Marine Policy, 53, 159–164.
Carmola, C. (2010). Private military companies and new wars: Risk, law & ethnics. London: Routledge.
Colás, A., & Mabee, B. (2010). The flow and ebb of private seaborn violence in global politics: Lessons from the Atlantic World, 1689–1815. In A. Colás & B. Mabee (Eds.), Mercenaries, pirates, bandits and empires: Private violence in historical context (pp. 83–106). New York: Columbia University Press.
Cook, P. (2014). SAMI - The security association for maritime industries. Interview, 2(09), 14.
Cowen, D. (2014). The deadly life of logistics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cullen, P. (2012). Surveying the market in maritime private security services. In C. Berube & P. Cullen (Eds.), Maritime private security. Market responses to piracy, terrorism, and waterborne security risks in the 21st century (pp. 25–37). London: Routledge.
Cutler, C. A. (1997). Artifice, ideology, and paradox: The public/private distinction in international trade law. Review of International Political Economy, 4(2), 261–285.
Cutler, C. A. (1999). Private authority in international trade relations: The case of maritime transport. In C. A. Cutler, V. Haufler, & T. Porter (Eds.), Private authority and international affairs (pp. 283–332). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cutler, C. A. (2003). Private power and global authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dupont, B. (2004). Security in the age of networks. Policing & Society, 14(1), 76–91.
Dutton, Y. (2013). Gunslingers on the high seas: A call for regulation. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 24(1), 107–160.
Florquin, N. (2012). Escalation at sea: Somali piracy and private security companies. In Small Arms Survey (Ed.), Small arms survey 2012: Moving targets (pp. 190–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, P. (2014). SCEG - The security in complex environments group. Interview, 1(09), 14.
Green, J. F. (2014). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grewal, T. (2008). International ship safety regulations. In W. Talley (Ed.), Maritime safety, security and piracy. London: Informa Law.
Guzzini, S., & Neumann, I. (Eds.). (2012). The diffusion of power in global governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (Eds.). (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, S. J. (2012). The evolution of best management practices in the civil maritime sector. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 35(7–8), 562–569.
Hirst, O., & Thompson, G. (1992). The problem of “globalization”: International economic relations, national conomic management and the formation of trading locks. Economy and Society, 21, 357–396.
Hönke, J. (2013). Transnational companies and security governance: Hybrid practices in a postcolonial world. London and New York: Routledge.
ICS—International Chamber of Shipping. (2013). Comparison of flag state laws on armed guards and arms on board. Accessed January 10, 2015, from http://www.ics-shipping.org/docs/default-source/Piracy-Docs/comparison-of-flag-state-laws-on-armed-guards-and-arms-on-board3F9814DED68F.pdf?sfvrsn=0
IMB—International Maritime Bureau. (2007). Piracy and armed robbery against ships, report for the period 1 January–31 December 2006. London: ICC International Maritime Bureau. Accessed October 31, 2014, from https://www.icc-ccs.org/piracy-reporting-centre/request-piracy-report
IMB—International Maritime Bureau. (2012). Piracy and armed robbery against ships, report for the period 1 January–31 December 2011. London: ICC International Maritime Bureau. Accessed October 31, 2014, from https://www.icc-ccs.org/piracy-reporting-centre/request-piracy-report
IMO—International Maritime Organization. (2011). Interim recommendations for port and coastal states regarding the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high risk area. IMO Doc.MSC.1/Circ.1408. London: IMO.
IMO—International Maritime Organization. (2012a). Interim guidance to private maritime security companies providing privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high risk area. IMO Doc.MSC.1/Circ.1443. London: IMO.
IMO—International Maritime Organization. (2012b). Revised interim guidance for flag states regarding the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high risk area. IMO Doc.MSC.1/Circ.1406/Rev.2. London: IMO.
IMO—International Maritime Organization. (2012c). Revised interim guidance to ship owners, ship operators and ship masters on the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high risk area. IMO Doc. MSC.1/Circ.1405/Rev2. London: IMO.
IMO—International Maritime Organization. (2015). Private armed security. Accessed December 30, 2015, from http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Security/PiracyArmedRobbery/Pages/Private-Armed-Security.aspx
International Transport Federation. (2015). Defining FOCs and the problems they pose. Accessed January 3, 2015, from http://www.itfseafarers.org/defining-focs.cfm
ISO—International Organization for Standardization. (2013). Ships and marine technology – Guidelines for private maritime security companies (PMSC) providing privately contracted armed security personnel (PCASP) onboard ships (and pro forma contract), ISO/PAS 28007. Geneva: ISO.
Jessop, B. (2002). Globalization and the national state. In S. Aaronowitz & P. Bratsis (Eds.), Paradigm lost: State theory reconsidered (pp. 185–220). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
JWC—Joint War Committee. (2010, December 16). Increased range of Somali-based piracy. JW2010/009. Accessed January 3, 2015, from http://www.lmalloyds.com/LMA/CMDownload.aspx?ContentKey=2e87ba17-4c5f-4318-aaa2-9b0011b7e86c&ContentItemKey=a80d3f67-9693-4d7b-9247-3eedfa741d46
Klinkenberg, I. K. (2013). Pirates versus private security companies – A road to safety or insecurity at sea. Unpublished MA dissertation. Department of Nograric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
Kraska, J. (2013). International and comparative regulation of private maritime security companies employed in counter-piracy. In D. Guildfoyle (Ed.), Modern piracy: Legal challenges and responses (pp. 19–249). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Leander, A. (2010). Practices (Re)producing orders: Understanding the role of business in global security governance. In M. Ougaard (Ed.), Business and global governance (pp. 57–78). Abingdon: Routledge.
Leira, H., & de Carvalho, B. (2010). Privateers of the North Sea: At worlds end. In A. Colás & B. Mabee (Eds.), Mercenaries, pirates, bandits and empires: Private violence in historical context (pp. 55–82). New York: Columbia University Press.
Liss, C. (2009). Privatization of maritime security in Southeast Asia. In T. Jäger & G. Kümmel (Eds.), Private military and security companies: Chances, problems, pitfalls and prospects. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Lloyd’s Register LRQA. (2014). Your guide to implementing ISO/PAS 28007. Coventry: Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited.
Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2007). Civilizing security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2008). “Pirates,” stewards, and the securitization of global circulation. International Political Sociology, 2(3), 219–235.
Mabee, B. (2003). Security studies and the ‘Security State’: Security provision in historical context. International Relations, 17(2), 135–151.
Miller, J. (2009). Piracy causes changes in routes, insurance. The Wall Street Journal, 9 April.
MSC—Maritime Safety Committee. (2011). Report of the maritime safety committee on its eighty-ninth session. MSC 89/25, 27.05.11. London: IMO.
MSC—Maritime Safety Committee. (2012). Guidance for private maritime security companies agreed by IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee. Briefing: 17, 25.05.12. Accessed January 20, 2015, from http://www.imo.org/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/17-msc-90-piracy.aspx#.VMv8EC4YG5I
MSC—Maritime Safety Committee. (2014, November 26). Report of the maritime safety committee on its ninety-fourth session. MSC 94/21. London: IMO.
Murphy, M. (2009). Small boats, weak states, dirty money: Piracy and maritime terrorism in the modern world. London: Hurst and Company.
Oliveira, G. C. (2013). ‘New Wars’ at sea: A critical transformative approach to the political economy of Somali piracy. Security Dialogue, 44(1), 3–18.
Owens, P. (2008). Distinctions, distinctions: ‘Public’ and ‘private’ force. International Affairs, 84(2), 977–990.
Petrig, A. (2014). Human rights and law enforcement at sea: Arrest, detention and transfer of piracy suspects. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.
Pfeifer, S. (2009, April 21). Aegis sets sights on foiling pirates off Somali coast. Financial Times.
Pittney, J. J., Jr., & Levin, J. C. (2013). Private anti-piracy navies: How warships for hire are changing maritime security. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Pristrom, S., Li, K. X., Yang, Z., & Wang, J. (2013). A study of maritime security and piracy. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(7), 675–693.
Pristrom, S. & Madsen, H. (2014, September 1) IMO – The international maritime organization. Interview.
Ritchie, R. C. (1997). Government measures against piracy and privateering in the Atlantic area, 1750–1850. In D. J. Starkey, E. S. van Eyck van Heslinga, & J. A. de Moor (Eds.), Pirates and privateers: New perspectives on the war on trade in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Roundtable of International Shipping Associations. (2011). Letter for secretary-general Ban Ki-Moon. Accessed November 28, 2014, from https://www.bimco.org/~/media/About/Press/2011/Letter_to_Ban_Ki-Moon_-_Piracy.ashx
Safety4Sea. (2011). Industry guidelines regarding the use of private maritime security contractors, May 20, 2011. Accessed April 20, 2015, from http://www.safety4sea.com/industry-guidelines-regarding-the-use-of-private-maritime-security-contractors--4073
Salter, M. (Ed.). (2009). Politics at the airport. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
SAMI—Security Association for the Maritime Industries. (2014). The evolution of the security association for the maritime industry (SAMI) and piracy in the Indian Ocean. Lessons from Piracy. Accessed September 10, 2014, from http://www.lessonsfrompiracy.net/files/2014/06/DRAFT-The-Evolution-of-the-Security-Association-for-the-Maritime-Industry-8-May-14.pdf
Sassen, S. (2003). Globalization or denationalization. Review of International Political Economy, 10(1), 1–22.
Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SCEG—Security in Complex Environments Group. (2015). Accredited certification for PSC1/ISO 18788 and ISO 28007. Accessed August 5, 2014, from https://www.adsgroup.org.uk/pages/95837038.asp
Schouten, P. (2014). Security as controversy: Reassembling security at Amsterdam airport. Security Dialogue, 45(1), 23–42.
Siebels, D. (2014). International standards for the private security industry. The RUSI Journal, 159(5), 76–83.
Stawpert, J. (2014, October 02). ICS – The international chamber of shipping. Interview.
Steinberg, P. (2001). The social construction of the ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steinberg, P. (2009). Sovereignty, territory, and the mapping of mobility: A view from the outside. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(3), 467–495.
Struett, M., Carlson, J. D., & Nance, M. (Eds.). (2013). Maritime piracy and the construction of global governance. New York and London: Routledge.
Thompson, J. (1994). Mercenaries pirates and sovereigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Van Hespen, I. (2014). Protecting merchant ships from maritime piracy by privately contracted armed security personnel: A comparative analysis of flag stat legislation and port and coastal state requirements. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 45(3), 361–400.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M. C. (2010). The public, the private and the evolution of security studies. Security Dialogue, 41(6), 1–8.
Wood, J., & Shearing, C. D. (2006). Imagining security. Devon: Willan Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aarstad, Å.K. (2018). Maritime Security and Transformations in Global Governance. In: Bures, O., Carrapico, H. (eds) Security Privatization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63010-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63010-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63009-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63010-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)