Abstract
This chapter explores the notion of curious practice and the methodology of its application in the context of primary school education in Finland. The concept of curious practice encourages us – researchers and educators – to ask “How does curious practice help us to address children’s relations to forests beyond the child (in) nature dualism?” Curious practice challenges the existing environmental education methodologies employed in recent years that draw heavily on research planning, the child’s representation of nature, and the results of a completed study. Despret’s (Domesticating practices: The case of Arabian Babblers. In G. Marvin and S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human–animal studies (pp. 23–38). New York: Routledge, 2014) approach of curious practice encourages researchers to unplan and make themselves available to the yet unknown, for every single encounter with the other is a mixture of unpredictability, the researcher’s attentiveness, and imagination. The rationale behind curious practice is in learning more about what is seen and heard via questioning the encounters that accept various absences of a preconceived framework of research. As a necessary complement to such a methodology, the chapter also presents a semiotic approach, employed by Eduardo Kohn (How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013), to inform the method of studying the logic of the world beyond human symbolism. The data used reveal an interdependency of children and forests that will be referred to as childrenforest in that it continuously generates a network of signs which adults and children themselves often are unable to access or represent. These present absences found in curious practice are crucial for our understanding of what we have overlooked while claiming that the other is known. With that, however, childrenforest cannot be fully grasped. Andrew Pickering’s (Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1(21), 77–83, 2013) notion of islands of stability is utilized to elaborate the ways that childrenforests signal the presence of the seemingly stable configurations of their dynamic becoming. The chapter concludes with a short discussion of the potential areas of curious practice application beyond the ethological and childhood research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
Blaise, M. (2016). Fabricated childhoods: Uncanny encounters with the more-than-human. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(5), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1075697.
Borge, A. I. H., Nordhagen, R., & Lie, K. K. (2003). Children in the environment: Forest day-care centers: Modern day care with historical antecedents. History of the Family, 8(4), 605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2003.04.001.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720–725.
Buchanan, B. (2015). The metamorphoses of Vinciane Despret. Angelaki, 20(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1039818.
Buchanan, B., Chrulew, M., & Bussolini, J. (2015). On asking the right questions. Angelaki, 20(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1039821.
Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513479295.
Burman, E. (2007). Deconstructing developmental psychology (Paperback 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H. S., Laestadius, L., et al. (2016). When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio, 45(5), 538–550.
Clarke, D. A. G., & Mcphie, J. (2014). Becoming animate in education: Immanent materiality and outdoor learning for sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(3), 198–216.
Daston, L., & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the order of nature (pp. 1150–1750). New York, NY/Cambridge, MA: Zone Books; Distributed by the MIT Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson, & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Despret, V. (2014). Domesticating practices: The case of Arabian babblers. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human–animal studies (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
Despret, V. (2015). The enigma of the raven. Angelaki, 20(2), 57–72.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Vol. 8). Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co Publishers. Southern Illinois Up, 1986/2008.
Duhn, I. (2016). Speculating on childhood and time, with Michael Ende’s Momo (1973). Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116677922.
Evans, R. J. W., & Marr, A. (Eds.). (2006). Curiosity and wonder from the renaissance to the enlightenment. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fjørtoft, I. (2001). The natural environment as a playground for children: The impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 111–117.
Golden, A. (2013). Preschool children explore the forest – the power of wild places in childhood. In D. R. Meier & S. Sisk-Hilton (Eds.), Nature education with young children: Integrating inquiry and practice (pp. 123–136). Florence, Italy: Routledge.
Goldman, L. (1998). Child’s play: Myth, mimesis and make-believe. New York, NY: Berg Publishers.
Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Griebling, S. (2015). “Trees and things that live in trees”: Three children with special needs experience the project approach. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 17(1). Retrieved 10 April 2017 from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v17n1/griebling.html.
Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. (2015). A curious practice. Angelaki, 20(2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1039817.
Harris, F. (2015). The nature of learning at forest school: Practitioners’ perspectives. Education, 3(13), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1078833.
Holton, G. (1996). On the art of scientific imagination. Daedalus, 125(2), 183–208. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20013446.
Holton, G. (2016). Our puzzling universe: From a promising beginning to forbidden knowledge. Social Research, 83(4), 905–916.
Hume, D. (1975). In L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.), Enquiries concerning human understanding and concerning principles of morals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1751, 1777).
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Karhunkorva, R. (2005). “Kuulin metsän tarinan”: kulttuurisesti ymmärretyn metsän merkitykset kuudesluokkalaisten Olipa kerran metsä –kirjoituksissa. [“I heard the story of the forest”: Culturally understood meanings of the forest in the six-graders’ “Once upon a time there was a forest” scripts]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University Digital Archive.
Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Korhonen, P. (2008). Lasten TV-ohjelmiin liittyvät pelot, painajaisunet ja pelonhallinta. [Children’s TV-included fears, nightmares, and coping with fears] (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Vol. 1332) Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2013). “Data” as vital illusion. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487873.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Latour, B. (1994). Pragmatogonies. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294037006006.
Leask, N. (2002). Curiosity and the aesthetics of travel-writing, 1770–1840: ‘From an antique land’: From an antique land’. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–49.
Lorimer, J. (2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment and planning D. Society and Space, 25(5), 911–932.
Lorimer, J. (2010). Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies. Cultural Geographies, 17(2), 237–258.
MacLure, M. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487863.
Malone, K. (2015). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 390–407.
McMillan, M. (1904). Education through the imagination. S. Sonnenschein & Co., Lim. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/educationthroug01mcmigoog.
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016). Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiology Spectrum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015.
Murris, K. (2013). The epistemic challenge of hearing child’s voice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(3), 245–259.
Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2013). Frictions in Forest Pedagogies: Common Worlds in Settler Colonial Spaces. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(4), pp. 355–365.
Payne, P. G. (2016). What next? Post-critical materialisms in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 169–178.
Pickering, A. (2008). Culture: Science studies and technoscience. In T. Bennett & J. Frow (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of cultural analysis (pp. 291–310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pickering, A. (2013). Being in an environment: A performative perspective. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1(21), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2013067.
Pickering, A. (2017). The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis, 61(2), 134–150.
Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child–matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474.
Reid, L., & Salonen, E., curators. (2016). Thinking like a forest. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017, from http://laurenkreid.com/Thinking-like-a-forest.
Ridgers, N. D., Knowles, Z. R., & Sayers, J. (2012). Encouraging play in the natural environment: A child-focused case study of forest school. Children’s Geographies, 10(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.638176.
Rudkowski, M. (2015). The complexity of understanding: Young children’s experiences in a forest program (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from SFU Summit institutional repository (Identifier: etd9305).
Russell, C. L., Sarick, T., & Kenelly, J. (2002). Queering environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 54–66.
Schäffer, S. D., & Kistemann, T. (2012). German forest kindergartens: Healthy childcare under the leafy canopy. Children, Youth and Environments, 22(1), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.22.1.0270.
Schmitt, F. F., & Lahroodi, R. (2008). The epistemic value of curiosity. Educational Theory, 58(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00281.x.
Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., … Weaver, J. (2014). Toward a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.
Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Stengers, I. (2011). Cosmopolitics II (R. Bononno, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Stolberg, T. L. (2008). W(h)ither the sense of wonder of pre-service primary teachers’ when teaching science?: A preliminary study of their personal experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1958–1964. https://doi-org.libproxy.helsinki.fi/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.005.
Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2016). Kids, raccoons, and roos: Awkward encounters and mixed affects. Children’s Geographies, 15(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1199849.
Taylor, N. (2012). Animals, mess, method: Post-humanism, sociology and animal studies. In L. Birke & J. Hockenhull (Eds.), Crossing boundaries. Investigating human-animal relationships (pp. 37–50). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Žižek, S., Reinhard, K., & Santner, E. L. (2013). The neighbor: Three inquiries in political theology, with a new preface (TRIOS) (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Vladimirova, A., Rautio, P. (2018). Unplanning Research with a Curious Practice Methodology: Emergence of Childrenforest in the Context of Finland. In: Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_25-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_25-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education