Skip to main content

Korean Ethnic Orientation and Regional Linguistic Variability in the Multiethnic Context of Houston

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Korean Englishes in Transnational Contexts

Abstract

Few studies in variationist sociolinguistics have investigated the Englishes of speakers of Asian heritage in the United States, and even fewer have looked at the correlation between ethnicity and linguistic variability among them. To address these limitations in the literature, this study offers an investigation of ethnic Koreans in the multiethnic context of Houston, Texas. The data come from sociolinguistic interviews with 15 Koreans of first- and second-generation immigrant backgrounds. Of particular interest to the chapter is the phonetic variation and sound changes of these Korean interviewees. Specifically, the chapter examines the fronted production of the back vowel GOAT (i.e., the pronunciation of the vowel in the word goat further forward in the mouth)—a dialect feature known as GOAT-fronting. The findings reveal how these speakers’ orientations to the Korean ethnic group and generational differences influence their linguistic behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ash, S., & Myhill, J. (1986). Linguistic correlates of inter-ethnic contact. In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, G. (2002). Real and apparent time. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, C. (2014). Backed, monophthongal GOAT among Asian Americans in the Mid-Atlantic United States. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benor, S. B. (2001). The learned /t/: Phonological variation in Orthodox Jewish English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M., Carter, S., & McLean, A. (n.d.). Mapping America: Every city, every block. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/projects/census/2010/explorer.html (viewed 23 September 2015).

  • Chun, E. (2001). The construction of White, Black, and Korean American identities through African American Vernacular English. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 11(1), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, E. (2009). Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho’s revoicings of Mock Asian. In A. Reyes & A. Lo (Eds.), Beyond Yellow English: Toward a linguistic anthropology of Asian Pacific America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukor-Avila, P., Jeon, L., Rector, P. C., Tiwari, C., & Shelton, Z. (2012). Texas—It’s like a whole nuther country: Mapping Texans’ perceptions of dialect variation in the Lone Star State. In A. Lawrence, T. Stout, & A. Chatterjee (Eds.), Texas Linguistics Forum 55 (Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Symposium About Language and Society—Austin) (pp. 10–19). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from http://studentorgs.utexas.edu/salsa/proceedings/2012/cukoravilaetal.pdf (viewed 10 September 2015).

  • Cutler, C. (1997). Yorkville crossing: White teens, hip hop and African American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3, 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, M. (2009). The sociolinguistics of ethnicity in Pittsburgh. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (2008a). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (2008b). Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism, 12, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (1992). Asian American panethnicity: Bridging institutions and identities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, T. P. (2008). The contemporary Asian American experience: Beyond the model minority. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fought, C. (2002). Ethnicity. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fought, C. (2006). Language and ethnicity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara, R. (1997). Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 655–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall-Lew, L. (2009). Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, D. (1997). Do I sound “Asian” to you?: Linguistic markers of Asian American identity. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2006). New ethnicities and language use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, B., & Van Uytvanck, D. (2007). EUDICO Linguistic Annotator (ELAN) manual. Retrieved from http://www.lat-mpi.eu/tools/elan/ (viewed 20 October 2014).

  • Hinton, L., Bremner, S., Corcoran, H., Leaner, J., Luthin, H., Moonwomon, B., et al. (1987). It’s not just Valley Girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M., & Walker, J. (2010). Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change, 22, 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, B. (1985). Variation in Australian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, B., & Sankoff, D. (1987). Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society, 16, 179–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston Facts & Figures. (n.d.). Houston Facts & Figures—Houston Visitors Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.visithoustontexas.com/media/research/facts-and-figures/ (viewed 23 September 2015).

  • Humes, K., Jonas, N. A., & Ramirez, R. R. (2011). Definition of race categories used in the 2010 Census. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19, 273–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1980). The social origins of sound change: Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., Rosenfelder, I., & Fruehwald, J. (2013). One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language, 89, 30–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., Sharon, A., & Boberg, C. (2006). The atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, P. (1999). American English. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2000). Korean Americans as speakers of English: The acquisition of general and regional features. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2014). The status of raised /ɔ/ among Bergen County (New Jersey) Korean Americans and its social meaning. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, Chicago, IL, [day month].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, S. (2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Denton, N. (1995). “They speak more Caucasian”: Generational differences in the speech of Japanese-Americans. MA thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Denton, N. (2002). Language and identity. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Denton, N. (2008). Homegirls: Language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Denton, N., & Iwai, M. (1993). “They speak more Caucasian”: Generational differences in the speech of Japanese-Americans. In R. Queen & R. Barrett (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium about Language and Society—Austin (pp. 58–67). Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, L. (1987). Language and social networks. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1992). Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. (2004). Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for identity creation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 49, 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, T. (1977). Phonetic feature system for vowels. PhD thesis, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M., & Wu, A. (2011). “Do you sound Asian when you speak English?” Racial identification and voice in Chinese and Korean Americans’ English. American Speech, 86(2), 152–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedzielski, N. (2013). Chinese American vowel variants: Evidence for an emerging ethnic identity? Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 42, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podesva, R. J. (2006). Phonetic detail in sociolinguistic variation: Its linguistic significance and role in the construction of social meaning. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (1999). The grammaticalization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11, 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://R-project.org (viewed 1 August 2015).

  • Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, A. (2009). Asian American stereotypes as a circulating resource. In A. Reyes & A. Lo (Eds.), Beyond Yellow English: Toward a linguistic anthropology of Asian Pacific America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, A., & Lo, A. (2009). Introduction: On Yellow English and other perilous terms. In A. Reyes & A. Lo (Eds.), Beyond Yellow English: Toward a linguistic anthropology of Asian Pacific America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rickford, J. R. (1985). Ethnicity as a sociolinguistic boundary. American Speech, 60, 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickford, J. R. (1999). African American Vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Online resource available at: www.lvc.uoregon.edu/norm/index.php

  • US Census Bureau. (2012). State & county QuickFacts: Houston, TX. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48/4835000.html (viewed 10 December 2014).

  • Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English I: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W. (1974). Sociolinguistic aspects of assimilation: Puerto Rican English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W., & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English, dialects and variation (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. (2007). Two vernacular features in the English of four American-born Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV, 35(13), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jeon, L. (2017). Korean Ethnic Orientation and Regional Linguistic Variability in the Multiethnic Context of Houston. In: Jenks, C., Lee, J. (eds) Korean Englishes in Transnational Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59788-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59788-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59787-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59788-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics