Abstract
Drawing on recent linguistic anthropological reflections on identity and discursive psychologists’ theorizing on social positioning, the authors of this chapter examine the dynamic and multifaceted enactment and transformation of identity in social interaction. The work presentd in this chapter suggests that agency and autonomy, key dimensions of adolescent identity development, do not emerge solely from the individual but are co-constructed and transformed in interpersonal exchanges. These theoretical propositions are supported through the discourse analysis of two family cases, which reveals that the discursive co-construction of adolescent agency and autonomy is non-linear and continuously negotiated. Families oscillate between different interactional configurations, with individual family members claiming, declining, reclaiming certain roles and competencies vis-à-vis other members of the family. In addition to illustrating the value of bridging different disciplinary perspectives together in the work presented in this chapter, the authors demonstrate the analytic purchase that a micro-examination of social interaction offers to adolescence and developmental psychology research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The debate on subjectivity and identity issues is not new: it has characterized the fields of philosophy and critical theory for the past half century. In particular, psychoanalysis, feminism, late Marxism and post-structuralism have widely challenged the notion of free and autonomous individual. In this paper, we decided to focus on psychology and anthropology as they are the field in which we have been trained and currently working. Moreover, the empirical material we present in this paper was collected having in mind specific research questions guided by psychological and anthropological theoretical approaches.
References
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthro-Pology, 30, 109–37.
Arcidiacono, F., & Bova, A. (2011). Argumentative strategies for conflict management and resolution in Italian and Swiss families. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1385–1389.
Arnett, J., Kloep, M., Hendry, L. B., & Tanner, J. L. (2011). Debating emerging adulthood. Stage or process? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aronsson, K., & Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse & Society, 2, 1–18.
Bamberg, M. (2010). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory and Psychology, 21, 1–22.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.
Beyers, W., & Grossens, L. (2008). Dynamics of perceived parenting and identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 165–184.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interactions: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585–614.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2010). Locating identity in language. In C. Llamas & D. Watt (Eds.), Language and identities (pp. 18–28). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Claes, M., Perchec, C., Miranda, D., Benoit, A., Bariaud, F., Lanz, M., et al. (2011). Adolescents’ perceptions of parental practices: A cross-national comparison of Canada, France, and Italy. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 225–238.
Coleman, J. (2010). The nature of adolescence (IVth ed.). New York: Routledge.
Côté, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Côté, J. E., & Schwartz, S. J. (2002). Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 571–586.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 44–63.
Duranti. (2004). Agency in language. In: A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion in linguistic anthropology (pp. 451–473). Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.
Everri, M. (2010). Families under the microscope. Observing interactional processes in family mictrotransition. Doctoral thesis, Dspace, http://hdl.handle.net/1889/1457. Accessed 1 April 2016.
Everri, M. (2011). Le microtransizioni nelle famiglie con figli adolescenti. Un gioco di equilibri. Nucleo monotematico: Uno sguardo triadico alla video-analisi dei processi interattivi. Teorie, metodi e linee di ricerca. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia dello Sviluppo [The mictrotransitions in families with adolescent children: A game of balance. Special issue: A triadic look at the video-analysis of interactive processes. Theory, methods, and research lines. Italian Journal of Developmental Psychology] 99, 91–99.
Everri, M., Fruggeri, L., & Molinari, L. (2014). Microtransitions and the dynamics of family functioning. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48, 61–78.
Everri, M., Mancini, T., & Fruggeri, L. (in press). Disentangling parental monitoring: The role of family communication in achieving parental knowledge. Psicologia Sociale.
Ford, D. L., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-Constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 28, 233–60.
Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56, 415–428.
Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwood.
Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1991). Relationships as developmental contexts. In R. Cohen, & A. W. Siegel (Eds.), Context and development (pp. 253–279). NJ: Erlbaum Hillsdale.
Holmbeck, N. G. (1996). A model of family relational transformations during the transition to adolescence: Parent-adolescent conflict and adaptation. In J. A. Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence. Interpersonal domains and context (pp. 36–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kreppner, K., & Ullrich, M. (1998). Talk to mom and dad, and listen to what is in between. In M. Hofer, P. Noack, & J. Youniss (Eds.), Verbal interaction and development in families with adolescents (pp. 83–108). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (1994). Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 197–209.
Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology, 16, 202–236.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Andelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York: Wiley.
Marcia, J. E. (1987). The identity status approach to the study of ego identity development. In T. Honess & K. Yardley (Eds.), Self and identity: Perspectives across the lifespan. New York: Routledge.
Molinari, L., Everri, M., & Fruggeri, L. (2010). Family micro-transitions: Observing the process of change in families with adolescent children. Family Process, 49, 236–250.
Norris, S. (2007). The micropolitics of personal national and ethnicity identity. Discourse & Society, 18, 653–674.
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 287–306.
Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1992). Family narrative as political activity. Discourse & Society, 3, 301–340.
Ortner, S. B. (1996). Making gender: The politics and erotics of culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A., & Sterponi, L. (2001). Mutual apprentices: The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations. Human Development, 44, 340–361.
Schwartz, S. J., Côté, J. E., & Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37, 201–229.
Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing—Circularity—Neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19, 3–12.
Shapiro, E. R. (1988). Individual change and family development: Individuation as a family process. In C. J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions. Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 159–180). New York: The Guilford Press.
Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How adolescents construct their worlds. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Stattin, H., Persson, S., Burk, W., & Kerr, M. (2011). Adolescents’ perceptions of the democratic functioning in their families. European Psychologist, 16, 32–42.
Sterponi, L. (2014). Caught red-handed: How Italian parents engage children in moral discourse and action. In C. Wainryb & H. Recchia (Eds.), Talking about right and wrong: Parent-child conversations as contexts for moral development (pp. 122–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomm, K. (1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27, 1–15.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 45–70). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Zittoun, T. (2012). On the emergence of the subject. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 259–273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Transcript Conventions
(0.3) | Pause in seconds |
|---|---|
. | A full stop indicates a pause longer than 0.3 s |
unfortunately | An underlined word means emphasis on that word |
Yes [I think [but I | Simultaneous talk (overlap) |
– | Truncated word or interruption |
((looks at his brother)) | Double parentheses indicate non verbal behavior |
= | No break or delay between the words connected |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Everri, M., Sterponi, L. (2017). Co-constructing the Adolescent’s Identity: Agency and Autonomy as Interactional Accomplishments. In: Bagga-Gupta, S., Hansen, A., Feilberg, J. (eds) Identity Revisited and Reimagined. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58056-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58056-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58055-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58056-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)