Abstract
Teresa M. Amabile is one of the world’s leading thinkers on creativity and innovation. Her work has expanded our understanding of what it means to be creative, as well as the internal and external forces that influence it. Her contributions include measurement tools (Consensual Assessment Technique, Work Preference Inventory, KEYS to Creativity and Innovation), as well as conceptual models and principles (Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation, Intrinsic Motivation Principle of Creativity, The Progress Principle). Through her efforts, rigorous scholarship in the field of creativity and innovation has flourished over the past four decades. Her legacy includes a much greater awareness of how the work environment shapes creativity and progress, as well as how much the inner work lives of employees matter for positive engagement and successful organizational change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Academy of Mangement. (2018). 2018 lifetime achievement award winner: Teresa Amabile – Organizational Behavior (OB) Division. https://connect.aom.org/ob/awards/lifetime-achievement/teresa-amabile-laa
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.221.
Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.
Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
Amabile, T. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). JAI Press. [Reprinted in: B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). The evolution and adaptation of organizations. JAI Press, and B. M. Staw (Ed.). (1995). Psychological dimensions of organizational behavior. Prentice Hall.]
Amabile, T. M. (1992). Social environments that kill creativity. In S. S. Gryskiewicz & D. A. Hills (Eds.), Readings in innovation (pp. 1–18). Center for Creative Leadership.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87.
Amabile, T. M. (2011, October 12). The Progress Principle [Video]. TEDxAtlanta. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD6N8bsjOEE
Amabile, T. M. (2014). Big C, Little C, Howard, and me: Approaches to understanding creativity. In M. L. Kornhaber & E. Winner (Eds.), Mind, work, and life: A Festschrift on the occasion of Howard Gardner’s 70th birthday (Vol. 1). The Offices of Howard Gardner.
Amabile, T. M. (2016). The motivation for creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, S. T. Fiske, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Scientists making a difference (pp. 275–278). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316422250.060.
Amabile, T. M. (2017). In pursuit of everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 335–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.200.
Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity and the labor of love. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108185936.003.
Amabile, T. M. (2019a). Educating leaders who make a difference in the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804172.
Amabile, T. M. (2019b). Understanding retirement requires getting inside people’s stories: A call for more qualitative research. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(3), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waz007.
Amabile, T. M., Baker III, G. P., & Beer, M. (1995a, July). Cambridge technology partners (A). Harvard Business School Case 496-005 (Revised April 1996).
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367.
Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995b). User’s guide for KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Center for Creative Leadership.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995.
Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.1.92.
Amabile, T. M., Fisher, C. M., & Pillemer, J. M. (2014). IDEO’s culture of helping. Harvard Business Review, 92, 54–61.
Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work Environment Inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534321.
Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory (Technical Report Number 30). Center for Creative Leadership. https://doi.org/10.35613/ccl.1987.1088.
Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1988). Creative human resources in the R&D laboratory: How environment and personality impact innovation. In R. L. Kuhn (Ed.), Handbook for creative and innovative managers (pp. 27–33). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.35613/ccl.1987.1088
Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 52–61. [Reprinted in: Harvard Business Review Press (2020). HBR’s 10 must reads in creativity.].
Amabile, T. M., & Hennessey, B. A. (1992). The motivation for creativity in children. In A. K. Boggiano & T. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social developmental perspective (pp. 54–74). Cambridge University Press.
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(14), 23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. (2010). What really motivates workers. Harvard Business Review, 88(1), 44–45.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2007). Inner work life: The hidden subtext of business performance. Harvard Business Review, 85(5), 72–83.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011a). Meeting the challenges of a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01308.x.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011b). The power of small wins. Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 70–80.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011c). The Progress Principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Harvard Business Review Press.
Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J. S., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P., Marsh, M., & Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 418–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069464.
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001.
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003.
Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.
Beer, M. (2020). Fit to compete: Why honest conversations about your company’s capabilities are the key to a winning strategy. Harvard Business Review Press.
Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., & Spector, R. (1990). The critical path to corporate renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
Conti, R., Collins, M. A., & Picariello, M. (2001). The role of gender in mediating the effects of competition on children’s creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00217-8.
Cox, C. (1926). Genetic studies of genius, Vol. II: The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford University Press.
Cromwell, J. R. (2018). Further unpacking creativity with a problem-space theory of creativity and constraint. In G. Atinc (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventy-eight annual meeting of the Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.119.
Cromwell, J. R., Amabile, T. M., & Harvey, J.-F. (2018). An integrated model of dynamic problem solving within organizational constraints. In R. Reiter-Palmon, V. Kennel & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace (pp. 53–81). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00003-6.
Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004.
Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644.
Edmondson, A., & Mogelof, J. P. (2005). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams. In L. Thompson & H. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 109–136). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153.
Fisher, C. M., & Barrett, F. (2019). The experience of improvising in organizations: A creative process perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0100.
Fisher, C. M., Pillemer, J., & Amabile, T. M. (2018). Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1524–1553. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0207.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham and Gandhi. Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2019, August 13). Creativity and creativities: The challenges ahead. In Tribute to Teresa Amabile. Creativity Conference: Festschrift in Honor of Teresa Amabile. Harvard Business School.
George, J. M. (2008). Creativity in organizations. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Annals of the academy of management (Vol. 1, pp. 439–477). https://doi.org/10.1080/078559814.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487.
Hennessey, B. A. (1995). Social, environmental, and developmental issues and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212492.
Hennessey, B. A. (2004). The social psychology of creativity: The beginnings of a multi-cultural perspective. In S. Lau (Ed.), Creativity: When East meets West (pp. 201–226). World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812567192_0009.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. American Psychologist, 53(6), 674–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.6.674.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416.
Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(89)90011-8.
Hennessey, B. A., Mueller, J. S., & Amabile, T. M. (2020). Consensual assessment. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 199–205). Elsevier/Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23590-6.
Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688.
Kramer, S. J. (2019, August 13). Toast to Teresa Amabile. In Creativity Conference: Festschrift in Honor of Teresa Amabile. Harvard Business School.
Kurtzberg, T. R., & Mueller, J. S. (2005). The influence of daily conflict perceptions on creativity: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022931.
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035519.
Moneta, G. B., Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., & Kramer, S. (2010). Multi-rater assessment of creative contributions to team projects in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320902815312.
Mueller, J. S. (2017). Creative change: Why we resist it…how we can embrace it. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., Loewenstein, J., & Deal, J. J. (2018). Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0887.
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Arreola, N. (2015). Does generating multiple ideas lead to increased creativity? A comparison of generating one idea vs. many. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087274.
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1119.
Stevenson, H. H., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Entrepreneurial management: In pursuit of opportunity. In T. K. McCraw & J. L. Cruikshank (Eds.), The intellectual venture capitalist: John H. McArthur and the work of the Harvard Business School, 1980–1995. Harvard Business School Press.
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo-Mossi, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 17–27.
Sutton, R. (2011, August 3). The progress principle: A masterpiece every manager should own. Bob Sutton Work Matters. https://bobsutton.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/08/the-progress-principle-a-masterpiece-every-manager-should-own.html
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Personal Press.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Harcourt, Brace.
Zebrowitz, L. (2019, August 13). Toast to Teresa Amabile. In Creativity Conference: Festschrift in Honor of Teresa Amabile. Harvard Business School.
Further Reading
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity and the labor of love. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.
Amabile, T. M. (2019). Educating leaders who make a difference in the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804172.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011a). Meeting the challenges of a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01308.x.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011b). The Progress Principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Harvard Business Review Press.
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hadley, C.N. (2020). Teresa M. Amabile: Innovative Scholar of Creativity and Work Environments. In: Szabla, D.B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_134-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_134-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences