Skip to main content

Regulating CO2 Emissions for Vans: Is the European Parliament Still a Defender of Environmental Interests?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lobbying in the European Parliament

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

In this chapter, I analyse lobbying on the directive on the reduction of CO2 emissions from vans, which was a lobbying success for the car industry. The chapter shows that the car industry was influential because they stood united and faced little opposition. The conclusions cast doubt on the European Parliament’s (EP’s) reputation as an environmental champion by demonstrating that the EP has become an environmental pragmatist. The move from environmental “trailblazer” to pragmatist is partly a result of the increased cooperation between the EP’s committees as well as cooperation between the EP and the Council. The norms and working procedures of the ordinary legislative procedure have put a lid on the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety’s environmental ambition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • ACEA. (2009). Auto industry pushes hard to reduce CO 2 emissions and needs supportive real realistic legislative framework to succeed. Retrieved April 20, 2012, from http://www.acea.be/index.php/news/news_detail/auto_industry_pushes_hard_to_reduce_co2_emissions_and_needs_supportive_real

  • Bilefsky, D. (2007). Europe Compromises with automakers on carbon limits. The New York Times. February 7, 2012, Retrieved August 26, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/07/business/worldbusiness/07carbon.html?pagewanted=print

  • Burns, C. (2005). The European Parliament: The EU’s environmental champion? In A. G. Jordan (Ed.), Environmental policy in the European Union. Actors, institutions & processes (2nd ed.). London: Earthscan. Ch. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C., & Carter, N. (2010). Is co-decision good for the environment? An analysis of the European Parliament’s green credentials. Political Studies, 58(1), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conservatives in the European Parliament. (2010). Lobbying contact reports. Retrieved June 8, 2012, from http://www.conservativeeurope.com/MEP-expenses-code.aspx

  • Council of the European Union. (2009). Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2011). Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers.Earnshaw, D. and Judge, D. (2006). No simple dichotomies: lobbyists and the European parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies, 8(4), 61-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw, D., & Judge, D. (2006). No simple dichotomies: Lobbyists and the European parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies, 8(4), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EurActiv. (2010c). MEPs let van makers off lightly from CO 2 cuts. September 29, 2010, Retrieved December 5, 2015, from http://www.euractiv.com/transport/meps-let-van-manufacturers-lightly-co2-cuts-news-498231

  • European Commission. (2008b). Concept paper for the proposal to reduce CO 2 emissions from light duty vehicles. Retrieved April 25, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/events/0020/index_en.htm

  • European Commission. (2009). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the community’s integrated approach to reduce CO 2 emissions from light-duty vehicles. COM (2009) 593 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2010a). Committee amendments to the draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the community’s integrated approach to reduce CO 2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (COM(2009)0593 – C7-0271/2009 – 2009/0173(COD).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2010b). Committee report tabled for plenary: Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the community’s integrated approach to reduce CO 2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (COM(2009)0593 – C7-0271/2009 – 2009/0173(COD).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2010d). Draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the community’s integrated approach to reduce CO 2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (COM(2009)0593 – C7-0271/2009 –2009/0173(COD).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2011d). Plenary debate – 15 February 2011 – Vans regulation. Retrieved June 12, 2011, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5822152

  • Hall, R. L., & Deardoff, A. (2006). Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (1999). Policy-making and diversity in Europe. Escaping deadlock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, D. (1992). Predestines to save the earth’: The environment committee of the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 1(4), 186–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, R. (2002). Clean air and car emissions: What industries and issue groups can and can’t achieve. In R. Pedler (Ed.), European Union lobbying: Changes in the arena (pp. 104–122). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringe, N. (2010). Who decides, and how?: Preferences, uncertainty, and policy choice in the European Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. J. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, M. (2000). The politics of codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. P. (2008). All access points are created equal: Explaining the fate of diffuse interests in the EU. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10(1), 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T&E. (2010a). Vans and CO 2 . Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.transportenvironment.org/publications/vans-and-co2

  • T&E. (2010b). Vans and CO 2 analysis of automotive industry arguments. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.transportenvironment.org/sites/default/files/media/2010%2001%20analysis%20of%20industry%20position%20vans%20co2.pdf

  • ten Brink, P. (2010). Mitigating CO2 emissions from cars in the EU. In S. Oberthur & M. Pallemaerts (Eds.), The new climate policies of the European Union: Internal legislation and climate diplomacy (pp. 179–210). Brussels: VUBPRESS Brussels University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh, A. (2000). The hustle: Citizenship practice, NGOs and ‘policy coalitions’ in the European Union the cases of auto oil, drinking water and unit pricing. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A., Pridham, G., Cini, M., Konstadakopulos, D., Porter, M., & Flynn, B. (2000). Environmental governance in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, R. K. W. (2002). Environmental policy-making in Britain, Germany and the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, R. K. W. (2012). Environmental policy: From environmental disunion towards Environmental Union. In J. Hayward & R. K. W. Wurzel (Eds.), European disunion: The multidimensional power struggles. Palgrave Studies in European Politics. Ch. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, R. K. W., & Connelly, J. (2011). The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zito, A. R. (2000). Creating environmental policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dionigi, M.K. (2017). Regulating CO2 Emissions for Vans: Is the European Parliament Still a Defender of Environmental Interests?. In: Lobbying in the European Parliament. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42688-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics