Abstract
Biodiesel is a renewable and sustainable alternative to the petroleum fossil fuels. Biodiesel can be produced from variety of feedstocks such as edible, non-edible oils, animal fats, and microalgal lipids (Ma and Hanna 1999; Sharma et al. 2008). Fast growth rates and high lipid accumulation have proven microalgae as a promising feedstock for biodiesel production (Chisti 2007; Rawat et al. 2013). Catalytic conversion of feedstock oil to fatty acid alkyl esters (FAAE), i.e., biodiesel is the most widely used method (Helwani et al. 2009). The conversion process depends upon number of factors such as quality of feedstock oil, choice of catalyst, acyl acceptor, use of solvent, and reaction parameters. The recent advances such as process intensification by microwave and ultrasonication have improved the yields of catalytic conversion of lipids to biodiesel. This chapter deals with the brief overview, recent advances, and challenges in catalytic conversion of microalgal lipids to biodiesel.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Ionic Liquid
- Crude Glycerol
- Transesterification Reaction
- Catalytic Conversion
- Transesterification Process
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Biodiesel is a renewable and sustainable alternative to the petroleum fossil fuels. Biodiesel can be produced from variety of feedstocks such as edible, non-edible oils, animal fats, and microalgal lipids (Ma and Hanna 1999; Sharma et al. 2008). Fast growth rates and high lipid accumulation have proven microalgae as a promising feedstock for biodiesel production (Chisti 2007; Rawat et al. 2013). Catalytic conversion of feedstock oil to fatty acid alkyl esters (FAAE), i.e., biodiesel is the most widely used method (Helwani et al. 2009). The conversion process depends upon number of factors such as quality of feedstock oil, choice of catalyst, acyl acceptor, use of solvent, and reaction parameters. The recent advances such as process intensification by microwave and ultrasonication have improved the yields of catalytic conversion of lipids to biodiesel. This chapter deals with the brief overview, recent advances, and challenges in catalytic conversion of microalgal lipids to biodiesel.
2 Microalgal Lipids as a Feedstock for Biodiesel
Microalgal lipid is considered as a greener and sustainable feedstock for biodiesel synthesis. Microalgae have faster growth rates and higher lipid accumulation capability than the terrestrial plants. Microalgae also offer other environmental benefits such as CO2 mitigation and wastewater utilization. Microalgae have shown lipid accumulate of up to 20–70% lipid per dry cell weight. Various microalgal strains such as Chlorella, Dunaliella, Nannochloropsis, Scenedesmus, Neochloris, Nitzschia, Porphyridium, Phaeodactylum, and Isochrysis have been studied for assessing their potential as a biodiesel feedstock (Amaro et al. 2011). Ensuring high lipid accumulation in microalgae is a crucial parameter for making the biodiesel production process economical. Microalgal lipid accumulation can be enhanced by altering the cultivation conditions and nutrients in the media (Singh et al. 2016a). Nitrogen, light, and CO2 stress are widely used strategies for enhancing lipid accumulation in microalgae (Singh et al. 2016b).
Microalgal oils are composed of neutral lipids, polar lipids with some amount of hydrocarbons, sterols, waxes, and pigments (Singh et al. 2014). The neutral lipids are considered as most suitable for the biodiesel synthesis because of their easy conversion to fatty acid alkyl esters (FAAE). In microalgal cells neutral lipids act as the energy storage components and are mainly composed of triglycerides (TAG) and some amount of free fatty acids (FFA). While the polar lipids serve the structural roles (phospholipids in cell membrane) as well as physiological functions such as cell signaling (sphingolipids) (Sharma et al. 2012). Triglycerides and free fatty acids both can be converted into biodiesel via transesterification and esterification process, respectively. However, free fatty acid could cause saponification during the reaction if alkali catalysts are used. Microalgal lipids are known to contain high free fatty acid content.
Biodiesel fuel properties are influenced by the number of carbon atoms in the chain, degree of unsaturation, percentage composition of saturated and unsaturated fatty acid in microalgal lipids. Thus it is important to choose microalgal strains with suitable fatty acid composition for biodiesel synthesis which complies with the international standards (Guldhe et al. 2015b; Singh et al. 2014). Microalgal lipids are composed of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Microalgal lipids have shown C14:0, C16:0, C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 as major contributing fatty acids (Song et al. 2013). These fatty acids are considered as most suitable for quality biodiesel production. The cultivation conditions and nutrients supplied also have an influence on the fatty acid composition of the microalgal lipids. Table 1 depicts the fatty acid compositions and lipid content of different microalgae used for biodiesel production.
3 Transesterification Process
In the process of biodiesel synthesis, triglycerides and methanol are interacted in a reaction called as transesterification or alcoholysis. Methyl esters of fatty acids, i.e., biodiesel and glycerol are the products formed in the transesterification reaction (Cook and Beyea 2000). A catalyst is used to facilitate this reaction via improved rate of reaction and high product yield. Excess alcohol is added to shift the equilibrium of this reversible reaction towards the products side. Alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, and pentanol can be used in the transesterification process. Methanol is used more commonly because of its low cost and its physical and chemical advantages (Helwani et al. 2009). NaOH dissolves easily in alcohols and reacts with triglycerides. In a transesterification reaction stoichiometrically, a 3:1 molar ratio of alcohol to triglycerides is needed. Generally the ratio needs to be higher to drive the reaction equilibrium towards maximum ester yield. Biomass-derived fuels share many of the same characteristics as their fossil fuel counterparts. Once formed, they can be substituted in whole or in part for petroleum-derived products. The general reaction mechanism is shown in Fig. 1.
4 Catalysts
The transesterification reaction can be catalyzed by chemical (alkali and acid) or enzyme catalysts. The chemical alkali catalysts include NaOH, KOH, carbonates, and corresponding sodium and potassium alkoxides such as sodium methoxide, sodium ethoxide, sodium propoxide, and sodium butoxide. Sulfuric acid, sulfonic acids, and hydrochloric acid are commonly used as chemical acid catalysts. Enzyme lipases from various sources are used as biocatalyst for biodiesel synthesis. Alkali-catalyzed transesterification is faster than acid-catalyzed transesterification (Benemann 1997). The catalytic conversion has not been meticulously studied for microalgal biodiesel production. Table 2 shows the various catalysts used for conversion of microalgal lipids to biodiesel.
4.1 Homogeneous Chemical Catalyst
4.1.1 Homogeneous Acid Catalysts
Homogeneous acid catalysts can produce biodiesel from low cost lipid feedstocks, generally associated with high FFA concentrations (cooking oil and greases, FFA>6%). Microalgal lipids are also known to have high FFA concentrations in the lipids. For acid-catalyzed systems, sulfuric acid, HCl, BF3, H3PO4, and organic sulfonic acids have been used by various researchers (Vyas et al. 2010). Mathimani et al. (2015) comparatively studied the transesterification of Chlorella sp. Lipids using various types of catalyst. In their study they used homogeneous acid (H2SO4), homogeneous alkali (NaOH), heterogeneous acid (Fe2(SO4)3), and heterogeneous alkali (CaO) catalysts. The study showed that the maximum biodiesel yield was detected with the transesterification process catalyzed by homogeneous acid catalyst.
The mechanism of the acid-catalyzed transesterification of oils is depicted in Fig. 2. Mechanism represented here is for monoglyceride, it can be applied to di- and triglycerides. The protonation of the carbonyl group of the ester forms the carbocation (II). The carbocation undergoes a nucleophilic attack of the alcohol, which leads to the tetrahedral intermediate (III), followed by elimination of glycerol to form the new ester (IV), and to redevelop the catalyst H+. According to this mechanism, if water is present in the reaction mixture carboxylic acids can be formed by reacting with carbocation. Thus to avoid the loss of product acid-catalyzed reaction needs to be performed in the absence of water (Schuchardta et al. 1998).
4.1.2 Homogeneous Alkali Catalyst
The most commonly used alkali catalysts for biodiesel synthesis are KOH, NaOH, and CH3ONa (Gemma et al. 2004). The reaction mechanism for alkali-catalyzed transesterification was determined as a three step process. The alkali-catalyzed transesterification is faster than the acid-catalyzed reaction. The mechanism of the base-catalyzed transesterification of oils is shown in Fig. 3. In the first step the base catalyst reacts with the alcohol to produce an alkoxide and protonated catalyst. In the second step nucleophilic attack of the alkoxide at the carbonyl group of the triglyceride leads to a tetrahedral intermediate from which the alkyl ester and the corresponding anion of the diglyceride are generated. The anion of diglyceride deprotonates the catalyst, thus regenerating the active species, which is now available to react with a second molecule of the alcohol, for another catalytic cycle. Diglycerides and monoglycerides follow the same mechanism to form a mixture of alkyl esters and glycerol.
In the alkali-catalyzed transesterification reaction, catalyst is dissolved in methanol by stirring. The mixture of catalyst and alcohol mixture is added to the oil. The reaction mixture is stirred continuously at ambient pressure. After completion of the reaction two liquid phases are produced: ester and crude glycerol. Crude glycerol settles down at the bottom after several hours of settling. After settling is complete, water is added to the reaction mixture followed by stirring, and the glycerine is allowed to settle again. A two step process washing is performed for ester recovery, which needs to be performed with extreme care. First step is water wash and then the acid treatment with stirring. Air is carefully passed through the aqueous layer while gently stirring. This process is continued until the clear ester layer is formed. After settling, the aqueous solution is drained, and water is added again for the final washing (Demirbas 2005; Demirbas 2008). Since base-catalyzed transesterification proceeds faster than the acid-catalyzed reaction and their less corrosive nature than the acidic compounds, industrial processes usually apply base catalysts.
If feedstock oil contains high amount of free fatty acids the alkali catalyst leads to the soap formation which affects the biodiesel yield and also causes problem in the washing steps (Singh et al. 2014). Even when water-free alcohol or oil mixture is used, some water is generated in the reaction mixture by the interaction of the hydroxide with the alcohol. The presence of water leads to the hydrolysis of some amount of ester, with resultant soap formation (Fig. 4). The undesirable saponification reaction hampers the ester yields and makes it difficult to recover the glycerol due to the formation of emulsions (Freedman et al. 1984).
4.2 Heterogeneous Chemical Catalyst
There are numerous heterogeneous catalysts that have been studied for biodiesel synthesis. The heterogeneous catalysts utilized in synthesis of biodiesel are grouped as solid acid and solid base catalyst. Solid acid catalyst includes a wide range of chemicals viz. resins, tungstated and sulfated zirconia, polyaniline sulfate, heteropolyacid, metal complexes, sulfated tin oxide, zeolite, acidic ionic liquids, and others have been used by researchers. Solid base catalysts also include a wide range of catalysts viz. calcium oxide, hydrotalcite (also called layered double hydroxide), alumina, and zeolites (Lam et al. 2010; Sharma et al. 2011). Homogeneous acid and base catalysts used for biodiesel synthesis have several disadvantages, e.g., corrosion of the reactors, metal pipes, storage tanks, and engines. Tedious washing process for their removal is energy intensive and generates wastewater. The heterogeneous catalysts give the advantage of easy separation and thus reuse (Chouhan and Sarma 2011). Reuse of heterogeneous catalyst could improve the economics of the conversion process. Zhang et al. (2012) used KOH/La-Ba-Al2O3 as a heterogeneous catalyst for conversion of microalgal lipids. The reaction was carried out at 60 °C for 3 h and they observed the highest conversion of 97.7% in their study with 25% loading of KOH on modified alumina. To reduce the cost of catalyst several low cost heterogeneous catalysts derived from the waste materials, eggshell, bones, mollusks fish waste, etc., are applied for biodiesel production (Singh et al. 2014). Nur Syazwani et al. (2015) synthesized the CaO catalyst from Angel Wing shell and applied for transesterification of Nannochloropsis oculata lipids. They observed the 84.11% biodiesel yield with 9% catalysts concentration and 1:150 oil to methanol molar ratio in 1 h reaction time. Leaching of the heterogeneous catalysts into the final product, i.e., biodiesel is the major concern. Leached catalyst into the product could hamper the fuel quality as well as its performance in the engines (Singh et al. 2014). A large number of heterogeneous catalysts have been studied for the synthesis of biodiesel from the edible and non-edible plant based oils; however, application of these catalysts on the microalgal based oil is yet to be thoroughly studied.
4.3 Biocatalysts
Enzyme lipase is employed as the biocatalyst for conversion of oils to biodiesel. Lipase is capable of catalyzing both esterification and transesterification process. Thus lipases can be effectively used for conversion of microalgal lipids with high free fatty acid concentration to biodiesel (Guldhe et al. 2015a). Enzyme catalyst provides several advantages over the chemical catalysts. Enzymes are known to possess high selectivity and specificity which lead to high purity product formation. Thus enzymatic transesterification gives high purity biodiesel and by-product glycerol. Less purification steps and minimal use of chemical minimize the wastewater generation unlike in chemical catalyzed biodiesel synthesis. Enzyme catalyst does not require high temperature conditions and can function effectively at atmospheric pressure. Thus the energy input for the enzyme catalyzed reactions is lower than the chemical catalysts (Robles-Medina et al. 2009). Major constraint while using lipases as a catalyst is its high price. Lipase if immobilized can be separated from the reaction mixture and reused for several batches of the conversion process. Novel immobilization techniques such as cross-linked protein coated microcrystals, magnetic support particle, and nanofiber are used for lipases to improve their catalytic activity, reuse potential, and stability in solvents (Guldhe et al. 2015a). The reuse potential of biocatalyst can reduce the cost of catalytic conversion. The activity of lipases can be inhibited by the presence of excessive alcohol (<3 moles). Thus several researchers have suggested the stepwise addition of methanol in the reaction mixture (Fukuda et al. 2001; Guldhe et al. 2015b). Stoichiometrically 3 moles of methanol is needed in the transesterification reaction for 1 mole of triglyceride. In lipase catalyzed transesterification 1 mole equivalent of methanol with respect to oil is added thrice after periodic interval during the reaction. Enzyme catalysis can be carried out in two ways, viz., using immobilized extracellular lipases and immobilized whole cells (intracellular) producing lipase. Xiong et al. (2008) used the Candida sp. 99–125 sp. lipase for the transesterification of Chlorella protothecoides lipids and observed 98.15% biodiesel conversion. The application of biocatalyst for conversion of microalgal lipids to biodiesel can make the process greener.
5 Acyl Acceptors Used in Transesterification of Microalgal Lipids
Transesterification is the common used process to convert triglycerides into biodiesel. This consists of the reaction of triglyceride and an acyl acceptor. Carboxylic acids, alcohols, and other ester can be used as an acyl acceptor. Glycerol is produced in transesterification when alcohol is used as an acyl acceptor while triacylglycerol is produced when ester is used as an acyl acceptor. Several acyl acceptors have been studied by the researchers for transesterification process. Methanol is the most widely used acyl acceptor in transesterification process (Helwani et al. 2009). Methanol is short chain alcohol which leads to faster reaction rate and also its inexpensive nature makes it favorable acyl acceptor at an industrial scale biodiesel production process. The major drawback of methanol is its toxic nature which raises the concerns regarding environmental and accidental risks. Methanol as an acyl acceptor is more toxic for lipase activity compared to ethanol. Use of ethanol as an acyl acceptor can improve the catalytic performance of lipase and also its reuse potential (Raita et al. 2010). In addition, ethanol can be produced from renewable sources via fermentation, which makes the process of biodiesel production greener. Only few studies report use of ethanol as acyl acceptor. The literature unanimously recommends a stepwise addition of alcohols to reduce their toxic effect towards enzyme catalyst (Guldhe et al. 2015a). Further research is needed for exploring the potential of other compounds as acyl acceptor for transesterification reaction.
6 Solvents Used in Transesterification of Microalgal Lipids
The feedstock oil and alcohol are immiscible and thus slow down the reaction rate. To overcome this problem researchers have suggested the use of solvent in the transesterification reaction. Solvents increase the mass transfer rate which eventually results in better reactant interactions and fast reaction rate (Abbaszaadeh et al. 2012). Various solvents have been applied in the transesterification. Hexane, tetrahydrofuran, and diethyl ether are most popular solvents for transesterification reaction in biodiesel synthesis. Lam and lee (2013) investigated the effect of various solvents (hexane, ethanol, tetrahydrofuran, toluene, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, and chloroform) on the transesterification of C. vulgaris oil using sulfuric acid as a catalyst. Among the various solvents studied by them tetrahydrofuran significantly improves the reaction rate and also reduces the methanol and catalyst amounts needed for reaction.
The solvents need to be removed from the biodiesel as well as glycerol after the completion of the reaction. Solvents are readily available at low cost, thus its use does not drastically affect the economics of the production process. However, high volatility, toxicity, potential hazards, and environmental risk raise concerns regarding their usage. To overcome these concerns recently ionic liquids have been employed as the solvent in transesterification reaction. Ionic liquids are termed as green solvents because of their properties such as negligible vapor pressure, high solubility, and tunable as per reaction requirement (Mohammad Fauzi and Amin 2012). Much more attention needs to be given on the novel solvents such as ionic liquids for their application in microalgal biodiesel production process.
7 In-Situ Transesterification
In-situ transesterification couples the extraction of lipids and transesterification via catalysis together. In-situ transesterification is alternative to the conventional process, which has the potential of reducing the processing steps and the overall conversion cost. The in-situ process aids the conversion of the oil to biodiesel directly from the oil bearing biomass. In-situ transesterification process eliminates the solvent extraction step. This technique thus reduces the requirement of solvents used for extraction step (Ehimen et al. 2010). This process is also gaining recognition as a lipid measurement procedure for algae (Laurens et al. 2012). In-situ transesterification can be done by using dry or wet microalgal biomass. Recently microwave and sonication assisted in-situ transesterification are studied for increasing the biodiesel yield. Tran et al. (2012) studied the in-situ transesterification of wet C. vulgaris biomass catalyzed by Burkholderia lipase. They observed 97.3% biodiesel yield when sonication pretreated biomass was subjected to in-situ transesterification in hexane as a co-solvent. This technique has shown potential to reduce the number of processing steps, amount of organic solvent used, and thus the overall production cost of biodiesel synthesis.
8 Process Intensification by Microwave and Ultrasound
Microalgal biodiesel is still far from commercial realization because of the high cost of production. Process intensification to reduce the reaction time and increase the yields could aid in reducing the biodiesel production cost. Catalytic conversion of oils to biodiesel can be intensified by using microwave or ultrasound techniques. The microwave or ultrasound assisted lipid conversion processes offer the advantages of shorter reaction time and higher yields over the conventional heating processes. The transesterification reaction assisted by microwave and sonication has been extensively investigated with vegetable oils in recent years to enhance the biodiesel yield. Microwave irradiation directly delivers energy to the reactants in the transesterification reaction. Thus the microwave assisted reaction completes in shorter time because of the effective heat transfer. The mass transfer of reactants in a sonicator is about 10 times faster than the conventional mode of stirring (Gole and Gogate 2012). Microwave and sonication techniques can be effectively coupled with in-situ transesterification of microalgal biomass (Guldhe et al. 2014). In in-situ transesterification process these intensification techniques serve dual purpose of breaking the cell wall as well as effective mass transfer. These process intensification techniques are, however, associated with high energy consumption. Further investigation is needed to improve the efficiency of using microwave or sonication for transesterification of microalgal lipids.
9 Challenges and Future Prospective of Catalytic Conversion of Microalgal Lipids
Biodiesel from microalgae is identified as promising future transport fuel. However, at present the high production cost is the major bottleneck in its commercial scale production. Conversion of microalgal lipids to biodiesel is a key step in production process. Lot of attention has been provided on the up-stream steps such as strain selection, cultivation, and lipid enhancement in microalgal biodiesel production process. There is need for thorough research on the microalgal lipids conversion process using various catalysts. Varying lipid quality, low yields, long reaction time, scaling-up, and achieving desired quality product are some of the major challenges in catalytic conversion process of microalgal lipids. High free fatty acid content in microalgal lipids advocates the use of acid or enzyme catalyst for conversion reaction. Numerous heterogeneous catalysts have been investigated for conversion of vegetable and other feedstock oils. This promising group of catalysts needs to be thoroughly studied for its application in microalgal biodiesel production. In-situ transesterification has shown potential to reduce the production cost by avoiding the extraction step. Low product yields in in-situ transesterification process need attention from the researchers to make this technology efficient. Process intensification by microwave and ultrasound techniques has shown potential to improve the yields in conventional as well as in-situ transesterification processes. Scaling-up of the efficient conversion process is also a challenging task. Comprehensive techno-economic and environmental risk assessment studies need to be conducted for competent conversion technologies for microalgal biodiesel production. Efficient and economically viable conversion technologies will lead the microalgal biodiesel production towards sustainability and greener future.
References
Abbaszaadeh A, Ghobadian B, Omidkhah MR, Najafi G (2012) Current biodiesel production technologies: a comparative review. Energy Convers Manag 63:138–148
Amaro HM, Guedes AC, Malcata FX (2011) Advances and perspectives in using microalgae to produce biodiesel. Appl Energy 88(10):3402–3410
Benemann JR (1997) Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospects. Nat Biotechnol 14:1101–1103
Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25(3):294–306
Chouhan APS, Sarma AK (2011) Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(9):4378–4399
Cook J, Beyea J (2000) Bioenergy in the United States: progress and possibilities. Biomass Bioenergy 18:441–455
Demirbas A (2005) Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification methods. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31:466–487
Demirbas A (2008) Comparison of transesterification methods for production of biodiesel from vegetable oils and fats. Energy Convers Manag 49:125–130
Ehimen EA, Sun ZF, Carrington CG (2010) Variables affecting the in situ transesterification of microalgae lipids. Fuel 89(3):677–684
Freedman B, Pryde EH, Mounts TL (1984) Variables affecting the yields of fatty esters from transesterified vegetable oils. JAOCS 61(10):1638–1643
Fukuda H, Kondo A, Noda H (2001) Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oil. J Biosci Bioeng 92(5):405–416
Gemma V, Mercedes M, Jose A (2004) Integrated biodiesel production: a comparison of different homogeneous catalysts systems. Bioresour Technol 92:297–305
Gole VL, Gogate PR (2012) A review on intensification of synthesis of biodiesel from sustainable feed stock using sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 53:1–9
Gouveia L, Marques AE, da Silva TL, Reis A (2009) Neochloris oleabundans UTEX #1185: a suitable renewable lipid source for biofuel production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36(6):821–826
Guldhe A, Singh B, Mutanda T, Permaul K, Bux F (2015a) Advances in synthesis of biodiesel via enzyme catalysis: Novel and sustainable approaches. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:1447–1464
Guldhe A, Singh B, Rawat I, Bux F (2014) Synthesis of biodiesel from Scenedesmus sp. by microwave and ultrasound assisted in situ transesterification using tungstated zirconia as a solid acid catalyst. Chem Eng Res Des 92(8):1503–1511
Guldhe A, Singh B, Rawat I, Permaul K, Bux F (2015b) Biocatalytic conversion of lipids from microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus to biodiesel using Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase. Fuel 147:117–124
Guldhe A, Singh P, Kumari S, Rawat I, Permaul K, Bux F (2016) Biodiesel synthesis from microalgae using immobilized Aspergillus niger whole cell lipase biocatalyst. Renew Energy 85:1002–1010
Helwani Z, Othman MR, Aziz N, Fernando WJN, Kim J (2009) Technologies for production of biodiesel focusing on green catalytic techniques: A review. Fuel Process Technol 90(12):1502–1514
Hita Peña E, Robles Medina A, Jiménez Callejón MJ, Macías Sánchez MD, Esteban Cerdán L, González Moreno PA, Molina Grima E (2015) Extraction of free fatty acids from wet Nannochloropsis gaditana biomass for biodiesel production. Renew Energy 75:366–373
Hossain ABMS, Salleh A, Boyce AN, Chowdhury P, Naqiuddin M (2008) Biodiesel fuel production from algae as renewable energy. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 4:250–254
Lam MK, Lee KT (2013) Catalytic transesterification of high viscosity crude microalgae lipid to biodiesel: Effect of co-solvent. Fuel Process Technol 110:242–248
Lam MK, Lee KT, Mohamed AR (2010) Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: a review. Biotechnol Adv 28(4):500–518
Laurens LML, Quinn M, VanWychen S, Templeton DW, Wolfrum EJ (2012) Accurate and reliable quantification of total microalgal fuel potential as fatty acid methyl esters by in situ transesterification. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:167–178
Ma F, Hanna M (1999) Biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour Technol 70:1–15
Mathimani T, Uma L, Prabaharan D (2015) Homogeneous acid catalysed transesterification of marine microalga Chlorella sp. BDUG 91771 lipid—an efficient biodiesel yield and its characterization. Renew Energy 81:523–533
Miao X, Wu Q (2006) Biodiesel production from heterotrophic microalgal oil. Bioresour Technol 97(6):841–846
Mohammad Fauzi AH, Amin NAS (2012) An overview of ionic liquids as solvents in biodiesel synthesis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(8):5770–5786
Nur Syazwani O, Rashid U, Taufiq Yap YH (2015) Low-cost solid catalyst derived from waste Cyrtopleura costata (Angel Wing Shell) for biodiesel production using microalgae oil. Energy Convers Manag 101:749–756
Praveenkumar R, Shameera K, Mahalakshmi G, Akbarsha MA, Thajuddin N (2012) Influence of nutrient deprivations on lipid accumulation in a dominant indigenous microalga Chlorella sp., BUM11008: Evaluation for biodiesel production. Biomass Bioenergy 37:60–66
Raita M, Champreda V, Laosiripojana N (2010) Biocatalytic ethanolysis of palm oil for biodiesel production using microcrystalline lipase in tert-butanol system. Process Biochem 45(6):829–834
Rawat I, Ranjith Kumar R, Mutanda T, Bux F (2013) Biodiesel from microalgae: a critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production. Appl Energy 103:444–467
Robles-Medina A, Gonzalez-Moreno PA, Esteban-Cerdan L, Molina-Grima E (2009) Biocatalysis: towards ever greener biodiesel production. Biotechnol Adv 27(4):398–408
Schuchardta U, Serchelia R, Vargas RM (1998) Transesterification of vegetable oils: a review. J Braz Chem Soc 9(1):199–210
Sharma KK, Schuhmann H, Schenk PM (2012) High lipid induction in microalgae for biodiesel production. Energies 5(12):1532–1553
Sharma YC, Singh B, Korstad J (2011) Advancements in solid acid catalysts for ecofriendly and economically viable synthesis of biodiesel. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5(1):69–92
Sharma YC, Singh B, Upadhyay SN (2008) Advancements in development and characterization of biodiesel: a review. Fuel 87(12):2355–2373
Singh B, Guldhe A, Rawat I, Bux F (2014) Towards a sustainable approach for development of biodiesel from plant and microalgae. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:216–245
Singh P, Guldhe A, Kumari S, Rawat I, Bux F (2016a) Combined metals and EDTA control: an integrated and scalable lipid enhancement strategy to alleviate biomass constraints in microalgae under nitrogen limited conditions. Energy Convers Manag 114:100–109
Singh P, Guldhe A, Kumari S, Rawat I, Bux F (2015) Investigation of combined effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and iron on lipid productivity of microalgae Ankistrodesmus falcatus KJ671624 using response surface methodology. Biochem Eng J 94:22–29
Singh P, Kumari S, Guldhe A, Misra R, Rawat I, Bux F (2016b) Trends and novel strategies for enhancing lipid accumulation and quality in microalgae. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:1–16
Song M, Pei H, Hu W, Ma G (2013) Evaluation of the potential of 10 microalgal strains for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 141:245–251
Tale M, Ghosh S, Kapadnis B, Kale S (2014) Isolation and characterization of microalgae for biodiesel production from Nisargruna biogas plant effluent. Bioresour Technol 169:328–335
Talebi AF, Mohtashami SK, Tabatabaei M, Tohidfar M, Bagheri A, Zeinalabedini M, Hadavand Mirzaei H, Mirzajanzadeh M, Malekzadeh Shafaroudi S, Bakhtiari S (2013) Fatty acids profiling: a selective criterion for screening microalgae strains for biodiesel production. Algal Res 2(3):258–267
Tran DT, Yeh KL, Chen CL, Chang JS (2012) Enzymatic transesterification of microalgal oil from Chlorella vulgaris ESP-31 for biodiesel synthesis using immobilized Burkholderia lipase. Bioresour Technol 108:119–127
Umdu ES, Tuncer M, Seker E (2009) Transesterification of Nannochloropsis oculata microalga’s lipid to biodiesel on Al2O3 supported CaO and MgO catalysts. Bioresour Technol 100(11):2828–2831
Vyas AP, Verma JL, Subrahmanyam N (2010) A review on FAME production processes. Fuel 89(1):1–9
Xiong W, Li X, Xiang J, Wu Q (2008) High-density fermentation of microalga Chlorella protothecoides in bioreactor for microbio-diesel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78(1):29–36
Zhang X, Ma Q, Cheng B, Wang J, Li J, Nie F (2012) Research on KOH/La-Ba-Al2O3 catalysts for biodiesel production via transesterification from microalgae oil. J Nat Gas Chem 21(6):774–779
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guldhe, A., Ramluckan, K., Singh, P., Rawat, I., Mahalingam, S.K., Bux, F. (2017). Catalytic Conversion of Microalgal Lipids to Biodiesel: Overview and Recent Advances. In: Gupta, S., Malik, A., Bux, F. (eds) Algal Biofuels. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51010-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51010-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51009-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51010-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)