Abstract
Mid-ocean ridges illustrate well how volcanic, tectonic, hydrothermal and sedimentary processes sculpt geomorphology in the deep ocean. Because of their poor accessibility (lying 2700 m below sea level on average) and remote locations, the development and deployment of new technology has been important for the discovery and investigation of new features. In contrast with continental environments, erosion has only modestly affected these areas, so features can be well preserved, in particular, volcanic landforms. The eruption of lavas creates volcanic cones, ridges of hummocky flows, widespread low-relief flows and drain-back features in lava lakes. Plate-tectonic extension creates faults, many with moderate dips, as inferred from the earthquakes they produce. However, other faults with presently shallower dips are suggested by corrugated slip surfaces exposed at the seabed on slow-spreading ridges. Steep scarps, comprising fractured rock and in places weak lithologies such as serpentinite, are easily destabilized, producing landslides, talus cones and talus ramps. Seawaters penetrating the crust and heated by it produce hydrothermal springs, such as spectacular “black smokers”. Precipitation of sulphides from those exhaling fluids and their deposition produces smooth mats of sediment and chimneys that can collapse to contribute to the sedimentary deposits as talus. This combination of processes makes mid-ocean ridges fascinating environments to work on, representing how >60% of Earth’s solid (oceanic) crust has been created. Despite poor accessibility of such areas, researchers will likely continue to deploy new instruments as they are developed to reveal more details of mid-ocean ridge geomorphology and understanding of how it develops.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Mid-ocean ridges occur where Earth’s oceanic tectonic plates are separating and the gap between them is being filled by hotter upwelling mantle rocks (Fig. 1a). Those hotter rocks have lower density than mantle rocks beneath older oceanic crust, hence their relative buoyancy has created ridges on Earth’s solid surface. In practice, these are only visible as ridges in topographic cross-sections of large vertical exaggeration. At the ridge crest itself (the “axis”), the lithosphere is rifting. This process has produced many normal faults, which form linear escarpments on the seabed. Where the plates are separating slowly, the uppermost mantle has become colder and more rigid than where plates are separating rapidly. In slow-spreading ridges, where the lithosphere is thick, we commonly find a rift valley, a feature that has been ascribed to a steady-state necking of the lithosphere (Tapponier and Francheteau 1978) or to viscous head loss in the asthenospheric mantle rising between the plates (Ribe 1988). At fast spreading ridges, in contrast, the lithosphere is hotter and thinner, so the axial valley is commonly very narrow and shallow or non-existent, commonly replaced with a narrow ridge. Also a result of the plate separation, pressure in the upwelling mantle progressively decreases, causing partial melting. Those ‘melts’ percolate up towards the surface, where they intrude the crust (which hence is largely formed of gabbroic intrusions). Injections of melt into the brittle crust create the dyke complex and occasional eruptions at the solid surface produce a variety of volcanic landforms (lava flows, ridges, cones and seamounts).
The spreading described above is organized into segments of the ridge, which can be viewed roughly as composite rifting volcanoes. Between those “spreading segments”, the movement can be accommodated by strike-slip faults, which commonly lie within deep “transform valleys” oriented perpendicular to the spreading segments (Figs. 1b and 2a). In contrast, in places where the distances between segments are small, the strike-slip movement instead can be accommodated without a through-going fault, in a more complicated way involving both extension and strike-slip movement (by “transtensional” fault movements and/or by oblique volcanic intrusions). These features are called “non-transform discontinuities”.
Mid-ocean ridges lie above sea level in only a few isolated places (such as on Iceland and in the Afar region of Africa). Elsewhere, their crests lie at an average water depth of 2700 m. Because of their poor accessibility, the development and deployment of new technology has been important in the history of how the mid-ocean ridges have been explored, starting with the early lead-line soundings for telephone cable routes in the 19th Century, which first outlined the regional shapes of the ridges, to modern research using high-resolution multibeam sonars deployed near the bed. Whereas in subaerial geomorphology, hypothesis and enquiry have been prompted by structures that have always been visible, in submarine geomorphology, advances of understanding have typically occurred when new features have been discovered or imaged with instruments at higher resolution. Also because of the limited accessibility, our knowledge of the marine geological processes creating these morphological features has relied mostly on a forensic type of analysis (reconstructing events based on analyses of samples or other geophysical data) rather than by monitoring of processes more directly, although monitoring has been possible in some instances, some of which are outlined below.
Although not untouched by erosion, mid-ocean ridges have been modified much less than continental landscapes sculpted by rivers, glaciers and coastal erosion. They therefore provide excellent examples of how the shape of the seabed provides clues to the processes that formed it. Many of the original maps of ocean bathymetry drafted by Bruce Heezen and Marie Tharp (e.g., Fig. 2a) contributed information on mid-ocean ridge features that needed to be explained ultimately by the seafloor spreading theory. Those maps were created by interpolating between widely spaced lines of echo-soundings from research ship traverses. If a more continental style of erosion of such landscapes had occurred, it is doubtful that the orthogonal pattern of straight axial valleys and transform valleys would have been revealed so easily.
The following Sects. 2–7 review the different components of ridge geomorphology, while providing some history of that development. A personal view of likely developments follows in Sect. 8. For more detailed reading on mid-ocean ridge geomorphology, Searle (2013) is recommended.
2 Regional Geomorphology
Features broader than 10 km are now well revealed by the free air gravity field derived from satellite altimetry measurements (Sandwell et al. 2014). Figure 2b shows the regional bathymetry derived partly using the altimetry measurements where echo-soundings are sparse [exploiting the effect of the seabed density contrast on free air gravity anomalies to derive bathymetry variation (Smith and Sandwell 1997)]. As shown in that figure, the pattern of fracture zones (valleys) crossing the Atlantic is revealed more clearly than in the earlier map (Fig. 2a), as well as features with trends intermediate between the fracture zones and spreading segments, which are produced by migrating spreading segments (Briais and Rabinowicz 2002).
Early in the development of the seafloor spreading hypothesis and as different parts of the oceanic basement were dated using seafloor spreading magnetic anomalies and Deep Sea Drilling Project samples, it was found that the seafloor subsides in proportion to the square root of crustal age (Parsons and Sclater 1977). Where a ridge overlies hotter mantle (near hotspots or mantle plumes), temperature gradients through the lithosphere might be expected to be steeper, so the lithosphere should cool more rapidly. The oceanic crust has indeed been found to subside more rapidly near hotspots than elsewhere, with subsidence rates correlating strongly with the ridge axis depth—Crosby and McKenzie (2009) found >10% greater initial subsidence rate for ridges 2400 m deep compared with those 2800 m deep.
“Morphometric” studies involve characterizing the shapes of structures and determining how the derived shape characteristics vary with parameters representing potential influences on the morphology. The method has been used to investigate the transition from an axial rift valley at slow-spreading ridges to a ridge at fast-spreading ridges, which occurs over intermediate spreading rates of 40–60 mm year−1, though also varies with absolute depth of the ridge axis, as ridges near mantle hotspots (where ridges are elevated) can have axial highs like fast-spreading ridges (Malinverno 1993; Small 1994).
Regional bathymetry maps such as Fig. 2b are now capable of resolving some of the topographic fabric of abyssal hills (small ridges oriented parallel to the main spreading ridge, north-south in Fig. 2b). As described in Sect. 3, these hills were created mainly by the faults at the spreading ridges. Malinverno (1991) showed that the transition from a rift valley to an axial high is accompanied by a change in the relief of the abyssal hills, such that their root-mean-square relief varies inversely with the square root of spreading rate.
The lithosphere at ridges is thinner and therefore weaker than that beneath the older parts of the oceanic plates. Where weights act on the young lithosphere, it is deflected over shorter distances. The weight of Ascension Island, for example, has depressed the young lithosphere around it to ~40 km from the island (Minshull and Brozena 1997) compared with >200 km deflection by the Hawaii islands on Cretaceous oceanic lithosphere. Other deflections can occur because of rifting, where fault movements remove weight of hanging wall rocks from lithospheric footwalls.
3 Faults
First motions of teleseismic recordings of earthquakes generated at mid-ocean ridges have suggested that normal fault movements occur with moderately dipping fault planes, of ~45° dip (Huang and Solomon 1988). This observation has supported a view up until the late 1990s that such moderately dipping normal faults have generated much of the seabed relief observed at ridges, such as illustrated from the interpretation of Deep-Tow bathymetry profiles in Fig. 3a. With continued seafloor spreading, such relief is inherited by the abyssal hills that form the rugosity of basement underlying the majority of the ocean basins.
Faults on land have been studied with traditional surveying and space-based techniques (InSAR and GPS) to record how the deformation that occurs during individual earthquakes contributes to the development of rift topography. Unfortunately, for most mid-ocean ridges, inaccessibility and attenuation of radar waves in seawater has prevented a similar approach, but there have been successful efforts to record deformation in the Afar and Iceland. For example, Stein et al. (1991) recorded the elevation changes associated with a volcanic rifting event, in which movements of normal faults accompanied intrusion of a dyke. Those displacements partly mimicked the shape of the inner rift, suggesting how individual events contribute to the geomorphology. Mechanical modelling suggested that activated faults had steep dips of 60°–80°, supporting the view of steep faulting at ridges mentioned earlier. Significant work has been carried out in the Afar and on Iceland to characterize such events. However, as Afar and Iceland both overlie mantle hotspots where the crust is unusually thick, the rifting process may not be exactly analogous to the deeper mid-ocean ridges.
Contradicting the above view of steep faults, a closer examination of data from hull-mounted multibeam sonars by Cann et al. (1997) uncovered shallow-dipping corrugated surfaces at the seabed. The example in Fig. 3b was identified by them and shows a rounded surface with corrugations aligned with the seafloor spreading direction, as though a fault footwall has slipped at low angle or moderately steeply in the crust and rotated towards a horizontal inclination at the seabed. Paleomagnetic measurements on samples recovered by scientific drilling (at the open star symbol in Fig. 3b) indeed showed evidence for ~46° rotation (Morris et al. 2009). Although such faults were previously suspected to be associated with weak serpentinite rocks, the drilling recovered mainly gabbros in the footwall. Escartín et al. (2008) estimated that around half of the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge is spreading by such ‘detachment’ faults, the remainder spreading by intrusion of dykes and high angle fault movements.
The evidence of strike-slip earthquakes in transform valleys, inferred from fault plane solutions (Sykes 1967), was important support for the seafloor-spreading hypothesis (Fig. 1b). Although seismic moment release rates of transform valleys are 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than those of spreading segments, seismic coupling is nevertheless ~<10% (Rundquist and Sobolev 2002), so most fault movements do not generate detectable earthquakes. Furthermore, the large and varied vertical relief of these valleys implies that there must be some dip-slip fault movements in transform valleys. Indeed, escarpments produced by such movements have been sites of submersible traverses investigating the structure of the crust (Karson 1998; Mitchell et al. 2000).
4 Landslides
Bathymetry data collected with multibeam sonars installed in the hulls of research vessels have poor resolution and can reveal only the largest landslides at ridges (Tucholke 1992). However, higher resolution seabed images from sidescan sonars towed closer to the ocean floor have revealed talus ramps and cones formed from the degradation of fault scarps (Kong et al. 1988; Searle et al. 1998). Such features develop within only a few millions of years of the crust forming, possibly from rock slopes destabilized by frequent earthquakes. Following this initial stage, scarps apparently continue degrading over 10s of millions of years, forming trellis channel networks (Tucholke et al. 1997).
