Skip to main content

Tenkasi, Ramkrishnan (Ram) V.: Expanding and Bridging the Boundaries of Theory, Practice, and Method

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

In the field of organization development and change, Dr. Ramkrishnan (Ram) V. Tenkasi is an emergent thinker with contributions to scholarship and practice. Woven throughout the career of this academic and Fulbright senior research scholar is a recurrent theme of dialectical synthesis and boundary expansion along with frequent collaboration across a spectrum of advisors, peers, and doctoral students. Tenkasi’s scholarship has influenced the field with contributions to its understanding of organizational knowledge and communication, scholar-practitioners and the linkage of thought and action, and models of organization development – particularly large-scale change. He continues to expand his own learning and boundaries through immersion in cross-disciplinary methodologies while expanding both the rigor and relevance of our field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N., Shani, A. B., & Styhre, A. (2004). Collaborative research in organizations: Foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. G., & Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. R., & Bartunek, J. M. (2003). Theories and practices of organizational development. Handbook of psychology, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, G. A. (2004). Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and scientific realism. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 16–48). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R. J., Jr., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, B., & Tenkasi, R. V. (2015, August). A comparative study of organizational change: Dialogical, diagnostic, and diagnostic-dialogical. The Academy of Management annual meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., & Tenkasi, R. V. (2019). GEE: A practical method for longitudinal analysis. Organization Development Journal, 37(3), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G., Molloy, E. S., & Glen, R. (1977). A methodological critique of fifty-eight selected work experiments. Human Relations, 30(8), 675–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis (Vol. 241). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1987). Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2003). Generalized estimating equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A., & Huff, J. (2001). Refocusing the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 12, S49–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., Ledford, G. E., & Lake, D. G. (1996). Creating high performance organizations. Human Resource Management-New York, 35(2), 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics concept, method and reality in social science: Equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K.Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior (Vol. 1). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., Mohrman, J., & Allan, M. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change: A grounded analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303258072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E. J. (2015). A comparative analysis of the roles, strategies and tactics used by scholar-practitioners in organization development and medical translational research to simultaneously create research knowledge and help clients achieve results. Dissertation. Lisle: Benedictine University. (Order No. 3714837). Available from Publicly Available Content Database. (1707629786). https://0-search-proquest-com.libus.csd.mu.edu/docview/1707629786?accountid=100

  • Tenkasi, R. V. (1993). Knowing and organizational being. In R. Pasternak (Ed.), Mastery of mind: Perspective on time, space and knowledge (pp. 111–180). Dharma Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V. (2011). Integrating theory to inform practice: Insights from the practitioner-scholar. In S. A. Mohrman, E. E. Lawler III, & a. Associates (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (p. 456). Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Chesmore, M. C. (2003). Social networks and planned organizational change: The impact of strong network ties on effective change implementation and use. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2004). Actionable knowledge and scholar-practitioners: A process model of theory-practice linkages. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(3), 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2008). Following the second legacy of Aristotle: The scholar-practitioner as an epistemic technician. In A. B. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne, & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 49–72). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Mohrman, S. A. (1999). Global change as contextual collaborative knowledge creation. In D. L. Cooperrider & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Organizational dimensions of global change: No limits to cooperation (pp. 114–138). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., Mohrman, S. A., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1998). Accelerated learning during organizational transition. In S. A. Mohrman, J. R. Galbraith, & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Tomorrow’s organization: Crafting winning capabilities in a dynamic world (pp. 330–361). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1377–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, I. C., & Kram, K. E. (2009). Enacting the scholar practitioner: An exploration of narratives. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(5), 12–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S. E. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32, 891–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K.-Y. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42(12), 121–130. https://doi-org.proxy.elmhurst.edu/10.2307/2531248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Boland, R. J., Jr., & Tenkasi, R. V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., Mohrman, J., & Allan, M. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change: A grounded analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V. (1993). Knowing and organizational being. In R. Pasternak (Ed.), Mastery of mind: Perspective on time, space and knowledge (pp. 111–180). Dharma Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V. (2000). The dynamics of cognitive oversimplification processes in R&D environments: An empirical assessment of some consequences. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5–8), 782–798. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V. (2011). Integrating theory to inform practice: Insights from the practitioner-scholar. In S. A. Mohrman & E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (pp. 211–232). Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Chesmore, M. C. (2003). Social networks and planned organizational change: The impact of strong network ties on effective change implementation and use. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 39(3), 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2004). Actionable knowledge and scholar-practitioners: A process model of theory-practice linkages. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(3), 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2008). Following the second legacy of Aristotle: The scholar-practitioner as an epistemic technician. In A. B. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne, & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 49–72). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2013). Understanding the essential principles for integrating theory and research knowledge to the realm of practice: Lessons from the scholar practitioner. In G. D. Sardana & T. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Reframing human capital for organizational excellence (pp. 224–241). Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Sanders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sanders, E.J., Hay, G.W., Brock, B., Barho, E. (2020). Tenkasi, Ramkrishnan (Ram) V.: Expanding and Bridging the Boundaries of Theory, Practice, and Method. In: Szabla, D.B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_94-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_94-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Tenkasi, Ramkrishnan (Ram) V.: Expanding and Bridging the Boundaries of Theory, Practice, and Method
    Published:
    23 October 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_94-2

  2. Original

    Ramkrishnan (Ram) V. Tenkasi: Expanding and Bridging the Boundaries of Theory, Practice, and Method
    Published:
    13 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_94-1