Skip to main content

Migration under Control: Sovereignty, Freedom of Movement, and the Stability of Order

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resistance and Change in World Politics

Part of the book series: Global Issues ((GLOISS))

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

For decades, anyone entering national territory without valid documentation has faced criminalisation as an ‘illegal’. Although governments, international organisations, and societal majorities in receiving states support a type of order in which free movement is essentially restricted to the national sphere, resistance to such an order has also made itself felt. This comes in different forms and has different normative orientations, but all strands of it are united in striving to remove obstacles to human mobility and ease cross-border movement. However, none of these efforts has made much headway in turning the discursive tide on the regulation of international migration. Limited organisational capacity, difficulties in coalition-building, and ideological barriers have prevented success by oppositional and even more so by dissident actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    By extension, those who smuggle migrants and refugees and are frequently criminalised for doing so can be seen as collaborators of the dissidents. Opposition to the criminalisation of such individuals is articulated by groups such as ‘no-racism.net’. See, for example, the latter’s 2014 campaign against the Austrian Aliens Act (no-racism.net 2014).

  2. 2.

    Dissident supporters of migrants can, of course, also be organised as non-governmental groups and generally differ from oppositional actors mainly in their political aims and not their organisational form. That said, in contrast to oppositional NGOs—especially the large, transnational ones—they are often characterised by a network-like set-up involving fewer structures of a permanent or hierarchical kind and employing fewer professional staff.

  3. 3.

    This case study focuses on international migration and does not look at mobility in the broader sense. No consideration is therefore given to regulation regarding short-term holiday or business travel.

  4. 4.

    At the start of the 2000s, there were already over 50 international organisations dealing with worldwide migration (Kalm 2008: 45; Rother 2010: 422).

  5. 5.

    Institutions, authorities, and forums that played a prominent role in this process included the International Conference on Population and Development (1994); the UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants (created in 1999 by the Commission on Human Rights); the Berne Initiative (2001); the Geneva Migration Group (2003–2006), which developed into the Global Migration Group (meeting at regular intervals since 2006); the United Nations General Assembly High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (2006); and the Global Forum on Migration and Development (which has met annually since 2007).

  6. 6.

    Other conventions and agreements touching directly or indirectly on the issue of migration include the European Social Charter (1991/1996); the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965); the Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000); the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons (2003); and the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea, and Air (2004).

  7. 7.

    In Europe, only Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, and Turkey have ratified the Convention.

  8. 8.

    The ILO Convention on Migration for Employment (No. 97, 1949) has only been ratified by 49 states—though these include many members of the EU. The number of those who have ratified the Migrant Workers Convention (No. 143, 1975) is even smaller: 23.

  9. 9.

    “It is recognised that the return of persons found not to be in need of international protection or not otherwise authorised to enter and remain is essential to maintaining the integrity of a migration management system as well as to maintaining the integrity of the institution of asylum” (IOM and UNHCR 2001: 5).

  10. 10.

    The Schengen Agreement (1985/1996) provides for the largely unrestricted movement of people within its area of application. The right of EU citizens to work and reside freely within the Union has been established gradually over time (e.g. in EC Directive 2004/38/EC).

  11. 11.

    Analysis of all publicly available EU Council documents dating from 1999 to 2014 demonstrates this (see Annex)—though there has been an overall increase in the use of the term ‘irregular migration’ over this period, from five occurrences in 1999 to 151 occurrences in 2014.

  12. 12.

    Since 1999, member states have increased harmonisation by establishing the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), which is also intended to ensure equal minimum standards for all asylum applicants across the Union. As part of the CEAS, the Dublin Regulation stipulates that the member state of first access is responsible for processing an asylum claim.

  13. 13.

    Another is the Directive on Seasonal Workers (2014/36/EU), adopted in February 2014 and designed to ease and harmonise the rules governing seasonal employment and to protect the rights of non-EU workers engaged in this kind of work.

  14. 14.

    The GAMM provides the overarching framework for EU policy on external migration and asylum. Besides defining four political priorities (improving the management of legal migration, combating irregular migration and human trafficking, maximising impacts on development, and promoting international protection), it has developed a number of legal, political, and operational instruments and projects.

  15. 15.

    Individual member states often maintain their own agreements in addition to the EU partnerships.

  16. 16.

    In Germany, which has so far issued the highest number of Blue Cards, applicants need to earn a minimum of €48,400 per year, or, in the case of workers designated by the national authorities as urgently required, €37,752 per year.

  17. 17.

    The full text of the Charter is available at http://no-racism.net/upload/875914516.pdf, accessed 11 March 2015.

  18. 18.

    One of the SIS’s activities is disseminating information on irregular migrants to the Schengen states and associated EU countries.

  19. 19.

    This is even more true of the UNHCR and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants.

  20. 20.

    The Convention of the Law of the Sea (1982), for instance, stipulates the obligation to rescue people in distress at sea, regardless of their nationality or status.

  21. 21.

    As indicated, non-refoulement is a legal requirement in relation to refugees. However, it also has relevance for many irregular migrants: given that, in reality, the distinction between refugees and migrants is blurred, and claiming asylum may be the only means of gaining entry to a destination state, being able to lodge such a claim is important for all intercepted persons, regardless of their eventual status.

  22. 22.

    Following the deaths of hundreds of refugees off the island of Lampedusa in October 2013, Italy launched the Mare Nostrum rescue mission. Because most other EU states refused to help resource it, the mission was terminated after a year and replaced with the Frontex-run Triton mission. Initially, this had only a third of Mare Nostrum’s budget and covered a much smaller area. It was only after 800 more refugees died within a few days in May 2015 that the EU mission was expanded to a size roughly equivalent to that of its Italian predecessor.

  23. 23.

    In contrast to the position taken in this book, dissidents as described here appear to view the global order as hierarchical, since, in their view, every policy-field is ultimately dominated by neoliberal capitalism.

  24. 24.

    The closest any government has come to instituting general freedom of movement was the inclusion, by Ecuador, of a ‘universal citizenship’ provision in its constitution. This measure, adopted in 2008, allowed visa-free entry to all for stays of up to three months. In 2010, following pressure at home and internationally, visas were reintroduced for 10 African and Asian countries, including China, Afghanistan, Eritrea, and Somalia (Feline Freier 2013).

  25. 25.

    One indication of this is the significant increase in the use of the term ‘migration management’ in EU documents—though its frequency is nowhere near that of the phrase ‘border control’. For details, see Annex.

  26. 26.

    The increased association is, again, demonstrated by an analysis of EU documents. This shows that the number of documents containing both the word ‘terrorism’ and the word ‘migration’ increased sharply in 2001, peaking in 2006 and subsequently remaining relatively stable. See Annex.

  27. 27.

    Pope Francis, for instance, called the Lampedusa boat tragedy of October 2013 ‘a disgrace’.

  28. 28.

    The 2014 Frontex Annual Activity Report, for example, describes the Triton mission in the following terms:

    To help Italy deal with the rising tide of migrants, Frontex launched Joint Operation Triton at the beginning of November…Although the key objective of JO Triton is to support Italian authorities at the external sea borders, the operation also provides additional search and rescue capacity in the Central Mediterranean as assets deployed in the operation routinely suspend all border control activities to respond to search and rescue coordination centre (MRCC) requests to assist with distress calls. (EU Council 2015a: 14–5)

  29. 29.

    In summer 2015, the European Commission proposed the admission of an obligatory quota of refugees by each member state. In the Council, however, member states only committed themselves to accepting refugees on a voluntary basis.

References

  • AI, ICJ, and ECRE. 2013. ‘Joint Briefing on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Rules for the Surveillance of the External Sea Borders in the Context of Operational Cooperation Coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union’. Accessed 7 July 2015. http://www.ecre.org/component/downloads/downloads/790.html.

  • Amaya-Castro, Juan M. 2012. ‘Migration and the World of Work: Discursive Constructions of the Global in ILO Narratives about Migration’. In The New Politics of International Mobility: Migration Management and Its Discontents, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 49–74. Osnabrück: IMIS-Beiträge 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angenendt, Steffen, and Wenke Apt. 2010. ‘Die demographische Dreiteilung der Welt: Trends und sicherheitspolitische Herausforderungen’. SWP-Studie 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asyl, Pro. 2013. ‘Pushed Back: Systematische Menschenrechtsverletzungen an den griechisch-türkischen See- und Landgrenzen’. Accessed 7 July 2015. http://www.proasyl.de/fileadmin/fm-dam/NEWS/2013/Summary_Faelle_Deutsch_Pushed_Back.pdf.

  • Bader, Veit. 2005. ‘The Ethics of Immigration’. Constellations 12(3): 331–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, Veit. 2012. ‘Moral, Ethical and Realist Dilemmas of Transnational Governance of Migration’. American Behavioral Scientist 56(9): 1165–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin-Edwards, Martin. 2008. ‘Towards a Theory of Illegal Migration: Historic and Structural Components’. Third World Quarterly 29(7): 1449–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael. 2011. ‘Humanitarianism, Paternalism, and the UNCHR’. In Refugees in International Relations, edited by Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher, 105–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basok, Tanya. 2009. ‘Counter-Hegemonic Human Rights Discourses and Migrant Rights Activism in the US and Canada’. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(2): 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermejo, Rut. 2009. ‘Migration and Security in the EU: Back to Fortress Europe?’. Journal of Contemporary European Research 5(2): 207–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Alexander, ed. 2011. Global Migration Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Alexander, and Lucie Cerna. 2011. ‘High-Skilled Labour Migration’. In Global Migration Governance, edited by Alexander Betts, 60–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blockupy. 2013. ‘Refugee Strikes and Struggles gegen Ausgrenzung und Ausbeutung: Aufruf antirassistischer Netzwerke zu den Blockupy-Aktionstagen in Frankfurt’. 13 May. Accessed 24 August 2015. https://blockupy.org/1337/noborder-meets-blockupy/.

  • Bojadžijev, Manuela, and Serhat Karakayali. 2004. ‘Autonomie der Migration: 10 Thesen zu einer Methode’. In Turbulente Ränder: Neue Perspektiven auf Migration an den Grenzen Europas, edited by Transit Migration Forschungsgruppe, 203–9. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, Cristina. 2006. ‘Migration Control in Europe after 9/11: Explaining the Absence of Securitization’. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(3): 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, Joseph H. 1987. ‘The Case for Open Borders’. Review of Politics 49(2): 251–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, Joseph H. 1992. ‘Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective’. In Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money, edited by Brian Barry and Robert E. Goodin, 25–47. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, John P. 2010. ‘Open Borders: Absurd Chimera or Inevitable Future Policy’. International Migration 48(5): 14–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerna, Lucie. 2013. ‘Understanding the Diversity of EU Migration Policy in Practice: The Implementation of the Blue Card Initiative’. Policy Studies 34(2): 180–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerna, Lucie. 2014. ‘The EU Blue Card: Preferences, Policies, and Negotiations Between Member States’. Migration Studies 2(1): 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CISPM. 2014. ‘Final Declaration of the International Days of Rome (Italy), 13–16 November’. Accessed 16 March 2015. http://www.borderline-europe.de/sites/default/files/background/Final%20Declaration%20CISPM%20Rome%202014.pdf.

  • Cisse, Madjiguene. 2002. Papiere für alle: Die Bewegung der Sans Papiers in Frankreich. Hamburg: Assoziation A Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelisse, Galina. 2010. ‘Immigration Detention and the Territoriality of Universal Rights’. In The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement, edited by Nicholas De Genova and Nathalie Peutz, 101–22. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • COWI. 2009. ‘External Evaluation of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union. Final Report’. 15 January. Accessed 13 June 2016. http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/may/frontex-eval-report-2009.pdf.

  • Düvell, Franck. 2003. ‘The Globalisation of Migration Control’. Open Democracy, 11 June. Accessed 15 July 2013. http://www.opendemocracy.net/people-migrationeurope/article_1274.jsp.

  • Düvell, Franck. 2011. ‘Irregular Migration’. In Global Migration Governance, edited by Alexander Betts, 78–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Marcus. 2001. ‘Absturzgefahr für den Kranich’. Die ZEIT, 13 June. Accessed 22 August 2015. http://www.zeit.de/2001/25/Absturzgefahr_fuer_den_Kranich.

