Abstract
The chapter discusses the process of digitalization of the public sector and public services in Europe and addresses its impacts on the domain of work and employment. The emerging interest and involvement of the public service trade unions in Europe in the digitalization-related debate is discussed. The argument is that digitalization, being examined in the literature mainly from a ‘technical’ perspective, starts increasingly to challenge stakeholders in general and trade unions concretely in terms of work and employment consequences. However, there is an evolving process being built on a still-limited concrete knowledge and ideas to deal with it. Even if the 2015–2016 policy debates within the European trade union movements are intense, they are still too general.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The present report is prepared in the framework of a contract with the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) in the period March to June 2015 (‘The digital economy and public services’).
- 2.
For example, the 45th Standing Committee on Local and Regional Government, 22 September 2015, Brussels.
- 3.
- 4.
HM Revenue and Customs, HMRC Digital Strategy, December 2012, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-strategy-december-2012.
- 5.
Digital Agenda Norway (2012), Digitizing Public Sector Services. Norwegian eGovernment Program, Oslo, https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/fad/kampanje/dan/regjeringensdigitaliseringsprogram/digit_prg_eng.pdf.
- 6.
- 7.
See also Dunleavy, P. and Margetts, H. (2010), The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance, American Political Science Association Conference, 4 September 2010, Washington DC, USA.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
The paradigm of the open government is driven by opening up public data and services and facilitating collaboration for the design, production and delivery of public service. It is also about making government processes and decisions open, in order to foster citizen participation and engagement.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
And need to follow developments related to digitalization in other sectors—see, for example, Luce, S. (2015), Background Report For the UNI Europa Commerce Conference, Gdansk, May 2015.
Bibliography
Baines, S., Wilson, R., & Walsh, S. (March, 2010). Seeing the full picture? Technologically enabled multi-agency working in health and social care. New Technology, Work and Employment, 25(1), 19–33.
Berger, J. (2014, December 8–10). Mandatory e-government has arrived : The silent protest from staff calls for the committed scholar – resistance must never be futile! In 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Auckland. http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/8115/acis20140_submission_84.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Bowles, J. (2014, July 17). The computerisation of European jobs – Who will win and who will lose from the impact of new technology onto old areas of employment. Bruegel blog.
Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS). (2015). Grünbuch Arbeiten 4.0. http://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen-DinA4/gruenbuch-arbeiten-vier-null.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.
Capgemini, IDC, Rand Europe, Sogeti and DTi. (2010, December). Digitizing Public Services in Europe: Putting ambition into action. 9th Benchmark Measurement. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=6537. Last Accessed 6 Feb 2017.
Degryse, C. (2016). Digitalisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets (ETUI working paper). Brussels: ETUI.
Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2010, September 4). The second wave of digital era governance. In American Political Science Association Conference, Washington DC.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.
ETUC. (2015a). The digital agenda of the European Commission: Preliminary ETUC assessment. Brussels. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/documents/digital-agenda-european-commission-preliminary-etuc-assessment. Last accessed 11 Nov 2016.
ETUC. (2015b). ETUC action programme 2015–2019. Stand up in solidarity for quality jobs, workers’ rights and a fair society in Europe. https://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/other/files/20151007_action_programme_en-consolidated_0.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
ETUC. (2016). ETUC resolution on digitalisation: “Towards fair digital work.” Adopted by the Executive Committee on 8–9 June 2016. https://www.etuc.org/documents/etuc-resolution-digitalisation-towards-fair-digital-work. Date accessed 27 Oct 2016.
Eurofound. (2014). Restructuring in the public sector. Dublin. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1470en.pdf. Last accessed 5 Jul 2016.
Eurofound. (2015). New forms of employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
EY. (2014). La révolution des métiers. Nouveaux métiers, nouvelles compétences : quels enjeux pour l’entreprise? EY France. www.ey.com/fr/RevolutionDesMetiers
Flecker, J., & Meil, P. (2010). Organisational restructuring and emerging service value chains: Implications for work and employment. Work, Employment & Society, 24(4), 680–698.
Frey, C., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin School. Available at http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf. Last Accessed 25 June 2015.
Hayes, N., Introna, L., & Petrakaki, D. (July, 2014). Imbrications of institutional logics: The case of an e-government initiative in Greece. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(2), 124–138.
Holtgrewe, U. (2014). New new technologies: The future and the present of work in information and communication technology. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(1), 9–24.
Holtgrewe, U., Kirov, V., & Ramioul, M. (Eds.). (2015). Hard work in the new jobs. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huvila, I. (2012). Digitisation of information resources and changes in the worlds of librarians, archivists and museum professionals. Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Proceedings. http://ozk.unizd.hr/proceedings/index.php/lida/article/view/65
Huws, U., Dahlmann, S., Flecker, J., Holtgrewe, U., Schonauer, A., Ramioul, M., & Geurts, K. (2009). Value chain restructuring in Europe in a global economy (WORKS project, 111 p).
Katz, R., Koutroumpis, P., & Callorda, F. (2014). Using a digitization index to measure the economic and social impact of digital agendas. Info, 16(1), 32–44.
Kirov, V. (2015). The digital economy and public services in Europe. ETUI analytical report for the purpose of the European Public Service Union (EPSU), Brussels, 55 p. (Non-published report).
Kowalski, W. (2015, July 6). The European digital agenda: Unambitious and too narrow, social Europe. http://www.socialeurope.eu/2015/07/european-digital-agenda-unambitious-narrow
Luce, S. (2015, May). Background report for the UNI Europa commerce conference. Gdansk. http://www.uniglobalunion.org/sites/default/files/files/news/backgroundreport-en.pdf. Date accessed 16 Oct 2016.
Meil, P. (2015, November 24). ICT and work. Future opportunities, fresh insecurities. Presentation at the Eurofound conference ‘Changing working conditions in Europe: Moving towards better work, first findings from the Eurofound’s 6th European working conditions survey.’ Luxembourg.
Nygren, K. (2012). Narratives of ICT and organizational change in public administration. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(6), 615–630.
OECD. (2012). Conclusions of the ministerial meeting of the OECD Public Governance Committee. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/governance/ministerial/47231930.pdf
OECD. (2013). Government at glance. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/government-at-a-glance-2013_gov_glance-2013-en;jsessionid=f3n90v98md3s.x-oecd-live-03. Last accessed Jul 5 2016.
OECD. (2014). Skills and jobs in the internet economy (OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 242). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxvbrjm9bns-en
Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.
Pollitt, C. (2012). New perspectives on public services: Places and technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Valenduc, G., & Vendramin, P. (2016). Work in the digital economy: Sorting the old from the new (ETUI Working Paper). Brussels: ETUI.
Webster, J. (2014, September 3–5). How can you tell a virtual worker from any other? Issues in the analysis of the class and gender relations of virtual work. In EU COST Action IS1202 Dynamics of Virtual Work International Conference (Keynote paper). Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirov, V. (2017). Digitalization of Public Services in Europe: Policy Challenges for the European Trade Union Movement. In: Meil, P., Kirov, V. (eds) Policy Implications of Virtual Work. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52057-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52057-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52056-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52057-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)