Skip to main content

Turing on the Integration of Human and Machine Intelligence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophical Explorations of the Legacy of Alan Turing

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 324))

Abstract

Philosophical discussion of Alan Turing’s writings on intelligence has mostly revolved around a single point made in a paper published in the journal Mind in 1950. This is unfortunate, for Turing’s reflections on machine (artificial) intelligence, human intelligence, and the relation between them were more extensive and sophisticated. They are seen to be extremely well-considered and sound in retrospect. Recently, IBM developed a question-answering computer (Watson) that could compete against humans on the game show Jeopardy! There are hopes it can be adapted to other contexts besides that game show, in the role of a collaborator of, rather than a competitor to, humans. Another, different, research project—an artificial intelligence program put into operation in 2010—is the machine learning program NELL (Never Ending Language Learning), which continuously ‘learns’ by ‘reading’ massive amounts of material on millions of web pages. Both of these recent endeavors in artificial intelligence rely to some extent on the integration of human guidance and feedback at various points in the machine’s learning process. In this paper, I examine Turing’s remarks on the development of intelligence used in various kinds of search, in light of the experience gained to date on these projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Where I think Turing was indicating “human” or “humans” in using the term “man” or “men”, I may paraphrase or replace words within brackets accordingly.

  2. 2.

    In supervised learning, all of the examples given the computer program during training are labeled; in semi-supervised learning, the computer program is provided with labels for only a subset of the examples it is given to deal with, and in unsupervised learning, none of the examples the computer program is to deal with is labeled.

  3. 3.

    The dating of the work as composed in the summer of 1948 is per Jack B. Copeland, footnote 53 of Copeland (ed.). (2004), p. 409. Copeland notes errors by others in stating the date of this report. He notes that the phrase “Manchester machine (as actually working 8/7/48)” appears in both the finished NPL [National Physical Laboratory] report and in the draft typescript. Thus the draft report was completed sometime after July 8. The 1948 conference of the International Congress of Genetics was held July 7–14, 1948 (Bengtsson and Tunlid 2010, p. 709).

  4. 4.

    Quoted in (Bengtsson and Tunlid 2010), p. 712.

  5. 5.

    I think that Turing is very clear about the fact that he is drawing an analogy when he lays out the analogy between natural selection and the analogue he proposes be tried (in his later (1950) paper Computing machinery and intelligence). In the analogy in that paper, which he explicitly lays out there, he says that “the judgment of the experimenter” is analogous to Natural selection. In that analogy, “how well [the machine] learns” would be analogous to how well an animal form does in terms of survival.

  6. 6.

    In Copeland (ed.) 2004, p. 409.

  7. 7.

    Vygotsky”s Thought and Language was published in 1934, and he had traveled to London before that.

  8. 8.

    In a suggestive paper (Lindblom and Ziemke 2003) Jessica Lindblom and Tom Ziemke discuss how Vygotsky’s views Vygotsky (1986) might apply to designing human-robot interaction.

  9. 9.

    “NELL: The Computer that Learns”, downloaded 25 January 2014. http://www.cmu.edu Web.

  10. 10.

    In (Mitchell et al. 2009).

  11. 11.

    Checking NELL’s “Recently-Learned Facts” on January 26, 2014, I find that “h_ross perot is a politician who holds the office of president” is held with 99.2% confidence!

  12. 12.

    Of the 4.53% of answers that were not Wikipedia titles, “some are multiple answer questions (e.g., “Indiana, Wisconsin, and Ohio” and “heat and electricity”), some are synthesized answers to puzzle questions (e.g. “TGIF Murray Abrahams” and “level devil”) and a small number are verb phrases (e.g., “get your dog to heel”) (Chu-Carroll 2012a; 4:2)

References

  • Bengtsson, B. O., and A. Tunlid. 2010. The 1948 International Congress of Genetics in Sweden: People and Politics. Genetics 185: 709–715. Also available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907196

  • Chu-Carroll, J., J. Fan, N. Schlaefer, and W. Zadrozny. 2012a. Textual Resource Acquisition and Engineering. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(¾), Paper 4 May/July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Carroll, J. et al. 2012b. Finding Needles in the Haystack: Search and Candidate Generation. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(¾), Paper 6 May/July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Carroll, J., E. W. Brown, A. Lally, and J. W. Murdock.2012c. Identifying Implicit Relationships. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(¾) Paper 12 May/July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J.B., ed. 2004. The Essential Turing: Seminal Writings in Computing, Logic, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Artificial Life, Plus the Secrets of Enigma. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. 2008. Repurposing Turing’s ‘Human Brake’. Annals of the History of Computing. 30(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R., F. H. Bennett III, D. Andre, and M. A. Keane. 1999. Genetic Programming: Turing’s Third Way to Achieve Machine Intelligence. EUROGEN workshop in Jyvdskyld, Finland on May 30 – June 3, 1999. Available at http://www.genetic-programming.com/jkpdf/eurogen1999turing.pdf.

  • Lao, N., T. Mitchell, and W. W. Cohen. 2011. Random Walk Inference and Learning in a Large Scale Knowledge Base. In EMNLP ‘11 Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Matural Language Processing, 529–539. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, J., and Y. Ziemke. 2003. Social Situatedness of Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Vygotsky and Beyond. Adaptive Behavior 11 (2): 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. M., J. Betteridge, A. Carlson, E. Hruschka, and R. Wang. 2009. Populating the Semantic Web by Macro-Reading Internet Text. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, J. W. et al. 2012. Typing Candidate Answers Using Type Coercion. IBM Journal of Research and Development 56(¾), Paper 7 May/July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • NELL: The Computer that Learns. http://www.cmu.edu/homepage/computing/2010/fall/nell-computer-that-learns.shtml. Accessed 25 Jan 2014

  • Sterrett, S. G. 2012. Bringing up Turing’s ‘Child-Machine’. In How the World Computes: Turing Centenary Conference and 8th Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2012, Cambridge, UK, June 18–23, 2012. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7318, ed. S. Barry Cooper, Anuj Dawar, and Benedikt Löwe, 703–713, Berlin/Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A.M. 2005. Proposed Electronic Calculator (1945). In Alan Turing’s Automatic Computing Engine: The MASTER Codebreaker’s Struggle to Build the Modern Computer, ed. B.J. Copeland, 369–454. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M. 2004a. Intelligent Machinery (1948). In ed. J. B. Copeland, 418–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004b. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. In ed. J. B. Copeland, 418–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004c. Lecture on the Automatic Computing Engine. In ed. J. B. Copeland, 378–394. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published 1934).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan G. Sterrett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sterrett, S.G. (2017). Turing on the Integration of Human and Machine Intelligence. In: Floyd, J., Bokulich, A. (eds) Philosophical Explorations of the Legacy of Alan Turing. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 324. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53280-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics