Abstract
Acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) has a variety of clinical presentations. In the early posttransplantation setting, histologic confirmation of aGVHD via skin biopsy is frequently equivocal. Additional clinical information may be necessary to differentiate aGVHD from its clinical mimickers such as viral exanthema, morbilliform drug eruptions, engraftment syndrome (ES), pre-engraftment syndrome (PES), and in severe cases, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [1–3].
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) has a variety of clinical presentations. In the early posttransplantation setting, histologic confirmation of aGVHD via skin biopsy is frequently equivocal. Additional clinical information may be necessary to differentiate aGVHD from its clinical mimickers such as viral exanthema, morbilliform drug eruptions, engraftment syndrome (ES), pre-engraftment syndrome (PES), and in severe cases, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [1–3].
Diagnosing and Staging/Grading Acute GVHD
Chapter 6 outlines the diagnosis and staging/grading of aGVHD.
Clinical Manifestations of Acute GVHD
The skin is the most common site of involvement of aGVHD, whether or not extracutaneous features develop. In addition, cutaneous aGVHD is typically the earliest presenting feature of the disease. No systematic prospective studies have been rigorously conducted to determine the most common clinical presentation or anatomic site of distribution for aGVHD, but numerous case series have elucidated the heterogeneity with which aGVHD may present at the bedside. The many different morphologies that may develop in aGVHD are illustrated in the rest of this chapter.
Erythema
Erythema in aGVHD may be patchy or confluent, and may have associated pruritus or dysesthesia [4]. Frequently, erythema develops first on the ears, the hands (palmar or dorsal surface), or both. It may later generalize to the rest of the body (Figs. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.5, and 3.7).
Follicular Accentuation
Prominence of hair follicles (whether overlying erythema is present or not) is typical of aGVHD [5]. Such prominence is often misdiagnosed as folliculitis, but it typically heralds the involvement of aGVHD within the follicular epithelium (Figs. 3.8 and 3.9).
Morbilliform Lesions
Morbilliform aGVHD is among the most common presentations [6]. Eruptions are erythematous macules and papules that may coalesce into larger papules and plaques, which are symmetric and are often pruritic. This presentation may clinically mimic viral exanthema or drug eruptions (Figs. 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13).
Erythroderma
Erythrodermic aGVHD presents with confluent erythematous patches that mimic severe viral exanthema, drug reactions, psoriasis, eczematous dermatitis, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) (Fig. 3.14). When mucous membrane lesions are present, there are no clinical or histologic differences between skin stage 4 aGVHD and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [7–9]. If extracutaneous features of aGVHD are present, diagnosis may be possible via tissue confirmation at involved sites. If extracutaneous features of aGVHD are absent, review of clinical symptoms and their development in relation to initiation of medications is mandatory. Viral serologies and/or quantification of viremia via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of the blood may aid in the diagnosis of an erythrodermic viral exanthem, such as those caused by HHV-6. Concurrent empiric treatment of aGVHD, viral infection, and TEN may be necessary if a clear diagnosis cannot be rendered.
Reticulated Patterns
Acute GVHD may present in a reticulated, netlike pattern (Fig. 3.15).
Desquamation
Superficial desquamation is typical of a variety of inflammatory dermatoses, whether or not patients are hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. In aGVHD, desquamation may develop as skin lesions resolve, or it may appear at presentation. Desquamation may be superficial, deep, focal, or more generalized, in which case it may mimic SJS, TEN, or SSSS (Figs. 3.16, 3.17, 3.18, and 3.19).
Bullae
Rarely, bullous aGVHD may develop (Fig. 3.20).
Papules
Papular aGVHD may mimic papular eczema or papular urticaria (Figs. 3.21 and 3.22).
Conclusion
Familiarity with the many presentations of aGVHD and its clinical spectrum is imperative in the care of patients after HSCT. Recognition of this variability can ensure that accurate and immediate treatment of aGVHD is initiated to improve outcomes for affected patients.
References
Ziemer M, Haeusermann P, Janin A, Massi D, Ziepert M, Wolff D, et al. Histopathological diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease of the skin: an interobserver comparison. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:915–24.
Byun HJ, Yang JI, Kim BK, Cho KH. Clinical differentiation of acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease from drug hypersensitivity reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:726–32.
Mays SR, Kunishige JH, Truong E, Kontoyiannis DP, Hymes SR. Approach to the morbilliform eruption in the hematopoietic transplant patient. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26:155–62.
Hymes SR, Alousi AM, Cowen EW. Graft-versus-host disease: part I. Pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;66:515.e1–18; quiz 533–4.
Friedman KJ, LeBoit PE, Farmer ER. Acute follicular graft-vs-host reaction. A distinct clinicopathologic presentation. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:688–91.
Cornejo CM, Kim EJ, Rosenbach M, Micheletti RG. Atypical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:690–5.
Macedo FI, Faris J, Lum LG, Gabali A, Uberti JP, Ratanatharathorn V, White MT. Extensive toxic epidermal necrolysis versus acute graft versus host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: challenges in diagnosis and management. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35:e431–5.
Arvidson J, Kildal M, Linde T, Gedeborg R. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and hemolytic uremic syndrome after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11:689–93.
Correia O, Delgado L, Barbosa IL, Domingues JC, Azevedo R, Vaz CP, Pimentel P. CD8+ lymphocytes in the blister fluid of severe acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease: further similarities with toxic epidermal necrolysis. Dermatology. 2001;203:212–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cotliar, J.A. (2017). Clinical Presentation of Acute Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease. In: Cotliar, J. (eds) Atlas of Graft-versus-Host Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46952-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46952-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46950-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46952-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)