Abstract
After presenting some basic genetic, historical and typological information about American Sign Language, this chapter outlines the quantification patterns it expresses. It illustrates various semantic types of quantifiers, such as generalized existential, generalized universal, proportional, definite and partitive which are defined in the Quantifier Questionnaire in chapter “The Quantifier Questionnaire”. It partitions the expression of the semantic types into morpho-syntactic classes: Adverbial type quantifiers and Nominal (or Determiner) type quantifiers. For the various semantic and morpho-syntactic types of quantifiers it also distinguishes syntactically simple and syntactically complex quantifiers, as well as issues of distributivity and scope interaction, classifiers and measure expressions, and existential constructions. The chapter describes structural properties of determiners and quantified noun phrases in American Sign Language, both in terms of internal structure (morphological or syntactic) and distribution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Unless cited otherwise, data are from the authors’ own fieldwork with signers of ASL.
- 2.
Following the conventions of the literature, signs are glossed using the closest English equivalent in small capitals font (picture). If necessary for adequate representation of a single sign’s meaning, a sequence of hyphenated English words may be used (take-picture). Throughout the text, we include figures of certain key signs. Video productions of these and other signs included in the data and discussion here should be largely accessible at Spread the Sign (www.spreadthesign.com), an online dictionary also used by Kimmelman (this volume).
- 3.
The terminology ‘C-handshape’ and ‘B-handshape’ refer to the handshapes of the ASL fingerspelling system, a language contact or language borrowing phenomenon used to represent English words in ASL signing. The handshapes of this system have been adopted as a means of conventionally referring to the handshapes of signs (though they are only a subset of possible sign handshapes).
- 4.
Subscripts are used to transcribe morphological marking. The subscripted [aspect:continuative] in (2a), for example, indicates that the verb eat is inflected with the morphological marking of continuative aspect, which involves reduplication of the movement of the verb in combination with a transitional circular movement. The bracketed material ([I]) in the translation indicates material that is not overtly present in the ASL data but is necessary to provide a grammatical translation in English.
- 5.
The cl:c “loaf”,[reduplication:horizontal, 3x] transcription of the classifier represents that a classifier (cl) using the C-handshape (:c) was used to represent a loaf of bread and was reduplicated horizontally across space three times.
- 6.
The sign glossed here as election is a result nominal derived via reduplication from the verbal form vote-for. For a recent analysis of this nominalization process, see Abner (To appear).
- 7.
Data adapted from cited sources has been changed only to ensure consistency of transcription with the conventions adopted here.
- 8.
As an anonymous reviewer points out, it is also possible to co-locate three in the referential space associated with i craig. Whether or not this co-location is consistent or obligatory is currently unclear.
- 9.
The binding restriction in (14b) may also suggest that the negatively quantified no o politics person is not semantically equivalent to sentential negation of an existentially quantified noun, as argued for in other languages.
- 10.
- 11.
Some signers will use a calque-like process to meta-linguistically distinguish each/every interpretations, repeating the movement of each so that it matches the multi-syllabicity of English every.
- 12.
The sign glossed here as cl:b small-book is a bent B-handshape indicating the (thin) thickness of a book.
References
Aarons, D. (1994). Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Abner, N. (2013). Gettin’ together a POSSe: The primacy of predication in ASL possessives. Sign Language and Linguistics, 16(2), 125–156.
Abner, N. (2015). What you see is what you Get.Get: Surface transparency and ambiguity of nominalizing reduplication in American sign language. Submitted to Syntax.
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2005). Morphological universals and the sign language type. In G. Booj & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004 (pp. 19–39). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Barberà, G. (2014). Use and functions of spatial planes in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) discourse. Sign Language Studies, 14(2), 147–174.
Bernath, J. (2009). Pinning down articles in American Sign Language. Ms., University of Connecticut.
Boolos, G. (1981). For every A there is a B. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 465–466.
Bošković, Ž., & Gajewski, J. (2009). Semantic correlates of the NP/DP parameter. Proceedings of NELS, 39, 121–134.
Boster, C. T. (1996). On the quantifier-noun phrase split in American Sign Language and the structure of quantified noun phrases. In W. Edmondson & R. B. Wilbur (Eds.), International review of sign linguistics (pp. 159–208). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Braze, D. (2004). Aspectual inflection, verb raising and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua, 114(1), 29–58.
Caponigro, I., & Davidson, K. (2011). Ask, and tell as well: Clausal question-answer pairs in ASL. Natural Language Semantics, 19(4), 323–371.
Cecchetto, C., Geraci, C., & Zucchi, S. (2009). Another way to mark syntactic dependencies. The case for right peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language, 85(2), 278–320.
Chen Pichler, D. (2010). Using early ASL word order to shed light on word order variability in sign language. In M. Anderssen, K. Bentzen, & M. Westergaard (Eds.), Variation in the input: Studies in the acquisition of word order (Studies in psycholinguistics, Vol. 39, pp. 157–177). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cormier, K. (2002). Grammaticization of indexic signs: How American Sign Language expresses numerosity. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Davidson, K. (2013). And or Or: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics and Pragmatics, 6(4), 1–44.
Davidson, K., & Gagne, D. (2014). Vertical representation of quantifier domains. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 18, 110–127.
Emmorey, K. (2014). Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130301.
Fischer, S. (1973). Two processes of reduplication in the American Sign Language. Foundations of Language, 9, 469–480.
Fischer, S. (1975). Influences on word-order change in American Sign Language. In C. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 3–25). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fischer, S. (1990). The head parameter in ASL. In W. Edmondson & F. Karlsson (Eds.), SLR ‘87: Papers from the fourth international symposium on sign language research (pp. 75–85). Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.
Fischer, S., & Gough, B. (1974). Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 18, 17–48.
Fischer, S. D., & Lillo-Martin, D. (1990). Understanding conjunctions. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1, 71–80.
Graf, T., & Abner, N. (2012). Is syntactic binding rational?. In Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on Tree adjoining grammars and related formalisms (pp. 189–197).
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jones, V. L. (2013). Numeral incorporation in American Sign Language. Master’s thesis, University of North Dakota.
Keenan, E. L. (1988). On semantics and the binding theory. In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 105–144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Keenan, E. L. (2012). The quantifier questionnaire. In E. Keenan & D. Paperno (Eds.), Handbook of quantifiers in natural language (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer.
Keenan, E. L., & Paperno, D. (2012). Overview. In E. Keenan & D. Paperno (Eds.), Handbook of quantifiers in natural language (pp. 941–949). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kegl, J. (1976). Relational grammar and American Sign Language. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Koulidobrova, E. (2012). When the quiet surfaces: Argument omission ‘transfer’ in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Koulidobrova, E. (2016). Elide me bare. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.
Kuhn, J. (2015). ASL Loci: Variables or Features? Journal of Semantics. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffv005.
Liddell, S. K. (1980). American sign language syntax (Vol. 52). The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
Lillo-Martin, D., & Fischer, S. (1992). Overt and Covert Wh-questions in American Sign Language. Presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
Lillo-Martin, D., & Klima, E. (1990). Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research (Vol. 1, pp. 191–210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacLaughlin, D. (1997). The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Neidle, C. (2003). Language across modalities: ASL focus and question constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, 71–98.
Padden, C. A. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.
Partee, B. (1991). Adverbial quantification and event structures. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 439–456.
Petronio, K. (1993). A focus position in ASL. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Petronio, K. (1995). Bare noun phrases, verbs and quantification in ASL. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, & B. Partee (Eds.), Quantification in natural languages (pp. 603–618). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Petronio, K., & Lillo-Martin, D. (1997). Wh-movement and the position of spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language, 73, 18–57.
Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Eds.). (2012). Sign language: An international handbook (Vol. 37). Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.
Quer, J. (2012). Quantificational strategies across language modalities. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, K. Schulz, G. Sassoon, & M. Westera (Eds.), Selected papers from 18th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 82–91). Boston: Springer.
Quer, J., & Steinbach, M. (2015). Ambiguities in sign languages. The Linguistic Review, 32(1), 143–165.
Rathmann, C. (2005). Event structure in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Schlenker, P., Lamberton, J., & Santoro, M. (2013). Iconic variables. Linguistics and Philosophy, 36(2), 91–149.
Stassen, L. (1985). Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stokoe, W. (1960). The sign structure: An outline communication systems of the American Deaf (Studies in linguistics, occasional papers, Vol. 8). Buffalo: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics.
Supalla, T., & Newport, E. (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic.
Wilbur, R. B. (1994). Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 647–672.
Wilbur, R. B. (1996). Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In W. Edmondson & R. B. Wilbur (Eds.), International review of sign linguistics (pp. 209–256). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wilbur, R. B. (1998, November). Generic and habitual structures in ASL: The role of brow raise. Presented at Theoretical issues in sign language research 6, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.
Wilbur, R. B. (2008). Complex predicates involving events, time, and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In Q. Josep (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 217–250). Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.
Wilbur, R. B. (2009). Productive reduplication in ASL, a fundamentally monosyllabic language. Language Sciences, 31, 325–343.
Wilbur, R. B. (2010). The semantics-phonology interface. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey (pp. 355–380). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilbur, R. B. (2011). Nonmanuals, semantic operators, domain marking, and the solution to two outstanding puzzles in ASL. Sign Language and Linguistics, 14, 148–178.
Wilbur, R. B. (2015). Word formation in sign languages. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word Formation. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of linguistics and communication science) (pp. 2225–2251). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wilbur, R. B., & Patschke, C. (1999). Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2, 3–40.
Wood, S. (1999). Semantic and syntactic aspects of negation in ASL. Master’s thesis, Purdue University.
Zimmer, J., & Patschke, C. (1990). A class of determiners in ASL. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues (pp. 201–210). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Acknowledgements
We are extremely indebted to all of the Deaf consultants who have participated in the fieldwork sessions that inform this chapter, especially to Sandra Wood, who provided many insightful discussions of the quantifier data. We also thank Edward Keenan, Denis Paperno, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable feedback and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abner, N., Wilbur, R.B. (2017). Quantification in American Sign Language. In: Paperno, D., Keenan, E. (eds) Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language: Volume II. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 97. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44330-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44330-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44328-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44330-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)