Scientific drilling on the flanks of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge has recovered inter-layered serpentinite rock breccias and lavas. Lithological sequences of rocks observed in submersible dives and in rock dredges also do not obviously follow the simple “classical” oceanic crustal structure of lavas successively overlying diabase (dykes), gabbro and mantle rocks (Mitchell 2001). Landslides may explain some heterogeneity, by mixing up the lithologies locally; high-resolution maps of serpentinite-rich basement (Cannat et al. 2013) have revealed landslides in serpentinite, such as those shown in Fig. 4. The breccias created by landsliding can then be over-erupted by lavas, leading to the lithological sequences found in the drill cores.
5 Volcanic Geomorphologic Features
Early detailed investigation of volcanic landforms was carried out with shipboard multibeam sonars and manned submersibles during a joint French-American study on the slow-spreading Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Ballard and Van Andel 1977), and during a similar study on the medium-spreading Galapagos Spreading Centre (Ballard et al. 1979). Since then, there have many volcanic investigations involving submersibles, ROVs, AUVs and deeply towed devices, centred mainly on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and fast-spreading East Pacific Rise.
On fast-spreading ridges, erupted lavas tend to have low viscosities and therefore spread out easily, leaving flat-lying (“sheet” and “lobate”) flows, as well as steeper slopes (Soule et al. 2007). Lava lakes containing pillars where the lava became chilled by trapped water venting through them are common, with pillar “bathtub rings” caused by subsequent lava drain back. The more recent high-resolution bathymetry from AUVs has revealed channels, pathways travelled by the distributing lava (Soule et al. 2005).
In contrast, eruptions on slow-spreading ridges produce a more rugged geomorphology. The terrain is commonly described as ‘hummocky’ and in photographs typically contains stacks of pillow lavas, although flat-lying lava flows also occur (Perfit and Chadwick 1998). Hummocky flows can be arranged in ridges and tumuli (Bryan et al. 1994), likely originally erupted over dykes or dyke swarms. Some superimposed cones may represent late-stage focused effusion from the dykes, as occurs in subaerial eruptions (Head et al. 1996). Some cones may be rootless (Bryan et al. 1994) and fed by lava tubes (Smith and Cann 1999). Photographs of both fast and slow ridges typically show abundant fissures from the on-going extension.
Illustrating how the new high-resolution topography available from AUVs and ROVs is helping to study volcanic landforms, Fig. 5 shows data collected from the East Pacific Rise (Deschamps et al. 2014). Despite faster cooling and high ambient pressure, many features such as those shown are comparable with those found in lava flow fields on land and can be interpreted in terms of lava flowage, inflation, cooling and drainback.
6 Hydrothermal Springs
Emissions of hydrothermal fluids can produce hot ‘black smokers’ (jets of fluids containing precipitating sulphide particles) or clearer diffuse venting. The particles in black smokers can settle to form smooth mounds of hydrothermal sediment. Precipitating silicate and sulphide minerals from the fluids can also produce chimneys many metres to >10 m tall, such as illustrated in Fig. 6. Chimneys are unstable and can topple during earthquakes or otherwise fracture to contribute talus to the sedimentary mounds the chimney fields stand on. Petrological and geochemical analyses of samples obtained from these chimneys have revealed that they were formed of layers of different minerals, suggesting cycles in the hydrothermal fluid composition and temperature, as well as mineral reactions during seawater ingress. While many hydrothermal springs are associated with fluid circulation above the hot magma, some are associated with circulation through ultramafic rocks brought towards the seabed by detachment faults.
7 Sediment Transport and Deposition
Where ridges lie far from the continents, only pelagic particles accumulate on them, generally at slower rates than other forms of sediment near continents, so that hints of the oceanic basement relief commonly remain visible in seabed morphology even on crust of many millions of years in age. Those pelagic sediments can accumulate like snow with little redistribution so that they drape the underlying basement topography. Commonly, though, some lateral (usually downslope) movement occurs to leave concave up-wards deposits (Mitchell 1995) or flat lying turbidite ‘ponds’ (van Andel and Komar 1969). Where ridges lie near to continental sources of sediment, more frequent turbidity currents can flood the axial valley with sediment, such as the northern Juan de Fuca Ridge (Davis and Lister 1977). Even more exotically, the invading sediments can include flows of evaporites, such as in the Red Sea (Augustin et al. 2014).
8 Remaining Issues and Developments
Our understanding of mid-ocean ridge geomorphology should continue to improve as new technology is developed and deployed. Modern multibeam sonars are capable of imaging acoustic backscattering from the water column as well as the seabed and could be used to record emissions and biota over vent sites along with more optimized acoustic imaging of them (Bemis et al. 2015). Synthetic aperture sonar (adapted from synthetic aperture radar) may further improve seabed imaging. Acoustic backscattering strength in sidescan sonar images depends on seabed micro-roughness at the scale of the sonar acoustic frequency, any sediment cover and incidence angle of the signal with the bed (which varies with bed topography). For example, the low backscattering of smooth sheet flows (Soule et al. 2005) illustrates the effect of roughness. As attenuation in any sediment cover also varies with acoustic frequency (Mitchell 1993), we might expect data collected with multi-frequency sonars to reveal useful information. More generally, increasing use of deeply towed systems, ROVs and AUVs with seabed imaging systems (cameras, sonars and LiDAR) should progressively enlarge the database of observations we have of high-resolution geomorphology.
Knowledge of the subsurface lithologic structure would be helpful, as on land, for working out how the geomorphology develops, in particular, for volcanic landforms. However, structure is difficult to image with geophysical methods and sampling by scientific drilling has been limited because of cost and technical issues (holes in friable volcanic rock are unstable). Illustrating the problem with geophysical datasets, seismic refraction methods can reveal boundaries in the upper crust that are not lithological boundaries exactly, because seismic velocities vary with the porosity of the rock, affecting its bulk rigidity (Carlson 2010), and porosity may vary within units. Alteration also varies velocities, illustrated by reflections in seismic data collected over the detachment fault in Fig. 3b (Collins et al. 2009). Similar issues apply to electro-magnetic measurements, where electrical resistivity varies with connected porosity and pore fluid resistivity (sensitive to conducting brines and magmatic fluids). Nevertheless, further progress will be made by carefully designed experiments combining geophysical experiments with information from scientific drilling and observing rock sequences exposed at fault escarpments (Karson 1998).
Much of the effort on ridges has involved ‘forensic science’, i.e., we have imaged seabed features and attempted to reconstruct the processes that formed them, aided by analyses of samples and geophysical data. There has been less progress in observing geological events or processes as they occur. Although seismicity can forewarn a volcanic eruption in some instances, the times of occurrence of volcanic eruptions, fault movements and landslides are largely unpredictable, making planning of any in situ observation problematic.
This is important for physical volcanology. On land, infrared measurements are routinely made on erupting lavas to monitor temperature; lava viscosity is strongly non-linear with temperature, so the final geometries of flows strongly depend on lava temperature and eruption rate. Temperature measurements in submarine mid-ocean ridges have not been possible. Individual lava flows are the basic units of the uppermost crust and thus important for determining how the crust develops, but mapping their geometries at the seabed is difficult because lava types can vary with effusion rate and gradient so their surface morphology is insufficiently characteristic for distinguishing them (on land a single lava flow can change between a’a’ and pahoehoe types during the same eruption). To overcome this, boundaries to some historical lava flows have been mapped out based on the extent of un-sedimented lava (e.g., Soule et al. 2007). Caress et al. (2012) characterized the shapes and thickness distributions of ~10 m thick lava flows erupted in 2011 on the Juan de Fuca Ridge using repeated high-resolution bathymetry from an AUV. As these studies illustrate, information should accumulate over time with further surveying, encompassing lavas newly erupted since previous surveys were carried out.
Further information on eruptions and crustal deformations will arise from bottom observatories (cabled or autonomous packages of instruments). For example, Chadwick et al. (2012) documented inflation-deflation cycles from pressure sensors on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, including a sudden uplift immediately prior to the 2011 eruption associated with intrusion of a dyke. The same event was recorded with ocean bottom seismometers, which revealed changes in seismicity leading up to the eruption and constrained the eruption duration (Dziak et al. 2012). Cabled observatories off western North America will likely yield more information on eruptions over time.
More generally recording how the seabed changes its topography during earthquakes (Stein et al. 1991), will be challenging as associated depth changes of ~1 m are typically smaller than the depth precision of hull-mounted multibeam sonars. Nevertheless, recordings of earthquake T-waves using hydrophones moored in the oceans can be used to detect and locate small magnitude earthquakes, allowing volcano-tectonic earthquakes to be studied (Smith et al. 2003). Such information provided in real-time may allow opportunistic inspection of earthquake ruptures and deformation in the future. Observatory pressure sensors and acoustic ranging to bottom-moored transponders may also ultimately reveal tectonic movements.
As the above notes illustrate, we have made enormous progress in understanding mid-ocean ridge geomorphology, despite their deep and commonly remote locations, and we can expect further exciting developments to emerge over the decades to come.
References
Augustin N, Devey CW, van der Zwan FM, Feldens P, Tominaga M, Bantan R, Kwasnitschka T (2014) The transition from rifting to spreading in the Red Sea. Earth Planet Sci Lett 395:217–230
Ballard RD, van Andel TH (1977) Morphology and tectonics of the inner rift valley at lat 36°50′N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geol Soc Am Bull 88:507–530
Ballard RD, Holcomb RT, van Andel TH (1979) The Galapagos Rift at 86°W: 3. Sheet flows, collapse pits, and lava lakes of the Rift valley. J Geophys Res 84:5407–5422
Becker JJ, Sandwell DT, Smith WHF, Braud J, Binder B, Depner J, Fabre D, Factor J, Ingalls S, Kim S-H, Ladner R, Marks K, Nelson S, Pharaoh A, Trimmer R, Von Rosenberg J, Wallace G, Weatherall P (2009) Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30_PLUS. Mar Geodesy 32:355–371
Bemis KG, Silver D, Xu G, Light R, Jackson D, Jones C, Ozer S, Liu L (2015) The path to COVIS: a review of acoustic imaging of hydrothermal flow regimes. Deep Sea Res II 121:159–176
Briais A, Rabinowicz M (2002) Temporal variations in the segmentation of slow to intermediate spreading mid-ocean ridges 1. Synoptic observations based on satellite altimetry data. J Geophys Res 107:Paper 2098. doi:2010.1029/2001JB000533
Bryan WB, Humphris SE, Thompson G, Casey JF (1994) Comparative volcanology of small axial eruptive centers in the MARK area. J Geophys Res 99:2973–2984
Cann JR, Blachman DK, Smith DK, McAllister E, Janssen B, Mello S, Avgerinos E, Pascoe AR, Escartin J (1997) Corrugated slip surfaces formed at ridge-transform intersections on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature 385:329–332
Cannat M, Mangeney A, Ondréas H, Fouquet Y, Normand A (2013) High-resolution bathymetry reveals contrasting landslide activity shaping the walls of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge axial valley. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14. doi:10.1002/ggge.20056
Caress DW, Clague DA, Paduan JB, Martin JF, Dreyer BM, Chadwick WW, Denny A, Kelley DS (2012) Repeat 1 m resolution bathymetric surveys reveal April 2011 lava flows at axial seamount. Nature Geosc 5:483–488
Carlson RL (2010) How crack porosity and shape control seismic velocities in the upper oceanic crust: Modeling downhole logs from Holes 504B and 1256D. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 11:Paper Q04007. doi:04010.01029/02009GC002955
Chadwick WW, Nooner SL, Butterfield DA, Lilley MD (2012) Seafloor deformation and forecasts of the April 2011 eruption at axial seamount. Nature Geosci 5:474–477
Collins JA, Blackman DK, Harris A, Carlson RL (2009) Seismic and drilling constraints on velocity structure and reflectivity near IODP Hole U1309D on the central dome of Atlantis Massif, Mid-Atlantic Ridge 30°N. Geochem Geophys Geosyst vol 10, article Q01010. doi:10.1029/2008GC002121
Crosby AG, McKenzie D (2009) An analysis of young ocean depth, gravity and global residual topography. Geophys J Int 178:1198–1219
Davis EE, Lister CRB (1977) Tectonic structures on the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geol Soc Am Bull 88:346–363
Deschamps A, Grigné C, Saout ML, Soule SA, Allemand P, Lanoe BVV, Floc’h F (2014) Morphology and dynamics of inflated subaqueous basaltic lava flows. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 15. doi:10.1002/2014GC005274
Dziak RP, Haxel JH, Bohnenstiehl DR, Chadwick WW, Nooner SL, Fowler MJ, Matsumoto H, Butterfield DA (2012) Seismic precursors and magma ascent before the April 2011 eruption at axial seamount. Nature Geosci 5:478–482
Escartín J, Smith DK, Cann J, Schouten H, Langmuir CH, Escrig S (2008) Central role of detachment faults in accretion of slow-spreading oceanic lithosphere. Nature 455:790–794
Head JW, Wilson L, Smith DK (1996) Mid-ocean ridge eruptive vent morphology and substructure: Evidence for dike widths, eruption rates, and axial volcanic ridges. J Geophys Res 101:28265–28280
Heezen BC, Tharp M (1961) Physiographic diagram of the South Atlantic, the Caribbean, the Scotia Sea, and the eastern margin of the South Pacific Ocean. Geol Soc Am
Huang PY, Solomon SC (1988) Centroid depths of mid-ocean ridge earthquakes: dependence on spreading rate. J Geophys Res 93:13445–13477
Karson JA (1998) Internal structure of oceanic lithosphere: a perspective from tectonic windows. In: Buck WR, Delaney PT, Karson JA, Lababrielle Y (eds) Faulting and magmatism at mid-ocean ridges. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp 177–218
Kelley DS, Delaney JR, Yoerger DR (2001) Geology and venting characteristics of the Mothra hydrothermal field, Endeavour segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geology 29:959–962
Kong LSL, Detrick RS, Fox PJ, Mayer LA, Ryan WBF (1988) The morphology and tectonics of the MARK area from Sea Beam and SeaMARC I observations (Mid-Atlantic Ridge 23°N). Mar Geophys Res 10:59–90
Macdonald KC, Luyendyk BP (1977) Deep-tow studies of the structure of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge crest near latitude 37°N. Geol Soc Am Bull 88:621–636
Malinverno A (1991) Inverse square-root dependence of mid-ocean-ridge flank roughness on spreading rate. Nature 352:58–60
Malinverno A (1993) Transition between a valley and a high at the axis of mid-ocean ridges. Geology 21:639–642
Minshull TA, Brozena JM (1997) Gravity anomalies and flexure of the lithosphere at Ascension Island. Geophys J Int 131:347–360
Mitchell NC (1993) A model for attenuation of backscatter due to sediment accumulations and its application to determine sediment thickness with GLORIA sidescan sonar. J Geophys Res 98:22477–22493
Mitchell NC (1995) Diffusion transport model for pelagic sediments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. J Geophys Res 100(B10):19991–920009
Mitchell NC (2001) Random sequences of lithologies exposed on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. J Geophys Res 106:26365–326378
Mitchell NC (2015) Submarine geomorphology. In: Sinclair H (ed) Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Mitchell NC, Tivey MA, Gente P (2000) Slopes of mid-ocean ridge fault scarps from submersible observations. Earth Planet Sci Lett 183:543–555
Morris A, Gee JS, Pressling N, John BE, MacLeod CJ, Grimes CB, Searle RC (2009) Footwall rotation in an oceanic core complex quantified using reoriented Integrated Ocean Drilling Program core samples. Earth Planet Sci Lett 287:217–228
Parsons B, Sclater JG (1977) An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age. J Geophys Res 82:803–827
Perfit MR, Chadwick JWW (1998) Magmatism at mid-ocean ridges: constraints from volcanological and geochemical investigations. In: Buck WR, Delaney PT, Karson JA, Lagrabrielle Y (eds) Faulting and magmatism at mid-ocean ridges. American Geophysical Union, pp 59–115
Ribe NM (1988) On the dynamics of mid-ocean ridges. J Geophys Res 93:429–436
Rundquist DV, Sobolev PO (2002) Seismicity of mid-oceanic ridges and its geodynamic implications: a review. Earth Sci Rev 58:143–161
Sandwell D, Müller RD, Smith WHF, Garcia E, Francis R (2014) New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science 346:65–67
Searle RC (2013) Mid-ocean ridges. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 318
Searle RC, Cowie PA, Mitchell NC, Allerton S, MacLeod CJ, Escartin J, Russell SM, Slootweg PA, Tanaka T (1998) Fault structure and detailed evolution of a slow spreading ridge segment: the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 29°N. Earth Planet Sci Lett 154:167–183
Small C (1994) A global analysis of mid-ocean ridge axial topography. Geophys J Int 116:64–84
Smith DK, Cann JR (1999) Constructing the upper crust of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: a reinterpretation based on the Puna Ridge, Kilauea Volcano. J Geophys Res 104:25379–25399
Smith WHF, Sandwell DT (1997) Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship soundings. Science 277:1956–1962
Smith DK, Escartin J, Cannat M, Tolstoy M, Fox CG, Bohnenstiehl DR, Bazin S (2003) Spatial and temporal distribution of seismicity along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (15–35°N). J Geophys Res 108:2167. doi:10.1029/2002JB001964
Soule SA, Fornari DJ, Perfit MR, Rubin KH (2007) New insights into mid-ocean ridge volcanic processes from the 2005–2006 eruption of the East Pacific Rise, 9°46′N–9°56′N. Geology 35:1079–1082
Soule SA, Fornari DJ, Perfit MR, Tivey MA, Ridley WI, Schouten H (2005) Channelized lava flows at the East Pacific Rise crest 9°–10°N: the importance of off-axis lava transport in developing the architecture of young oceanic crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 6:Q08005. doi:10.01029/02005GC000912
Stein RS, Briole P, Ruegg J-C, Tapponnier P, Gasse F (1991) Contemporary, Holocene and Quaternary deformation of the Asal Rift, Djibouti: implications for the mechanics of slow spreading ridges. J Geophys Res 96:21789–21806
Sykes LR (1967) Mechanism of earthquakes and nature of faulting on mid-ocean ridges. J Geophys Res 72:2131–2153
Tapponier P, Francheteau J (1978) Necking of the lithosphere and the mechanics of slowly accreting plate boundaries. J Geophys Res 83:3955–3970
Tucholke BE (1992) Massive submarine rockslide in the rift-valley wall of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geology 20:129–132
Tucholke BE, Stewart WK, Kleinrock MC (1997) Long-term denudation of ocean crust in the central North Atlantic Ocean. Geology 25:171–174
Van Andel TH, Komar PD (1969) Ponded sediments of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between 22° and 23° North latitude. Geol Soc Am Bull 80:1163–1190
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, N.C. (2018). Mid-ocean Ridges. In: Micallef, A., Krastel, S., Savini, A. (eds) Submarine Geomorphology. Springer Geology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57852-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57852-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57851-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57852-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)