Skip to main content

Abstract

Mediation analysis aims at evaluating the causal mechanisms through which a treatment or intervention affects an outcome of interest. The goal is to disentangle the total treatment effect into an indirect effect operating through one or several observed intermediate variables, the so-called mediators, as well as a direct effect reflecting any impact not captured by the observed mediator(s). This chapter reviews methodological advancements with a particular focus on applications in economics. It defines the parameters of interest, covers various identification strategies, for example, based on control variables or instruments, and presents sensitivity checks. Furthermore, it discusses several extensions of the standard mediation framework, such as multivalued treatments, mismeasured mediators, and outcome attrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert JM (2008) Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models. Stat Med 27:1282–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert JM, Nelson S (2011) Generalized causal mediation analysis. Biometrics 67:1028–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist J, Imbens G, Rubin D (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 91:444–472. (with discussion)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athey S, Imbens GW (2006) Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 74:431–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avin C, Shpitser I, Pearl J (2005) Identifiability of path-specific effects. In: IJCAI-05, proceedings of the nineteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Edinburgh, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. pp 357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellani L, Bia M (2018) The long-run effect of childhood poverty and the mediating role of education, forthcoming in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijwaard GE, Jones AM (2019) An IPW estimator for mediation effects in hazard models: with an application to schooling, cognitive ability and mortality. Empir Econ 57:129–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Bind M-A, VanderWeele TJ, Schwartz JD, Coull BA (2017) Quantile causal mediation analysis allowing longitudinal data. Stat Med 36:4182–4195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodory H, Huber M (2018) The causalweight package for causal inference in R, SES Working Paper 493, University of Fribourg, Fribourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunello G, Fort M, Schneeweis N, Winter-Ebmer R (2016) The causal effect of education on health: what is the role of health behaviors? Health Econ 25:314–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess S, Daniel RM, Butterworth AS, Thompson SG (2015) Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways. Int J Epidemiol 44:484–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Kuroki M, Pearl J, Tian J (2008) Bounds on direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables. Biometrics 64:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Imai K, Yam , and Z. Zhang (2016): “Efficient nonparametric estimation of causal mediation effects,” working paper arXiv:1601.03501

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Chen YC, Liu JT (2019) The impact of family composition on educational achievement, forthcoming in the Journal of Human Resources 54:122–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YT, Hsu YC, Wang HJ (2020) A stochastic frontier model with endogenous treatment status and mediator, forthcoming in the Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 38:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1957) Analysis of covariance: its nature and uses. Biometrics 13:261–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti G, Heckman JJ, Pinto R (2016) The effects of two influential early childhood interventions on health and healthy behaviour. Econ J 126:F28F65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stavola BL, Daniel RM, Ploubidis GB, Micali N (2015) Mediation analysis with intermediate confounding: structural equation modeling viewed through the causal inference lens. Am J Epidemiol 181:64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuchert E, Huber M, Schelker M (2019) Direct and indirect effects based on difference-in-differences with an application to political preferences following the Vietnam draft lottery. J Bus Econ Stat 37:710–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dippel C, Gold R, Heblich S, Pinto R (2017) Instrumental variables and causal mechanisms: unpacking the effect of trade on workers and voters, Natl Bur Econ Res (No. w23209). pp 1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominici F, Zeger SL, Parmigiani G, Katz J, Christian P (2006) Estimating percentile-specific treatment effects in counterfactual models: a case-study of micronutrient supplementation, birth weight and infant mortality. J R Stat Soc Ser C 55:261–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn G, Bentall R (2007) Modelling treatment-effect heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions (psychological treatments). Stat Med 26:4719–4745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores CA, Flores-Lagunes A (2009) Identification and estimation of causal mechanisms and net effects of a treatment under unconfoundedness, IZA DP No. 4237

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores CA, Flores-Lagunes A (2010) Nonparametric partial identification of causal net and mechanism average treatment effects. mimeo, University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangakis C, Rubin D (1999) Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 86:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangakis C, Rubin D (2002) Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 58:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frölich M, Huber M (2017) Direct and indirect treatment effects causal chains and mediation analysis with instrumental variables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 79(5):1645–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Imbens GW (2013) Why ask why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions, NBER Working Paper No. 19614

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraci M, Mattei A (2017) A novel quantile-based decomposition of the indirect effect in mediation analysis with an application to infant mortality in the US population, arXiv working paper 1710.00720v2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br J Math Stat Psychol 67:451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ, Pinto R (2015) Econometric mediation analyses: identifying the sources of treatment effects from experimentally estimated production technologies with unmeasured and mismeasured inputs. Econ Rev 34:6–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Pinto R, Savelyev P (2013) Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. Am Econ Rev 103:2052–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Diaz S, Schisterman EF, Hernan MA (2006) The birth weight “paradox” uncovered? Am J Epidemiol 164:1115–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano K, Imbens GW (2004) The propensity score with continuous treatments. In: Gelman A, Meng XL (eds) Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives. Wiley, New York, pp 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71:1161–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong G (2010) Ratio of mediator probability weighting for estimating natural direct and indirect effects. In: Proceedings of the American statistical association, biometrics section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, p 24012415

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong G (2015) Causality in a social world: moderation, meditation and spill-over. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hong G, Deutsch J, Hill HD (2015) Ratio-of-mediator-probability weighting for causal mediation analysis in the presence of treatment-by-mediator interaction. J Educ Behav Stat 40:307–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong G, Qin X, Yang F (2018) Weighting-based sensitivity analysis in causal mediation studies. J Educ Behav Stat 43:32–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y, Huber M, Lee Y, Lettry L (2018) Direct and indirect effects of continuous treatments based on generalized propensity score weighting, forthcoming in Journal of Applied Econometrics, SES Working Paper 495, University of Fribourg, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y, Huber M, Lai T (2019) Nonparametric estimation of natural direct and indirect effects based on inverse probability weighting. J Econ Methods 8:621–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber M (2014) Identifying causal mechanisms (primarily) based on inverse probability weighting. J Appl Econ 29:920–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber M (2015) Causal pitfalls in the decomposition of wage gaps. J Bus Econ Stat 33:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Solovyeva A (2018) Direct and indirect effects under sample selection and outcome attrition, SES Working Paper 496, University of Fribourg, Fribourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Lechner M, Mellace G (2016) The finite sample performance of estimators for mediation analysis under sequential conditional independence. J Bus Econ Stat 34:139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Lechner M, Mellace G (2017) Why do tougher caseworkers increase employment? The role of program assignment as a causal mechanism. Rev Econ Stat 99:180–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Lechner M, Strittmatter A (2018) Direct and indirect effects of training vouchers for the unemployed. J R Stat Soc Ser A 181:441–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Schelker M, Strittmatter A (2019) Direct and indirect effects based on changes-in-changes, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1909.04981

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, van Dyk DA (2004) Causal inference with general treatment regimes. J Am Stat Assoc 99:854–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, Yamamoto T (2013) Identification and sensitivity analysis for multiple causal mechanisms: revisiting evidence from framing experiments. Polit Anal 21:141–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D (2010a) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods 15:309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010b) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Stat Sci 25:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2013) Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms. J R Stat Soc Ser A 176:5–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens GW (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat 86:4–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens GW, Angrist J (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62:467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens GW, Newey WK (2009) Identification and estimation of triangular simultaneous equations models without additivity. Econometrica 77:1481–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joffe MM, Small D, Have TT, Brunelli S, Feldman HI (2008) Extended instrumental variables estimation for overall effects. Int J Biostat 4:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd CM, Kenny DA (1981) Process analysis: estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Eval Rev 5:602–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman JS, MacLehose RF, Kaufman S (2004) A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation. Epidemiol Perspect Innovat 1:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman S, Kaufman J, MacLenose R, Greenland S, Poole C (2005) Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables. Stat Med 24:1683–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2015) Identifying mechanisms behind policy interventions via causal mediation analysis. J Policy Anal Manage 34:937–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange T, Vansteelandt S, Bekaert M (2012) A simple unified approach for estimating natural direct and indirect effects. Am J Epidemiol 176:190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange T, Rasmussen M, Thygesen LC (2014) Assessing natural direct and indirect effects through multiple pathways. Am J Epidemiol 179(4):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner M (2009) Sequential causal models for the evaluation of labor market programs. J Bus Econ Stat 27:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner M, Miquel R (2010) Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empir Econ 39:111–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei A, Mealli F (2011) Augmented designs to assess principal strata direct effects. J R Stat Soc Ser B 73:729–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquel R (2002) Identification of dynamic treatment effects by instrumental variables. University of St. Gallen Economics Discussion Paper Series, 2002–11, St. Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (2001) Direct and indirect effects. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, pp 411–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, van der Laan MJ (2006) Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology 17:276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirlott AG, MacKinnon DP (2016) Design approaches to experimental mediation. J Exp Soc Psychol 66:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdthavee N, Lekfuangfu WN, Wooden M (2013) The marginal income effect of education on happiness: estimating the direct and indirect effects of compulsory schooling on well-being in Australia, IZA Discussion Paper No. 7365. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42:185–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins J (1986) A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods - application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math Model 7:1393–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM (2003) Semantics of causal DAG models and the identification of direct and indirect effects. In: Green P, Hjort N, Richardson S (eds) In highly structured stochastic systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Greenland S (1992) Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Richardson T (2010) Alternative graphical causal models and the identification of direct effects. In: Causality and psychopathology: finding the determinants of disorders and their cures, ed. by P. Shrout, K. Keyes, and K. Omstein. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66:688–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (2004) Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes. Scand J Stat 31:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawada M (2019) Non-compliance in randomized control trials without exclusion restrictions, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1910.03204

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidpeter B (2018) Involuntary unemployment and the labor market returns to interim jobs, working paper, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen E, Chou C-P, Pentz MA, Berhane K (2014) Quantile mediation models: a comparison of methods for assessing mediation across the outcome distribution, multivariate behavioral research. Multivar Behav Res 49:471–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen M, Skipper L (2006) The costs of motherhood: an analysis using matching estimators. J Appl Econ 21:919–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjölander A (2009) Bounds on natural direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables. Stat Med 28:558–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small DS (2012) Mediation analysis without sequential ignorability: using baseline covariates interacted with random assignment as instrumental variables. J Stat Res 46:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen J, Loeys T, Moerkerke B, Vansteelandt S (2017a) Flexible mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Am J Epidemiol 186:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen J, Loeys T, Moerkerke B, Vansteelandt S (2017b) Medflex: an R package for flexible mediation analysis using natural effect models. J Stat Softw 76(11):1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ (2013) Inverse odds ratio-weighted estimation for causal mediation analysis. Stat Med 32:4567–4580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Shpitser I (2012) Semiparametric theory for causal mediation analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. Ann Stat 40:1816–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, VanderWeele TJ (2014) On identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure. Epidemiology 25:282–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have TR, Joffe MM, Lynch KG, Brown GK, Maisto SA, Beck AT (2007) Causal mediation analyses with rank preserving models. Biometrics 63:926–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Imai K, Keele L (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw 59:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Laan MJ, Petersen ML (2008) Direct effect models. Int J Biostat 4:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2008) Simple relations between principal stratification and direct and indirect effects. Statist Probab Lett 78:2957–2962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2009) Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 20:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2010) Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 21:540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2012a) Comments: should principal stratification be used to study mediational processes? J Res Educ Effect 5(3):245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2012b) Mediation analysis with multiple versions of the mediator. Epidemiology 23:454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ (2016) Mediation analysis: a practitioner’s guide. Annu Rev Public Health 37(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ, Chiba Y (2014) Sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects in the presence of exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounders. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health 11(2):e9027

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2009) Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Stat Interface 2:457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2010) Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. Am J Epidemiol 172:1339–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2014) Mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Epidemiol Methods 2:95–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteelandt S (2009) Estimating direct effects in cohort and casecontrol studies. Epidemiology 20(6):851–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteelandt S, VanderWeele TJ (2012) Natural direct and indirect effects on the exposed: effect decomposition under weaker assumptions. Biometrics 68:1019–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteelandt S, Bekaert M, Lange T (2012) Imputation strategies for the estimation of natural direct and indirect effects. Epidemiol Methods 1:129–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox AJ (2001) On the importance-and the unimportance-of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol 30:1233–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch C, Strobl R (2018) Identification of causal mechanisms based on between-subject double randomization designs, IZA Discussion Paper No. 11626. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T (2013) Identification and estimation of causal mediation effects with treatment noncompliance, unpublished manuscript, MIT Department of Political Science, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng W, van der Laan MJ (2012) Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects. Int J Biostat 8:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Huber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Huber, M. (2020). Mediation Analysis. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_162-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_162-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Mediation Analysis
    Published:
    20 October 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_162-2

  2. Original

    Mediation Analysis
    Published:
    07 September 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_162-1