  • EU Commission. 2011. ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Evaluation of EU Readmission Agreements’. 23 February. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Council. 2009. ‘COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2009/50/EC on the Conditions of Entry and Residence of Third-Country Nationals for the Purposes of Highly Qualified Employment’. 25 May 2009. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Council. 2015a. ‘FRONTEX Annual Activity Report 2014’. 25 June. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Council. 2015b. ‘Joint Report by EUROPOL, EUROJUST and FRONTEX on the State of Internal Security in the EU’. Accessed 29 June 2015. http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9359-2010-INIT/en/pdf.

  • Euskirchen, Markus, Henrik Lebuhn, and Gene Ray. 2009. ‘Big Trouble in Borderland: Immigration Rights and No-Border Struggles in Europe’. Paper presented at the College Art Association annual conference, Los Angeles, 25–28 February. Accessed 12 March 2015. http://lebuhn.in-berlin.de/bordertrouble.pdf.

  • Faist, Thomas 2004. The Migration-Security Nexus: International Migration and Security before and after 9/11. Willy Brandt Series of Working Papers in International Migration and Ethnic Relations, 4(3). Malmö: Malmö University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feline Freier, Luisa. 2013. Open Doors (For Almost All): Visa Policies and Ethnic Selectivity in Ecuador. Center for Comparative Immigration Studies Working Paper 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • FFM Online. 2015. ‘NoBorder goes Blockupy!’. Accessed 24 August 2015. http://ffm-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/noborder-goes-blockupy-2015-english.pdf.

  • Frontex. 2015. ‘Rapid Intervention’. Accessed 8 January 2015. http://frontex.europa.eu/operations/rapid-intervention.

  • GCIM. 2005. Migration in an Interconnected World: New Directions for Action. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Martin, and Antoine Pécoud, eds. 2010. The Politics of International Migration Management. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Martin, and Antoine Pécoud, eds. 2012. The New Politics of International Mobility: Migration Management and its Discontents. Osnabrück: IMIS-Beiträge 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genova, Nicholas de. 2010. ‘The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement’. In The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement, edited by Nicholas de Genova and Nathalie Peutz, 33–67. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Georgi, Fabian. 2010. ‘For the Benefit of Some: The International Organization for Migration and Its Global Migration Management’. In The Politics of International Migration Management, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 45–72. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Georgi, Fabian, and Susanne Schatral. 2012. ‘Towards a Critical Theory of Migration Control: The Case of the International Organization for Migration (IOM)’. In The New Politics of International Mobility: Migration Management and its Discontents, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 193–223. Osnabrück: IMIS-Beiträge 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Bimal. 2012. ‘A Snapshot of Reflections on Migration Management: Is Migration Management a Dirty Word?’. In The New Politics of International Mobility: Migration Management and its Discontents, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 25–30. Osnabrück: IMIS-Beiträge 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Commission on International Migration. 2005. Migration in an Interconnected World: New Directions for Action. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Migrants Action. 2011a. ‘World Charter of Migrants’. 4 February. Accessed 11 March 2015. http://no-racism.net/upload/875914516.pdf.

  • Global Migrants Action. 2011b. ‘Statement Approved by the Social Movements Assembly at the IV World Social Forum on Migrations (Quito 2010)’. 18 December. Accessed 24 August 2015. http://globalmigrantsaction.org/sn_displayfull.php?row_ID=177.

  • Grönheim, Hannah von. 2013. ‘Foucault und die Flüchtlinge: Zu Macht und Widerstand im Diskurs der Europäischen Union’. In Macht und Widerstand in der globalen Politik, edited by Julian Junk and Christian Volk, 141–59. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gümüş, Yasin Kerem. 2010. ‘The EU Blue Card Scheme: The Right Step in the Right Direction?’. European Journal of Migration and Law 12(4): 435–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurowitz, Amy. 2000. ‘Migrant Rights and Activism in Malaysia: Opportunities and Constraints’. Journal of Asian Studies 59(4): 863–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstad, Anne. 2011. ‘UNHCR and the Securitization of Forced Migration’. In Refugees in International Relations, edited by Alexander Betts and Gil Loescher, 237–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, Teresa. 2003. ‘No Borders: The Case against Immigration Controls’. Feminist Review 73: 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollyfield, James F. 1992. ‘Migration and International Relations: Cooperation and Control in the European Community’. International Migration Review 26(2): 568–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homann, Ralf. 2002. ‘Perpetual Restart: On the Hybrid Praxis of No One is Illegal’. September. Accessed 22 August 2015. http://www.republicart.net/disc/artsabotage/homann01_en.pdf.

  • HRW. 2003. ‘The International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Human Rights Protection in the Field: Current Concerns’. Submission to the IOM Governing Council Meeting, 18–21 November, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huke, Nikolai. 2011. Die europäische Blue Card: Umkämpftes Projekt und staatsapparative Strategie der Europäischen Kommission. Forschungsgruppe Europäische Integration Marburg Working Paper 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2003. ‘The International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Human Rights Protection in the Field: Current Concerns’. Submission to the IOM Governing Council Meeting, 18–21 November 2003, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef. 2000. ‘The European Union and the Securitization of Migration’. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): 751–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef, and Alessandra Buonfino. 2008. ‘Politics of Exception and Unease: Immigration, Asylum and Terrorism in Parliamentary Debates in the UK’. Political Studies 56(4): 766–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, Maggie. 2005. ‘The Securitization of Migration: A Racial Discourse’. International Migration 43(5): 163–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Migrants Alliance. 2013. ‘Declaration of the 4th Assembly of Migrants and Refugees (IAMR4)’. 4 April. Accessed 24 August 2015. https://ima2008.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/declaration-of-the-4th-international-assembly-of-migrants-and-refugees-iamr4/.

  • IOM. 2008. ‘Challenges of Irregular Migration: Addressing Mixed Migration Flows’. Discussion Note for the International Dialogue on Migration. Accessed 25 June 2015. http://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/shared/shared/mainsite/about_iom/en/council/96/MC_INF_294.pdf.

  • IOM. 2011. World Migration Report 2011: Communicating Effectively about Migration. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM and UNHCR. 2001. ‘Refugee and Migration Control: Perspectives from UNHCR and IOM’. 31 May. Accessed 8 July 2015. http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home/opendocPDFViewer.html?docid=3b3892256&query=mixedflow.

  • Isbister, John. 1996. ‘Are Immigration Controls Ethical?’. Social Justice 23(3): 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kevin R. 2003. ‘Open Borders?’. UCLA Law Review 51: 193–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge, Johannes. 2001. ‘Nötigung! Lufthansa will AbschiebegegnerInnen mundtot machen’. ak—Analyse & Kritik 455, 25 October. Accessed 13 May 2015. http://www.noborder.org/archive/www.deportation-class.com/lh/durchsuchung.html.

  • Kalm, Sara. 2008. Governing Global Migration. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalm, Sara. 2010. ‘Liberalizing Movements? The Political Rationality of Global Migration Governance’. In The Politics of International Migration Management, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 21–44. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasparek, Bernd. 2010. ‘Borders and Populations in Flux: Frontex’s Place in the European Union’s Migration Management’. In The Politics of International Migration Management, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 119–40. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kicinger, Anna. 2004. ‘International Migration as a Non-Traditional Security Threat and the EU Responses to this Phenomenon’. CEFMR Working Paper 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, Hagen, and Florian Schneider. 2002. ‘A Brief History of the Noborder Network’. Accessed 13 March 2015. http://www.autonoomcentrum.nl/discussie/a_brief_history_of_the_noborder_.htm.

  • Koser, Khalid. 2010. ‘Making the Case for the Global Governance of International Migration’. The Forum: Discussing International Affairs and Economics, 31–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, Rey. 2004. ‘Possible Steps towards an International Regime for Mobility and Security’. Global Migration Perspectives 8. Accessed 8 July 2015. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/42ce49184.pdf.

  • Kuczynski, Alexandra, and Simone Solka. 2009. ‘Die Hochqualifiziertenrichtlinie’. Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht 7: 219–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, Sarah. 2011. ‘FRONTEX and the Securitization of Migrants through Practices’. Paper presented at the Migration Working Group Seminar, European University Institute, 9 February, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Matthew Themba. 2006. ‘Nothing Left to Lose? An Examination of the Dynamics and Recent History of Refugee Resistance and Protest’. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Forced Migration Post-graduate Student Conference, 18–19 March, London. Accessed 8 July 2015. www.aucegypt.edu/GAPP/cmrs/reports/Documents/Lewis.pdf.

  • Lindemann, Ute. 2001. Sans-papiers-Proteste und Einwanderungspolitik in Frankreich. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Leonore. 2006. ‘The Limits of Transnational Activism: Organizing for Migrant Worker Rights in Malaysia and Singapore’. Paper presented at the workshop Transnationalisation of Solidarities and Women Movements, 27–28 April, Montreal. Accessed 8 July 2015. http://www.cccg.umontreal.ca/pdf/lenore%20lyons_en.pdf.

  • Martin, Philip. 2007. ‘Migration and Development: Toward Sustainable Solutions’. Willamette Journal for International Law and Dispute Resolution 15(2): 182–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Philip, and Manolo Abella. 2009. ‘Migration and Development: The Elusive Link at the GFMD’. International Migration Review 43(2): 431–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Jane. 2011. ‘An Intellectual History of Freedom of Movement in International Law: The Right to Leave as a Personal Liberty’. Melbourne Journal of International Law 12: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meilaender, Peter. 2001. Towards a Theory of Immigration. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munster, Rens van. 2009. Securitizing Immigration: The Politics of Risk in the EU. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Netts, Roger. 1971. ‘The Civil Right We Are Not Ready For: The Right of Free Movement of People on the Face of the Earth’. Ethics 81(3): 212–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland, Kathleen. 2010. ‘The Governance of International Migration: Mechanisms, Process, and Institutions’. Global Governance 16(3): 331–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieswand, Boris. 2011. ‘Der Migrations-Entwicklungs-Nexus in Afrika: Diskurswandel und Diasporaformation‘. In Potenziale der Migration zwischen afrikanischen Ländern und Deutschland, edited by Tatjana Baraulina, Axel Kreienbrink, and Andrea Riester, 400–25. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Author. 2013. ‘Final declaration of the Refugee Tribunal against the Federal Republic of Germany’. 5 July. Accessed 16 March 2015. http://thecaravan.org/files/caravan/Tribunal_vs_BRD_20130705_Final_Statement_english.pdf.

  • noborder.org. 2002. ‘Freedom of Movement and Installation’. 13 June. Accessed 13 March 2015. http://www.noborder.org/strasbourg/topics/free/display.php%3Fid=2&lang=en.html.

  • noborder.org. 2015a. ‘The IOM, Spies and Migrant Hunters: Campaign to Combat Global Migration Management’. Accessed 24 August 2015. http://www.noborder.org/iom/index.php.html#campaign.

  • noborder.org. 2015b. ‘Lufthansas Prozesse bringen das Abschiebegeschäft in die Öffentlichkeit’. Accessed 15 August 2015. http://www.noborder.org/archive/www.deportation-class.com/lh/jura.html.

  • noborder.org. 2015c. ‘Strasbourg: A Testing Ground?’. Accessed 13 March 2015. http://www.noborder.org/strasbourg/display/item_fresh.php%3Fid=228&lang=en.html.

  • no-racism.net. 2014. ‘Smash §114 FPG—Decriminalise Migration’. Accessed 10 July 2015. http://no-racism.net/article/4661/.

  • Nyers, Peter. 2003. ‘Abject Cosmopolitanism: The Politics of Protection in the Anti-deportation Movement’. Third World Quarterly 24(6): 1069–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyers, Peter, and Kim Rygiel, eds. 2012. Citizenship, Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, Henk. 2002. ‘Neoliberalism and the Regulation of Global Labor Migration’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 581(1): 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pécoud, Antoine, and Paul de Guchteneire. 2006a. ‘International Migration, Border Controls and Human Rights: Assessing the Relevance of a Right to Mobility’. Journal of Borderlands Studies 21(1): 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pécoud, Antoine, and Paul de Guchteneire. 2006b. ‘Migration, Human Rights and the United Nations: An Investigation into the Obstacles to the UN Convention on Migrant Workers’ Rights’. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 24(2): 241–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pro Asyl. 2013. ‘Pushed Back: Systematische Menschenrechtsverletzungen an den griechisch-türkischen See- und Landgrenzen’. Accessed 7 July 2015. http://www.proasyl.de/fileadmin/fm-dam/NEWS/2013/Summary_Faelle_Deutsch_Pushed_Back.pdf.

  • Rother, Stefan. 2009. ‘“Inside-Outside” or “Outsiders by Choice”? Civil Society Strategies towards the 2nd Global Forum on Migration and Development in Manila’. Asien Aktuell 111: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother, Stefan. 2010. ‘“Inseln der Überzeugung” nicht in Sicht: Der Nationalstaat, NGOs und die Governance von Migration’. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 20(3–4): 409–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, Maurice. 2006. ‘Brain Gain: Claims about Its Size and Impact on Welfare and Growth Are Greatly Exaggerated’. In International Migration, Remittances, and the Brain Drain, edited by Çaḡlar Özden and Maurice Schiff. 201–26. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seglow, Jonathan. 2005. ‘The Ethics of Immigration’. Political Studies Review 3(3): 317–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeldon, Ronald. 2008. ‘International Migration as a Tool in Development Policy: A Passing Phase’. Population and Development Review 34(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statewatch and Migreurop. 2012. ‘Reply to the Ombudsman’s Request for Submission—Frontex’s Fundamental Rights Strategy’, 27 September. Accessed 1 July 2015. http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-193-eu-ombs-inquiry-frontex-evidence.pdf.

  • Tanner, Arno. 2005. Brain Drain and Beyond: Returns and Remittances of Highly Skilled Migrants. GCIM Global Migration Perspectives 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugur, Mehmet. 2007. ‘Migration without Borders: The Ethics, Economics and Governance of Free Movement’. In Migration without Borders, edited by Antoine Pécoud and Paul de Guchteneire, 65–94. New York: Bergham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs\Population Division. 2013. ‘International Migration’. Wallchart. Accessed 19 June 2015. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/wallchart/docs/wallchart2013.pdf.

  • UNHCR. 1994. ‘The Principle of Non-Refoulement as a Norm of Customary International Law’. 31 January. Accessed 7 July 2015. http://www.refworld.org/docid/437b6db64.html.

  • UNHCR. 2015. Global Trends. Forced Displacement in 2014. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valarezo, Giselle. 2010. ‘A Voice for the Silenced: UFCW Canada and the National Campaign to Empower Vulnerable Migrant Agricultural Workers’. Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education 2(1): 20–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, Steven. 2007. ‘Circular Migration: The Way Forward in Global Policy?’. International Migration Institute Working Paper 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veth, Silke. 2015. ‘Kein Mensch ist illegal’. Accessed 22 August 2015. http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/ABC/ABC_der_Alternativen_kein_mensch_ist_illegal_Veth.pdf.

  • Walters, William. 2006. ‘No Border: Games With(out) Frontiers’. Social Justice 33(1): 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William. 2010. ‘Imagined Migration World: The European Union’s Anti-illegal Immigration Discourse’. In The Politics of International Migration Management, edited by Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 73–95. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1995. ‘Response to Veit Bader’. Political Theory 23(2): 247–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Shelley. 2007. ‘Immigrant Admissions and Global Relations to Harm’. Journal of Social Philosophy 38(2): 274–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, Delgado, Márquez Raúl, Humberto Covarrubias, and Rubén Puentes. 2010. ‘Reframing the Debate on Migration, Development and Human Rights: Fundamental Elements’. International Network on Migration and Development. Accessed 7 July 2015. http://rimd.reduaz.mx/documentos_miembros/ReframingtheDebate.pdf.

  • Zapata-Barrero, Ricard, and Antoine Pécoud. 2012. ‘New Perspectives on the Ethics of International Migration’. American Behavioral Scientist 56(9): 1159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svenja Gertheiss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex

Annex

Occurrences of migration-related terms in publicly available EU documents 1999–2014*

*Documents accessible via the Council of the European Union register at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/register/en/content/int/?lang=en&typ=ADV, using the ‘public documents only’ option

Fig. 1
figure 1

Occurrences of the terms ‘illegal migration’ and ‘irregular migration’ in EU documents issued between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2014, 344

Fig. 2
figure 2

Number of EU documents issued in the period from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2014 in which the terms ‘border control’ or ‘migration management’ appear, 344

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gertheiss, S. (2017). Migration under Control: Sovereignty, Freedom of Movement, and the Stability of Order. In: Gertheiss, S., Herr, S., Wolf, K., Wunderlich, C. (eds) Resistance and Change in World Politics . Global Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50445-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics