Abstract
This chapter examines fiscal sustainability in the context of sustainable development and the capital stocks that are critical to maintaining economic capacity. New indicators consistent with sustainable development are presented, drawing from local indicator projects around the world. While the ratio of national debt to national income (debt/GNI) is often used as a measure of fiscal sustainability, reliance on a single indicator raises the potential for selection bias. Since goals and indicators affect the conceptual framework within which policy is developed, an incorrect or incomplete indicator can interfere with adequately maintaining economic capacity or economic activity. A more comprehensive set of indicators would show the link between future spending needs and investment made in the present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
There is substantial controversy over whether using shadow prices to monetise capital stocks like health and the environment, as in the IWI, adds or subtracts from precision. The study by Bhuta et al. (2014) concluded that the results do not “provide a clear image of resource scarcity or depletion” (p. 11).
- 2.
The work of Rogoff and Reinhart (2010) is often cited to support concern over high ratios of debt/GNI and potential damage to future economic growth. However, their 2010 paper showed very weak relationships in established and affluent economies between debt/GNI ratios of less than 90% and real economic growth. Subsequent critiques of Reinhart-Rogoff based on re-calculations of the same data (Herndon et al. 2014) showed that the 90% ratio clearly did not apply to the 20 most affluent nations.
- 3.
The IMF (2000) report goes on to discuss the difficulty of identifying critical ranges for debt indicators “across heterogeneous countries without additional information” such as the average interest rate, the country’s tax base, the pace of output and export growth, the composition of debt, exchange rate vulnerability, and indicators of general corporate profitability (point 63).
- 4.
GASB (2011) adds the proviso that costs should not be shifted among generations. This presumably refers to shifting current operating costs into the future through debt financing, since state and local governments in the US regularly use debt to finance infrastructure that yields benefits to future generations. Note that this constraint is potentially much broader than its current application to purely financial matters. If the present-day generation uses fuels that emit carbon and impose costs on future generations, this should be included under the GASB definition.
- 5.
The unit may be a nation-state or one of a whole variety of sub-national governments, such as cities, counties, provinces, departments, cantonments, etc.
- 6.
The best source for debt levels in the US over time is Treasury Direct (2017).
- 7.
Higher wages are also likely to attract new workers into the labour force, including immigrants from abroad, which will somewhat offset the declining worker-to-population ratio.
- 8.
Public health and preventive medicine represent a particularly important area where current investment can reduce future per capita spending. Since medical expenditure for the elderly absorbs a large part of public budgets in most affluent countries, a multifaceted approach to “health” that includes lifestyle modification could improve health at the same time reduces future spending for the elderly population than trend forecasts currently predict. This would free up future public revenue for other types of spending, including debt service or repayment. Better public health and preventive medicine could also positively impact child development and workforce health, contributing to higher labour productivity and income, along with lower medical costs.
- 9.
Waldfogel and Washbrook (2011) also credit widely available and high-quality pre-school programmes in Great Britain with Great Britain’s higher economic and social mobility relative to the US (despite high income inequality and child poverty in both countries).
- 10.
The Global City Indicators Program (GCIP) funded by the World Bank has nine pilot projects, including Sao Paulo, Bogota, Cali, Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, and Toronto (The Global City Indicators n.d.)
- 11.
GASB (2014) is consistent with the literature on location incentives, which shows that rates of return on these are consistently low to non-existent. This suggests that fiscal sustainability would be far better served by spending on infrastructure.
- 12.
Spain had a relatively low public debt/GNI, although its high private debt (incurred largely through real estate speculation) led to economic problems once there was a downturn in the real estate market. As with Greece, Spain’s inability to print its own currency contributed to the capital market issues. For more, see Krugman (2010).
References
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories. Journal of Economic literature, 37(4), 1615–1660. doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1615.
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (2016). Racial Disparities in Florida Safety Belt Law Enforcement. ACLU. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/report/racial-disparities-florida-safety-belt-law-enforcement
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2013). Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. ASCE. Retrieved from http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
Bartik, T. (2011). Investing in Kids: Early Childhood Programs and Local Economic Development. Kalamazoo: Upjohn Press.
Bhuta, N., Malito, D. V., & Umbach, G. (2014). Representing, Reducing or Removing Complexity: Indicators of Sustainability and Fiscal Sustainability (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS) Working Paper, 2014/78). Florence: European University Institute. Retrieved from http://www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/
Bruntland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalk, N., & Hemming, R. (2000). Assessing Fiscal Sustainability in Theory and Practice (International Monetary Fund Working Paper Series WP/00/81). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Congressional Budget Office. (2010). Fiscal Stress Faced by Local Governments. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. (2012). Fiscal Sustainability Report 2012. Brussels: European Commission. doi: 10.2765/19669.
GASB. (2008). Exposure Draft of an Improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Norwalk: GASB. Retrieved from http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/EDMay08/Documents/conceptual_framework_exposure_draft.pdf
GASB. (2011). Preliminary Views on Major Issues Related to Economic Condition Reporting: Financial Projections. Norwalk: GASB. Retrieved from http://www.gasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175823466973&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs
GASB. (2014). Exposure Draft: Tax Abatement Disclosures. Norwalk: GASB. Retrieved from http://www.gasb.org/jsp/GASB/Document_C/GASBDocumentPage?cid=11761644979
Glaeser, E., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The Injustice of Inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 199–222. doi:10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00204-0.
Goldfarb, Z. A. (2011, August 6). S&P Downgrades U.S. Credit Rating for First Time. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/sandp-considering-first-downgrade-of-us-credit-rating/2011/08/05/gIQAqKeIxI_story.html
Goodwin, N. R. (2003). Five Kinds of Capital: Useful Concepts for Sustainable Development (Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper No. 03–07). Medford: Tufts University.
Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2007). The Users’ Perspective. Norwalk: GASB. Retrieved from http://www.gasb.org/jsp/GASB/GASBContent_C/
Greenwood, D. T. (2004). Measuring Quality of Life with Local Indicators. In E. N. Wolff (Ed.), What Has Happened to the Quality of Life in the Advanced Industrialised Nations? (pp. 334–374). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.
Greenwood, D. T. (2010, November 4). The Debts and Assets of Future Generations: Looking Beyond the Financial. Presented at the Intergenerational Well-being Seminar, Kraemer Family Library. Colorado Springs: University of Colorado.
Greenwood, D. T., & Holt, R. P. F. (2014). Improving the Standard of Living: Income, Quality of Life and Sustainability. In R. P. F. Holt & D. T. Greenwood (Eds.), A Brighter Future: Improving the Standard of Living Now and for the Next Generation (pp. 3–22). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Greenwood, D. T., & Holt, R. P. F. (2015 [2010]). Local Economic Development in the 21st Century: Quality of Life and Sustainability. New York: Routledge.
Heckman, J. J., & Carneiro, P. M. (2003). Human Capital Policy (National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER, Working Paper No. 9495). Washington, DC: NBER.
Hendrick, R. (2004). Assessing and Measuring the Fiscal Heath of Local Governments. Urban Affairs Review, 40(1), 78–114.
Herndon, T., Ash, M., & Pollin, R. (2014). Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(2), 257–279. doi:10.1093/cje/bet075.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2000). Debt- and Reserve-Related Indicators of External Vulnerability. Washington, DC: IMF. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/debtres/
International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2011). Recommended Practice Guideline, Reporting on the Long-Term Sustainability of a Public Sector Entity’s Finances. New York: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/recommended-practice-guideline-reporting-long-term-sustainability-public-sect
Jong-Sung, Y., & Khagram, S. (2005). A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 136–157. doi:10.1177/000312240507000107.
Krugman, P. (2010, February 5). The Spanish Tragedy. Retrieved from https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/the-spanish-tragedy/?_r=1
National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC). (2016). Data Sources: Apartment Rents (US). Washington, DC: NMHC. Retrieved from http://www.nmhc.org/Content.aspx?id=4418
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1994). Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? The American Economic Review, 84(3), 600–621. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118070
Rogoff, K., & Reinhart, C. (2010). Growth in a Time of Debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573–578. doi:10.2469/dig.v40.n3.19.
Solt, F. (2008). Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25193796
State and Local Energy Efficiency Action Network. (2014). Greater Energy Savings Through Building Energy Performance Policy: Four Leading Policy and Program Options. State and Local Enercy Efficiency Action Network. Retrieved from https://www4.eere.energy.gov/seeaction/publication/greater-energy-savings-through-building-energy-performance-policy-four-leading-policy
Sustainable Cities International. (2012). Indicators for Sustainability: How Cities Are Monitoring and Evaluating Their Success. Vancouver: Sustainable Cities International. Retrieved from http://www.mayorsinnovation.org/images/uploads/pdf/2__International_Case_Studies.pdf
The Global City Indicators. (n.d.). Website. Retrieved from http://www.cityindicators.org/
Treasury Direct. (2017). The Debt to the Penny and Who Holds It. Retrieved from http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/debt/current.
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organisation (WHO). (2004). Low Birthweight: Country, Regional and Global Estimates. New York: UNICEF. Retrieved from http://data.unicef.org/resources/low-birthweight-country-regional-and-global-estimates.html
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2010). Climate Friendly Buildings and Offices – A Practical Guide. Nairobi: UNEP. Retrieved from http://www.unep.fr/scp/publications/details.asp?id=DTI/1278/PA
United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). Poverty. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/poverty.html
United States Department of Education. (n.d.). Student Outcomes / Graduation Rates. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/catalog/student-outcomes.html
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www3.epa.gov/
United States Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Crime in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-US-2014
United States Geological Survey (USGS). (2016). USGS Water Quality Information. Reston: USGS. Retrieved from http://water.usgs.gov/owq/data.html
University of California, Davis. (n.d.). Tree Canopy Cover. Retrieved from https://indicators.ucdavis.edu/forest/indicators/tree-canopy-cover
University of Minnesota, Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis Laboratory. (n.d.). Impervious Surface Classification. Retrieved from http://land.umn.edu/methods/imperv_class.html
Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E. (2011). Income-Related Gaps in School Readiness in the United States and the United Kingdom. In T. Smeeding, R. Erikson, & M. Jantti (Eds.), Persistence, Privilege, and Parenting: The Comparative Study of Intergenerational Mobility (pp. 175–207). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenwood, D.T. (2018). Moving Beyond Traditional Indicators of Fiscal Sustainability: Examples from Locally Chosen Indicators. In: Malito, D., Umbach, G., Bhuta, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Indicators in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62707-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62707-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62706-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62707-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)