Abstract
Prostate cancer is the commonest solid cancer in men, with approximately 42,000 new cases per year in the United Kingdom [1]. This section details the evidence-based management of prostate cancer at all stages.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Prostate cancer is the commonest solid cancer in men, with approximately 42,000 new cases per year in the United Kingdom [1]. This section details the evidence-based management of prostate cancer at all stages.
3.1 Localised Prostate Cancer
Three predictive factors are used to risk stratify localised prostate cancer: Gleason grade, PSA and T-stage (see Table 3.1). They predict the risk of lymph node involvement, treatment failure and death from prostate cancer [2].
In general the treatment options for localised disease have comparable outcomes, and therefore management recommendations require assessment of comorbidities, performance status and patient choice. The management options are discussed in the following sections.
3.2 Active Surveillance
This conservative modality avoids overtreatment for low-risk disease, which is increasingly pertinent in the era of routine PSA testing [3]. It seeks to reduce the burden of side effects without compromising overall survival. Patients are closely observed using a multimodality approach (biochemical, radiological, histopathological). Approximately 30% of patients on active surveillance (AS) will subsequently require radical curative treatment, and 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival rates approach 100% [4, 5].
Indication:
-
Low-risk prostate cancer and selected men with intermediate risk disease
-
Suitable for radical treatment if indicated [1]
Side effects:
-
Psychological
3.3 External Beam Radiotherapy
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has an established role in the radical treatment of localised prostate cancer [6]. Developments have focused on maximising the tumour dose whilst limiting irradiation of normal tissues. 3D conformal therapy has evolved into image-guided (IG) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as the standard of care [7] (see Fig. 3.1).
Hypofractionated techniques are under investigation and may offer a greater therapeutic ratio than standard fractionation [7, 9,10,11,12,13,14].
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can be given in combination with radiotherapy. It achieves cytoreduction, allowing the use of smaller treatment fields, and potentiates tumour cell kill [9, 10]. Adjuvant ADT also improves overall survival in patients with high-risk disease [11,12,13]. The optimum duration of ADT relative to the risk of the disease is yet to be established [1].
EBRT can also be given as adjuvant or salvage therapy following radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients likely to have residual disease in the prostate bed (pT3; positive surgical margins; persistently detectable PSA; slowly rising PSA) are suitable candidates [14, 15].
Indications:
-
All prostate cancer risk categories
-
Post-operatively for high-risk disease
Side effects:
-
Acute: cystitis, diarrhoea, proctitis, rectal bleeding
-
Late: change in bowel habit, proctitis, impotence, secondary malignancy (rare)
3.3.1 Brachytherapy
Trans-perineal low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy involves the insertion of Iodine-125 (or Palladium-103) seeds into the prostate under ultrasound guidance. For low-risk disease the efficacy is at least comparable to EBRT/RP [16]. For intermediate- and high-risk patients, combination therapies involving EBRT with a brachytherapy boost (with/without ADT) may offer superior treatment outcomes [17].
Indications:
-
Selected patients with low and intermediate risk disease
Side effects [17,18,19]:
-
Acute: dysuria, urinary retention, proctitis
-
Late: urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction
High-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is delivered via a temporary iridium-192 implant inserted through hollow catheters placed in the prostate. In combination with EBRT, it can improve biochemical relapse-free survival and prostate cancer-specific survival compared to EBRT alone (intermediate-/high-risk disease) through dose escalation. Toxicity profiles are similar to EBRT alone [20, 21].
3.3.2 Radical Prostatectomy
Radical prostatectomy reduces prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality when compared to watchful waiting [22]. However recent evidence has not demonstrated benefits for all patients [23]. The incidences of post-operative complications, positive surgical margins and late urinary complications are reduced when performed by “high volume” surgeons in “high volume” centres [24, 25].
Surgery can now be performed open, laparoscopically or with robotic assistance (RALP). Nerve-sparing techniques have reduced the incidence of impotence but are only considered where they are not predicted to compromise surgical margins [26]. Extended lymph node dissection is considered for high-risk cases [7, 27].
Indications [7]:
-
Low and intermediate risk disease
-
Life expectancy >10 years
-
Selected patients with high-risk disease
Side effects: [7]
-
Urinary Incontinence, impotence
3.4 Metastatic Disease
The first-line treatment for patients with metastatic disease is ADT either with orchidectomy, luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists [17]. There is established evidence for early addition of docetaxel for suitable patients, although there is debate over whether this should just be for those with a high burden of disease [28, 29].
Management of “castration-resistant” metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) depends on disease burden, disease location, symptoms, PSA velocity, patient fitness, response to previous treatments and patient preference. There remains debate regarding optimum treatment sequencing and the individual contribution of each agent to overall survival, but the following agents have all demonstrated efficacy.
3.4.1 Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids reduce PSA levels, delay time to PSA progression and palliate symptoms [30]. Dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily demonstrates good efficacy [1, 31].
3.4.2 Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
Docetaxel + prednisone is the first-line chemotherapy agent for patients with a good performance status and is beneficial in terms of overall survival, quality of life and pain control [32]. Cabazitaxel is a second-line cytotoxic agent, also associated with a survival benefit and improved pain control, particularly in patients whose cancer progresses on/shortly after completing docetaxel therapy [33].
3.4.3 Androgen Receptor Pathway Targeted Agents
In castrate-resistant disease the androgen receptor (AR) pathway remains a useful target. Abiraterone acetate (a CYP-17 inhibitor) inhibits androgen biosynthesis in the adrenal glands, the tumour and the testes. It is administered with prednisone to minimise mineralocorticoid side effects. Enzalutamide targets multiple steps in the AR signalling pathway and, unlike other anti-androgens, has no partial-agonist action. Both agents have demonstrated efficacy in both the pre- and post-docetaxel settings, improving biochemical and radiological control, delaying deterioration in quality of life and improving survival [34,35,36,37].
3.4.4 Other Agents
Other treatment options include diethystilboestrol [38] and more recently Alpharadin (radium-223), an alpha emitter which targets bone metastases with alpha particles. The latter is associated with survival, quality of life and pain control benefits [39].
In prostate cancer, bisphosphonates are used to reduce/delay skeletal-related events (e.g. zoledronic acid) [40]. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets RANK ligand-mediated activation of osteoclasts. It is superior to zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing SREs [41].
Key Points
-
Three predictive factors are used to risk stratify localised prostate cancer: Gleason grade, PSA and T-stage. They predict the risk of lymph node involvement, treatment failure and death from prostate cancer.
-
Treatment options for localised disease have comparable outcomes; therefore management recommendations require assessment of comorbidities, performance status and patient choice.
-
Active surveillance avoids overtreatment for low-risk disease, which is increasingly pertinent in the era of routine PSA testing. Approximately 30% of patients on AS will subsequently require radical curative treatment, and 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival rates approach 100%.
-
External beam radiotherapy has an established role in the radical treatment of localised prostate cancer. Developments have focused on maximising the tumour dose whilst limiting irradiation of normal tissues.
-
Trans-perineal low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy involves the insertion of iodine-125 seeds into the prostate under ultrasound guidance.
-
High-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is delivered via a temporary iridium-192 implant inserted through hollow catheters placed in the prostate.
-
Surgery can now be performed open, laparoscopically or with robotic assistance (RALP).
-
The first-line treatment for patients with metastatic disease is ADT either with orchidectomy, luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists. The addition of docetaxel chemotherapy confers a survival benefit in certain patient populations.
-
Management of “castration-resistant” metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) depends on disease burden, disease location, symptoms, PSA velocity, patient fitness, response to previous treatments and patient preference.
References
National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Prostate Cancer: diagnosis and treatment: Clinical Guideline. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.
D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280(11):969–74.
Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schröder FH, et al. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(12):868–78.
Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, Nam R, Mamedov A, Loblaw A. Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):126–31.
Selvadurai ED, Singhera M, Thomas K, Mohammed K, Woode-Amissah R, Horwich A, et al. Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):981–7.
Nilsson S, Norlén BJ, Widmark A. A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2004;43(4):316–81.
Mottet N, Bastian P, Bellmunt J, et al. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on prostate cancer. 2014: Available from: https://www.uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/1607-Prostate-Cancer_LRV3.pdf
Heemsbergen WD, Hoogeman MS, Witte MG, Peeters ST, Incrocci L, Lebesque JV. Increased risk of biochemical and clinical failure for prostate patients with a large rectum at radiotherapy planning: results from the Dutch trial of 68 GY versus 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(5):1418–24.
Denham JW, Steigler A, Lamb DS, Joseph D, Turner S, Matthews J, et al. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: 10-year data from the TROG 96.01 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):451–9.
Roach M, Bae K, Speight J, Wolkov HB, Rubin P, Lee RJ, et al. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(4):585–91.
Bolla M, De Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, Van den Bergh AC, Oddens J, Poortmans PM, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2516–27.
Pilepich MV, Winter K, Lawton CA, Krisch RE, Wolkov HB, Movsas B, et al. Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma—long-term results of phase III RTOG 85–31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(5):1285–90.
Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE, Porter A, Grignon DJ, Brereton HD, et al. Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92–02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15):2497–504.
Swanson G, Thompson I, Tangen C, Paradelo J, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford E, et al. Update of SWOG 8794: adjuvant radiotherapy for pT3 prostate cancer improves metastasis free survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(1):S31.
Bolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, de Reijke TM, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012;380(9858):2018–27.
Grimm P, Billiet I, Bostwick D, Dicker AP, Frank S, Immerzeel J, et al. Comparative analysis of prostate-specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group. BJU Int. 2012;109(s1):22–9.
British Uro-Oncology Group. British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Section of Oncology. Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) guidance for managing prostate cancer; 2013.
Crook J, Lukka H, Klotz L, Bestic N, Johnston M. Systematic overview of the evidence for brachytherapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;164(7):975–81.
Wills F, Hailey DM. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 1999.
Hoskin PJ, Motohashi K, Bownes P, Bryant L, Ostler P. High dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy in the radical treatment of prostate cancer: initial results of a randomised phase three trial. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84(2):114–20.
Martinez AA, Gonzalez J, Ye H, Ghilezan M, Shetty S, Kernen K, et al. Dose escalation improves cancer-related events at 10 years for intermediate-and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated high-dose-rate boost and external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(2):363–70.
Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Stark JR, Busch C, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(18):1708–17.
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, Fox S, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(3):203–13.
Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, Tuerk I, Koenig P, Martínez-Piñeiro L, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):475–80.
Van Poppel H, Joniau S. An analysis of radical prostatectomy in advanced stage and high-grade prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53(2):253–9.
Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology. 2007;69(6):1095–101.
Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N, et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):480–7.
Sweeney et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. NEJM. 2015;373:737–46.
James et al. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Lancet. 2016;387:1163–77.
Venkitaraman R, Thomas K, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC. Efficacy of low-dose dexamethasone in castration-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008;101(4):440–3.
Venkitaraman R, Thomas K, Murthy V, Woode-Amissah R, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A, et al. A randomized phase II trial of dexamethasone versus prednisolone as a secondary hormonal therapy in CRPC. ASCO—Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. J Clin Oncol. 2013;2013(Suppl 6):abst 123.
Berthold DR, Pond GR, Soban F, de Wit R, Eisenberger M, Tannock IF. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):242–5.
De Bono J, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, Hansen S, Machiels J, Shen L, et al. Cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone with prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel: final results of a multinational phase III trial (TROPIC). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7s):4508.
Fizazi K, Scher HI, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, Chi KN, Jones RJ, et al. Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU-AA-301 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):983–92.
Rathkopf D, Smith M, de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Shore N, de Souza P, et al. Updated interim analysis (IA) of COU-AA-302, a randomized phase III study of abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) without prior chemotherapy. ASCO—Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. J Clin Oncol. 2013;(Suppl 6): abstr 5.
Cabot RC, Harris NL, Rosenberg ES, Shepard J-AO, Cort AM, Ebeling SH, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1187–97.
Beer T, Armstrong A, Sternberg C, Higano C, Iversen P, Loriot Y, et al. Enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy naive metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC): results of phase III PREVAIL study. ASCO—Genitourinary Cancers Symposium: J Clin Oncol. 2014.
Seidenfeld J, Samson DJ, Hasselblad V, Aronson N, Albertsen PC, Bennett CL, et al. Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(7):566–77.
Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle S, O’Sullivan J, Fosså S, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):213–23.
Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(19):1458–68.
Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damião R, Brown J, Karsh L, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):813–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, S., Aggarwal, A. (2017). Management of Prostate Cancer. In: Cook, G. (eds) PET/CT in Prostate Cancer. Clinicians’ Guides to Radionuclide Hybrid Imaging(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57624-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57624-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57623-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57624-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)