Keywords

Introduction

Large ingots are typically used to produce key components in large equipment, which are used in energy and power, metallurgical machinery, transportation, national defense and other fields. Macrosegregation , i.e. the compositional heterogeneity, is a serious defect commonly encountered in large ingots. This compositional heterogeneity usually leads to the non-uniform distribution of microstructure, harms the mechanical properties, and, at its worst, may even result in scrapping the final product. Macrosegregation results from the combined effect of compositional segregation at the microscopic scale and solid-liquid separation at the macroscopic scale. The relative motion of solid phase and liquid phase is mainly caused by such factors as thermo-solutal buoyancy flow, grains sedimentation, shrinkage-induced flow, and deformation of the solid phase skeleton [1, 2]. As macrosegregation cannot be eliminated by the subsequent heat treatment process, it is important to control the formation of macrosegregation during solidification to obtain a less segregated ingot. Due to the high cost of casting large ingots, it is unrealistic to simply use experimental methods to study macrosegregation. Numerical simulation, with the advantages of low cost and high efficiency, has become an important tool for understanding complex solidification processes and macrosegregation of large ingots.

Since the pioneering work of Flemings and Nereo [3] in 1960s, much effort has been devoted to the modeling of macrosegregation . Varieties of mathematical models have been developed to account for such mechanisms as thermal-solutal convection, free equiaxed crystal movement, solidification shrinkage-induced flow [4, 5]. The macrosegregation models commonly used can be divided into single-phase models, two-phase models and multi-phase models according to the number of basic dynamics phases used. Among them, the relatively simple single-phase models, divided into continuum models and volume average models, mainly consider the thermal-solutal buoyancy flow. The two-phase models or multi-phase models, further considering the effect of free equiaxed crystal motion or solid phase deformation on macrosegregation, however, are rather complicated. Numerous applications of macrosegregation models in steel ingots have been reported. Vannier and Combeau [6] utilized a continuum model to simulate macrosegregation of a 65 tons Fe-0.22 wt%C steel ingot, and compared the predictions with measurements of compositions in the center line. Liu et al. [7] adopted a continuum model to predict macrosegregation in a 360 tons ingot. Tu and coworkers [8] recently developed a multicomponent -multiphase model based on a two phase model previously developed in his research group, and applied the model to investigate a 36 tons Fe-0.51 wt%C-0.006 wt%S steel ingot, which was experimentally investigated by temperature recording and concentration analysis. In this experiment, the macrosegregation maps of carbon and sulphur were obtained based on 1800 component sampling points covering the entire half-section. General macrosegregation patterns in measurements have been reproduced by predictions. Good agreement is shown in quantitative comparisons between measurements and predictions of carbon and sulphur variations along selected positions. For applications in large steel ingot, single-phase models with much simplification, are still commonly used. The use of two-phase models, especially multi-phase models, is relatively rare. There are two factors accounting for this. On one hand, the development of two-phase models or multi-phase models is rather difficult, which hinders their applications to a certain extent. On the other hand, large ingots, due to their large sizes, will cost more computational time and resources with a two-phase or multi-phase model. Thus, applications of multi-phase macrosegregation models in large ingots with experiment validation are of great significance.

In this paper, the multicomponent-multiphase model developed by the authors has been adopted to predict macrosegregation in a 535 tons steel ingot in three dimensions. The ingot has been simplified as a Fe-0.24 wt%C-1.65 wt%Cr-0.39 wt%Mo quaternary alloy system for simulation. For simplicity, the model considers only the primary phase. The predictions have reproduced the classical macrosegregation patterns, including negative segregation at the bottom of the ingot and positive segregation at the top of the ingot. Finally, to quantitatively compare the results of macroscopic segregation prediction and the measured results, the predictions with measurements of compositions along the center line and three transverse sections are compared.

Mathematic Model

In current research, the air phase is further added in previous two-phase model [9] to considerate the solidification shrinkage of the ingot. Firstly, the mass, momentum, and species conservation equations for solid phase and liquid phase are each derived. Then the volume conservation equation is derived to consider the inhaled air phase due to the solidification shrinkage. Further, the energy conservation equation is derived for the solid-liquid mixture system. Besides, a multicomponent alloy system rather than a two alloy system is considered to further investigate the influence of a third or more of the alloy components on macrosegregation. Thus after adding additional solute conservation equations, the interfacial species balance is derived, further obtaining the interfacial concentration constraint relations for the multicomponent alloy system. For simplicity, the model considers only the primary phase, neglecting the formation of the secondary phase. The model is numerically solved by a homemade FVM code based on a multi-phase SIMPLEC algorithm.

The conservation equations are summarized in Table 1. In Table 1, t is the time, g is the volume fraction, ρ is the density, Γ is the interfacial phase change rate, v is the velocity, p is the pressure, μ is the viscosity, M d s is the drag force coefficient between the solid and liquid, g is the gravitational acceleration, ∆V a is the volume change due to solidification shrinkage per unit time, V cell is the grid cell volume, \( \Delta g_{s} \) is the grid cell solid volume fraction change per unit time, C is the concentration, S v is the interfacial area concentration, D is the mass diffusivity, \( \delta \) is the interfacial solute diffusion lengths, c p is the specific heat, T is the temperature, λ is the thermal conductivity, L is the latent heat. The subscripts “s” and “l” refer to solid phase and liquid phase, respectively.

Table 1 Mathematical equations of the multicomponent-multiphase model

The supplementation relations, including the descriptions of interfacial area concentration, the interfacial concentration diffusion layer length as well as the flow model, and detailed derivations of the model can be found in Refs. [8] and [9].

Results and Discussion

The multicomponent -multiphase model was applied to a 535 tons steel ingot , which was cast to produce the low pressure rotor for nuclear power. The steel ingot was 6.0 m in height and 4.0 m in mean diameter. The composition of the steel ingot with 30Cr2Ni4MoV steel grade is shown in Table 2. The molten metal was poured at 1530 °C. After being stripped out of the mold, the ingot was dissected into slices along the center plane, and the carbon, chromium and molybdenum concentrations were measured along the centerline and three transverse sections. The schematic of the ingot with the cross-section sampling positions is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 2 30Cr2Ni4MoV steel grade (wt%)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic of the ingot with the cross-section sampling positions

In current simulation, the Fe-0.24 wt%C-1.65 wt%Cr-0.39 wt%Mo quaternary alloy system was taken as the simplification of the 30Cr2Ni4MoV steel ingot to predict macrosegregation of the carbon, chromium and molybdenum components. The properties of the steel ingot and mold materials used are listed in Tables 3 and 4. The thermodynamic parameters used for multicomponent alloy solidification calculation are listed in Table 5. Due to the symmetry along the centerline axis, only a quarter of the ingot system was simulated. A 3-D orthogonal grid system consisting of 104544 cells was used and the mesh size was 80 mm × 80 mm × 80 mm. A constant time step of 0.5 s was used for the simulation. The initial temperature for the mold, sleeve, and powder are 25, 25, and 1500 °C. The interfacial heat transfer coefficients of the steel ingot system are listed in Table 6.

Table 3 Steel parameters [10, 11]
Table 4 Thermophysical properties of the mold materials [12]
Table 5 Thermodynamic parameters of Fe-C-Cr-Mo quaternary alloy system
Table 6 Steel ingot system interfacial heat transfer coefficients (W·m−2·K−1) [12]

The predicted concentration distributions at the end of solidification are shown in Fig. 2a–c. The predicted carbon, chromium, and molybdenum concentrations all exhibit similar patterns, including negative segregation at the bottom of the ingot and positive segregation at the top of the ingot. The predicted macrosegregation patterns for the three components are proven to be qualitatively reasonable.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Predicted carbon concentration, b predicted chromium concentration, and c predicted molybdenum concentration

Quantitative comparisons between predictions and measurements of the solute concentrations along the centerline and three transverse sections A, B and C are provided in Figs. 3 and 4 to evaluate the accuracy of the macrosegregation model. As shown in Fig. 1, the centerline was chosen for its full coverage of the solidification stage of the steel ingot . Section A and Section C, with the height of 630 and 4600 mm, were chosen to represent two typical serious segregation zones in the ingot, i.e. the negative segregation zone due to the sedimentation of solute-lean solid grains and the positive segregation zone formed by solute-rich melt at late stages. Section B, located at the height of 2400 mm over the bottom, represents the concerned ingot body zone. We can see that current predictions are generally in agreement with the measurements. However, for all the three species, some discrepancies arise in the positive segregation zone at the distance to the bottom higher than 3.8 m as shown in Fig. 3. Several factors may contribute to this. Firstly, we have assumed the ingot filling process is instant in the simulation, neglecting the actual multi-pouring process. This simplification ignores the initial non-uniform solute distribution after filling. Secondly, current simulation considers only four components; other components, however, may have a great impact on the solute convection during later stages of solidification [13].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Concentrations of carbon, chromium and molybdenum along the centerline

Fig. 4
figure 4

Concentrations of carbon, chromium and molybdenum along a section A, b section B and c section C

Conclusions

A multicomponent -multiphase model has been applied to investigate the macrosegregation formation in a 535t steel ingot in three dimensions. Typical macrosegregation patterns are reproduced by predictions for carbon, chromium and molybdenum. Moreover, quantitative comparisons between predictions and measurements of the solute concentrations have been made. The results exhibit good agreement except for some discrepancies in the positive segregation zone at the top of the ingot. It is assumed the simplification of the multi-pouring process and ignorance of other components than the Fe-C-Cr-Mo quaternary alloy system may be the main factors.