Abstract
As in the other parts of the book, in this part culturally entrenched boundaries and demarcations are also critically re-examined in light of the arrival of the Anthropocene as a new geological era. Here the focus is on rethinking the received distinction between humans and non-human animals. In a long series of discourses making up our cultural heritage, we humans have persistently tried to define the essence of our own humanity and to distinguish ourselves from other animals by laying claim to supposedly unique capacities and achievements like reason, language, morality, religion, technology, law and politics. By now, however, human exceptionalism in its cruder forms has definitely gone out of fashion. None of the contributors to this part of the book subscribes to such versions, but each has different views on how far the critique of human supremacy should be pursued and where the new boundaries should be redrawn, if at all. The issues raised in these contributions are of central importance for the reorientation of animal ethics and environmental ethics in the Age of the Anthropocene .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brady, E. 2013. The sublime in modern philosophy: aesthetics, ethics, and nature. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Donaldson, S., and W. Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: a political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guerrini, A. 2002. The rhetorics of animal rights. In Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory application, ed. J.P. Gluck, et al., 55–76. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Heisenberg, W. 1958. The representation of nature in contemporary physics. Daedalus 87(3): 95–108.
Huxley, J. 1957. New bottles for new wine. London: Chatto & Windus.
Kant, I. 1855[1781]. Critique of pure reason. London: Henry G. Bohn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van den Belt, H. (2016). Comment: Between Human and Animal. In: Bovenkerk, B., Keulartz, J. (eds) Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44205-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44206-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)