Abstract
It has been alleged that social pathologies are beginning to surface in cyberspace. The present study examined whether attribution-making process serve as a mechanism for a partner’s extradyadic involvement with some else through Internet. It extends insight into the prevalence, attribution, and rationale behind indulging in Internet Infidelity. A pilot study was conducted in North India (n = 488) where a survey questionnaire was administered.
Study 1 attempted to address the question by comparing attributions, perception, and attitude towards online acts of infidelity of the two set of participants: Those who admitted their involvement in Internet Infidelity (Group A) and those who were never involved in Internet Infidelity (Group B) of Online Infidelity. Meta-analysis yielded two components: Dispositional factors (which included three sub-factors: (a) Strong Moral Values, (b) Religious Principles, (c) Not wanting to Cheat on One’s Partner) and Situational factors (which also included three sub-factors: (a) Fear of Being Caught, (b) Lack of Knowledge, (c) Internet Inaccessibility). It was found that Perpetrators attributed situation factors and non-perpetrators attributed dispositional factors behind non indulgence or disengagement of people in Internet Infidelity.
Study 2 investigates the reasons of perpetrators (Married and In a committed relationship) behind involvement in Internet Infidelity. Findings demonstrated significantly different reasons behind involvement in extradyadic online relationship between respondents who are Married (Emotional Support, Frustration, Boredom) and In a Relationship (Peer Pressure, Desire to Explore).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albright, J. M. (2008). Sex in America online: An exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in Internet sex seeking and its impacts. Journal of Sex Research, 45(2), 175–186.
Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2(2), 128–163.
Barak, A., & Fisher, W. A. (2003). Experience with an Internet-based, theoretically grounded educational resource for the promotion of sexual and reproductive health. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 293–308.
Brand, R. J., Markey, C. M., Mills, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2007). Sex differences in self-reported infidelity and its correlates. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 101–109.
Buunk, B. P., & Van Driel, B. (1989). Variant lifestyles and relationships. USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Cano, A., & O'Leary, K. D. (2000). Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 774.
Chaney, M. P., & Dew, B. J. (2003). Online experiences of sexually compulsive men who have sex with men. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity,10(4), 259–274.
Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37(3), 343–361.
Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(2), 187–193.
Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 7(1–2), 5–29.
Cooper, A. (Ed.). (2013). Cybersex: The dark side of the force: A special issue of the Journal Sexual Addiction and Compulsion. Routledge.
Daines, B. (2006). Violations of agreed and implicit sexual and emotional boundaries in couple relationships–some thoughts arising from Levine’s ‘A clinical perspective on couple infidelity’. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21(1), 45–53.
Daneback, K., Cooper, A., & Månsson, S. A. (2005). An Internet study of cybersex participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(3), 321-328..
David, P. Infidelity: The Prisoner’s Dilemma.
Dew, B., Brubaker, M., & Hays, D. (2006). From the altar to the Internet: Married men and their online sexual behavior. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13(2-3), 195-207.
Dhapola, S. (2015, August 26). Cheating website Ashley Madison hacked: Everything you need to know. The Indian Express. Retrieved from http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/what-ashley-madison-data-breach-means-who-it-impacts/.
Dummett, M. (2011). Not so happily ever after as Indian divorce rates doubles. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-12094360.
Durgam, J. K. (2014, October 7). 1000 divorce cases filed every month. The New Indian Express. Retrieved from http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/hyderabad/1000-Divorce-Cases-Filed-Every-Month/2014/10/07/article2465777.ece.
Dutt, A. (2015, January 4). How and why number of young Indian couples getting divorced has risen sharply. The Hindustan Times. Retrieved from http://www.hindustantimes.com/sex-and-relationships/how-and-why-number-of-young-indian-couples-getting-divorced-has-risen-sharply/story-mEuaEoviW40d6slLZbGu6J.html.
Fisher, H. E. (1989). Evolution of human serial pairbonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78(3), 331–354.
Foster, J. D. (2005). Using cognitive dissonance theory to investigate the thoughts and behaviors of individuals who commit romantic infidelity. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/foster_josh_d_200508_phd.pdf.
Foster, J. D., & Misra, T. A. (2013). It did not mean anything (about me) Cognitive dissonance theory and the cognitive and affective consequences of romantic infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(7), 835–857.
Gottman, J., & Silver, N. (2012). What makes love last?: How to build trust and avoid betrayal. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Greenfield, D. N. (1999). Virtual addiction: Sometimes new technology can create new problems. The Center for Internet Studies@ Psychological Health Associates.
Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51(6), 358.
Heider, F. (2013). The psychology of interpersonal relations. USA: Psychology Press.
Hertlein, K. M. (2009, September). Distinguishing Internet infidelity from Internet addiction. Workshop presented at the Annual Nevada State Recovery Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal, 14(4), 366–371.
Hertlein, K. M., & Sendak, S. K. (2007). Love “bytes”: Internet infidelity and the meaning of intimacy in computer-mediated relationships. In Annual Conference of Persons, Intimacy, and Love, Salzburg, Austria.
Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems: A literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), 1.
Johnson, S. (2005). Your Cheatin’Heart: Myths and absurdities about extradyadic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 4(2–3), 161–172.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965a). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219–266.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965b). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.
Kenneth Paul Rosenberg, M. D., & Laura Curtiss Feder, P. (Eds.). (2014). Behavioral addictions: Criteria, evidence, and treatment. Elsevier, UK: Academic Press.
King, S. A. (1999). Internet gambling and pornography: Illustrative examples of the psychological consequences of communication anarchy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2(3), 175–193.
Lee, A. (2010). Technology and divorce: A correlation? The Huffington Post in association with The Times of India group. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/technology-and-divorce-a-_n_794643.html?section=india.
Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. UK: Oxford University Press.
Mahapatra, D. (2011, December 3). Adultery law biased against men, says Supreme Court. The Times of India. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Adultery-law-biased-against-men-says-Supreme-Court/articleshow/10964790.cms.
Maheu, M. M., & Gordon, B. L. (2000). Counseling and therapy on the Internet. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(5), 484.
Maruna, S., & Mann, R. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions†. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 155–177.
McCrea, S. M. (2008). Self-handicapping, excuse making, and counterfactual thinking: Consequences for self-esteem and future motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 274.
McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57–75.
Medora, N. P., Larson, J. H., Hortacsu, N., Hortagsu, N., & DAVE, P. (2002). Perceived attitudes towards romanticism; a cross-cultural study of American, Asian-Indian, and Turkish young adults. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(2) 155–178.
Merkle, E. R., & Richardson, R. A. (2000). Digital dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49(2), 187–192.
Mileham, B. L. A. (2007). Online infidelity in Internet chat rooms: An ethnographic exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 11–31.
Moller, N. P., & Vossler, A. (2015). Defining infidelity in research and couple counseling: A qualitative study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(5), 487–497.
Mukherjee, S. (2014, June 25). Adultery cases on rise: Chat trails give divorce lawyers new-age ammunition. The Times of India. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/Adultery-cases-on-the-rise-Chat-trails-give-divorce-lawyers-new-age-ammunition/articleshow/37141369.cms.
Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2010). Attitude change. In R. F. Baumiester & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 217–259). New York: Oxford.
Pittman III, F. S., & Wagers, T. P. (1995). Crises of infidelity. Guilford Press.
Raina, P. (2012). For Indian women, divorce is a raw deal. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/22/for-indian-women-divorce-a-raw-deal/?src = rechp&_r = 0.
Ross, M. W., Månsson, S. A., Daneback, K., Cooper, A., & Tikkanen, R. (2005). Biases in internet sexual health samples: Comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 61(1), 245–252.
Russell, M. (2003). Infidelity online. The Post-Bulletin, 78, E4.
Rusbult, C. E. (1993). Understanding responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships: The exit-voiceloyalty-neglect model.
Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Determinants and consequences of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in adult romantic involvements. Human relations, 39(1), 45-63.
Schneider, J. P. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 7(1–2), 31–58.
Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition & Emotion, 16(2), 299–307.
Sheppard, V. J., Nelso, E. S., & Andreoli-Mathie, V. (1995). Dating relationships and infidelity: Attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 21(3), 202–212.
Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 23.
Sonwalker, P. (2015, October 9). Indians among top users of infidelity website Ashley Madison. The Hindustan Times. Retrieved from http://www.hindustantimes.com/tech/indians-among-top-users-of-infidelity-website-ashley-madison/story-Q1e6aVwUObBHRzsuoEcKKJ.html.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
Tittle, C. R., & Botchkovar, E. V. (2005). Self‐control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology, 43(2), 307–354.
Topalli, V. (2005). When being good is bad: An expansion of neutralization theory*. Criminology, 43(3), 797–836.
Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 48–60.
Tsapelas, I., Fisher, H. E., & Aron, A. (2011). Infidelity: When, where, why. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships II (pp. 175–195). New York: Routledge.
Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet changing social life? It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195–205.
Uberoi, P. (2001). A suitable romance? Trajectories of courtship in Indian popular fiction. In M. Shoma (Eds.), Images of the ‘modern woman in Asia: Global media, local meanings’ (pp. 169–187). Taylor and Francis: London and New York.
Umbrajkar, M. (2012, July 22). Increase the number of family courts in Pune. The Times of India. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/Increase-the-number-of-family-courts-in-Pune/articleshow/15092692.cms.
Varnado, S. (2013). Avatars, Scarlet'A’s, and Adultery in the technological age. Arizona Law Review, 55(2), 371–416.
Vossler, A., & Moller, N. P. (2014). “The relationship past can’t be the future”: couple counsellors’ experiences of working with infidelity. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29(4), 424–435.
Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 569–579.
Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful Internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 57–67.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1995). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford.
World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77432/1/WHO_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf.
Yeniceri, Z., & Kökdemir, D. (2006). University students’ perceptions of, and explanations for, infidelity: The development of the Infidelity Questionnaire (INFQ). Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(6), 639–650.
Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402–415.
Young, K. S., Griffin-Shelley, E., Cooper, A., O’mara, J., & Buchanan, J. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 7(1–2), 59–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jain, G., Sahni, S.P. (2017). Understanding Attribution Bias and Reasons Behind Internet Infidelity in India. In: Viano, E. (eds) Cybercrime, Organized Crime, and Societal Responses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44501-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44501-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44499-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44501-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)