Skip to main content

Labor-Management Relations in Autocratic Regimes

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics

Abstract

This chapter examines contemporary labor-management relations in autocratic regimes, drawing on two sets of countries, namely, transitional peripheral economies in Central Asia (Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan) and hierarchical market economies in Latin America (Colombia and Honduras), for analysis. The chapter discusses the political economy, work, and labor relations of these countries, highlighting the role of the state, business, and international non-government organizations. It also takes into account the impact of large-scale (often in millions) migration of workers both internally within the country and cross-border. It is important to note that, just as there are different types of democratic systems, there are also different types of autocratic regimes with distinct political, economic, and social policy orientations, and this directly impacts the nature of labor relations. Under Latin American right-wing authoritarianism, a primary focus is on supporting a relatively small property-owning elite, and any countervailing worker power is seen as a direct attack on the latter. Even if workers have employment rights under the law, this zero-sum game view frequently results in extra-legal attacks on worker activists and their representatives, making union organization an extremely dangerous business. In contrast, the Central Asian autocracies, business elites are tied up within extended clan networks. Especially within Uzbekistan, a much closer emphasis has been placed on the provision of a critical mass of jobs as a means of buying political stability. Unions have been afforded a place in the system both for historical reasons and as proof of an ability to create a critical mass of decent work; at the same time, there is little room for union autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdukrakhamanov KK, Zokirova NK (2019) New challenges and priorities of the labor market development in Uzbekistan. Espacios 40(10):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Agudelo-Suárez AA, Vargas-Valencia MY, Vahos-Arias J, Ariza-Sosa G, Rojas-Gutiérrez WJ, Ronda-Pérez E (2020) Precarious employment and health: a qualitative study in Venezuelan immigrant population in Colombia. J Migr Health 1–2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbarzadeh S (1999) National identity and political legitimacy in Turkmenistan. Natl Pap 27(2):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktamovich RM (2020) Overview of legislation of Uzbekistan on the protection of employees’ rights. Am J Polit Sci Law and Criminol 2(11):65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bassam K (1997) The evolution of authoritarianism in Turkmenistan. Demokratizatsiya 5(3):386–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio T (2014) Beyond the transition paradigm: a research agenda for authoritarian consolidation. Demokratizatsiya 22(3):471–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Anner M (2011) The impact of international outsourcing on unionization and wages: evidence from the apparel export sector in Central America. ILR Rev 64(2):305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anner M (2015) Labor control regimes and worker resistance in global supply chains. Labour Hist 56(3):292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardila-Sierra A, Abadia-Barrero C (2020) Medical labour under neoliberalism: an ethnographic study in Colombia. Int J Public Health 65(7):1011–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold D, Campbell S (2017) Labour regime transformation in Myanmar: constitutive processes of contestation. Dev Chang 48(4):801–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro L, Benassi C, Meardi G (2019) Theoretical and empirical links between trade unions and democracy. Econ Ind Democr 40(1):3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Baydildina A, Akshinbay A, Bayetova M, Mkrytichyan L, Haliepesova A, Ataev D (2000) Agricultural policy reforms and food security in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. Food Policy 25(6):733–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazin L (2008) Some responses to globalisation in Uzbekistan: state authoritarianism, migrant labour and neo-traditionalism. Anthropol Middle East 3(1):10–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensusán G (2016) Organizing workers in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico: the authoritarian-corporatist legacy and old institutional designs in a new context. Theor Inq Law 17(1):131–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishara D (2020) Legacy trade unions as brokers of democratization? Lessons from Tunisia. Comp Polit 52(2):173–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett R, Malagon L (2013) Overcoming the original sin of the “original condition”: how reparations may contribute to emancipatory peacebuilding. Hum Rights Rev 14(3):257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (2013) One hundred years of labor control: violence, militancy, and the Fairtrade banana commodity chain in Colombia. Environ Plan A Econ Space 45(11):2572–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown A (2016) Political regimes and employment relations in Thailand. J Ind Relat 58(2):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd JW, Chi W, Wang Y, Xie Q (2014) What do unions in China do? Provincial-level evidence on wages, employment, productivity, and economic output. J Lab Res 35(2):185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraway TL (2012) Pathways of dominance and displacement: the varying fates of legacy unions in new democracies. World Polit 64:278–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas M, Juarez CE (1994) Labor issues in Colombia’s privatization: a comparative perspective. Q Rev Econ Finance 34(2):237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan CKC (2010) The challenge of labour in China: strikes and the changing labour regime in global factories. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JO (2017) Four centuries of imperial succession in the comprador Pacific. Pac Hist Rev 86(2):193–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky A (2007) Globalization, labor, and violence in Colombia’s banana zone. Int Labor Work Class Hist 72(1):90–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civico A (2016) The Para-state: an ethnography of Colombia’s death squads. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook LJ (2018) Trade unions, management, and the state in contemporary Russia. In: Business and state in contemporary Russia. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 151–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke FL (2020) Unions and alternative forms of worker representation in China in an era of privatisation and globalisation. In: Lee BH, Ng SH, Lansbury R (eds) Trade unions and labour movement in the Asia-Pacific region. Routledge, London, pp 45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Croucher R (2015) National and international labour relations in oil and gas transnational corporations in Kazakhstan. Int Bus Rev 24:948–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies T, Loveman B (eds) (1997) The politics of antipolitics: the military in Latin America. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado RGM (2018) Political systems in Central America. A compared historical analysis. Temas de Nuestra América. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos 34(64):83–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag M, Wood G (eds) (2018) Comparative capitalism and the transitional periphery: firm centred perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag M, McGuinnness M, Wood G, Bayyurt N (2015) Context, law and reinvestment decisions: why the transitional periphery differs from other post-state socialist economies. Int Bus Rev 24(6):955–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond L (2008) The democratic rollback-the resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Aff 87:36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Chen Y, Zou S, Nover D (2019) Managing the water-climate-food nexus for sustainable development in Turkmenistan. J Clean Prod 220:212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukalskis A, Gerschewski J (2017) What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation. Contemp Polit 23(3):251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durdyev S, Ismail S (2017) The build-operate-transfer model as an infrastructure privatisation strategy for Turkmenistan. Utilities Policy 48:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Eade D (2004) International NGOs and unions in the South: worlds apart or allies in the struggle? Dev Pract 14(1/2):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar AL (2004) Tribal nation: the making of Soviet Turkmenistan. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorowycz D, Gatto M, Maydom B (2020) State-sponsored trade unions after democratic transitions. Democratization 27(7):1142–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel E, Brudny YM (2012) No more colour! Authoritarian regimes and colour revolutions in Eurasia. Democratization 19(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Daly M (2019) Impunity of international labor rights violators and beneficiaries: the case of Uzbekistan. World Dev Perspect 14(C):100097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Hodess K (2019) Worker power, trade union strategy, and international connections: dockworker unionism in Colombia and Chile. Lat Am Polit Soc 61(3):29–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG (1963) Mexico: the Janus faces of 20th century bourgeois revolution. In: Whither Latin America. Monthly Review Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs D, Tse P, Feng X (2019) Labour research under coercive authoritarianism: comparative reflections on fieldwork challenges in China. Econ Ind Democr 40(1):132–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2011) Is China next? Wall Street J, 12 March. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703560404576188981829658442.htm. Accessed 20 June 2021

  • Gast AS (2020) The Eurasian Economic Union – keeping up with the EU and China. Post-Communist Econ 2020:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill L (2007) “Right there with you” Coca-Cola, labor restructuring and political violence in Colombia. Crit Anthropol 27(3):235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill L (2014) Building transnational labor solidarity: an interview with Neil Martin. Dialect Anthropol 38(2):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard J (1992) Strikes as collective voice: a behavioral analysis of strike activity. Ind Labor Relat Rev 46(1):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin K (1973) Policy options for rural development. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 35(4):239–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriev IS, Dekalchuk AA (2017) Collective learning and regime dynamics under uncertainty: labour reform and the way to autocracy in Russia. Democratization 24(3):481–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh C (2019) A Gramscian conjuncture in Latin America? Reflections on violence, hegemony, and geographical difference. Antipode 51(5):1474–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess S (2013) Authoritarian landscapes: popular mobilization and the institutional sources of resilience in nondemocracies. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann ET (2018) Labor market integration of returned educational migrants in Turkmenistan. Post-Sov Aff 34(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak S (2005) The ideology of the Turkmenbashy regime. Perspect Eur Polit Soc 6(2):305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell J (2008) All-China federation of trades unions beyond reform? The slow march of direct elections. China Q 196:845–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell J, Pringle T (2019) Shades of authoritarianism and state–labour relations in China. Br J Ind Relat 57(2):223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu EH, Zhang ML, Shan HM, Zhang L, Yue YQ (2018) Job satisfaction and union participation in China: developing and testing a mediated moderation model. Empl Relat 40(6):964–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui ES (2021) Movement-oriented labor organizations in an authoritarian regime: the case of China. Hum Relat. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211001433

  • Hydén G (1983) No shortcuts to progress: African development management in perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakóbowski J, Marszewski M (2018) Crisis in Turkmenistan a test for China’s policy in the region. OSW Comment 31(284):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadirova Z (2015) Integration of Uzbekistan into international labor market. Himal Cent Asian Stud 19(3/4):205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenka E (2017) Totalitarianism. In: Goodin R, Pettit P, Pogge T (eds) A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Wiley, London, pp 821–829

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp M (2005) Gender ideals and income realities: discourses about labor and gender in Uzbekistan. Natl Pap 33(3):403–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller S (2015) The puzzle of manual harvest in Uzbekistan: economics, status and labour in the Khrushchev era. Cent Asian Surv 34(3):296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korovkin T, Sanmiguel-Valderrama O (2007) Labour standards, global markets and non-state initiatives: Colombia's and Ecuador’s flower industries in comparative perspective. Third World Q 28(1):117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani N (2020) Who killed Berta Caceres?: dams, death squads, and an indigenous defender’s battle for the planet. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CK (2007) Against the law: labor protests in China’s rustbelt and sunbelt. University of California, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lévesque C, Marc-Antonin H, Murray G, Bourque R (2018) Corporate social responsibility and worker rights: institutionalizing social dialogue through international framework agreements. J Bus Ethics 153(1):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M (2010) Union organising in China: still a monolithic labor movement? Ind Labor Relat Rev 64(1):30–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Li C (2014) Environment pressures, managerial industrial relations ideologies and unionization in Chinese enterprises. Br J Ind Relat 52(1):82–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardozzi L (2019) Can distortions in agriculture support structural transformation? The case of Uzbekistan. Post-Communist Econ 31(1):52–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Tao Z, Wang Y (2010) Union effects on performance and employment relations: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 21(1):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje B (2014) Labour relations, production regimes and labour conflicts in the Chinese automotive industry. Int Labour Rev 153(4):535–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malynovska O (2006) Migration situation in Turkmenistan. In: Rios R (ed) Migration perspectives, planning and managing labour. International Organization for Migration, Vienna, pp 103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Malyuchenko I (2015) Labour migration from Central Asia to Russia: economic and social impact on the societies of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Cent Asia Secur Policy Briefs 21:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Maree J (1989) Harnessing intellectuals: tensions between democracy and leadership in the independent trade unions in the 1970s. S Afr Sociol Rev 1(2):58–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers A, Novelli M (2007) Researching resistance to neoliberal globalization: engaged ethnography as solidarity and praxis. Globalizations 4(2):229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia D, Uribe MJ (2011) Is violence against union members in Colombia systematic and targeted? Economia 12(1):119–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisá ELC, Silverman JK, Piñón Pereira Dias M (2019) Labor and development in twenty-first-century Latin America: two political options. Lat Am Perspect 46(6):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison C, Sacchetto D, Croucher R (2020) Migration, ethnicity and solidarity: ‘multinational workers’ in the former Soviet Union. Br J Ind Relat 58(4):761–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy RH (2019) Governance and the dimensions of autocracy. Constit Polit Econ 30(2):131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natta PM (2021) Anti-forced labour update: stronger legislation with an absence of guidance. Glob Trade Cust J 16(5):181–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Novelli M (2004) Globalisations, social movement unionism and new internationalisms: the role of strategic learning in the transformation of the Municipal Workers Union of EMCALI, Globalisation, Societies and Education 2(2):161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurdinova S (2014) Human development and women employment in Uzbekistan: situation and problems. Reg Form Dev Stud 13(2):88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell G (1978) Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state. Latin American Research Review 13(1):3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara SL (1999) Irrigation and water management in Turkmenistan: past systems, present problems and future scenarios. Eur Asia Stud 51(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyrouse S (2010) Berdymukhammedov’s Turkmenistan: a modest shift in domestic and social politics. China & Eurasia Forum Quarterly 8(3):47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrouse S (2015) Turkmenistan: strategies of power, dilemmas of development. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pion-Berlin D, Martínez R (2017) Soldiers, politicians, and civilians: reforming civil-military relations in democratic Latin America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pipkin S (2011) Local means in value chain ends: dynamics of product and social upgrading in apparel manufacturing in Guatemala and Colombia. World Dev 39(12):2119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polese A, Beacháin DÓ, Horák S (2017) Strategies of legitimation in Central Asia: regime durability in Turkmenistan. Contemp Polit 23(4):427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle T, Clarke S (2011) The challenge of transition: trade unions in Russia, China and Vietnam. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radchenko S (2017) Turkmenistan: grasping for legitimacy. J Democr 28(3):168–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimqulova L (2021) The procedure for resolving individual labour disputes in Uzbekistan, post-Soviet countries and some developed countries. Comparative-legal analysis. Ilkogretim Online 20(3):1494–1507

    Google Scholar 

  • Richani N (2005) Multinational corporations, rentier capitalism, and the war system in Colombia. Lat Am Polit Soc 47(3):113–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera M, Duncan G (2018) Colombian paramilitaries: from death squads to state competitors. Glob South 12(2):109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts B (1996) The social context of citizenship in Latin America. Int J Urban Reg Res 20(1):38–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GB (2007) Strikes and labor organization in hybrid regimes. Am Polit Sci Rev 101(4):781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo M (2019) The antinomies of successful mobilization: Colombian recyclers manoeuvre between dispossession and exploitation. Dev Chang 2019:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal JT (1967) The king’s ‘wicked advisers’ and medieval baronial rebellions. Polit Sci Q 82(4):595–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider BR (2009) Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. J Lat Am Stud 41(3):553–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafini GO, Szamosi LT (2015) Five star hotels of a multinational enterprise in countries of the transitional periphery: a case study in human resources management. Int Bus Rev 24(6):972–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecki J (2005) In support of democratization: free trade unions and the destabilization of the autocratic regimes. Rev Științ Pol Rev Sci Polit 6–7:135–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater D, Fenner S (2011) State power and staying power: infrastructural mechanisms and authoritarian durability. J Int Aff 65(1):15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring K (2020) The marriage of drug money and neoliberal development in Honduras: narcotrafficking cases touching the highest levels of the Honduran state reveal how intricate corruption networks launder drug money through extractive investment projects. Communities in resistance must contend not only with state repression, but also illicit interests. NACLA Rep Am 52(4):397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr SF (2014) Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan: staying away. In: Starr SF, Cornell SE (eds) Putin’s grand strategy: the Eurasian Union and its discontents. Silk Road Studies Program, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Singapore, pp 156–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart S (2009) Democracy promotion before and after the “colour revolutions”. Democratization 16(4):645–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stronski P (2017) Turkmenistan at twenty-five: the high price of authoritarianism. Carniege Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, Li Q (2007) Is the ACFTU a union and does it matter? J Ind Relat 49(5):701–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoene U (2019) Easing the tension between the state and the market? Developing social protection and labour law during Latin American industrialization. Cogent Soc Sci 5(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Tovar M, Luna-García JE (2019) Struggles for the right to health at work in Colombia: the case of associations of workers with work-related illnesses. Glob Public Health 14(6–7): 996–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubb D, Rojas DE (2020) “We voted for your peace Santos; now it is our turn”: a general strike, conflict, and the State in the Chocó, Colombia, Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes 45(2):155–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela JS (1989) Labor movements in transitions to democracy: a framework for analysis. Comp Polit 21(4):445–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z (2020) The mixed strategy of authoritarian labor rights repression. J Hum Rights 19(3):344–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G (2004) Business and politics in a criminal state: the case of Equatorial Guinea. Afr Aff 103(413):547–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G, Demirbag M (2015) Business and society on the transitional periphery: comparative perspectives. Int Bus Rev 24(6):917–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Zhong N (2013) Unions and workers’ welfare in Chinese firms. J Labor Econ 31(3):633–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakouchyk K (2019) Beyond autocracy promotion: a review. Politi Stud Rev 17(2):147–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Responsible Section Editor: Uwe Jirjahn. The authors of this chapter would like to thank Uwe Jirjahn for his insightful comments on the earlier version of this chapter. There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Lee Cooke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cooke, F.L., Wood, G. (2022). Labor-Management Relations in Autocratic Regimes. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_216-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_216-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics