Abstract
Several approaches from the social and natural sciences take finance, and especially financial markets, as a domain of systematic inquiry. Historians of economic thought have discussed extensively the emergence and evolution of some major, competing paradigms within finance, focusing on differences in their methodological and theoretical assumptions, as well as on the ways in which they have achieved dominant positions in the academia. However, how do these paradigms see the problem of their own value, in relationship to the value of their field of study? In other words, how do they present finance as a set of phenomena worth studying, and what is valuable about studying them from a particular angle? I examine here in this respect five significant scientific approaches to finance: financial economics, market microstructure, behavioral finance, social studies of science, and econophysics. I show how they represent the study of financial markets as a valuable, systematic endeavor, and how they represent their own value in providing a distinctive approach to the study of finance. I distinguish between internalistic and externalistic claims to value among these approaches. Internalistic value claims make reference to data accuracy and to methodological adequacy, while externalistic claims make reference to investigating links between finance and other forms of social organization and institutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Outside the sciences, we also encounter approaches claiming rigor and discipline. Technical analysis, for instance, enjoys relatively widespread usage among (professional and non-professional) traders, as well as some institutional structures, such as professional organizations and conferences. Technical analysis, however, is not regarded as a science and is not established as such within the academia. It does not claim a conceptual core—that is, a series of propositions and assumptions about human behavior and decision making, in the way the sciences of finance do.
References
Adler, P., Adler, P. (eds.): The Social Dynamics of Financial Markets. JAI Press, Greenwich CT (1984)
Aggarwal, R., Goodell, J.W.: Culture, institutions, and financing choices. How and why are they related. Res. Int. Bus. Finan. 31, 101–111 (2014)
Baker, W.: The social structure of a national securities market. Am. J. Sociol. 89(4), 775–811 (1984)
Barberis, N.: Thirty years of prospect theory in economics. NBER working paper 18621 (2013)
Brague, G.: Neither efficient, nor animally spirited, but eventually adjusting. The stock market according to L.A. Hahn. Q. J. Aust. Econ. 15(1), 89–119 (2012)
Callon, M. (ed.): The Laws of Markets. Blackwell, London (1998)
Cerrato, M., Kim, H., MacDonald, R.: Microstructure order flow. Statistical and economic evaluation of nonlinear forecasts. J. Int. Finan. Mark. Inst. Money 39, 40–52 (2015)
Chakraborti, A., Toke, I.M., Patriarca, M., Abergel, F.: Econophysics review I. Empirical Facts. Quant. Finan. 11(1), 991–1012 (2011)
Chang, Y.-C., Cheng, H.-W.: Information environment and investor behavior. J. Bank. Finan. 59, 250–264 (2015)
Collins, H.: Gravity’s Shadow. The Search for Gravitational Waves. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)
DeBondt, W., Muradoglu, G., Shefrin, H., Staikouras, S.K.: Behavioural finance: Quo Vadis? J. Appl. Finan. 18/2, 7–21 (2009)
Della Vigna, S.: Psychology and economics. Evidence from the field. J. Econ. Literat. 47/2, 315–372 (2009)
Fama, E.: Market efficiency, long term returns, and behavioral finance. J. Finan. Econ. 49, 283–306 (1998)
Findlay, M.C., Williams, E.E.: A fresh look at the efficient market hypothesis. how the intellectual history of finance encouraged a real ‘Fraud-on-theMarket’. J. Post Keynesian Econ. 23(2), 181–199 (2000)
Gingras, Y., Schinckus, C.: The institutionalization of econophysics in the shadow of physics. J. Hist. Econ. Thought 34(1), 109–130 (2012)
Grundy, B.D., Spencer Martin, J.: Understanding the nature of risks and the sources of rewards to momentum investing. Rev. Finan. Stud. 14, 29–78 (2001)
Guilbaud, F., Pham, H.: Optimal high frequency trading in a pro rata microstructure with predictive information. Math. Finan. 25(3), 545–575 (2015)
Howden, D.: Fama’s efficient market hypothesis and mises’ evenly rotating economy. Comparative constructs. Q. J. Aust. Econ. 12(2), 3–12 (2009)
Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Profitability of momentum strategies: an evaluation of alternative explanations. J. Finan. 56, 699–720 (2001)
Jovanovic, F., Schinckus, C.: Econophysics. A new challenge for financial economics? J. Hist. Econ. Thought 35(3), 319–352 (2013)
Kahneman, D., Riepe, M.W.: Aspects of investor psychology. beliefs, preferences, and biases investment advisors should know about. J. Portfolio Manage. 24(4), 52–65 (1998)
Knorr Cetina, K., Bruegger, U.: Global microstructures. The virtual societies of financial markets. Am. J. Sociol. 107/4, 905–950 (2002)
Latour, B.: The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA (1988)
Lepinay, V.: Codes of Finance. Engineering Derivatives in a Global Bank. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ (2011)
MacKenzie, D., Spears, T.: The formula that killed Wall Street’: the Gaussian Copula and modelling practices in investment banking. Soc. Stud. Sci. 44(3), 393–417 (2014)
MacKenzie, D., Millo, Y.: Constructing a market, performing a theory. The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 109(1), 107–145 (2003)
MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., Siu, L.: Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)
Mackenzie, D.: The credit crisis as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. Am. J. Sociol. 116(6), 1778–1841 (2011)
MacKenzie, D.: Material markets: how economic agents are constructed. Theory Cult. Soc. 29(2), 150–153 (2012)
McNamara, S.R.: The law and ethics of high-frequency trading. Minnesota J. Law Sci. Technol. (2015). SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2565707
Mizrach, B., Neely, C.: The transition to electronic trading in the secondary treasury market. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis working paper 2006–012 (2006)
Morgan, M.: Competing notions of ‘Competition’ in late nineteenth century American economics. Hist. Polit. Econ. 25(4), 563–604 (1993)
Muniesa, F.: The Provoked Economy. Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Routledge, London (2014)
Muradoglu, Y.G.: The UK crisis of 2008: What is real and what is behavioural? (2009). SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1373025 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1373025
Neate, R.: Queen finally finds out why no one saw the financial crisis coming. The Guardian (2012), 13 December, 2012
O’Hara, M.: Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell, Malden MA (1995)
O’Hara, M.: High frequency market microstructure. J. Finan. Econ. 116(2), 257–270 (2015)
Pardo Guerra, J.P.: Financial automation. past, present, and future, pp. 567–586. In: Knorr Cetina, K., Preda, A. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Phoa, W., Focardi, S.M., Fabozzi, F.J.: How do conflicting theories about financial markets coexist? J. Post Keynesian Econ. 29(3), 363–391 (2007)
Ray, R.: Econophysics. Finance, economics and physics. Appl. Econ. Lett. 18, 273–277 (2011)
Reinhart, C., Rogoff, K.: This Time Is Different. Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)
Ryu, D.: The information content of trades. An analysis of Kospi 2000 Index Derivatives. J. Fut. Mark 35(3), 201–221 (2015)
Sen, A.: Money and Value. On the Ethics and Economics of Finance. Edizioni Dell Elefante, Rome (1991)
Shiller, R.: Conversation, information and herd behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 54, 181–185 (1995)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, Daniel: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)
Weber, M.: Economy and Society. University of California Press, Berkeley CA (1978)
Weber, M.: Stock and commodity exchanges. Theory Soc. 29/3, 305–338 2000 [1896]
Wood, R.A.: Market microstructure research databases. History and projections. J. Bus. Econ. Stat 18(2), 140–145 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Preda, A. (2017). The Sciences of Finance, Their Boundaries, Their Values. In: Ippoliti, E., Chen, P. (eds) Methods and Finance. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49872-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49872-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49871-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49872-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)