Abstract
Body-mounted action cameras are increasingly used in social science research to account for and understand mobile experiences of the world. In this chapter, we explore the possibilities such technologies offer us for encountering and analysing aspects of other people’s and our own (as researchers) experiences through ethnographic theory and practice. In doing so, we focus on the notion of the video trace—that is, the idea that such cameras do not so much offer us the possibility to capture the world as it appears in front of the camera lens, but instead record a video trace through the world as created by our movement in specific environmental, sensory and affective configurations. We use this approach to examine what we might learn by making such recordings, and how the possibility of empathetic co-creation of sensory knowledge between researcher, research participants and potential audiences emerges. As such, we do not treat video as a ‘record’ of experience so much as we foreground its capacity to generate new knowledge by constituting a particular trace that enables a process of reflection, discussion and understanding. This process uses the recording as a springboard for knowledge-making rather than treating it as capturing something that already exists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, K., and J. Spinney. 2010. Catching a Glimpse: The Value of Video in Evoking, Understanding and Representing the Practice of Cycling. In Mobile Methodologies, ed. Ben Fincham, Mark McGuinness, and Lesley Murray, 130–151. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Byrne, D., A. Doherty, G. Jones, A. Smeaton, S. Kumpulainen, and K. Järvelin. 2007. The SenseCam as a Tool for Task Observation. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 2: 19–22.
Chalfen, R. 2014. Your Panopticon or Mine? Incorporating Wearable Technology’s Glass and GoPro into Visual Social Science. Visual Studies 29 (3): 299–310.
Favero, P. 2016. ‘Analogization’: Reflections on Wearable Cameras and the Changing Meaning of Images in a Digital Landscape. In Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, ed. E. Cruz and A. Lehmuskallio. London: Routledge.
Fors, V., M. Berg, and S. Pink. 2016. Capturing the ordinary. Imagining the user in designing and using automatic photographic lifelogging technologies. In Lifelogging: Theoretical Approaches and Case Studies about Self-Tracking, ed. S. Selke. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Glăveanu, V., and S. Lahlou. 2012. Through the Creator’s Eyes: Using the Subjective Camera to Study Craft Creativity. Creativity Research Journal 24 (2–3): 152–162.
Garrett, B.L. 2011. Videographic Geographies: Using Digital Video for Geographic Research. Progress in Human Geography 35 (4): 521–541.
Lahlou, S. 2011. How Can We Capture the Subject’s Perspective? An Evidence-based Approach for the Social Scientist. Social Science Information 50 (3–4): 607–655. doi:10.1177/0539018411411033.
Lindley, S.E., R. Harper, D. Randall, M. Glancy, and N. Smyth. 2009. Fixed in Time and “Time in Motion”: Mobility of Vision through a SenseCam Lens. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Mobile HCI’09, September 15–18, 2009, Bonn, Germany. doi:10.1145/1613858.1613861.
Longhurst, R., E. Ho, and L. Johnston. 2008. Using “the Body” as an ‘Instrument of Research’: Kimch’i and Pavlova. Area 40 (2): 208–217.
Oliver, M., A.R. Doherty, P. Kelly, H.M. Badland, S. Mavoa, J. Shepherd, J. Kerr, S. Marshall, A. Hamilton, and C. Foster. 2013. Utility of Passive Photography to Objectively Audit Built Environment Features of Active Transport Journeys: An Observational Study. International Journal of Health Geographics 12 (20). http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/12/1/20. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-12-20.
Pink, S. 2011. Drawing with our Feet (and trampling the maps): Walking with Video as a Graphic Anthropology. In Redrawing Anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, 143–156. Farnham: Ashgate.
Pink, S. 2015. Going Forward Through the World: Thinking Theoretically About First Person Perspective Digital Ethnography Between Theoretical Scholarship and Applied Practice. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9292-0.
Pink, S., and K. Leder Mackley. 2012. Video as a Route to Sensing Invisible Energy. Sociological Research Online. Online at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/3.html.
Pink, S., S. Sumartojo, D. Lupton, and C. Heyes LaBond. Empathetic Technologies: Digital Materiality and Video Ethnographym, Submitted.
Selke, S. (ed.). 2016. Lifelogging: Digital Self-Tracking and Lifelogging—Between Disruptive Technology and Cultural Transformation. Berlin: Springer.
Spinney, J. 2015. Close Encounters? Mobile Methods, (post) Phenomenology and Affect. Cultural Geographies 22 (2): 231–246.
Sumartojo, S. 2015. On Atmosphere and Darkness at Australia’s Anzac Day Dawn Service. Visual Communication 14 (2): 267–288. doi:10.1177/1470357215579587.
Sumartojo, S. 2016. Commemorative Atmospheres: Memorial Sites, Collective Events and the Experience of National Identity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi:10.1111/tran.12144.
Vannini, P., and L.M. Stewart. 2016. The GoPro Gaze. Cultural Geographies. doi:10.1177/1474474016647369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sumartojo, S., Pink, S. (2017). Empathetic Visuality: GoPros and the Video Trace. In: Gómez Cruz, E., Sumartojo, S., Pink, S. (eds) Refiguring Techniques in Digital Visual Research. Digital Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61221-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61222-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)