Abstract
Engagement is the key to successful language learning. It describes the dynamic state when learners are actively thinking about, focusing on, and enjoying their language learning. In order to be willing and ready to engage, learners need to be in the right frame of mind to do so. To better understand what the key motivational antecedents for engagement are, this chapter draws on insights from self-determination theory (SDT). This theory suggests that we all have needs that must be met in order for us to feel willing to engage with learning opportunities – we need to feel a sense of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. For example, this means a learner needs to believe they can successfully manage the learning that it is of value to them, that they have some choice and influence over what they do and how they do it, and that this can all be done within a supportive, low-anxiety community of peers and teacher. In this chapter, I describe what engagement is and why I think it is so important to understand for language education specifically. I reflect on the nature of the motivational antecedents and how we can best promote them as language educators. The chapter concludes with considerations for a holistic model of language learner engagement which would bring together the motivational antecedents within an ecological perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbari E, Naderi A, Simons R-J, Pilot A (2016) Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asia-Pac J Second Foreign Lang Educ 1:4
Assor A, Kaplan H, Roth G (2002) Choice is good but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. Br J Educ Psychol 72:261–278
Aubrey S (2017) Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Q 51(3):661–692
Bandura A (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol 4(3):359–373
Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy. W. H. Freeman, New York
Baralt M, Gurzynski-Weiss L, Kim Y (2016) Engagement with the language: how examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In: Sato M, Ballinger S (eds) Peer interaction and second language learning: pedagogical potential and research agenda. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 209–239
Batstone R (2002) Contexts of engagement: a discourse perspective on ‘intake’ and ‘pushed output’. System 30:1–14
Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3):497–529
Boo Z, Dörnyei Z, Ryan S (2015) L2 motivation research 2005–2014: understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System 55:145–157
Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) (2012) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York
Csikszentmihalyi M (2003) Flow: the classic work on how to achieve happiness. Rider, London
De Castella K, Byrne D (2015) My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. Eur J Psychol Educ 30(3):245–267
Deci EL, Schwartz AJ, Sheinman L, Ryan RM (1981) An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. J Educ Psychol 73(5):642–650
Denton P (2007) The power of our words: teacher language that helps children learn. Northeast Foundation for Children, Turners Falls
Dörnyei Z, Murphey T (2003) Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dörnyei Z, Ibrahim Z, Muir C (2015) Directed motivational currents: regulating complex dynamic systems through motivational surges. In: Dörnyei Z, MacIntyre P, Henry A (eds) Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 95–105
Dörnyei Z, Henry A, Muir C (2016) Motivational currents in language learning. Routledge, London
Dupreyrat C, Mariné C (2005) Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: a test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemp Educ Psychol 30(1):43–59
Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York
Dweck CS (2007) The perils and promises of praise. Educ Leadersh 65(2):34–39
Dweck CS, Chiu C, Hong Y (1995) Implicit theories and their role in judgements and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychol Inq 6(4):267–285
Eccles J, Wigfield A (1995) In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 21:215–225
Eccles J, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 53:109–132
Edstrom A (2015) Triads in the L2 classroom: interaction patterns and engagement during a collaborative task. System 52:26–37
Floyd KS, Harrington SJ, Santiago J (2009) The effect of engagement and perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Inf Sci 12:181–190
Fredricks JA (2014) Eight myths of student disengagement. Corwin, Thousand Oaks
Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH (2004) School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 74(1):59–109
Furrer CJ, Skinner EA (2003) Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. J Educ Psychol 95(1):148–162
Furrer CJ, Skinner EA, Pitzer JR (2014) The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Natl Soc Study Educ 113(1): 101–123
Gkonou C, Mercer S (2017) Understanding emotional and social intelligence among English language teachers. British Council, London
Green J, Liem GAD, Martin AJ, Colmar S, Marsh HW, McInerney D (2012) Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: key processes from a longitudinal perspective. J Adolesc 35:1111–1122
Han Y (2017) Mediating and being mediated: learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System 69:133–142
Harbour KE, Evanovich LL, Sweigart CA, Hughes LE (2015) A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Prev Sch Fail 59(1):5–13
Henry A, Davydenko S, Dörnyei Z (2015) The anatomy of directed motivational currents: exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. Mod Lang J 99(2):329–345
Hyland F (2003) Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31:217–230
Jang HK, Kim EJ, Reeve J (2012) Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. J Educ Psychol 104(4):1175–1188
Lawson MA, Lawson HA (2013) New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Rev Educ Res 83(3):432–479
Linnenbrink EA, Pintrich PR (2003) The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Read Writ Q 19(2):119–137
Lo J, Hyland F (2007) Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation with writing: the case of primary students in Hong Kong. J Second Lang Writ 16:219–237
Macklem GL (2015) Boredom in the classroom: addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. Springer, Dordrecht
Marsh HW (2006) Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: the role of self-concept in educational psychology, 26th Vernon-Wall Lecture. British Psychological Society, Leicester
Marsh HW, Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ (1988) A multifaceted academic self-concept: its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. J Educ Psychol 80(3):366–380
Mercer S (2011) Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Springer, Dordrecht
Mercer S (2015) Learner agency and engagement: believing you can, wanting to and knowing how to. Humanising Lang Teach 17(4):1–19
Mercer S, Dörnyei Z (in preparation) Engaging language learners in the age of digital distraction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mercer S, Ryan S (2010) A mindset for EFL: learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT J 64(4):436–444
Muir C, Dörnyei Z (2013) Directed motivational currents: using vision to create effective motivational pathways. Stud Second Lang Learn Teach 3(3):357–375
Murray G (ed) (2014) Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Nystrand M, Gamoran A (1991) Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Res Teach Engl 25(3):261–290
Pajares F, Miller MD (1994) Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. J Educ Psychol 86(2):193–203
Pajares F, Schunk DH (2005) Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs. In: Marsh HW, Craven RG, McInerney DM (eds) International advances in self research, vol 2. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 95–121
Pekrun R, Goetz T, Daniels LM, Stupnisky RH, Perry RP (2010) Boredom in achievement settings: exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. J Educ Psychol 102(3):531–549
Philp J, Duchesne S (2016) Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annu Rev Appl Linguist 36:50–72
Phung L (2017) Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Lang Teach Res 21(6):751–766
Pintrich PR, Schunk DH (2002) Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Platt E, Brooks FB (2002) Task engagement: a turning point in foreign language development. Lang Learn 52(2):365–400
Quint Oga-Baldwin WL, Nakata Y (2017) Engagement, gender and motivation: a predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System 65:151–163
Reeve J (2006) Teachers as facilitators: what autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elem Sch J 106(3):225–236
Reeve J (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York, pp 149–172
Reeve J, Tseng C-M (2011) Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol 36(4):257–267
Reschly AL, Christenson SL (2012) Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York, pp 3–19
Russell VJ, Ainley M, Frydenberg E (2005) Student motivation and engagement. In: Schooling issues digest. From: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/26080/20051107-0000/www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/schooling_issues_digest/schooling_issues_digest_motivation_engagement.htm. Accessed 23 Dec 2017
Ryan R, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78
Ryan R, Deci EL (2017) Self-determination theory. Guildford Press, New York
Schunk DH, Mullen CA (2012) Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York, pp 219–235
Schunk DH, Pajares F (2009) Self-efficacy theory. In: Wentzerl KR, Wigfield A (eds) Handbook of motivation at school. Routledge, London, pp 35–53
Shernoff DJ (2013) Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. Springer, Dordrecht
Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B, Shernoff ES (2014) Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In: Applications of flow in human development and education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 475–494
Sinatra GM, Heddy BC, Lombardi D (2015) The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educ Psychol 50(1):1–13
Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Connell JP, Wellborn JG (2009) Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In: Wentzerl KR, Wigfield A (eds) Handbook of motivation at school. Routledge, London, pp 223–245
Snyder B, Alperer-Tatli S (2007) Classroom practice: Learner engagement. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL Environments, 2nd Ed. (pp. 349–361). Alexandria, VA: TESOL
Steinberg L, Brown BB, Dornbusch SM (1996) Beyond the classroom: why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. Simon and Schuster, New York
Stroud R (2017) The impact of task performance scoring and tacking on second language engagement. System 69:121–132
Svalberg AM-L (2009) Engagement with language: interrogating a construct. Lang Aware 18(3–4): 242–258
Svalberg AM-L (2018) Researching language engagement; current trends and future directions, Language Awareness, 27:(1–2), 21–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1406490
Taguchi T, Magid M, Papi M (2009) The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: a comparative study. In: Dörnyei Z, Ushioda E (eds) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 66–97
Trowler V (2010) Student engagement literature review. Lancaster University, Lancaster
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mercer, S. (2019). Language Learner Engagement: Setting the Scene. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_40-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_40-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58542-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58542-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education