Abstract
This chapter presents a theoretical debate on the concept of communicative acts in dialogue with Searle’s speech acts theory and Habermas’ use speech acts in his theory of communicative action. I discuss how a theory of communicative acts conceives the existence of both power and dialogic interactions within the social structure, as well as other dimensions of the communication such as body language or accounting for more than speakers’ intentions. In a second part, this theory is linked to the communicative methodology of research and exemplified through CREA’s research with the Roma people. While research about the Roma have been traditionally dominated by power interactions, communicative research with them is based on an inter-subjective dialogue. Finally, I draw some reflections to continue advancing the development of transformative scientific knowledge that can contribute so social change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For Weber ([1922]1978, p. 53) Power is the probability that one actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his own will despite resistance, regardless of a basis on which this probability rests. As he very well qualified, all the imaginable qualities of a person and all sorts of possible constellations can place someone in a position of imposing his or her will in a given situation. People who argue that post-structuralism or post-modernism showed us that power can be everywhere have never read Weber nor the many authors that had already done these analyses before post-structuralists were even born. Weber ([1922]1978) also saw that power can be at the service of other goals (ideal or selfish) or just to enjoy the feeling of prestige that it provides.
- 2.
Habermas develops deeply the concept of validity claims, but he does not treat power claims in the same way. For instance, This internal relation between imperatives and statements of intention shows that the claim connected with imperatives is not a validity claim, a claim that could be criticized and defended with reason; it is a power claim (Habermas 1987, II, 31).
- 3.
Author’s translation from Italian.
- 4.
European Parliament resolution on the situation of Roma people in the European Union. Retrieved August 4, 2012 from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+MOTION+B6-2005-0274+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
References
Aubert, A., & Soler, M. (2007). Dialogism: The dialogic turn in the social sciences. In J. Kincheloe & R. Horn (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of education and psychology (pp. 521–529). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benhabib, S. (Ed.). (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Cavalli-Sforza, F. (1993). Chi siamo. La storia della diversità umana. Milano: Mondadori.
Community of Researchers on Excellence for All [CREA]. (2001–2004). WORKALÓ. The creation of new occupational patterns for cultural minorities: The gypsy case [RTD Project, 5th Framework Programme: Improving the Socio-Economic Knowledge Base, HPSE-ct2001-00101. DG XII]. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Community of Researchers on Excellence for All [CREA]. (2002–2004). CALLI BUTIPEN: Mujer gitana y mercado laboral [CALL BUTIPEN. Romani Women and Labour Market]. Plan Nacional de I+D+I. Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología. MTAS/Instituto de la Mujer, Barcelona.
Community of Researchers on Excellence for All [CREA]. (2004). WORKALO working Paper. Retrieved August 4, 2012 from http://www.neskes.net/workalo/BP58.pdf
Elster, J. (Ed.). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fernández Enguita, M. (1999). Alumnos gitanos en la escuela paya. Barcelona: Ariel.
Flecha, R., Vargas, J., & Dávila, A. (2004). Metodología comunicativa crítica en la investigación en ciencias sociales: la investigación Workaló. Lan-Harremanak, Revista de Relaciones Laborales, 11, 21–33.
Flecha, R. (2014). Using mixed methods from a communicative orientation researching with grassroots Roma. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 245–254. doi:10.1177/1558689814527945
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. Montevideo, Tierra Nueva. MÈxico, Siglo XXI Editores.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Brooklyn: Verso.
Gómez, J., Latorre, A., Sanchez, M., & Flecha, R. (2006). Metodologia comunicativa critica (Critical communicative methodology). Barcelona: Hipatia.
Gómez, A., Puigvert, L., & Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 235–245.
Gómez, A., & Munté, A. (2015). Communicative methodology of research and Roma migrant women in Spain: A process of social change. In L. Bryant (Ed.), Critical and creative research methodologies in social work (pp. 61–74). New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA.: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Hancock, I. (1988). Reunification and the role of International Romani Union. Roma, 29, 9–19.
Munté, A., Serradell, O., & Sordé, T. (2011). From research to policy: Roma participation through communicative organization. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 256–266.
Pulido, C., Elboj, C., Campdepadrós, R., & Cabré, J. (2014). Exclusionary and transformative dimensions communicative analysis enhancing solidarity among women to overcome gender violence. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 889–894.
Rose, R. (1983). “Sinti and Roma in Germany”, Roma, 7(2), 21–24.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J., & Soler, M. (2004). Lenguaje y ciencias sociales (Language and social sciences). Barcelona: Roure.
Sordé, T., Serradell, O., Puigvert, L., & Munté, A. (2013). Solidarity networks that challenge racialized discourses: The case of Romani immigrant women in Spain. European Journal of Women Studies, 4(20), 87–102. doi:10.1177/1350506813510425
Rudd, R. E., McCray, A. T., & Nutbeam, D. (2012). Health literacy and definition of terms. In D. L. Begoray, D. Gillis, & G. Rowlands (Eds.), (Chapter 2), Health literacy in context: International perspectives Hauppauge. New York, USA: Nova Sciences Publishers Inc.
Timmerman, Jeff. (2004). When her feet touch the ground: Conflict between the Roma familistic custom of arranged juvenile marriage and enforcement of international human rights treaties. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 13(2), 475–497.
Touraine, A., Flecha, R., & Wieviorka, M. (2004). Conocimiento e identidad (Knowledge and identity). Barcelona: El Roure.
Vargas, J., & Gómez, J. (2003). Why Romà do not like mainstream schools: Voices of a people without territory. Harvard Educational Review, 73(4), 559–590.
Weber, M. ([1922]1978). Economy and society. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soler-Gallart, M. (2017). Dialogic Relations and Interactions as an Alternative to Power. In: Achieving Social Impact . SpringerBriefs in Sociology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60270-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60270-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60269-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60270-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)