Abstract
Socio-pragmatic processing is a complex feature of human communication that relies on several cognitive systems such as attention, working memory, and the ability to access semantic information in the lexicon. This chapter examines socio-pragmatic processing in the context of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). We consider (a) the characteristics of communication in dementia, (b) how cognitive limitations associated with AD interact with the ability to fully process the contextual information necessary for attending to, and comprehending, socio-pragmatic information, and (c) the implications of interacting with people with AD for neuro-typical communication partners. Consideration of qualitative studies published in the past decade in addition to the examination of data collected in an ethnographic study suggest that people with AD are often adept at managing to sustain the use of small-talk and politeness tokens in conversational dyads. However, this may be due to the nature of these particular forms of talk which allow for more paradigmatic choices than other forms of talk that contain greater propositional density.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alzheimer’s Association (2015a). Types of dementia. http://www.alz.org/dementia/types-of-dementia.asp. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.
Alzheimer’s Association (2015b). 2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. http://www.alz.org/facts/. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America (2015). About Alzheimer’s. http://www.alzfdn.org/AboutAlzheimers/definition.html. Accessed 17 May 2015.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5 ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2014). Social language use (pragmatics). http://www.asha.org/public/speech/development/Pragmatics. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(3), 379–402.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheepen, C. (1988). The predictability of informal conversation. London: Pinter.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cowan, N. (2011). Working memory and attention in language use. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke, & M. J. Williams (Eds.), The handbook of pyscholinguistics and cognitive processing: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 75–97). New York: Psychology Press.
Davis, B. H., & Guendouzi, J. (Eds.). (2013). Pragmatics in dementia discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Davis, B., & Maclagan, M. (2010). Pauses, placeholders and fillers in Alzheimer’s discourse: Glueing relationships as impairment increases. In N. Amiridze, B. Davis, & M. Maclagan (Eds.), Fillers and placeholders in discourse and grammar (pp. 189–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Davis, B., & Maclagan, M. (2013). Talking with Maureen: Pauses, extenders, and formulaic language in small stories and canonical narratives by a woman with dementia. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative engagement (pp. 87–121). New York: Psychology Press.
Dell, G., & Kittredge, A. (2011). Connectionist models of aphasia and other language impairments. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke, & M. J. Williams (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics and cognitive processing: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 169–188). New York: Psychology Press.
Dell, G., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 517–542.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia.
Gopnik, A., & Aslington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59(1), 26–37.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guendouzi, J. (2013). ‘So what’s your name?’: Relevance in dementia. In B. Davis & J. Guendouzi (Eds.), Pragmatics in dementia discourse (pp. 29–54). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Guendouzi, J., & Müller, N. (2002). Defining trouble sources in dementia: Repair strategies and conversational satisfaction in interactions with an Alzheimer’s patient. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, & N. Hewlett (Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics (pp. 15–30). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guendouzi, J., & Müller, N. (2006). Approaches to discourse in dementia. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guendouzi, J., & Pate, A. (2014). Interactional and cognitive resources in dementia: A perspective from politeness theory. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 121–146). Blackwell: London.
Guendouzi, J., Davis, B., & Maclagan, M. (2015). Expanding expectations for narrative styles in the context of dementia. Topics in Language Disorders, 35(3), 237–257.
Gweon, H., & Saxe, R. (2013). Developmental cognitive neuroscience of theory of mind. In J. Rubenstein & P. Rakic (Eds.), Neural circuit development and function in the brain: Comprehensive developmental neuroscience (pp. 367–377). San Diego: Academic.
Hassenstab, J., Burns, J., & Morris, J. (2013). Clinical and neuropsychological features of Alzheimer’s disease. In D. Charney, J. Buxbaum, & P. Sklar (Eds.), Neurobiology of mental illness (4 ed., pp. 791–804). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 55–79.
Holtgraves, M., & Kashima, Y. (2008). Language, meaning, and social cognition. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 73–94.
Jagoe, C. (2015). Collaborative meaning-making in delusional talk as a search for mutual manifestness: A relevance theory approach. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 6(1), 53–70.
Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013). Functional neuroimaging of theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, M. Lombardo, & H. Tager-Flusberg (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 132–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Longworth, C., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2011). Language comprehension: A neurocognitive perspective. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke, & M. J. Williams (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 227–246). New York: Psychology Press.
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 451–510). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc..
Marletto, C. (2014). Formulating science in terms of possible and impossible tasks: A conversation with Chiara Marletto. http://edge.org/conversation/formulating-science-in-termsofpossibleandimpossible-tasks. Accessed 6 Dec 2014.
Meltzoff, A. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 838–850.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Perkins, M. R. (2008). Pragmatic impairment as an emergent phenomenon. In M. J. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 79–91). Oxford: Blackwell.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350.
Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2011). Relevance theory and language interpretation. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke, & M. J. Williams (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics and cognitive processing: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 747–760). New York: Psychology Press.
Sachdev, P., Blacker, D., Blazer, D., Ganguli, M., Jeste, D., Paulsen, J., & Petersen, R. (2014). Classifying neurocognitive disorders: The DSM-5 approach. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10(11), 634–642.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Saxe, R. (2013). The new puzzle of theory of mind development. In M. Banaji & S. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 107–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.
Schrauf, R., & Müller, N. (Eds.). (2013). Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. London: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17(1-2), 3–23.
Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd..
Van der Henst, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2004). Testing the cognitive and communicative principles of relevance. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 141–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wray, A. (2010). We’ve had a wonderful, wonderful thing: Formulaic interaction when an expert has dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 9(4), 517–534.
Wray, A. (2013). Mislaying compassion: Linguistic triggers for inadequate care-giving in Alzheimer’s disease care. In B. Davis & J. Guendouzi (Eds.), Pragmatics in dementia discourse (pp. 125–152). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Woodward, M. (2013). Aspects of communication in Alzheimer’s disease: Clinical features and treatment options. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(6), 877–885.
Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(15), 6753–6758.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guendouzi, J., Savage, M. (2017). Alzheimer’s Dementia. In: Cummings, L. (eds) Research in Clinical Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47487-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47489-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)