Abstract
Ultrasound scanning plays an important role in evaluating the extent of benign and malignant anorectal and pelvic diseases. This chapter discusses this important method for evaluating rare anorectal and pelvic neoplasias, one which allows for the quantification of the exact circumferential and longitudinal extension of the lesion into the rectal wall or adjacent tissue and the relation between the lesion and the sphincter muscles. This is the most important aspect to consider when planning surgical resection with or without sphincter-saving. In addition, the three-dimensional scanning mode is safer, making it possible to review the images posteriorly, in real time, as required by some lesions.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
FormalPara Learning ObjectiveThe reader will become familiarized with the role of endoanal ultrasonography in evaluation and treatment of anorectal cysts and masses
Endometriosis
Deep Endometriosis
Endometriosis is defined by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrial cavity and the myometrium. The most common locations of the ectopic endometriotic implants are found in the pelvis (ovaries and pelvic peritoneum), followed by deep infiltration sites (uterosacral ligaments, rectosigmoid colon, vagina, and bladder). Imaging examinations have been recommended for the diagnosis and identification of the lesion location [1, 2]. Several reports have demonstrated the accuracy of ultrasonography and its different modalities, including abdominal, transvaginal, transperineal, transrectal endoscopic, or three-dimensional (3D) mode, for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis in the rectal layers [3,4,5,6,7].
Anorectal ultrasound scanning using a 360° transducer provides the most detailed view of endometriosis infiltration in the rectal wall. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) with automatic scanning and multifrequencies makes it possible to determine the exact circumferential and longitudinal extension of the infiltration into the rectal layers, mesorectal fat, or adjacent tissues, and the relation between the lesion and the anal sphincter muscles. The examination includes the measurement of infiltration length and the distance between the distal infiltration edge and the proximal edge of the sphincter muscles [8], thus providing crucial information for the choice of therapeutic approach. Lesions appear as heterogeneous hypoechoic images mostly located in the perirectal fat and serosa or infiltrating the muscularis propria or submucosa rectal layers (Figs. 14.1, 14.2, and 14.3).
Ovarian endometrioma may be found in association with endometriosis infiltration in the rectal wall in variable percentages, and 3D-US can be useful in the identification of details [9] (Fig. 14.4). Studies using 3D-US with different modalities have reported several advantages: reconstruction of a volumetric image that can be saved, rotated, and evaluated in different planes in real time and that can be assessed and compared by the same or different examiners over time [10,11,12].
Perianal Endometriosis
Perineal endometriosis is rare and is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissues in the perineal sites with or without involvement of sphincter muscles [7]. The majority of patients are at reproductive age and have a history of vaginal delivery. Lesions may frequently be found in the episiotomy scar or laceration site after vaginal delivery.
The complete physical examination, including gynecologic and digital rectal examination, combined with 3D-US, should confirm whether or not the anal sphincter is involved and determine the exact circumferential and longitudinal extension of the infiltration. This provides the best approach in planning a local resection or sphincter-saving surgery in order to avoid fecal incontinence [13, 14] (Fig. 14.5).
Pre-sacral Neoplasia
Perirectal neoplasia is most often located in the retrorectal space and may be of varied etiology. Half the cases are congenital and two-thirds are cystic in nature [15, 16]. It commonly develops in young females or in adults, and it is rare in infants. Teratoma is the most frequently observed form in pediatric patients and contains fat or calcifications in 50% of cases [16, 17]. A wide variety of cystic lesions occur in the retrorectal space, and most are congenital. They are classified as epidermoid cysts, dermoid cysts, enteric cysts (tailgut cysts and cystic rectal duplication), and neurenteric cysts, according to their origin and histopathologic features [18].
Imaging may show specific signs and characteristics of the lesion, but the diagnosis remains histopathologic. Anorectal ultrasound scanning is useful in the evaluation of size, type of lesion (mixed cystic and solid components), and relation with the rectal wall and the sphincter muscles. Perirectal neoplasia has different characteristics: unilocular or multilocular retrorectal lesion; hypoechoic lesion (cystic); and mixed echogenicity/heterogeneous lesions , due to mucoid material, inflammatory debris, or solid component, usually with regular outline and not adhering to the rectal wall. In large lesions, displacement or stenosis of the rectal wall due to extrinsic compression may be visualized. It is important to define a rectal wall invasion or a communication between the cyst and the anorectal lumen (Figs. 14.6, 14.7, and 14.8).
Rare Tumors
Rectal Leiomyoma
Leiomyoma is a benign mesenchymal neoplasm that usually develops where smooth muscle is present. This lesion is rare, except in the esophagus and rectum. Only 3% of these smooth muscle tumors arising from the colon are gastrointestinal leiomyomas and represent about 0.1% of rectal neoplasias [19, 20]. In the rectum, most leiomyomas present as small intraluminal polyps and are limited to the muscularis mucosa, although there are reports of anorectal leiomyomas [21].
Definitive diagnosis requires anatomical and pathological examination (immunohistochemical staining). Leiomyomas are positive for actin and desmin and negative for CD34 and CD117 [20, 22]. Anorectal 3D ultrasound scanning shows the exact extent of the lesion and relationship with the anatomical structures (Fig. 14.9).
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract; however, they represent less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors [23]. GIST can occur everywhere along the GI tract, but most often are found in the stomach (60%) or small intestine (30%), followed by the rectum (3%), colon (1–2%), esophagus (<1%), and omentum/mesentery (rare) [24].
The clinical presentation and diagnosis of patients with GIST depend on the anatomic location of the lesions and their size and aggressiveness. Small GIST may form solid subserosal, intramural, or—less frequently—intraluminal mass. Large tumors tend to form external masses attached to the outer aspect of the gut, involving the muscular layers [25]. Evaluation includes imaging and/or endoscopy, but pathology and molecular genetics studies are required. Approximately 95% of GISTs are positive for the CD117 antigen [25].
Anorectal ultrasound scanning provides the most detailed view of the lesion and the relationship with other anatomical structures. 3D anorectal ultrasound makes it possible to determine the circumferential and longitudinal extension of the tumors and the relationship of the lesion with the sphincter muscles, the rectal layers, the perianal tissues, and the adjacent organs, crucial in planning a surgical resection (Figs. 14.10 and 14.11).
Cystic Vaginal Lesion
Vaginal cysts are benign lesions [26, 27]. The most frequent types are vaginal inclusion cysts and may result from injury to the vaginal walls during delivery or after surgery. Other lesions are Gartner duct cysts. They develop on the lateral walls of the vagina and are remnants of mesonephric ducts. This duct is present while the fetus is developing in the womb and most often disappears after birth. If parts of the duct remain, they may collect fluid and develop into a vaginal wall cyst later in life. A Bartholin cyst or abscess is the buildup of fluid into pus that forms a lump in one of the glands found on each side of the vaginal opening. It is located on the labia.
The clinical presentation depends on the cyst size. Diagnosis needs imaging techniques (ultrasound, magnetic resonance, or computed tomography). Ultrasound is recommended as the first-line imaging modality by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria [28]. Routine ultrasound protocol includes transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. Translabial imaging is not part of a routine examination and is limited to cases in which transvaginal ultrasound cannot be performed due to obstruction or pain, or there is a specific request for directed vaginal imaging. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging is recommended by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria when ultrasound is inconclusive or not diagnostic. Computed tomography is not considered the modality of choice for the evaluation of the female pelvis. 3D anorectal and endovaginal ultrasound with 360° modality and high frequency provides specific information concerning the relation between the lesion and the sphincter muscles, the rectal layers, and the adjacent organs (i.e., the bladder), and it has the advantage of allowing multiplanar assessment, measurements of the lesion's length and depth, and endorectal circumferential involvement (Fig. 14.12).
Cystic lesions appear as an hypoechoic and well-delimited area due to the fluid inside. When infected, they are visualized as heterogeneous lesions due to proteinaceous contents.
Benign Urethral Lesion
Benign solid lesions are rare; leiomyomas, hemangiomas, and fibroepithelial polyps are the most frequent diagnosis. Urethral leiomyomas originate from smooth muscle fibers of the urethra [29, 30]. Hemangiomas of the urethra develop from embryonic remnants of angioblastic cells that failed to develop into normal blood vessels [31]. Fibroepithelial polyps of the urethra more commonly occur in children [32]; however, they may be present in adulthood and most often the clinical presentation is that of an obstructing mass at the bladder neck and prostatic urethra.
Imaging is useful in distinguishing between urethral lesion or disorders of adjacent organs. Magnetic resonance imaging is an important technique in the evaluation of solid urethral and peri-urethral lesions. Another option is high-resolution transvaginal, transperineal, and transurethral ultrasound to assess cystic urethral and peri-urethral lesions. 3D-US adds important information due to high resolution multiplanar imaging of the pelvic floor. It helps to identify the consistency, extension, and relationship of the lesion with the adjacent anatomic structures (Fig. 14.13).
Lymphocele
Lymphoceles are due to the collection of lymphatic fluid in anatomic compartments, such as pelvic or retroperitoneal spaces, that result from transected afferent vessels during radical lymphadenectomy for prostatic or gynecologic cancers or during renal transplantation [33, 34].
Symptoms are related to the size of the lesion and the presence of infection. When a lymphocele is small and sterile, it usually re-absorbs spontaneously. When it is large, however, the lymphocele may compress adjacent structures such as the iliac vessels, bladder, ureter, or rectosigmoid.
Abdominal ultrasound is performed to determine the relationship between the lymphocele and adjacent abdominal organs. However, for lesions deep in the pelvis, 3D anorectal ultrasound is useful to identify the position, length, and depth of the lesion, the consistency of the fluid, and to characterize the presence of infection. Moreover, it provides further information for planning the treatment approach such as the relation with adjacent anatomic structures, or the distance between the distal margin of the lymphocele and the proximal margin of sphincter muscles (Fig. 14.14).
References
Jenkins S, Olive DL, Haney AF. Endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomic distribution. Obstel Gynecol. 1986;67(3):335.
Cornillie FJ, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns JM, Koninckx PR. Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(6):978–83.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Portuese A, Borruto F, Dorta M. Transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(3):444–8.
Bazot M, Malzy P, Cortez A, Roseau G, Amouyal P, Daraï E. Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:180–5.
Delpy R, Barthet M, Gasmin M, Berdah S, Shojai R, Desjeux A, et al. Value of endorectal ultrasonography for diagnosing rectovaginal septal endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Endoscopy. 2005;37(4):357–61.
Bahr A, Paredes V, Gadonneix P, Etienney I, Salet-Lizée D, Villet R, Atienza P. Endorectal ultrasonography in predicting rectal wall infiltration in patients with deep pelvic endometriosis: a modern tool for an ancient disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(6):869–75.
Kołodziejczak M, Sudoł-Szopińska I, Santoro GA, Bielecki K, Wiączek A. Ultrasonographic evaluation of anal endometriosis: report of four cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(11):1099–04.
Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM. 2- and 3-D ultrasonography of endometriosis, pelvic cyst, rectal solitary ulcer, muscle hypertrophy, rare neoplasms. In: Pescatori M, Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM, Zbar AP, editors. Imaging atlas of the pelvic floor and anorectal diseases. Milan: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 159–70.
Chapron C, Santulli P, de Ziegler D, Noel JC, Anaf V, Streuli I, et al. Ovarian endometrioma: severe pelvic pain is associated with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):702–11.
Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC. Clinical utility of threedimensional ultrasound. Radiographics. 2000;20(2):559–71.
Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Deb S. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic characteristics of endometriomata. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):718–24.
Guerriero S, Alcázar JL, Ajossa S, Pilloni M, Melis GB. Three-dimensional sonographic characteristics of deep endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(8):1061–6.
McCormick JT, Read TE, Akbari RP, Sklow B, Papaconstantinou HT, et al. Occult perineal endometrioma diagnosed by endoanal ultrasound and treated by excision: a report of 3 cases. J Reprod Med. 2007;52(8):733–6.
Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Jovanovic DR. Perineal endometriosis in episiotomy scar with anal sphincter involvement: report of two cases and review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(6):646–9.
Dozois RD, Chiu LK. Retrorectal tumours. In: Nicholls RJ, Dozeis RR, editors. Surgery of the colon and rectum. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1997. p. 533–45.
Gordon PH. Retrorectal tumours. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S, editors. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum and anus. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishers; 1999. p. 427–45.
Hjemslad BM, Helwin EB. Tailgut cysts. Report of 53 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1988;89(2):139–47.
Levine E, Batnitzky S. Computed tomography of sacral and perisacral lesions. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1984;21(4):307–74.
Chow WH, Kwan WK, Ng WF. Endoscopic removal of leiomyoma of the colon. Hong Kong Med J. 1997;3(3):325–7.
De Palma GD, Rega M, Masone S, Siciliano S, Persico M, Salvatori F, et al. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to a rectal leiomyoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(14):1769–70.
Miettinen M, Furlong M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Burke A, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, intramural leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas in the rectum and anus: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 144 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(9):1121–33.
Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Sobin LH. Mesenchymal tumors of muscularis mucosae of colon and rectum are benign leiomyomas that should be separated from gastrointestinal stromal tumors–a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of eighty-eight cases. Modern Pathol. 2001;14(10):950–6.
Judson I, Demetri G. Advances in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(Suppl 10):x20–4.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. In: Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 175–80.
Corless CL, Heinrich MC. Molecular pathobiology of gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas. Ann Rev Pathol. 2008;3:557–86.
Eilber KS, Raz S. Benign cystic lesions of the vagina: a literature review. J Urol. 2003;170(3):717–22.
Corton MM. Anatomy. In: Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Bradshaw KD, Halvorson LM, Schaffer JI, Corton MM, editors. Williams gynecology. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2016. p. 796–824.
American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Available at: http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality_safety/app_criteria.aspx. (2001). Accessed 29 Feb 2016.
Fasih N, Prasad Shanbhogue AK, Macdonald DB, Fraser-Hill MA, Papadatos D, Kielar AZ, et al. Leiomyomas beyond the uterus: unusual locations, rare manifestations. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):1931–48.
Lee MC, Lee SD, Kuo HT, Huang TW. Obstructive leiomyoma of the female urethra: report of a case. J Urol. 1995;153(2):420–1. Review.
Uchida K, Fukuta F, Ando M, Miiyake M. Female urethral hemangioma. J Urol. 2001;166(3):1008.
Aita GA, Begliomini H, Mattos Jr D. Fibroepithelial polyp of the urethra. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(2):155–6.
Dodd GD, Rutledge F, Wallace S. Postoperative pelvic lymphocysts. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970;108(2):312–23.
Petru E, Tamussino K, Lahousen M, Winter R, Pickel H, Haas J. Pelvic and paraaortic lymphocysts after radical surgery because of cervical and ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(4):937–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murad-Regadas, S.M., Santoro, G.A. (2017). Endoanal Imaging of Anorectal Cysts and Masses. In: Shobeiri, S. (eds) Practical Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52929-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52929-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52928-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52929-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)