Abstract
This chapter aims to present what could be the contribution of a socio-critical approach for the benefit of digital equity in education. It begins with the presentation of the main issues of digital equity in education. It continues with the presentation of the need and the foundations of that socio-critical approach on digital technologies in education and ends with the main lines of research aligned with such a perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albero, B., & Thibault, F. (2009). La recherche française en sciences humaines et sociales sur les technologies en éducation. Revue française de pédagogie, 169, 53–66.
Barre-de Miniac, C. (2000). Le rapport à l’écriture. Aspects théoriques et didactiques. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Bayne, S. (2014). What’s the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? Learning Media and Technology, 40(1), 5–20.
Beynon, W. M., Norris, M. T., Russ, S. B., Slade, M. D., Yung, Y. P., & Yung, Y. W. (1989). Software construction using definitions: An illustrative example. Warwick: University of Warwick.
Brotcorne, P., & Valenduc, G. (2009). Les compétences numériques et les inégalités dans les usages d’internet. Comment réduire ces inégalités? Les Cahiers du numérique, 1(5), 45–68.
Bruillard, É. (2011). Le déploiement des ENT dans l’enseignement secondaire: entre acteurs multiples, dénis et illusions. Revue française de pédagogie, 177, 101–130.
Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge/Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Bukodi, E. (2017). Cumulative inequalities over the life-course: Life-long learning and social mobility in Britain. Journal of Social Policy, 46, 367–404.
Bulfin, S., Johnson, N. F., & Bigum, C. (Eds.). (2015). Critical perspectives on technology and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chaptal, A. (2003). Réflexions sur les technologies éducatives et les évolutions des usages: le dilemme constructiviste. Distances et savoirs, 1(1), 121–147.
Collin, S., Guichon, N., & Ntebutse, J. G. (2015). Une approche sociocritique des usages numériques en éducation. STICEF, 22, 89–117.
Conseil international des sciences sociales (CISS), l’Institut des Études Développement (IDS), & UNESCO. (2016). Rapport mondial sur les sciences sociales. Lutter contre les inégalités. Pistes vers un monde juste. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002459/245995f.pdf
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York:Teachers College Press
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1880–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
De Haan, J. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide. IT & Society, 1(7), 66–88.
De Munck, J. (2011). Les trois dimensions de la sociologie critique. Sociologies. Retrieved from http://sociologies.revues.org/3576
Dieuzeide, H. (1982). Marchands et prophètes en technologie de l’éducation. In Actes du colloque: Les formes médiatisées de la communication éducative (pp. 78–82). Lyon: Ecole Normale supérieure de Saint-Cloud.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, E. C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and Agenda for research on digital inequality. Report prepared for the Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from http://socinfogroup2.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/41364119/fromunequalaccesstodifferentiateduse.pdf
Duru-Bellat, M. (2006). Peut-on diminuer les inégalités scolaires à l’école? In G. Chapelle D. Meuret (dir.). Améliorer l’école. (pp. 25-36). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Erstad, O. (2012). The learning lives of digital youth-beyond the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 25–43.
Erstad, O., Gilje, O., & Arnseth, H.-C. (2013). Learning lives connected: Digital youth across school and community spaces. Comunicar, 40(20), 89–98.
Eynon, R. (2008). The learner and their context: Review of the evidence. A report to BECTA. Oxford: Department of Education. University of Oxford.
Eynon, R. (2012). The challenges and possibilities of the impact agenda. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(1), 1–3.
Friesen, N. (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of elearning. Ubiquity, 9(22), 3–9. Retrieved at: http://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=1386860
Friesen, N. (2013). Educational Technology and the New Language of Learning: Lineage and Limitations. In N. Selwyn & K Facer. (dir.), The Politics of Education and Technology: Conflicts, Controversies, and Connections (pp.21–38). New York/: Palgrave Macmillan.
George, É. (2014). Quelles perspectives critiques pour aborder les TIC? Tic & Société, 8(1–2), 10–29.
Gorski, P. C. (2009). Insisting on digital equity: Reframing the dominant discourse on multicultural education and technology. Urban Education, 44(3), 348–364.
Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2010). From digital divide to digital equity: Learners’ ICT competence in four primary schools in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6(2), 84–105.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved from http://webuse.org/pdf/Hargittai-SecondLevelFM02.pdf
Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An Agenda for research and design. Technical report. Irvine: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jacquinot, G. (1981). On demande toujours des inventeurs…. Apprendre des médias, 33, 5–23.
Le Douarin, L. (2014). Usages des nouvelles technologies en famille. Informations sociales, 1(181), 62–71.
Leask, M. (2011). Improving the professional knowledge base for education: Using knowledge management and Web 2.0 tools. Policy Futures in Education, 9(5), 644–660.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
Maddux, C. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2012). External validity and research in information technology in education. Computers in the Schools, 29(3), 249–252.
Moeglin, P. (1993). Le paradigme de la machine à enseigner. Études de communication, 14, 91–106.
OCDE. (2011). L’enseignement supérieur à l’horizon 2030. Paris: OCDE.
OECD. (2010). Are the new millenium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2013). Equity and quality in education. Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/50293148.pdf
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Results in focus. Paris: OECD.
Penoup, M.-C. (1999). L’écriture extrascolaire des collégiens, Des constats aux perspectives didactiques. Paris: ESF.
Resta, P. (2011). EDU SUMMIT 2011. Thematic working group 4: Global awareness. Summary report and action Agenda 2011. Retrieved from http://www.curtin.edu.au/edusummit/local/docs/4_EDUsummIT_2011_global_awareness_expanded_brief_paper.pdf
Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2006). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of E-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage.
The Glossary of Education Reform. (n.d.). Equity. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/equity/
The National Digital Inclusion Alliance. (n.d.). Definitions. Retrieved from https://digitalinclusion.org/definitions/
Underwood, J., & Dillon, G. (2011). Chasing dreams and recognising realities: Teachers’ responses to ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 317–330.
Warschauer, M. (1998). Online learning in sociocultural context. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(3), 68–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ntebutse, J.G., Collin, S. (2018). A Sociocritical Perspective on the Integration of Digital Technology in Education. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Lai, KW. (eds) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_73-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_73-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53803-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53803-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
A Sociocritical Perspective on the Integration of Digital Technology in Education- Published:
- 21 February 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_73-2
-
Original
A Sociocritical Perspective on the Integration of Digital Technology in Education- Published:
- 11 January 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_73-1