Abstract
Usually, the notion of time shared by paleontologists is an arrow. Hence, time is a synonym of duration, either when discussing questions relevant to one thousand years or to a billion years. Geological time, or “deep time”, is a simple concept. This concept of time has been built from lithology and from the study of faunas and floras inside these lithologic layers, or, differently said, from fossils. Stratigraphy, as a science, rests on lithology and fossils. Modern methods which produce radiometric dates (absolute ages) confirmed two centuries of stratigraphers’observations and speculations. Nevertheless, comparison of the linear time of geology and the branching time of living beings is a source of severe difficulties. Although they seem familiar, the relationships between life and time, between differentiation and duration, or between evolution and chronology are rather complex. Time and fossils are less secure allies than usually thought. The deployment of living beings in the temporal dimension creates multiple parallel durations and independent developments. Hence, the historical reading of the tree of life and the interpretation of geological time are not immediate. The notions of hierarchical time and of temporal paralogy developed in this paper, demonstrate these difficulties, often underestimated.
Time passes slowly up here in the daylight We stare straight ahead and try so hard to stay right
(Bob Dylan, Time passes slowly)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
“Homology” here is to be understood as similarity due to resemblance.
- 2.
“Homology” here is to be understood as similarity due to ancestry .
References
Benton, M.J., and G.W. Storrs. 1994. Testing the quality of the fossil record: Paleontological knowledge is improving. Geology 22: 111–114.
Chadwick, G.H. 1930. Subdivision of geological time. Geological Society of America Bulletin 41: 47–48.
Corsi, P. 2001. Lamarck. Genèse et enjeux du transformisme. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Cuvier, G. 1812. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles. Vol. 4. 1st ed. Paris: Deterville.
———. 1825. Discours sur les révolutions de la surface du globe. Paris: Dufour et D’Ocagne.
———. 1834. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles, tome premier. 4th ed. Paris: Edmond d’Ocagne.
Cuvier, G., and A. Brongniart. 1808. Essai sur la géographie minéralogique des environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle 11: 293–316.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.
Delamétherie, J.-C. 1797. Théorie de la Terre (2e édition, 5 vols.). Paris: Maradan.
Doolittle, W.F., and E. Bapteste. 2007. Pattern pluralism and the tree of life hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 2043–2049.
D’Orbigny, A. 1849. Cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques. Vol. 1. Paris: Masson.
Dupuis, C. 1986. Darwin et les taxinomies d’aujourd’hui. In L’Ordre et la diversité du vivant, ed. P. Tassy, 215–240. Paris: Arthème Fayard/Fondation Diderot.
———. 1992. Permanence et actualité de la Systématique – III – Regards épistémologiques sur la taxinomie cladiste. Adresse à la XIe session de la Willi Hennig Society (Paris 1992). Cahiers des Naturalistes 48: 29–53.
Eldredge, N., and J. Cracraft. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Method and theory in comparative biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fitch, W. 1970. Distinguish homologous from analogous proteins. Systematic Zoology 19: 99–113.
Gheerbrant, E., and P. Tassy. 2009. L’origine et l’évolution des éléphants. Comptes Rendus Palevol 8: 281–294.
Gingerich, P.D. 1976. Paleontology and phylogeny: Patterns of evolution at the species level in early Tertiary mammals. American Journal of Science 276: 1–28.
———. 1979. The stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction in vertebrate paleontology. In Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology, ed. J. Cracraft and N. Eldredge, 41–77. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gohau, G. 1987. Histoire de la géologie. Paris: La Découverte.
Gradstein, F., J. Ogg, M. Schmitz, G. Ogg (eds.) (2012). The geologic time scale 2012. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. 1994. Comparing the stratigraphic record to estimates of phylogeny. Paleobiology 20: 470–483.
Huelsenbeck, J.P., and B. Rannala. 1997. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny using stratigraphic data. Paleobiology 23: 174–180.
Kocot, K.M., M.R. Citarella, L.L. Moroz, and K.M. Halanych. 2013. PhyloTreePruner: A phylogenetic tree-based approach for selection of orthologous sequences for phylogenomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 9: 429–435.
Lamarck, J.-B. Monet de. 1802. Hydrogéologie ou Recherches sur l’influence qu’ont les eaux sur la surface du globe terrestre. Paris: L’auteur.
Lamarck, J.-B Monet de. 1809. Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Dentu.
Lecointre, G. 2015. Telling the story of life: On the use of narrative. In Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences, ed. T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, and M. Silberstein, 387–410. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/ London: Springer.
Lecointre, G., and H. Le Guyader. 2006. The tree of life. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Lelièvre, H., Bagils R. Zaragüeta, and I. Rouget. 2008. Temporal information, fossil record and phylogeny. C. R. Palevol 7: 27–36.
Mandelbrot, B. 1956. La distribution de Willis-Yule, relative aux nombres d’espèces dans les genres biologiques. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires de l’Académie des Sciences 242: 2223–2226.
Matthew, W.D. 1926. Early days of fossil hunting in the high plains. Natural History 26: 449–454.
Minelli, A., G. Fusco, and S. Sartori. 1991. Self-similarity in biological classification. Biosystems 26: 89–97.
Nelson, G.J., and P.Y. Ladiges. 1996. Paralogy in cladistic biogeography and analysis of paralogy-free subtrees. American Museum Novitates 3167: 1–58.
Norell, M.A., and M.J. Novacek. 1992. The fossil record an evolution: Comparing cladistic paleontologic evidence for vertebrate history. Science 255: 1690–1693.
Pol, D., and M.A. Norell. 2001. Comments on the Manhattan stratigraphic measure. Cladistics 17: 285–289.
Pol, D., M.A. Norell, and M.E. Siddall. 2004. Measures of stratigraphic fit to phylogeny and their sensitivity to tree size, tree shapes, and scale. Cladistics 20: 64–75.
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr. 1984. A Kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10: 246–267.
Siddall, M.E. 1996. Stratigraphic consistency and the shape of things. Systematic Biology 45: 111–115.
———. 1997. Stratigraphic indices in the balance: A reply to Hitchin and Benton. Systematic Biology 46: 569–573.
———. 1998. Stratigraphic fit to phylogenies: A proposed solution. Cladistics 14: 201–208.
Smith, A.B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil records. Documenting evolutionary patterns. Oxford: Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Smith, W. 2010 [first edition 1817]. A stratigraphical system of organized fossils. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sollers, P. 2003. Eloge de l’infini. Paris: Gallimard, Folio.
Stenonis, N. 1669. De solido intra solidum naturaliter contento. Dissertationis prodromus. Florence.
Tassy, P. 1990. Phylogénie et classification des Proboscidea (Mammalia): Historique et actualité. Annales de Paléontologie 76: 159–224.
———. 1991. L’Arbre à remonter le temps. Paris: Christian Bourgois.
———. 1994. Le temps entre stabilité et rupture: La dimension paléontologique. L’Inactuel 2: 57–64.
———. 1999. Willi Hennig et l’objet paléontologique. Geodiversitas 21: 5–23.
Theobald, D.L. 2010. A formal test of the theory of universal common ancestry. Nature 465: 219–222.
Van Couvering, J., and W.A. Berggren. 1977. Biostratigraphic basis of the Neogene time scale. In Concepts and methods of biostratigraphy, ed. E.G. Kauffman and K.J.F. Hazel, 282–306. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
Wagner, P.J. 1995. Stratigraphic tests of cladistic hypotheses. Paleobiology 21: 153–178.
Wills, M.A. 1999. Congruence between phylogeny and stratigraphy: Randomization tests and the gap excess ratio. Systematic Biology 48: 559–580.
Zaragüeta Bagils, R., and H. Lelièvre. 2001. Ages et noms versus caractères et phylogénie: le problème de l’ajustement entre la stratigraphie et la phylogénie. In Systématique et Paléontologie, Biosystema, ed. P. Tassy and A. de Ricqlès, vol. 19, 169–185.
Zaragüeta Bagils, R., H. Lelièvre, and P. Tassy. 2004. Temporal paralogy, cladograms, and the quality of the fossil record. Geodiversitas 26: 381–389.
Acknowledgements
I thank Christophe Bouton and Philippe Huneman for their invitation to participate in this volume. This article is derived from a presentation given on the 27th of September 2012 at the conference “The Time of Nature, the Nature of Time” organized by C. Bouton, Ph. Huneman and P. Duris, in Bordeaux, France. A former version of the manuscript benefited from René Zaragüeta’s criticisms and suggestions. Two careful reviewers helped greatly to improve the text. I greatly appreciated the artistic help of Alexandre Lethiers and Sophie Fernandez. I am also grateful to Andrew McFarland for a thorough language check of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tassy, P. (2017). The Making of Paleontological Time. In: Bouton, C., Huneman, P. (eds) Time of Nature and the Nature of Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53725-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53725-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53723-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53725-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)