Skip to main content

Equality of Opportunity: Welfare and Public Policies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Equality of Opportunity

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to discussing the relationship that exists between welfare and public policy through the measurement of inequality. Our narrative outlines how setting the right policy to increase welfare must necessarily come through a multidimensional assessment of inequality. In recent years, a thoughtful frontier of inequality measurement has proposed an analysis of inequality of opportunity to understand and study the differences that exist between and within countries. We aim at discussing how the study of inequality measurement is essential for understanding the channels that contribute to making the income distribution much more unfair over time. For this, we argue on the main methodologies proposed in the literature − discussed in a straightforward manner – both from a theoretical and empirical view. In particular, the empirical illustration through EU-SILC data can help to understand how important such a pathway can be to capture as much as possible the effects on welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaberge R, Mogstad M, Peragine V (2011) Measuring long-term inequality of opportunity. J Public Econ 95(3):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson R (1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philos Stud 56(1):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson RJ (1999) Equality of opportunity for welfare defended and recanted. J Polit Philos 7(4):488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1951) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York. 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2(3):244–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D, Auersperg M (1981) A new procedure for the measurement of inequality within and among population subgroups. Can J Econ 14(4):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F (1979) Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica 47(4):901–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan G, Buchanan J (1985) The reason of rules: constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Checchi D, Peragine V (2010) Inequality of opportunity in Italy. J Econ Inequal 8(4):420–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coco G, Pignataro G (2013) Unfair credit allocations. Small Bus Econ 41:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coco G, Pignataro G (2014) The poor are twice cursed: wealth inequality and inefficient credit market. J Bank Financ 49:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen GA (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99(4):906–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell FA (1980) On the structure of additive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud 47(3):521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1981a) What is equality? Part 1: equality of welfare. Philos Public Aff 10(3):185–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1981b) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Public Aff 10(4):283–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster JE, Shneyerov AA (2000) Path independent inequality measures. J Econ Theory 91(2):199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL (2005) Inequality. NBER working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaparanta P, Kanbur R, Paukkeri T (2022) Promoting education under distortionary taxation: equality of opportunity versus welfarism. J Econ Inequal 20(1):281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hédoin C (2022) Welfare theory, public action, and ethical values: revisiting the history of welfare economics. Econ Philos 38(2):326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasso de la Vega C, Urrutia AM (2005) Path independent multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures. Investig Econ 29(2):379–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Donni P, Peragine V, Pignataro G (2014) Ex-ante and ex-post measurement of equality of opportunity in health: a normative decomposition. Health Econ 23(2):182–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Ottaviano G (1999) Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFate K, Lawson R, Wilson WJ (1995) Poverty, inequality, and the future of social policy: Western States in the New World order, Russell Sage Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Ternero JD, Roemer JE (2006) Impartiality, priority, and solidarity in the theory of justice. Econometrica 74(5):1419–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peragine V (2004) Measuring and implementing equality of opportunity for income. Soc Choice Welf 22(1):187–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignataro G (2009) Decomposing equality of opportunity by income sources. Econ Bull 29(2):702–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignataro G (2010) Measuring equality of opportunity by shapley value. Econ Bull 30(1):786–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignataro G (2012) Equality of opportunity: policy and measurement paradigms. J Econ Surv 26(5):800–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignataro G (2021) Spatial inequality: a multidimensional perspective. In: Colombo S (ed) Spatial Economics, Applications, vol II. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 1971

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer JE (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos Public Aff 22(2):146–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer JE (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer JE (2001) Three egalitarian views and American law. Law Philos 20(4):433–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer JE (2002) Egalitarianism against the veil of ignorance. J Philos 99(4):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer J (2004a) Equal opportunity and intergenerational mobility: going beyond intergenerational income transition matrices. In: Corak M (ed) Generational income mobility in North America and Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer JE (2004b) Eclectic distributional ethics. Politics, Philos Econ 3(3):267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1973) On economic inequality. W.W. Norton, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1977) On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica 45:1539–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks AF (1984) Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52(6):1369–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen A (2006) Welfare states, family inequality, and equality of opportunity. Res Soc Stratification Mobility 24(4):367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West A, Nikolai R (2013) Welfare regimes and education regimes: equality of opportunity and expenditure in the EU (and US). J Soc Policy 42(3):469–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Pignataro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bonacini, L., Pignataro, G. (2023). Equality of Opportunity: Welfare and Public Policies. In: Sardoč, M. (eds) Handbook of Equality of Opportunity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_70-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_70-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52269-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52269-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics