Abstract
Acute cholecystitis (AC) is considered the inflammation of the gallbladder, and it is caused in most cases by the presence of gallstones. According to the literature and WSES guidelines the first radiologic technique for diagnosis of AC remains to be Ultra Sound (US), however Contrast Tomography (CT) scan may play an important role in complicated AC or in patients where no clear symptoms are present.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
7.1 Introduction
Acute cholecystitis (AC) is considered the inflammation of the gallbladder, and it is caused in most cases by the presence of gallstones. It can be associated to local or general signs of inflammation and the diagnosis is given from a combination of detailed clinical history and clinical examination, laboratory tests and images as reported by the recent World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines [1]. AC can affect 10–20% of patients with gallstones, and in up to 39% of cases, a gangrenous AC was found [2, 3].
Another clinical entity that mimics the lithiasic AC is the acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) [4] that represents 2–15% of all AC. However, AAC is related with a high mortality (10% up to 90% comparing to 1% of AC) because patients with AAC are often critically ill patients with hypovolemic shock, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, dehydration, sepsis, and vasculitis.
Abdominal ultrasound (US) is considered the first and preferred initial imaging technique to detect the presence of gallstones and to evaluate the inflammatory changes in the gallbladder [1]. US is also valuable because it is free from ionizing radiation and is easily available and not invasive with a good diagnostic accuracy [1]. However computed tomography (CT), even if it is related to ionizing radiation, seems to be more useful when US is not diagnostic and in patients with confusing clinical condition or to evaluate eventual AC complications [1].
7.2 Value of Computed Tomography
As mentioned above, the role of CT in AC is not clearly defined. In the literature comparing with US, CT shows sensitivity from 85 to 94% (95% CI, 66–95 and 95% CI, 73, 99%, respectively) and specificity from 59 up to 81% (95% CI 42, 74 and 95% CI 69–90%, respectively), while for US they are, respectively, 81 and 83% [15].
A recent meta-analysis that summarized the role of the different diagnostic techniques in AC shows that cholescintigraphy has the highest diagnostic accuracy and the accuracy of US leaves a substantial margin of error, comparable to that of MR imaging, while CT is still under evaluation [5].
The use of US remains crucial in AC (Figs. 7.1 and 7.2), however there is an increased number of patients undergoing CT especially in suspected complicated AC (Table 7.1) [3, 6].
In patients where AC is suspected, in watching the CT images, the attention should be focused on the gallbladder wall (thickness, enhancement, continuity, irregularity, and the presence or absence of gas), the gallbladder lumen (presence or absence of gallstones, gas, high-density fluid, sloughed mucosa), the pericholecystic space (fat stranding, fluid, abscess), and the characteristics of pericholecystic organs (the liver, peritoneal collection, small bowel obstruction) [3, 6].
Gallbladder perforation is rare, without specific clinical signs at presentation, and often requires an urgent surgical intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality rates. For this reason, some authors like Niemeier proposed a classification for perforated gallbladder dividing it in type I (acute free perforation into the peritoneal cavity without protective adhesions), type II (subacute perforation surrounded by a pericholecystic abscess walled off by adhesions), and type III (chronic perforation with a fistula between the gallbladder and viscus) [7]. It has been pointed out that CT scan scores better than US in detecting gallbladder perforations, establishing a prompt definitive diagnosis of gallbladder perforation and hence decreasing morbidity and mortality [7].
Some authors suggest that a dual-phase (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images) abdominal CT can be important to predict the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to laparotomic cholecystectomy [8]. The most factors that seem to be associated with conversion were the absence of gallbladder wall enhancement (58% vs. 40% in non-conversion group, p = 0.02) and the presence of infundibular gallstones (78% vs. 22% in non-conversion group, p = 0.04) [8]. These data could suggest that contrast-enhanced CT can give a better selection of patients and can minimize time of conversion.
7.3 CT Findings in AC
The detection of the following findings at the CT scan is reported as highest sensitivity and specificity criteria of AC: a gallbladder distention (in 41% of cases), pericholecystic fat density and collection (respectively, in 52 and 31% of cases), gallbladder wall thickness of more than 7 mm (in 59% of cases), subserosal edema (in 31% of cases), local or widespread absence of gallbladder wall enhancement, and high gallbladder bile attenuation (in 24% of cases) (Figs. 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5) [3, 8, 9]. In case of pericholecystic abscess, it is possible to find focal mural defects or mural abscess with a focal intramural bulge [3]. These signs have specificity for complicated or perforated AC close to 90% [3]. However, it has to be pointed out that CT has a lower sensitivity in detecting gallstones compared to US [3].
Gangrenous AC (GAC) shows an increase in transient focal enhancement of the liver adjacent to the gallbladder during the arterial phase of dynamic CT and an attenuation ratio of the arterial phase ≥1.46 [10]. These characteristics seem to be predictive for GAC helping for a rapid diagnosis to reduce complication rates [10].
A particular entity is the xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis that is a rare inflammatory disease of the gallbladder due to an acute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltration and macrophages containing lipids forming such as foamy histiocytes [11]. Clinical manifestations are similar to AC, and the CT images show in most of patients a diffuse thickening of the gallbladder wall with an aggressive presentation and extent into adjacent structures, which mimic a gallbladder carcinoma, with intramural hypo-attenuated nodules that are suggestive for (but also similar to) adenomyomatosis [11].
A particular CT finding is the emphysematous AC secondary to infections by gas-forming organisms such as Clostridium welchii, especially in diabetic patients [3].
Other rare cases are the Mirizzi syndrome (impacted gallstone in the gallbladder neck or cystic duct that causes an extrinsic compression of the common hepatic duct, dilatation of intrahepatic bile ducts) and the cholecystocholedochal fistula from recurrent gallbladder inflammation around the impacted gallstones [3].
Conclusions
Although according to the literature and WSES guidelines the first radiologic technique for diagnosis of AC remains US, CT scan may play an important role in complicated AC or in patients where no clear symptoms are present. Furthermore, some CT scan findings may help to stratify patients with probable high or low difficulties in the execution of surgery, either laparoscopic or laparotomic.
References
Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F, Peitzmann AB, Fingerhut A, Catena F, Agresta F, Allegri A, Bailey I, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Biffl W, Bonavina L, Borzellino G, Brunetti F, Burlew CC, Camapanelli G, Campanile FC, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Civil I, Coimbra R, De Moya M, Di Saverio S, Fraga GP, Gupta S, Kashuk J, Kelly MD, Koka V, Jeekel H, Latifi R, Leppaniemi A, Maier RV, Marzi I, Moore F, Piazzalunga D, Sakakushev B, Sartelli M, Scalea T, Stahel PF, Taviloglu K, Tugnoli G, Uraneus S, Velmahos GC, Wani I, Weber DG, Viale P, Sugrue M, Ivatury R, Kluger Y, Gurusamy KS, Moore EE. 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:25.
Strasberg SM. Acute calcolous cholecystitis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2804–11.
Chawla A, Bosco JI, Lim TC, Srinivasan S, Teh HS, Shenoy JN. Imaging of acute cholecystitis and cholecystitis-associated complications in the emergency setting. Singap Med J. 2015;56(8):438–43; quiz 444.
Tana M, Tana C, Cocco G. Acute acalculous cholecystitis and cardiovascular disease: a land of confusion. J Ultrasound. 2015;18:317–20.
Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology. 2012;264:708–20.
Soyer P, Hoeffel C, Dohan A, Gayat E, Eveno C, Malgras B, Pautrat K, Boudiaf M. Acute cholecystitis: quantitative and qualitative evaluation with 64-section helical CT. Acta Radiol. 2013;54(5):477–86.
Boruah DK, Sanyal S, Sharma BK, Boruah DR. Comparative evaluation of ultrasonography and cross-sectional imaging in determining gall bladder perforation in accordance to Niemeier’s classification. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(8):TC15–8.
Fuks D, Mouly C, Robert B, Hajji H, Yzet T, Regimbeau JM. Acute cholecystitis: preoperative CT can help the surgeon consider conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Radiology. 2012;263(1):128–38.
Fidler J, Paulson EK, Layfield L. CT evaluation of acute cholecystitis: findings and usefulness in diagnosis. AJR. 1996;166:1085–8.
Maehira H, Itoh A, Kawasaki M, Ogawa M, Imagawa A, Mizumura N, Okumura S, Kameyama M. Use of dynamic CT attenuation value for diagnosis of acute gangrenous cholecystitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(12):2306–9.
Zhao F, Lu PX, Yan SX, Wang GF, Yuan J, Zhang SZ, Wang YX. CT and MR features of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: an analysis of consecutive 49 cases. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(9):1391–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montori, G. et al. (2018). Acute Cholecystitis. In: Catena, F., Di Saverio, S., Ansaloni, L., Coccolini, F., Sartelli, M. (eds) CT Scan in Abdominal Emergency Surgery. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48347-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48347-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48346-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48347-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)