Abstract
NUT carcinoma (NC) is a genetically defined, highly aggressive, and incurable squamous cell carcinoma associated with chromosomal rearrangements of NUT, most commonly resulting in BRD4-NUT fusion oncogenes or, less commonly, BRD3-NUT, NSD3-NUT, or NUT-variant fusion oncogenes. NC most often arises in the thorax (especially the mediastinum) and in the head and neck (especially the sinonasal tract), but can arise at virtually any site. The karyotype of NCs is uniquely simple compared with that of other squamous cell carcinomas, suggesting that it arises through a genetic or epigenetic shortcut to the phenotype of squamous cell carcinoma. NC is almost certainly underdiagnosed, in part because it has a relatively nonspecific histologic and immunophenotypic profile. NC has a cytopathologic appearance that mimics other primitive small round cell tumors or basaloid neoplasms. Once a difficult diagnosis to make, NC is now diagnosable in most cases by immunohistochemical staining with an anti-NUT monoclonal antibody. No specific chemotherapeutic regimen has demonstrated efficacy in treating NC, but trials investigating the treatment of NC with bromodomain inhibitors that directly target the BRD-NUT oncoproteins are ongoing (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Clinical Features of NUT Carcinoma
NUT carcinoma (NC) is a rare, aggressive cancer. It can affect any gender or age group and occurs equally in males and females from the neonatal period [1, 2] through the eighth decade of life [3, 4]. Fewer than one hundred cases have been reported. At sites outside of the lung NC may represent 4–18% of tumors otherwise diagnosed as poorly differentiated carcinomas or undifferentiated malignant neoplasms [2, 5, 6]. Based on one study, the prevalence of NC amongst primary pulmonary nonglandular carcinomas was less than 1% [7]. There is no known racial predilection.
The cell of origin is not known and no in situ epithelial component has ever been observed. The tumor is usually locally invasive and widely metastatic at diagnosis. Because NCs arise from various anatomical sites, they cannot be categorized by the same system of nomenclature as most other carcinomas, which are traditionally defined by the tissue of origin. Instead, NC is defined genetically by the presence of chromosomal rearrangements involving the NUT (aka NUTM1) gene [8]. NCs tend to arise from midline anatomical sites, most commonly the upper aerodigestive tract (50%) [9] and the mediastinum (41%) [10]. However, it has been diagnosed within such varied tissues as the parotid gland, pancreas, adrenal gland, subcutis, bladder, and iliac bone [2, 11–14]. Apart from these unique features, NC is best known for its devastating clinical course. NC is characterized by aggressive local invasion and by lymphatic and hematogenous spread [2]. NC is often initially responsive to chemotherapy and radiation, but it invariably recurs rapidly and does not respond to subsequent therapeutic interventions. The median survival is only 6.7 months [4, 10], despite its frequent occurrence in previously healthy children or young adults without comorbid conditions. Thoracic NC usually presents at an advanced stage, with pleural effusions, pleuritic chest pain, nonproductive cough, weight loss, and shortness of breath [15, 16]. Thoracic NC may disseminate to bone, ovaries, liver, and brain [4, 12, 17–22]. Chest X-rays typically demonstrate extremely rapid tumor progression, with complete opacification of the thorax within 2–8 weeks from initial presentation [18]. By computed tomography (CT), NC appears as a hypoattenuating, heterogeneously enhancing, often extensively necrotic mass with poorly defined, infiltrative borders (Fig. 7.1) [15, 18, 23]. Given the age distribution of NC, it is unlikely that smoking plays a pathogenic role; this hypothesis is supported by the absence of a smoking history in many, but not all NC patients [13]. None of the cases tested to date have been associated with Epstein-Barr virus or with human papilloma virus infection [6, 13]. NC has been encountered in many parts of the developed world but is under-recognized in many developing countries.
It was in this rare cancer that the new class of bromodomain (BET) inhibitors were originally developed. BET inhibitors target the chromatin-binding bromdomains of BRD4 (and all other BET proteins) and thus directly inhibit the BRD4-NUT oncoprotein [24]. Clinical use of these inhibitors has demonstrated efficacy in NC [25], and multiple trials are ongoing enrolling NC patients in the United States and Europe. With the development of targeted therapy for NC, there is increased urgency for the early detection and diagnosis of this aggressive cancer.
Histopathology
The histopathology of NC is characteristic, but not diagnostic. The most common appearance is that of a poorly differentiated carcinoma with focal, abrupt squamous differentiation (Fig. 7.2). In contrast to many other poorly differentiated carcinomas, which consist of highly pleomorphic large cells, NC cells are usually medium sized, round, and often monomorphic in appearance (Fig. 7.3). Overt areas of squamous differentiation are seen in approximately half of cases [8] but may not always be present, particularly in small biopsies. A peculiar feature seen often in NC is a brisk neutrophilic infiltrate not associated with necrosis (Fig. 7.4). Well documented NC with unequivocal features of adenocarcinoma have not been seen. The histopathologic features of NC overlap with those of several other poorly differentiated cancers, including poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma [5], Ewing sarcoma, Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, thymic carcinoma, neuroblastoma, pancreatoblastoma [12], and even primary salivary gland carcinoma (Fig. 7.5) [26]. NC is commonly misdiagnosed; it has even been mistaken for acute leukemia (due to the occasional expression of CD34) [2]. Also contributing to the failure to diagnose NC is poor awareness of the disease among clinicians and pathologists, its rarity, and until recently, the absence of widely available diagnostic tests. To counter the lack of awareness of NC among pathologists and oncologists, an Internet-based international NC registry (http://www.NCRegistry.org) has been established. This registry provides access to (a) pathologic review, (b) updated information about the disease, (c) treatment guideline suggestions, (d) a repository for clinical data, and (e) educational information for physicians and patients about this disease.
Cytology
NUT carcinoma has a cytopathologic appearance that is nonspecific and mimics other primitive small round cell tumors or basaloid neoplasms [27–30]. Samples are highly cellular with monotonous, primitive-appearing small-to-mid-sized cells distributed most often singly and only occasionally in groups (Fig. 7.6). Vacuolated cytoplasm, corresponding with intracytoplasmic glycogen, is frequently seen, creating artifactual separation of cells and imparting a “fried-egg”-like appearance (Figs. 7.7 and 7.8) [27, 28, 31]. Chromatin ranges from open and pale, to hyperchromatic and neuroendocrine-like (Figs. 7.9 and 7.10) [32]. Mitoses, necrotic debris, and crush artifact are common [28, 33]. Overall, the cytologic characteristics overlap considerably with other poorly to undifferentiated carcinomas.
Macroscopy
NCs often present at advanced stages and therefore are not frequently amenable to surgical resection. NC typically grows as a large mass extending into hilar structures or along the pleura and chest wall (Fig. 7.11) [17]. NC has a fleshy, tan-white cut surface with or without prominent geographic necrosis.
Histopathologic Features in Biopsy Specimens
NUT carcinoma typically presents as sheets and nests of undifferentiated cells with a monomorphic appearance. The nuclei have irregular contours and granular to open chromatin (Figs. 7.9 and 7.10). The characteristic presence of abrupt foci of keratinization (Fig. 7.2) could be absent in small biopsy specimens [11, 16, 34]. Tumor cells infiltrate and expand the interstitium and may appear contiguous with bronchial epithelium (Fig. 7.12) [17]. Prominent geographic necrosis might be present (Fig. 7.13).
Tumor cells may be associated with a reactive pneumocyte proliferation, leading to diagnostic consideration of an adenosquamous carcinoma.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of NC depends on the demonstration of NUT (aka NUTM1) gene rearrangement or mis-expression. Although cytogenetic demonstration of a t(15;19) by karyotyping is sufficient for a presumptive diagnosis of NC, most diagnoses are based on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues because few suspected carcinomas are submitted for karyotyping. To fill this diagnostic need, one of the authors developed a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay that uses dual-color, break-apart bacterial artificial chromosome probes flanking the NUT and BRD4 loci (Fig. 7.14) [35–37]. This assay can be used on virtually any specimen preparation, including frozen tissue, acetic acid-fixed cytogenetic preparations, thin (4–5 μm) sections of FFPE tissues or disaggregated cells, and air-dried or ethanol-fixed slides. Because this approach works on archival, formalin-fixed tissue, retrospective analysis can be performed on samples that are decades old [2].
If fresh or frozen tissue is available, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction can be employed by use of primers flanking the known BRD4 and NUT break points [38]. However, this method overlooks NUT-variant fusion genes. To develop a diagnostic test for NC that can be used routinely in the community, a monoclonal antibody to NUT (clone C52B1, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA) that detects NUT expression by immunohistochemistry was developed by one of the authors (CAF, Fig. 7.15) [39]. NUT expression is normally restricted to post-meiotic spermatids of the testes (Fig. 7.16) [40]. In a study that included a large number of control tissues, predominantly other forms of carcinoma, nuclear reactivity with this antibody was 100% specific and 87% sensitive for the diagnosis of NC when present in greater than 50% of cells [41]. The nuclear reactivity with the NUT antibody in NC frequently, though not invariably, displayed a speckled pattern of staining (Fig. 7.17). In this same study, the authors also observed NUT nuclear staining in a large percentage of germ cell tumors (seminomas, dysgerminomas, and embryonal carcinomas), though the staining was weak, not speckled, and present in less than 10% of cells.
Immunohistochemistry
Most cases of NC have nuclear expression for p63/p40 consistent with squamous differentiation (Fig. 7.18). Broad spectrum cytokeratins are positive in the majority of cases (Fig. 7.19), although rare cases are negative [6, 33]. The other epithelial markers such as EMA, BerEP-4, CEA are expressed variably in NCs. Occasionally NCs can stain for chromogranin, synaptophysin, or even TTF-1 (Fig. 7.20) [17]. NCs are often positive for CD34, which may lead to a misdiagnosis of acute leukemia [2]. Germ cell, lymphoid, and myeloid markers are negative.
Differential Diagnosis
Since NC potentially look like any other poorly differentiated neoplasm, testing for NUT expression by immunohistochemistry should be considered in all poorly differentiated carcinomas that lack glandular differentiation or specific etiology [34]. NC may be misdiagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, Ewing sarcoma, metastatic germ cell tumor, and acute leukemia [4, 35].
Summary
NC is a genetically defined, highly aggressive, and incurable squamous cell carcinoma associated with chromosomal rearrangements of NUT, most commonly resulting in BRD4-NUT fusion oncogenes or, less commonly, BRD3-NUT, NSD3-NUT or NUT-variant fusion oncogenes. Once a difficult diagnosis to make, NC is now diagnosable in most cases by immunohistochemical staining with an anti-NUT monoclonal antibody. Given the emergence of promising targeted therapy for this otherwise incurable cancer, there is an urgent need for increased awareness and early diagnosis of NC. Since NC resembles other poorly differentiated neoplasms, testing for NUT expression by immunohistochemistry should be considered in all poorly differentiated carcinomas with p63 or p40 nuclear expression that lack glandular differentiation or specific etiology.
References
Shehata BM, Steelman CK, Abramowsky CR, Olson TA, French CA, Saxe DF, et al. NUT mid line carcinoma in a newborn with multiorgan disseminated tumor and a 2-year-old with a pancreatic/hepatic primary. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2010;13(6):481–5. PubMed PMID: WOS:000288185300008. English.
French CA, Kutok JL, Faquin WC, Toretsky JA, Antonescu CR, Griffin CA, et al. Midline carcinoma of children and young adults with NUT rearrangement. J Clin Oncol Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4135–9.
Stelow EB, Bellizzi AM, Taneja K, Mills SE, LeGallo RD, Kutok JL, et al. NUT rearrangement in undifferentiated carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32A(6):828–34. PubMed PMID: WOS:000256553000003. English.
Bauer DE, Mitchell CM, Strait KM, Lathan CS, Stelow EB, Luer SC, et al. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of NUT midline carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res Official J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2012;18(20):5773–9. PubMed PMID: 22896655. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3473162.
Stelow EB, Bellizzi AM, Taneja K, Mills SE, Legallo RD, Kutok JL, et al. NUT rearrangement in undifferentiated carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(6):828–34.
Evans AG, French CA, Cameron MJ, Fletcher CD, Jackman DM, Lathan CS, et al. Pathologic characteristics of NUT midline carcinoma arising in the mediastinum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(8):1222–7. PubMed PMID: 22790861. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3396884.
Sholl LM, Nishino M, Pokharel S, Mino-Kenudson M, French CA, Janne PA, et al. Primary pulmonary NUT midline carcinoma: clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characterizations. J Thorac Oncol Official Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2015;10(6):951–9. PubMed PMID: 26001144. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4443847.
French CA, Kutok JL, Faquin WC, Toretsky JA, Antonescu CR, Griffin CA, et al. Midline carcinoma of children and young adults with NUT rearrangement. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4135–9. PubMed PMID: WOS:000224573400015. English.
Chau NG, Hurwitz S, Mitchell CM, Aserlind A, Grunfeld N, Kaplan L, et al. Intensive treatment and survival outcomes in NUT midline carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2016. PubMed PMID: 27509377.
French CA. Demystified molecular pathology of NUT midline carcinomas. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(6):492–6. PubMed PMID: WOS:000277941500004. English.
den Bakker MA, Beverloo BH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Meeuwis CA, Tan LM, Johnson LA, et al. NUT midline carcinoma of the parotid gland with mesenchymal differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(8):1253–8.
Shehata BM, Steelman CK, Abramowsky CR, Olson TA, French CA, Saxe DF, et al. NUT midline carcinoma in a newborn with multiorgan disseminated tumor and a 2-year-old with a pancreatic/hepatic primary. Pediatr Dev Pathol Official J Soc Pediatr Pathol Paediatr Pathol Soc. 2010;13(6):481–5. PubMed PMID: 20017639.
French CA. Pathogenesis of NUT midline carcinoma. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:247–65.
Mertens F, Wiebe T, Adlercreutz C, Mandahl N, French CA. Successful treatment of a child with t (15;19)-positive tumor. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(7):1015–7.
Nelson BA, Lee EY, French CA, Bauer DE, Vargas SO. BRD4-NUT carcinoma of the mediastinum in a pediatric patient: multidetector computed tomography imaging findings. J Thorac Imaging. 2010;25(3):W93–6.
Lee AC, Kwong YI, Fu KH, Chan GC, Ma L, Lau YL. Disseminated mediastinal carcinoma with chromosomal translocation (15;19). A distinctive clinicopathologic syndrome. Cancer. 1993;72(7):2273–6.
Tanaka M, Kato K, Gomi K, Yoshida M, Niwa T, Aida N, et al. NUT midline carcinoma: report of 2 cases suggestive of pulmonary origin. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(3):381–8.
Polsani A, Braithwaite KA, Alazraki AL, Abramowsky C, Shehata BM. NUT midline carcinoma: an imaging case series and review of literature. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(2):205–10.
Vargas SO, French CA, Faul PN, Fletcher JA, Davis IJ, Dal Cin P, et al. Upper respiratory tract carcinoma with chromosomal translocation 15;19: evidence for a distinct disease entity of young patients with a rapidly fatal course. Cancer. 2001;92(5):1195–203.
Engleson J, Soller M, Panagopoulos I, Dahlen A, Dictor M, Jerkeman M. Midline carcinoma with t (15;19) and BRD4-NUT fusion oncogene in a 30-year-old female with response to docetaxel and radiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:69. PubMed PMID: 16542442. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1456975.
Ball A, Bromley A, Glaze S, French CA, Ghatage P, Kobel M. A rare case of NUT midline carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep. 2012;3:1–3. PubMed PMID: 24371650. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3862205.
Puliyel MM, Mascarenhas L, Zhou S, Sapra A, Dal Cin P, French CA, et al. Nuclear protein in testis midline carcinoma misdiagnosed as adamantinoma. J Clin Oncol Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2014. PubMed PMID: 24470009.
Stelow EB, French CA. Carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract with rearrangement of the nuclear protein of the testis (NUT) gene (NUT midline carcinomas). Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16(2):92–6.
Filippakopoulos P, Qi J, Picaud S, Shen Y, Smith WB, Fedorov O, et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature. 2010;468(7327):1067–73. PubMed PMID: 20871596. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3010259.
Stathis A, Zucca E, Bekradda M, Gomez-Roca C, Delord JP, de La Motte Rouge T, et al. Clinical response of carcinomas harboring the BRD4-NUT oncoprotein to the targeted bromodomain inhibitor OTX015/MK-8628. Cancer Discovery. 2016;6(5):492–500. PubMed PMID: 26976114. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4854801.
den Bakker MA, Beverloo BH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Meeuwis CA, Tan LM, Johnson LA, et al. NUT midline carcinoma of the parotid gland with mesenchymal differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(8):1253–8. PubMed PMID: WOS:000268850300019. English.
Bishop JA, French CA, Ali SZ. Cytopathologic features of NUT midline carcinoma: a series of 26 specimens from 13 patients. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;n/a–n/a.
Bellizzi AM, Bruzzi C, French CA, Stelow EB. The cytologic features of NUT midline carcinoma. Cancer. 2009;117(6):508–15.
Policarpio-Nicolas MLC, de Leon EMB, Jagirdar J. Cytologic Findings of NUT midline carcinoma in the hilum of the lung. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43(9):739–42. PubMed PMID: WOS:000359703200014. English.
Kuroda S, Suzuki S, Kurita A, Muraki M, Aoshima Y, Tanioka F, et al. Cytological features of a variant NUT midline carcinoma of the lung harboring the NSD3-NUT fusion gene: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Pathol. 2015;2015:572951. PubMed PMID: 25685583. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4320876.
Wartchow EP, Moore TS, French CA, Mierau GW. Ultrastructural features of NUT midline carcinoma. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2012;36(4):280–4.
Bishop JA, French CA, Ali SZ. Cytopathologic features of NUT midline carcinoma: a series of 26 specimens from 13 patients. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016. PubMed PMID: 27400194.
Zhu B, Laskin W, Chen Y, French CA, Cameron MJ, Nayar R, et al. NUT midline carcinoma: a neoplasm with diagnostic challenges in cytology. Cytopathol Official J Brit Soc Clin Cytol. 2011;22(6):414–7.
Stelow EB. A review of NUT midline carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2011;5(1):31–5. PubMed PMID: 21221870. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3037455.
French CA, Ramirez CL, Kolmakova J, Hickman TT, Cameron MJ, Thyne ME, et al. BRD-NUT oncoproteins: a family of closely related nuclear proteins that block epithelial differentiation and maintain the growth of carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2008;27(15):2237–42. PubMed PMID: WOS:000254621300014. English.
French CA, Miyoshi I, Aster JC, Kubonishi I, Kroll TG, Dal Cin P, et al. BRD4 bromodomain gene rearrangement in aggressive carcinoma with translocation t (15;19). Am J Pathol. 2001;159(6):1987–92. PubMed PMID: WOS:000172457400003. English.
Schwartz BE, Hofer MD, Lemieux ME, Bauer DE, Cameron MJ, West NH, et al. Differentiation of NUT midline carcinoma by epigenomic reprogramming. Cancer Res. 2011;71(7):2686–96. PubMed PMID: WOS:000289057600029. English.
Engleson J, Soller M, Panagopoulos I, Dahlen A, Dictor M, Jerkeman M. Midline carcinoma with t (15;19) and BRD4-NUT fusion oncogene in a 30-year-old female with response to docetaxel and radiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2006;6. PubMed PMID: WOS:000237264000001. English.
Haack H, Johnson LA, Fry CJ, Crosby K, Polakiewicz RD, Stelow EB, et al. Diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma using a NUT-specific monoclonal antibody. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(7):984–91. PubMed PMID: WOS:000268043400003. English.
French CA, Miyoshi I, Kubonishi I, Grier HE, Perez-Atayde AR, Fletcher JA. BRD4-NUT fusion oncogene: a novel mechanism in aggressive carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63(2):304–7.
Haack H, Johnson LA, Fry CJ, Crosby K, Polakiewicz RD, Stelow EB, et al. Diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma using a NUT-specific monoclonal antibody. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(7):984–91. PubMed PMID: 19363441. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2783402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chirieac, L.R., French, C.A. (2017). NUT Carcinoma. In: Roden, A., Moreira, A. (eds) Mediastinal Lesions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48379-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48379-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48377-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48379-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)