Skip to main content

Mainstreaming and Interculturalism’s Elective Affinity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mainstreaming Integration Governance

Abstract

This chapter focuses on interculturalism as an emerging policy paradigm for diversity management. I concentrate my core contribution in arguing that in migration-related diversity management, we are in the process of a policy paradigm change, going from a multicultural to an intercultural policy paradigm, and that mainstreaming is a core driver of this process. Given this key argument, I will also defend that mainstream interculturalism is a more appropriate framework for dealing with the complexity of current super-diverse societies and transnational mind. I will conclude that one of the advantages mainstream interculturalism in need of further research is that it can be argued that it seems to contribute to xenophobia reduction, namely reducing ethno-national narratives, racism, prejudice, false stereotypes and negative public opinions, which restrict contact between people from different backgrounds.

Mid-eighteenth century (as elective attraction): originally a technical term for the preferential combination of chemical substances, it was widely used figuratively in the nineteenth century, notably by Goethe (in his novel Elective Affinities) and by Weber (in describing the correspondence between aspects of protestantism and capitalism). In its common use ‘elective affinity’ means: ‘A correspondence with, or feeling of sympathy or attraction towards, a particular idea, attitude, or person’ English Oxford Living Dictionaries: @OxfordWords https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/elective_affinity

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., and E. LaFerrara. 2005. Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Literature 43: 762–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amelina, A., and T. Faist. 2012. De-Naturalizing the National in Research Methodologies: Key Concepts of Transnational Studies in Migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (10): 1707–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakbasel. 2011. Correlation Study between the Intercultural City Index and Other Data. Basel. http://www.coe.int

  • Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka. 2006. Introduction: Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Setting the Context. In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, ed. K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. 2001. Culture and Identity: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R., and C. Joppke., eds. 2010. How Liberal are Citizenship Tests? EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/41. Florence, Italy: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, EUDO Citizenship Observatory, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. 2013. Ideas and Policy Change. Governance 26 (2): 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini, E., G.I.P. Ottaviano, D. Pinelli, and G. Prarolo. 2009. Diversity, Cities and Economic Development. In Sustainable Cities. Diversity, Economic Growth, Social Cohesion, ed. Janssens M.D. Pinelli, D.C. Reymen, and S. Wallman. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. 1995. The Economic Benefits of Immigration. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, G. 2015. Interculturalism: A View from Quebec. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, G., and Ch. Taylor. 2008. Building the Future, a Time for Reconciliation: Abridged Report. Québec: Commission de consultation sur les pratiques d’accomodement reliées aux différences culturelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. 2002. Ethnicity Without Groups. European Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantle, T. 2016. The Case for Interculturalism, Plural Identities and Cohesion. In Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines, ed. N. Meer, T. Modood, and R. Zapata-Barrero, 133–157. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, M., T.R. Burns, and D. Calvo. 2009. Public Policy Paradigms: Theory and Practice of Paradigm Shifts in the European Union. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. 2016. Experiences of Islamophobia: Living with Racism in the Neoliberal Era. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. 2000. Ethnicity and Globalization: From Migrant Worker to Transnational Citizen. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, vol. I, 2nd ed., with a New Preface. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collet, E., and M. Petrovic. 2014. The Future of Immigrant Integration in Europe: Mainstreaming Approaches for Inclusion. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2008. White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue “Living Together As Equals in Dignity”. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz, M. 2006. If You Are My Brother, I May Give You a Dime! Public Opinion on Multiculturalism, Trust and the Welfare State. In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, ed. K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 90–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, G. 2013. Theories of Multiculturalism: An Introduction. Oxford: Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M., J. Schneider, and F. Lelie. 2012. The European Second Generation Compared Does the Integration Context Matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigneault, P.-M. 2014. Reassessing the Concept of Policy Paradigm: Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Policy Studies. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (3): 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, B. 2002. Racism and Social Change in the Republic of Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidikova, I. 2015. Intercultural Integration: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity as an Advantage. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, 136–151. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundara, P.J.S. 2000. Interculturalism, Education and Inclusion. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundara, J.S. 2005. Racism and Intercultural Issues in Urban Europe. In Racism in Metropolitan Areas, ed. R. Pinxten and E. Preckler, 113–126. New York and London: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbling, M., ed. 2012. Islamophobia in Western Europe and North America. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., and M. Howlett, eds. 2015. Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intercultural Cities Program (ICC Index): http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/Cities/Default_en.asp

  • Isin, E.F., and B.S. Turner, eds. 2002. Handbook of Citizenship Studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, M., D. Pinelli, D.C. Reymen, and S. Wallman, eds. 2009. Sustainable Cities. Diversity, Economic Growth, Social Cohesion. London, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. 2004. The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy. British Journal of Sociology 55: 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics 30 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khovanova-Rubicondo, K., and D. Pinelli. 2012. Evidence of the Economic and Social Advantages of Intercultural Cities Approach. Paper, March. https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/Source/Cities/Review.doc

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multiculturalism: A Liberal View of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future. Migration Policy Institute, February. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM-Multiculturalism-Web.pdf

  • ———. 2016. Solidarity in Diverse Societies: Beyond Neoliberal Multiculturalism and Welfare Chauvinism. Comparative Migration Studies 3 (17): 2–19. doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. 2014. The ‘Death’ of State Multiculturalism: Examining Political Discourse in Post-2010 Europe. In Identities and Borders: Interculturalism, the Construction of Identity, ed. R. Blake and N. Walthrust-Jones, 3–19. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwineck, A. 2015. European Intercultural Mindset—What Can the Attitudes and Perceptions of Europeans on Intercultural Dialogue, Integration and Discrimination Tell the Local Policymakers. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, 97–114. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, N., P. Mouritsen, D. Faas, and N. de Witte. 2015. Examining ‘Postmulticultural’ and Civic Turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark. American Behavioural Scientist. doi:10.1177/0002764214566496.

  • Meer, N., T. Modood, and R. Zapata-Barrero, eds. 2016. Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. 2007. Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., A. Triandafyllidou, and R. Zapata-Barrero, eds. 2006. Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, P. 2008. Political Responses to Cultural Conflict: Reflections on the Ambiguities of the Civic Turn. In Constituting Communities: Political Solutions to Cultural Conflict, ed. P. Mouritsen and K.E. Jørgensen, 1–30. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Beyond Post-national Citizenship. Access, Consequence, Conditionality. In European Multiculturalisms: Cultural, Religious and Ethnic Challenges, ed. A. Triandafyllidou, T. Modood, and N. Meer, 88–115. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Resilience of Citizenship Traditions: Civic Integration in Germany, Great Britain and Denmark. Ethnicities 13 (1): 86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritzen, P. 2009. The Culture of Citizenship. A Reflection on Civic Integration in Europe. In Citizenship Policies in the Age of Diversity: Europe at the Crossroads, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, 23–35. Barcelona: CIDOB Edicions. Accessed May 2017. http://dcpis.upf.edu/~ricard-zapata/~ricardzapata/gritim_cidob_monograph_2008.pdf

  • Parekh, B. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. 2007. Multiculturalism without Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten, R., and M. Cornelis. 2002. What Interculturalism Could Bring a Solution to Racism? In Europe’s New Racism: Causes, Manifestations, and Solutions, ed. Evens Foundation, 211–232. New York and London: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravinder, B. 2012. Interculturalism in Europe: Fact, Fad or Fiction—the Deconstruction of a Theoretical Idea. In Unedited Workshop Proceedings: Debating Multiculturalism 1 (Conference Papers): Dialogue Society Publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277952735

  • Scholten, P., E. Collett, and M. Petrovic. 2016, March. Mainstreaming Migrant Integration? A Critical Analysis of a New Trend in Integration Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi:10.1177/0020852315612902.

  • Sen, A. 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, Issues of Our Time. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, N. 2001. Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Questions. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, R. 2012. Challenging Multiculturalism: European Models of Diversity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thränhardt, D., and M. Bommes, eds. 2010. National Paradigms of Migration Research. Osnabrück: IMIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. 2001. Outline of a General Theory of Citizenship. In Culture and Citizenship, ed. N. Stevenson, 11–32. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uberoi, V., and T. Modood, eds. 2015. Multiculturalism Rethought: Interpretations, Dilemmas and New Directions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. 2007. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2014. Migration and Diversity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S., and S. Wessendorf, eds. 2010. Backlash Against Multiculturalism in Europe: Public Discourse, Policies and Practices. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. 2015. Measuring Intercultural Policies: The Example of the Intercultural Cities Index. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, 115–135. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, M., and M. Howlett. 2014. The Politics of Policy Anomalies: Bricolage and the Hermeneutics of Paradigms. Critical Policy Studies 8 (2): 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., and N.G. Schiller. 2003. Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology. International Migration Review 37 (3): 576–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. 2004. The Intercultural City Reader. Stroud: Comedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Meet Me on the Corner? Shaping the Conditions for Cross-Cultural Interaction in Urban Public Space. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P., and C. Landry. 2008. The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachary, P. 2003. The Diversity Advantage: Multicultural Identity in the New World Economy. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata-Barrero, R. 2009. Citizenship Policies in the Age of Diversity: Europe at the Crossroads. Barcelona: CIDOB Edicions.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Anti-immigration Populism: Can Local Intercultural Policies Close the Space? Discussion Paper, Policy Network, London. http://dcpis.upf.edu/~ricard-zapata/~ricardzapata/Policynetwork. interculturalism.discussion.paper-1.pdf

  • ———. 2015a. Interculturalism: Main Hypothesis, Theories and Strands. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, 3–19. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Conclusions: Three Building Blocks for Taking Interculturalism Seriously. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, 185–196. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. Intercultural Governance Index: An Exploratory Study on Spanish Cities. In Mondi Migranti: Rivista di studi e ricerche sulle migrazioni internazionali, Issue 2. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. Multi-level Intercultural Governance in Barcelona: Mainstreaming Comprehensive Approach. In Symposium on Theorizing ‘The Local Turn’ in the Governance of Immigrant Policies: A Multi-level Approach, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, T. Caponio and P. Scholten. International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS) 83 (2). doi:10.1177/0020852315592962.

  • ———. 2017b. The Intercultural Turn in Europe: Process of Policy Paradigm Change and Formation. In The Promise and Challenge of Intercultural Dialogue: From Theory to Policy and Practice, ed. F. Mansouri, Chap. 4, 169–193. Paris: UNESCO Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata-Barrero, R., Caponio, T., and P. Scholten. 2017a. Introduction: Theorizing the ‘Local Turn’ in a Multilevel Governance Framework of Analysis. A Case Study in Immigrant Policies. In Symposium on Theorizing ‘The Local Turn’ in the Governance of Immigrant Policies: A Multilevel Approach, ed. R. Zapata-Barrero, T. Caponio, and P. Scholten. International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS) 83 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., eds. 2017b. Symposium on Theorizing ‘The Local Turn’ in the Governance of Immigrant Policies: A Multi-level Approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS) 83 (2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zapata-Barrero, R. (2018). Mainstreaming and Interculturalism’s Elective Affinity. In: Scholten, P., van Breugel, I. (eds) Mainstreaming Integration Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59277-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics