Abstract
This chapter looks at the ethics of separating conjoined twins by first establishing the individual dignity of each twin in light of both philosophical reasoning and how the Church has addressed such cases throughout its history—e.g., each twin being baptized separately. The essay goes on to then analyzes the moral permissibility of separating Jodie and Mary in light of the intentionality involved. The chapter concludes that, since there is no course of action that could benefit both twins, and only one of them is harmed while the other is benefitted, it is permissible to separate the two for the intended end of benefitting Jodie, while tolerating the foreseen side-effect that Mary will die as her separated body will be unable to sustain itself. However, that it would have been improper for Jodie and Mary’s parents to have consented to the separation since they should be equally concerned about the survival and welfare of both children. The fact that it was a judge’s order that ultimately determined the twins’ respective fates was more ethically appropriate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Resnick’s (2013, p. 344) translation of Augustine (1955, bk. 16, cap. 8, ll. 53–6): “ante annos aliquot, nostra certe memoria, in oriente duplex homo natus est superioribus membris, inferioribus simplex. nam duo erant capita, duo pectora, quattuor manus, uenter autem unus, et pedes duo, sicut uni homini; et tamdiu uixit, ut multos ad eum uidendum fama contraheret.”
- 2.
This medieval debate finds an analog in contemporary discussions of human identity and individuality. For example, Eric Olson (2014) examines questions such as whether conjoined twins are two organisms but only one person.
- 3.
I have attempted to answer these questions in Kaczor (2003).
- 4.
My own views may be found in Kaczor (2001, 2007).
- 5.
I leave aside a vexing case. What should be done if one adult conjoined twin wishes for separation and the other does not want separation? In cases of profoundly conjoined twins , it could be like Jodie and Mary that both will die if they are not separated, but one can survive and the other die more quickly if they are separated. In such cases, as well as others, what should be done if the twins, both consenting adults, disagree with each other? I leave this good question here unanswered.
- 6.
I am grateful to the James Madison Program at Princeton University for the support provided in writing this essay.
References
Augustine. 1955. In De civitate Dei, ed. Bernhard Dombart and Alfons Kalb. Turnhout: Brepols.
Brock, Stephen. 2008. Veritatis Splendor §78, St. Thomas, and (Not Merely) Physical Objects of Moral Acts. Nova et Vetera, English Edition 6(1): 1–62.
Dewan, Lawrence. 2008. St. Thomas, Rhonheimer, and the object of the Human Act. Nova et Vetera, English Edition 6(1): 63–112.
Finnis, John. 2010. The other F-word. The Public Discourse, October 20. http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/10/1849/. Accessed 21 July 2016.
Finnis, John, Germain Grisez, and Joseph Boyle. 2001. ‘Direct’ and ‘indirect’: A reply to critics of our action theory. The Thomist 65: 1–44.
Flannery, Kevin. 2008. Aristotle and human movements. Nova et Vetera, English Edition 6(1): 113–138.
Gilbert, Daniel. 2006. Stumbling on happiness. New York: Vintage Books.
Kaczor, Christopher. 2003. The tragic case of Jodie and Mary: Questions about separating conjoined twins. The Linacre Quarterly 70: 159–170.
———. 2007. Intention, foresight, and mutilation: A response to Giebel. International Philosophical Quarterly 47: 477–482.
———. 2015. The ethics of abortion: Women’s rights, human life, and the question of justice, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Kaveny, M. Cathleen. 2001. The case of conjoined twins: Embodiment, individuality, and dependence. Theological Studies 62: 753–786.
———. 2007. Virtuous decision-makers and incompetent patients: The case of the conjoined twins. In A just and true love: Feminism at the frontiers of theological ethics, ed. Maura A. Ryan and Brian F. Linnane, 338–368. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Kobylarz, Krzysztof. 2014. History of treatment of conjoined twins. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 46: 116–123.
Lee, M., A. Gosain, and D. Becker. 2011. The bioethics of separating conjoined twins in plastic surgery. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 128: 328e–334e.
Long, Steven A. 2008. Veritatis Splendor §78 and the Teleological Grammar of the Moral Act. Nova et Vetera, English Edition 6(1): 139–156.
O’Brien, Matthew. B., and Robert C. Koons. 2012. Objects of intention: A hylomorphic critique of the new natural law theory. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86(4): 655–703.
Olson, Eric T. 2014. The metaphysical implications of conjoined twinning. Southern Journal of Philosophy 52(S1): 24–40.
Resnick, Irven Michael. 2013. Conjoined twins, medieval biology, and evolving reflection on individual identity. Viator 44: 343–368.
Seligman, Martin E.P. 2011. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.
Tollefsen, Christopher. 2013. Response to Robert Koons and Matthew O’Brien’s “Objects of Intention”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87(4): 751–778.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaczor, C. (2017). Is It Ethically Permissible to Separate Conjoined Twins? Murder, Mutilation, and Consent. In: Eberl, J. (eds) Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 127. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55766-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55766-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55764-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55766-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)