Skip to main content

Later Medieval Philosophy of Cognitive Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others

Part of the book series: Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action ((HSNA,volume 3))

Abstract

King’s chapter provides a systematic overview of the state of the philosophy of cognitive psychology in the first half of the fourteenth century, and so a framework for the subsequent chapters as well. In addition to outlining the broad consensus position, which he calls ‘the Neo-Aristotelian synthesis,’ King identifies ‘five specific trouble spots’ in which this consensus is threatened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Secondary

  • Adriaenssen, H. T. (2014). Peter John Olivi and Peter Auriol on conceptual thought. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 2, 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniak, M. (2010). The soul-body problem at Paris ca. 1200–1250. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J., & Brower-Toland, S. (2008). Aquinas on mental representation: Intentionality and concepts. The Philosophical Review, 117, 193–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower-Toland, S. (2007a). Intuition, externalism, and direct reference in Ockham. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 24, 317–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower-Toland, S. (2007b). Ockham on judgment, concepts, and the problem of intentionality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37, 67–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower-Toland, S. (2013). Olivi on consciousness and self-knowledge: The phenomenology, metaphysics, and epistemology of mind’s reflexivity. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 1, 136–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (2012). Aristotle and Augustine: Two philosophical ancestors of Duns Scotus’s philosophy of mind. In A. Musco (Ed.), Universality of reason – Plurality of philosophies in the middle ages. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy of the Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la Philosophie Médiévale, Palermo 2007 (Vol. 1, pp. 47–72). Palermo: Officina di Studi Medievali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (2015). Duns Scotus’s theory of cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goehring, B. (2006). Henry of ghent on cognition and mental representation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, P. (2013). Durand of St.-Pourçain and Thomas Aquinas on representation. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1994). Scholasticism and the philosophy of mind: The failure of Aristotelian psychology. In T. Horowitz & A. Janis (Eds.), Scientific failure (pp. 109–138). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2003). Two conceptions of experience. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 11, 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2004). Duns Scotus on mental content. In Duns Scot à Paris, 1302–2002. Actes du colloque de Paris, 2–4 Septembre 2002, edited by Olivier Boulnois, Elisabeth Karger, Jean-Luc Solère, and Gérard Sondag, Collection Textes et Études du Moyen Age no. 26, pp. 65–88. Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2007a). Rethinking representation in the middle ages. In H. Lagerlund (Ed.), Representations and objects of thought in mediaeval philosophy (pp. 81–100). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2007b). Abelard on mental. The American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 81, 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2008). The inner cathedral: Mental architecture in high scholasticism. Vivarium, 46, 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2012). Body and soul. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), The Oxford handbook to medieval philosophy (pp. 505–524). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2015). Thinking about things: Singular thought in the middle ages. In G. Klima (Ed.), Intentionality, cognition, and representation in the middle ages (pp. 104–121). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2004a). John Buridan on the acquisition of simple substantial concepts. In R. Friedman & S. Ebbesen (Eds.), John Buridan and beyond: Topics in the language sciences 1300–1700 (pp. 17–32). Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2004b). Tradition and innovation in medieval theories of mental representation. In G. Klima & A. W. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for medieval logic and metaphysics (Vol. 4, pp. 4–11). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2009). Aquinas on the materiality of the human soul and the immateriality of the human intellect. Philosophical Investigations, 32, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2011). Indifference vs. universality of mental representation in Ockham, Buridan, and Aquinas. In F. Amerini (Ed.), Later medieval perspectives on intentionality (Quaestio 10/2010) (pp. 99–110). Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2013a). Three myths of intentionality vs. some medieval philosophers. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2013b). The medieval problem of Universals. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013b Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/universals-medieval/

  • Klima, G. (2015a). Mental representations and concepts in medieval philosophy. In G. Klima (Ed.), Intentionality, cognition, and representation in the Middle Ages (pp. 323–337). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2015b). Universality and immateriality. Acta Philosophica, 24, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlund, H. (Ed.). (2011). Encyclopedia of medieval philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normore, C. (2007). The invention of singular thought. In H. Lagerlund, M. Yrjönsuuri, & L. Alanen (Eds.), Forming the mind (pp. 109–128). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Daly, G. (1987). Augustine’s philosophy of mind. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (2001). Aquinas on intellectual representation. In D. Perler (Ed.), Ancient and medieval theories of intentionality (pp. 185–201). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (2004). Ockham on concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (2010). Mental language and predication: Ockham and Abelard. In Analytica (Vol. 14, pp. 183–194).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (2015). Ockham’s externalism. In G. Klima (Ed.), Intentionality, cognition, and mental representation in medieval philosophy (pp. 166–185). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (1997a). Theories of cognition in the later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (1997b). Olivi on the metaphysics of soul. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 6, 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (2008). The mind-soul problem. In H. Thijssen (Ed.), Mind, perception, and cognition (pp. 3–19). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (2012). Mind and hylomorphism. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of medieval philosophy (pp. 486–504). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge history of medieval philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (2013). How many souls do I have? Late Aristotelian debates on the plurality of faculties. In R. Friedman & J.-M. Counet (Eds.), Medieval perspectives on Aristotle’s De anima (pp. 277–296). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickavé, M. (2015). Causality and cognition: An interpretation of Henry of Ghent’s Quodlibet V q.14. In G. Klima (Ed.), Intentionality, cognition, and mental representation in medieval philosophy (pp. 46–80). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pini, G. (2008). Scotus on the object of cognitive acts. Franciscan Studies, 66, 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pini, G. (2015). Two models of thinking: Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus on occurrent thoughts. In G. Klima (Ed.), Intentionality, cognition, and mental representation in medieval philosophy (pp. 81–103). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pluta, O. (2007). How matter becomes mind: Late medieval theories of emergence. In H. Lagerlund, M. Yrjönsuuri, & L. Alanen (Eds.), Forming the mind (pp. 149–168). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. F. (2014). Augustine on active perception. In J. F. Silva & M. Yrjönsuuri (Eds.), Active perception in the history of philosophy (pp. 79–98). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spruit, L. (1994). Species intelligibilis: From perception to knowledge. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau, K. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham: Optics, epistemology and the foundations of semantics, 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedale, M. (2007). Representation in scholastic epistemology. In H. Lagerlund (Ed.), Representations and objects of thought in mediaeval philosophy (pp. 63–80). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Further Reading

Further Reading

There is a wealth of scholarship on medieval philosophy in all languages, but the following suggestions are confined to recent works in English that help guide the reader. There are good general discussions of many topics in medieval cognitive psychology in the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( http://plato.stanford.edu ) as well as in the revised edition of The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy (ed. Pasnau 2014) and in the Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy (ed. Lagerlund 2011). The Cambridge Companion series has individual volumes on Augustine, Abelard, Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham, each of which has some treatment of issues in the philosophy of mind. Details about more specialized works that cover material treated in this Introduction follow.

For “The Long Shadow of Augustine”: The standard study of Augustine’s views about cognitive psychology is O’Daly (1987), with particular attention paid to his theory of ‘active’ perception in Silva (2014). There is no systematic study of Augustine’s influence on the philosophy of mind in the later Middle Ages, but there are many specialized studies, such as Cross (2012), which deal with Augustine’s long shadow. For the twelfth century, King (2007b) and Panaccio (2010) deal with Abelard’s theory of Mental Language and more broadly with his account of thinking.

For “The Neo-Aristotelian Synthesis”: The initial formation of the neo-Aristotelian synthesis in cognitive psychology is partly covered in Bieniak (2010). Historical surveys are to be found in Tachau (1988) and Pasnau (1997a). There are several extended studies of the views of individual philosophers, most notably Henry of Ghent in Goehring (2006), John Duns Scotus in Cross (2015), and William of Ockham in Panaccio (2004), each of which may be consulted as regards the more particular problems the synthesis faced. The details of the neo-Aristotelian synthesis in cognitive psychology can be found in almost any of the general reference works listed above. Some dissenters from the mainstream are discussed in Pasnau (1997b) and Brower-Toland (2013) (Olivi) and in Adriaenssen (2014) (Olivi and Auriol).

For “The Ontology of Psychology”: Problems in the ontology of psychology are surveyed in King (2012). Pluta (2007) deals with particular questions about emergence and materialism; Klima (2009) takes up the issue of the immateriality of the human soul. Pasnau (2008) concentrates on the relation between mind and soul, while Pasnau (2012) is a more general treatment of the relation of psychology to hylomorphism.

For “Mental Architecture”: Mental architecture is the main focus of King (2008) and Perler (2013).

For “Transduction”: The problem of transduction, especially the contrast between abstractive and illuminationist accounts of cognition, is dealt with in King (1994) and Klima (2013b). Spruit (1994) surveys the history of the debates over the need for an intellective representation, a key feature in transduction. Klima (2011) takes up abstraction, while Pini (2015) looks at occurrent thought in Aquinas and Scotus. Henry of Ghent’s views about how causality is related to cognition is taken up in Pickavé (2015).

For “The Object of Thought”: Singular thought is the main focus of Normore (2007) and King (2015).

For “Intentionality”: King (2007a) gives an overview of how to think about representation and intentionality in the Middle Ages; Klima (2004a, b; 2013a; 2015a, b) gives top-down accounts of medieval theories of representation, while Tweedale (2007) offers a historical survey. Aquinas is dealt with in Panaccio (2001) and in Brower and Brower-Toland (2008); his account is contrasted with that of Durand of St.-Pourçain in Hartman (2013), and with Ockham and Buridan in Klima (2011). King (2004) and Pini (2008) analyze Scotus’s views of cognition and mental content. Ockham’s alternative account, and in particular the question of his externalism, is treated in Brower-Toland (2007a, b) and Panaccio (2015); King (2003) emphasizes instead Ockham’s shift to competencies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

King, P. (2017). Later Medieval Philosophy of Cognitive Psychology. In: Klima, G. (eds) Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51763-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics