Abstract
This chapter addresses the impress of values beyond the strictly technical pursuit of effective means onto new technology and asks how the political ramifications of that process should be understood. It focuses on Andrew Feenberg’s idea of a technical code, which is a key concept in his thesis that technology design and use are always political. The idea of the technical code explains how nontechnical meanings and values get inscribed in technology, govern its use and place it in our social and cultural imaginaries. Its effectiveness runs from overdetermination of actions at the scene of design to the assignment of a particular symbolic place for technology, as against other classes of artifact, in social life. This signification varies between historical cultures and is one of the stakes in what Feenberg presents as a contested process involving social networks that include actors who may take sharply opposed interests in any given technology design. Feenberg’s progressive technical politics recommends democratic design practice to counter what he calls “hegemonic technological rationality,” which controls and is reproduced through the technical code. I argue that this conception of technical politics is inhibited in its development by the enduring influence of an outmoded conception of our technological culture, which Feenberg himself has repudiated as “dystopic.” The dominant articulation, hegemonic at the scene of design, is no longer best opposed solely with reference to democratization: other values must be brought into play.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor W. Negative Dialectics. Translated by E.B. Ashton. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.
Bijker, Wiebe E. Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs. London: MIT Press, 1997.
Borgmann, Albert. Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. London: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Bowker, Geoffrey. C. and Susan L. Star. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its consequences. London: MIT Press, 1999.
Habermas, Jürgen. Toward a Rational Society. Translated by J. J. Shapiro. Cambridge: Polity, 1989.
Hennion, Antoine. “Music and mediation: towards a new sociology of music.” In The Cultural Study of Music: A critical introduction. Edited by M. Clayton, T. Herbert, and R. Middleton. London: Routledge, 2003.
Feenberg, Andrew. Between Reason and Experience. London: MIT Press, 2010.
———. Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Alternative Modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
———. Critical Constructivism, forthcoming.
———. Transforming Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Laclau, Ernesto. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: Verso, 1979.
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso, 1985.
Latour, Bruno. Rejoicing: or the torments of religious speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.
Scharff, Robert and Val Dusek. Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirkpatrick, G. (2017). Transforming Dystopia with Democracy: The Technical Code and the Critical Theory of Technology. In: Arnold, D., Michel, A. (eds) Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57897-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57897-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57896-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57897-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)