Abstract
Polymer nanoparticles are one type of the arsenal of nanomedicines that are developed to improve efficacy and specificity of drug delivery and to design new contrast agents enhancing the performance of diagnostic methods based on imaging techniques. To answer the various challenges, it has lead the way to development of suitable nanoparticles. Many types of methods of preparation were proposed designing nanoparticles taking different structures and integrating various functions. The purpose of the introduction to the part I of the book devoted to the methods of preparation of polymer nanoparticles to be used as nanomedicines is to present the different types of polymer nanoparticles that were designed so far and to give an overview on their methods of preparation. It is also important to place these methodologies in a prospective view raising future challenges and bottlenecks.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Methods
- Micelles
- Polymer nanoparticles
- Nanocapsules
- Nanospheres
- Nanogel
- Polyelectrolyte complex
- Self-assembling
- Precipitation
- Polymerization
- Emulsion
- Polymer solution
- Layer-by-layer
- Microfluidic
- Self-assembling
- Complex
- Spherical particles
- Nonspherical nanoparticles
- Multifunctional nanoparticles
1 Introduction
In the 1970s, polymer nanoparticles were found to be suitable materials thanks to their small size to serve the purpose of the “magic bullet” born behind the concept of drug targeting that was inspired by Paul Ehrlich, an imminent bacteriologist and immunologist who received the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1908. However, to be used as drug carriers, polymer nanoparticles need to comply with regulatory registration and fulfill stringent specifications. Besides, they must integrate all functionalities that are needed to complete a specific medical application. Among others, this includes a composition made of suitable materials for in vivo use and preparation conditions that are compatible with the production of pharmaceutical grade compounds.
2 Development of Methods of Preparation of Nanoparticles Made of Polymers: Progresses
By the time polymer nanoparticles were first introduced to be used as drug carriers, they were produced by polymerization methods (Birrenbach and Speiser 1976; See the historical perspective by Kreuter 2007; Couvreur 2013). In addition to regulatory constraints that are an important limitation for the choice of the polymer composing the nanoparticles, nanoparticles designed to become nanomedicines need to fulfill various types of functions. Drugs should be associated efficiently with nanoparticles while protection against degradation should be insured in storage conditions and in vivo during transportation of the nanomedicine toward the target site of delivery of the drug. This implies that the drug remains associated with the nanoparticles during transportation. However, the association needs to become unstable once the nanoparticle has reached the target site, where the drug should be available to express its biological activity. Behind mechanisms controlling the stability of the association of the drug with the nanoparticles, other functionalities are needed to help the nanoparticles to reach the delivery site. The requested properties, which are contradictory for some of them, can be associated customizing the design of new polymers. The number of suitable polymers that can compose nanoparticles developed to be used as nanomedicine produced by polymerization methods is extremely low being a bottleneck for an extensive development of the polymerization methods to prepare polymer-based nanomedicines. Other limitations of these methods include the use of organic solvents and sometimes of large amounts of surfactants, while the majority of polymer nanoparticles synthesized by polymerization methods are nonbiodegradable. Nevertheless, the first rapidly biodegradable nanoparticles were synthesized by emulsion polymerization using alkylcyanoacrylate monomers (Couvreur et al. 1979). A broad range of nanoparticles composed of poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) were synthesized since then and are used to develop innovative therapeutic strategies with many types of drugs with interests for developing treatments of serious diseases (Vauthier et al. 2003a, b, 2007; Andrieux and Couvreur 2009; Nicolas and Couvreur 2009). Today, poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles prepared by polymerization methods continue to generate interest on the international scene (Murthy and Harivardhan Reddy 2006; Vauthier et al. 2007; Graf et al. 2009; Nicolas and Couvreur 2009; Yordanov 2012; Sulheim et al. 2016). Polymerization methods were successful to provide with nanoparticles of interest that were translating to clinics being evaluated in clinical trial phase II/III for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (primary liver cancer) (Zhou et al. 2009; Soma et al. 2012; Onxeo 2016). However, all nanoparticles developed as nanomedicines and prepared by polymerization methods were synthesized with monomers of the alkylcyanoacrylate family limiting the choice of intrinsic properties that can be given to the particles although some flexibilities are allowed tuning conditions of polymerization (Chap. 5 from Vauthier).
To enlarge the choice of polymers composing nanoparticles to be used as nanomedicines, a series of methods were developed based on the use of polymers that were synthesized independently of the nanoparticles. Obtaining polymer nanoparticles from already prepared polymers was a challenge. The first series of attempts was based on the use of matrices formed by thin emulsions in which the polymer was dissolved in the tiny droplets composing the dispersed phase of the emulsion. The polymer was then forced to precipitate using various artifacts in order to obtain nanoparticles. Evaporation of the solvent contained in the droplets was the approach proposed in the pioneer work in the early 1980s (Gurny et al. 1981). The development of this emulsification-solvent evaporation method was applied first to the production of nanoparticles made of poly(lactide) (PLA), the most used polymer composing medical devices for parenteral administration. Since then, the method has been applied to a large choice of polymers. This method brought a real breakthrough. It was the first time nanoparticles were obtained directly from polymers while they were all obtained before by polymerization methods. It was an important milestone for the development of methods for the preparation of nanomedicines occurring as polymer nanoparticles . In a derived method also based on the precipitation of a polymer dissolved in the emulsion droplets, the polymer solvent is extracted from the droplets diluting the emulsion with a third solvent in which both the continuous and the dispersed phases of the parent emulsion are miscible. This operation causes the immediate precipitation of the polymer contained in the emulsion droplets that compose the dispersed phase of the emulsion. In general, both the emulsification-solvent evaporation method and the emulsification-solvent extraction method can be applied with polymers that are soluble in organic solvents (Chap. 4 from Mendoza-Muñoz et al.). Instead of precipitation, the polymer contained in the droplets of the emulsion can be gelified. This method was addressed to produce nanoparticles composed of hydrogels to associate hydrosoluble drugs with nanoparticles that was challenging with previous methods . The main difficulty with methods based on the use of emulsions is to prepare emulsion with a small size of the emulsion droplets. While the majority of works were based on the use of mechanical techniques to produce the thin emulsion required, several authors have suggested the formulation of miniemulsions and microemulsions as matrices to produce the nanoparticles. More recently, microfluidic techniques have been introduced. Droplets hence nanoparticles are formed one by one in a very well controlled manner (Karnik et al. 2008; Valencia et al. 2012; Pedro et al. 2013; Lim et al. 2014). To avoid the use of organic solvents, supercritical fluid technologies were envisaged (Sun et al. 2005; Meziani et al. 2006; Elizondo et al. 2012; Sheth et al. 2012; Girotra et al. 2013).
In another series of methods , nanoparticles are prepared directly from polymer solutions . Nanoparticles form by causing a rapid change of the physicochemical conditions that induces the nucleation of particles of small size. In general, they form by mixing the initial polymer solution with a second medium with which it is fully miscible. Mechanisms behind nucleation of nanoparticles include precipitation of the polymer, self-assembling of macromolecules providing that they were selected with the required architecture or specific properties, formation of complexes and gelation. Figure 1 illustrates the formation of nanoparticles based on the induction of nucleation from two examples of methods: the formation of polymer micelles resulting from self-assembling of amphiphilic polymers assisted by solvent diffusion (Fig. 1a) (Chap. 2 from Miladi et al. and Chap. 3 from Tang and Prud’homme), and the formation of nanogels triggered by self-assembling of two polymers having complemental groups to form inclusion complexes between alkyl chains grafted on one polymer and cyclodextrins grafted on a second polymer (Fig. 1b) (Gref et al. 2006; Hassani et al. 2012).
In some cases, the nucleated nanoparticles are stabilized in a second step that can be performed in the same vessels. For instance, after nucleation of polymer particles by precipitation , it is generally necessary to remove the solvent of the polymer from the dispersing medium. The so-called nanoprecipitation method in which nanoparticle nucleation is induced by a solvent shift belongs to this category of method (Fessi et al. 1989; Ganachaud and Katz 2005; Minost et al. 2012; Chap. 2 from Miladi et al. and Chap. 3 from Tang and Prud’homme). Nanoparticles obtained by gelation are sometimes stabilized by complexation with another polymer that sticks on the surface to stabilize the particle (Oh et al. 2008; Kabanov and Vinogradov 2009; Maya et al. 2013; Wu and Delair 2015). Interesting features with these methods are their rapidity and scalability because production can be performed with a continuous-based process as demonstrated with the nanoprecipitation method. These methods of preparation can be achieved with a large panel of polymers. Although precipitation methods and methods based on self-assembling of amphiphilic polymers generally require the use of organic solvents (Fig. 1a) (Chap. 2 from Miladi et al. Chap. 3 from Tang and Prud’homme, Weber 1998; Torchilin 2007; Kabanov and Vinogradov 2009; Rowan 2009; Guan et al. 2015; Fuks et al. 2011; Pearson et al. 2013; Robertson et al. 2013), self-assembling methods based on the formation of polymer complexes and those based on a gelation process can be performed in aqueous media avoiding totally the use of organic solvent (Fig. 1b) (Vauthier and Couvreur 2000; Janes et al. 2001; Gref et al. 2006; Kabanov and Vinogradov 2009; Daoud-Mahammed et al. 2009; Delair 2011; Hassani et al. 2012; Maya et al. 2013; Eckmann et al. 2014). Another marked advantage of the last category of method is given by the fact that nanoparticles form in gentle conditions that are suitable to associate very fragile hydrosoluble molecules with the nanoparticles. For instance, the methods based on the formation of complexes and nanogels can be used to associate biologically active peptides, proteins, and nucleic acids with nanoparticles. With methods based on the complexation of polyelectrolytes of opposite charges, peptides, and nucleic acids may compose one of the polyelectrolyte involved in the formation of the complex included in the final nanoparticles (Kabanov and Vinogradov 2009; Delair 2011; Kataoka et al. 2001; Mukhopadhyaya et al. 2012; Osada 2014; Bekale et al. 2015; Shiraki et al. 2016). All these techniques of preparation of polymer nanoparticles allow production of nanoparticles with a wide range of properties thanks to the nature of polymers that can be used to produce them.
3 Producing Polymer Nanoparticles with Different Structures and Characteristics
A broad range of methods of preparation of polymer nanoparticles was requested to permit association of drugs having various biological activities and physicochemical properties. In general, molecules are associated with the nanoparticles while they are solubilized in an appropriate solvent. Solubility properties of drug molecules are important factors to consider and that contribute for the success of drug to nanoparticle association. Although soluble molecules are the majority of compounds that were associated with nanoparticles so far, metal nanoparticles were interesting ingredients to associate with polymer nanoparticles designing a new generation of contrast agents for application in diagnostic based on imaging techniques (Khemtong et al. 2009; Maya et al. 2013; Cormode et al. 2014; See Chap. 17 from Herceg et al.). The solvent in which the drug molecule is soluble or metal nanoparticles occur as a stable dispersion is a key for the choice of the method of preparation. However, in general, methods of preparation need to be customized on a case-by-case basis to design each new nanomedicine. Existing methods can be used to inspire the development of new methods. They were applied to make nanoparticles with polymers of various nature and to produce nanoparticles having different structures to resolve many different challenges found to achieve efficient drug association and releasing issues (Fig. 2) (Chap. 13 from Zandanel and Charrueau, Chap. 14 from Charrueau and Zandanel).
Methods based on general principles that were described above are all suitable to prepare matrix-like-type nanoparticles. Reservoir-type nanoparticles, i.e., nanocapsules could be obtained modifying and adapting protocols of most of the previous methods (Couvreur et al. 2002; Mora-Huertas et al. 2010). Figure 3 summarizes the different methods of production of polymer nanoparticles and gives the type of nanoparticle produced.
Size and shape of nanoparticles are important characteristics to consider as they both influence the pharmacokinetic and cell uptake; hence, they can dramatically affect the efficacy of the nanomedicine (Truong et al. 2015). In general, size can be well controlled by experimental conditions used preparing the nanoparticles. Nanoparticles with a spherical shape are generally prepared by the above-mentioned methods. The obtaining of nanoparticles with a shape that differed from a sphere was reported only in a few cases producing nanoparticles by self-assembling of polymers and amphiphilic materials (Lee et al. 2010; Cauchois et al. 2013; Chap. 6 from Ponchel and Cauchois). New methods were specifically introduced to design nanoparticles with well-controlled nonspherical shapes (Chap. 6 from Ponchel and Cauchois). For instance, rod-like nanoparticles can be produced stretching spherical particles embedded in a stretchable matrix (Mitragotri 2009; Wang et al. 2011a). Print methods were introduced to design polymer nanoparticles with a wide range of shapes (Oh et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011b; Perry et al. 2011; Sultana et al. 2013) (Fig. 4).
4 Future Challenges
In the infant age of their development, polymer nanoparticles were designed as very simple particles based on the association of a drug with a nanosized-scale particle made of biodegradable polymer. The evolution is to design multifunctional nanoparticles that may include diagnostic and therapeutic elements together with equipment’s controlling the pharmacokinetic and biodistribution hence improving targeting efficiency of the carrier and its drug releasing properties. Table 1 summarizes the different functionalities that are desired to associate with nanoparticles and gives examples of items found in the corresponding toolbox to achieve each function.
The possibility to design very precise nanoparticles with polymers by tuning nanoparticle properties to optimize the benefit of the treatment for each patient taking into account the individual variability while the safety profile will be high is seen as an opportunity to elaborate personalized therapeutic protocols (Mura and Couvreur 2012). To permit the development of suitable nanoparticles to be used in personalized nanomedicine, nanoparticles should be tailor-made with a great flexibility. Methods for the preparation need to satisfy all exigencies that are required to make the nanoparticles a pharmaceutical compound having a given activity. In the same time, there will be a need for methods fulfilling reproducible preparation of nanoparticles with customized properties. Emerging approaches are based on the development of platforms that allow preparation of nanoparticles which properties can be tuned easily. For instance, those based on self-assembly of polymers are progressing as they can be applied to assemble a family of polymers in which each is bearing a different functionality to be included into one nanoparticle (De Miguel et al. 2015; Bao et al. 2013). Another suitable method that offers possibilities to integrate different functionality in a single nanoparticle is based on the superimposition of polymer layers forming the final nanoparticles layer-by-layer (Caruso 2001; Bao et al. 2013; Yan et al. 2014). These strategies allow the building of multifunctional nanoparticles with high precision. Preparation of multifunctional nanoparticles is also accessible by most of the other described methods providing that the polymer that gives the structure of the nanoparticle also shows the required properties. In general, this can be achieved customizing the design of polymers to give them all desired features as explained in the Chap. 12 from Cammas. For instance, this approach can be used to conceive stimuli responsive nanoparticles delivering their cargo in well-controlled conditions (Mura et al. 2013). Surface functionalization can be adjusted introducing postsynthesis modifications. This is often used to equip the nanoparticle surface with a targeting moiety to optimize precision of the delivery method at the target site (Nicolas et al. 2013). Postsynthesis modifications are predominantly achieved by chemical methods but the layer-by-layer approach is another option to achieve surface modification of nanoparticles (Labouta and Schneider 2010; Poon et al. 2011; Bao et al. 2013; Ejima et al. 2013; Nicolas et al. 2013; Yan et al. 2014). In the movement which tends to increase the number of functionality to associate with nanoparticles, it is nevertheless important to keep in mind that the complexity should not compromise translation to clinic. Bottlenecks to development of highly sophisticated nanomedicines may arise from their method of preparation among other factors. Whatever will be the functions to associate with the nanoparticles, the method of preparation needs to be scalable producing large amount of nanoparticles. It should also be robust to insure the reproducible production of the nanoparticles and to comply with the high rate of quality requested for pharmaceutical grade compounds to insure their safety.
This part of the book was aimed to describe methods that can be used to produce polymer nanoparticles that are interested to develop nanomedicines. Choice has been made to illustrate methods from each group. Chapters 2 from Miladia et al. and 3 from Tang and Prud’homme focus on methods based on nanoprecipitation that are using polymer solutions while the precipitation of the polymer is induced by a solvent shift. Chapter 4 proposed by Alcala-Alcala et al. described methods based on the use of emulsions . Methods based on polymerization are described in Chap. 5 proposed by Vauthier. The obtaining of nonspherical nanoparticles is the subject of Chap. 6 proposed by Ponchel. All these chapters were written to provide with basic and practical information to inspire the development of nanomedicines made of polymer sharing the authors’ expertise on the key methods of preparation.
References
Andrieux K, Couvreur P (2009) Polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles for delivery of drugs across the blood-brain barrier. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1:463–474. doi:10.1002/wnan.5
Bao G, Mitragotri S, Tong S (2013) Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery and molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:253–282. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152409
Bekale L, Agudelo D, Tajmir-Riahi HA (2015) Effect of polymer molecular weight on chitosan-protein interaction. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 125:309–317. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.037
Birrenbach G, Speiser PP (1976) Polymerized micelles and their use as adjuvants in immunology. J Pharm Sci 65:1763–1766
Caruso F (2001) Nanoengineering of particle surfaces. Adv Mater 13:11–22
Cauchois O, Segura-Sanchez F, Ponchel G (2013) Molecular weight controls the elongation of oblate-shaped degradable poly(γ-benzyl-L-glutamate)nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 452:292–299. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.074
Cormode DP, Naha PC, Fayad ZA (2014) Nanoparticle contrast agents for computed tomography: a focus on micelles. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 9:37–52. doi:10.1002/cmmi.1551
Couvreur P (2013) Nanoparticles in drug delivery: past, present and future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:21–23. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.010
Couvreur P, Kante B, Roland M, Guiot P, Baudhuin P, Speiser P (1979) Poly(cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles as potential lysosomotropic carriers: preparation, morphological and sorptive properties. J Pharm Pharmacol 31:331–332
Couvreur P, Barratt G, Fattal E, Legrand P, Vauthier C (2002) Nanocapsule technology: a review. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 19(2):99–134
Daoud-Mahammed S, Couvreur P, Bouchemal K, Chéron M, Lebas G, Amiel C, Gref R (2009) Cyclodextrin and polysaccharide-based nanogels: entrapment of two hydrophobic molecules, benzophenone and tamoxifen. Biomacromolecules 10:547–554. doi:10.1021/bm801206f
de Miguel L, Popa I, Noiray M, Caudron E, Arpinati L, Desmaele D, Cebrián-Torrejón G, Doménech-Carbó A, Ponchel G (2015) Osteotropic polypeptide nanoparticles with dual hydroxyapatite binding properties and controlled cisplatin delivery. Pharm Res 32:1794–1803. doi:10.1007/s11095-014-1576-z
Delair T (2011) Colloidal polyelectrolyte complexes of chitosan and dextran sulfate towards versatile nanocarriers of bioactive molecules. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 78:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.001
Eckmann DM, Composto RJ, Tsourkasc A, Muzykantov VR (2014) Nanogel carrier design for targeted drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2:8085–8097. doi:10.1039/C4TB01141D
Ejima H, Richardson JJ, Caruso F (2013) Multivalent directed assembly of colloidal particles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52:3314–3316. doi:10.1002/anie.201209461
Elizondo E, Veciana J, Ventosa N (2012) Nanostructuring molecular materials as particles and vesicles for drug delivery, using compressed and supercritical fluids. Nanomedicine (Lond). 7:1391–1408
Fessi H, Puisieux F, Devissaguet JP, Ammoury N, Benita S (1989) Nanocapsule formation by interfacial deposition following solvent displacement. Int J Pharm 55:R1–R4. doi:10.1016/0378-5173(89)90281-0
Fuks G, Mayap Taloma R, Gauffre F (2011) Biohybrid block copolymers: towards functional micelles and vesicles. Chem Soc Rev 40:2475–2493. doi:10.1039/C0CS00085J
Ganachaud F, Katz JL (2005) Nanoparticles and nanocapsules created using the Ouzo effect: spontaneous emulisification as an alternative to ultrasonic and high-shear devices. Chem phys chem. 6:209–216
Girotra P, Singh SK, Nagpal K (2013) Supercritical fluid technology: a promising approach in pharmaceutical research. Pharm Dev Technol 18:22–38
Graf A, McDowell A, Rades T (2009) Poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles for enhanced delivery of therapeutics—is there real potential? Expert Opin Drug Deliv 6:371–387. doi:10.1517/17425240902870413
Gref R, Amiel C, Molinard K, Daoud-Mahammed S, Sébille B, Gillet B, Beloeil JC, Ringard C, Rosilio V, Poupaert J, Couvreur P (2006) New self-assembled nanogels based on host-guest interactions: characterization and drug loading. J Control Release 111:316–324
Guan L, Rizzello L, Battaglia G (2015) Polymersomes and their applications in cancer delivery and therapy. Nanomedicine 10(17):2757–2780. doi:10.2217/nnm.15.110
Gurny R, Peppas N, Harrington DD, Banker GS (1981) Development of biodegradable and injectable lattices for controlled release of potent drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 7:1–25
Hassani LN, Hendra F, Bouchemal K (2012) Auto-associative amphiphilic polysaccharides as drug delivery systems. Drug Discov Today 17:608–614. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.01.016
Janes KA, Calvo P, Alonso MJ (2001) Polysaccharide colloidal particles as delivery systems for macromolecules. Adv Drug Del Rev 47:83–97
Kabanov AV, Vinogradov SV (2009) Nanogels as pharmaceutical carriers: finite networks of infinite capabilities. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:5418–5429. doi:10.1002/anie.200900441
Karnik R, Gu F, Pamela Basto P, Cannizzaro C, Dean L, Kyei-Manu W, Langer R, Farokhzad OC (2008) Microfluidic platform for controlled synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles. Nano Lett 8:2906–2912. doi:10.1021/nl801736q
Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y (2001) Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 47:113–131
Khemtong C, Kessinger CW, Gao J (2009) Polymeric nanomedicine for cancer MR imaging and drug delivery. Chem Commun (Camb) 24:3497–3510. doi:10.1039/b821865j
Kreuter J (2007) Nanoparticles—a historical perspective. Int J Pharm 331:1–10
Labouta HI, Schneider M (2010) Tailor-made biofunctionalized nanoparticles using layer-by-layer technology. Int J Pharm 395:236–242
Lee AH, Oh KT, Baik HJ, Lee BR, Oh YT, Lee DH, Lee ES (2010) Worm-like Micelles for drug delivery development of worm-like polymeric drug carriers with multiple ligands for targeting heterogeneous breast cancer cells. Bull Korean Chem Soc 31:2265–2271. doi:10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.8.2265
Lim JM, Bertrand N, Valencia PM, Rhee M, Langer R, Jon S, Farokhzad OC, Karnik R (2014) Parallel microfluidic synthesis of size-tunable polymeric nanoparticles using 3D flow focusing towards in vivo study. Nanomedicine 10:401–409. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2013.08.003
Maya S, Sarmento B, Nair A, Rejinold NS, Nair SV, Jayakumar R (2013) Smart stimuli sensitive nanogels in cancer drug delivery and imaging: a review. Curr Pharm Des 19:7203–7218
Meziani MJ, Pathak P, Desai T, Sun YP (2006) Supercritical fluid processing of nanoscale particles from biodegradable and biocompatible polymers. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:3420–3424. doi:10.1021/ie050704n
Minost A, Delaveau J, Bolzinger MA, Fessi H, Elaissari A (2012) Nanoparticles via nanoprecipitation process. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul 6:250–258
Mitragotri S (2009) In drug delivery, shape does matter. Pharm Res 26:232–234. doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9740-y
Mora-Huertas CE, Fessi H, Elaissari A (2010) Polymer-based nanocapsules for drug delivery. Int J Pharm 385:113–142. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.10.018
Mukhopadhyaya P, Mishrab R, Ranac D, Patit Kundua P (2012) Strategies for effective oral insulin delivery with modified chitosan nanoparticles: a review. Prog Polym Sci 37:1457–1475. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.004
Mura S, Couvreur P (2012) Nanotheranostics for personalized medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:1394–1416. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.006
Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2013) Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater 12:991–1003. doi:10.1038/nmat3776
Murthy RSR, Harivardhan Reddy L (2006) Poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles for delivery of anti-cancer drugs. In: Amiji MM (ed) Nanotechnology for cancer therapy (Chap 15). CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca-Raton, pp 251–288. doi:10.1201/9781420006636.ch15
Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2009) Synthesis of poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate)-based colloidal nanomedicines. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1:111–127. doi:10.1002/wnan.15
Nicolas J, Mura S, Brambilla D, Mackiewicz N, Couvreur P (2013) Design, functionalization strategies and biomedical applications of targeted biodegradable/biocompatible polymer-based nanocarriers for drug delivery. Chem Soc Rev 42:1147–1235. doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f
Oh JK, Drumright R, Siegwart DJ, Matyjaszewski K (2008) The development of microgels/nanogels for drug delivery applications. Progress Polym Sci. 30:447–477. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.01.002
Onxeo (2016) http://www.onxeo.com/en/nos-produits/portefeuilles-produits/orphelins-oncologie/
Osada K (2014) Development of functional polyplex micelles for systemic gene therapy. Polymer J 46:469–475. doi:10.1038/pj.2014.49
Pearson RT, Avila-Olias M, Joseph AS, Nyberg S, Battaglia G (2013) Smart polymersomes: formation, characterisation and applications. RSC Smart Mater 1(1):179–207
Pedro M, Valencia PM, Pridgen EM, Rhee M, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Karnik R (2013) Microfluidic platform for combinatorial synthesis and optimization of targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy. ACS Nano 7:10671–10680. doi:10.1021/nn403370e
Perry JL, Herlihy KP, Napier ME, Desimone JM (2011) PRINT: a novel platform toward shape and size specific nanoparticle theranostics. Acc Chem Res 44:990–998. doi:10.1021/ar2000315
Poon Z, Chang D, Zhao X, Hammond PT (2011) Layer-by-Layer Nanoparticles with a pH-sheddable layer for in vivo targeting of tumor hypoxia. ACS Nano 5:4284–4292. doi:10.1021/nn200876f
Robertson JD, Patikarnmonthon N, Joseph AS, Battaglia G (2013) Block copolymer micelles and vesicles for drug delivery. In: Bader RA, Putnam DA (eds) Engineering polymer systems for improved drug delivery (Chap 6). Wiley, Hoboken, pp 163–188. doi:10.1002/9781118747896.ch6
Rowan SJ (2009) Polymer self-assembly: Micelles make a living. Nature Mater 8:89–91. doi:10.1038/nmat2365
Sheth P, Sandhu H, Singhal D, Malick W, Shah N, Kislalioglu MS (2012) Nanoparticles in the pharmaceutical industry and the use of supercritical fluid technologies for nanoparticle production. Curr Drug Deliv 9:269–284
Shiraki K, Kurinomaru T, Tomita S (2016) Wrap-and-strip technology of protein-polyelectrolyte complex for biomedical application. Curr Med Chem 23:276–289
Soma E, Atali P, Merle P (2012) A clinically relevant case study: the development of Livatag1 for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Alonso MJ, Csaba NS (eds) RSC Drug Discovery Series No. 22 nanostructured biomaterials for overcoming biological barriers (Chap 11). The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 591–600
Sulheim E, Baghirov H, Von Haartman E, Bøe A, Åslund AKO, Mørch Y, De Lange Davies C (2016) Cellular uptale and intracellular degradation of poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. J Nanobiotechol 14:1–14. doi:10.1186/s12951-015-0156-7
Sultana F, Manirujjaman, Imran-Ul-Haque MD, Arafat M, Sharmin S (2013) An overview of nanogel drug delivery system. J App Pharm Sci 3:S95–S105. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2013.38.S15
Sun YP, Meziani MJ, Pathak P, Qu L (2005) Polymeric nanoparticles from rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solution. Chemistry 11:1366–1373
Torchilin VP (2007) Micellar nanocarriers: pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm Res 24:1–16
Truong NP, Whittaker MR, Mak CW, Davis TP (2015) The importance of nanoparticle shape in cancer drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 12:129–142. doi:10.1517/17425247.2014.950564
Valencia PM, Farokhzad OC, Karnik R, Langer R (2012) Microfluidic technologies for accelerating the clinical translation of nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 7:623–629. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.168
Vauthier C, Couvreur P (2000) Development of nanoparticles made of polysaccharides as novel drug carrier systems. In: Wise DL (ed) Handbook of pharmaceutical controlled release technology (Chap. 2). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. 10.1007/978-3-319-41421-8_21, pp 413–429
Vauthier C, Dubernet C, Chauvierre C, Brigger I, Couvreur P (2003a) Drug delivery to resistant tumors: the potential of poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. J Control Release 93:151–160
Vauthier C, Dubernet C, Fattal E, Pinto-Alphandary H, Couvreur P (2003b) Poly(alkylcyanoacrylates) as biodegradable materials for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55:519–548
Vauthier C, Labarre D, Ponchel G (2007) Design aspects of poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles for drug delivery. J Drug Target 15:641–663
Wang Y, Merkel TJ, Chen K, Framen CA, Betts DR, DeSimone JM (2011a) Generation of a library of particles having controlled sizes and shapes via the mechanical elongation of master templates. Langmuir 27:524–528. doi:10.1021/la1045095
Wang J, Byrne JD, Napier ME, DeSimone JM (2011b) More effective nanomedicines through particle design. Small 7:1919–1931. doi:10.1002/smll.201100442
Weber SE (1998) Polymer micelles: an example of self-assembling polymers. J Phys Chem B 102:2618–2626. doi:10.1021/jp980386o
Wu D, Delair T (2015) Stabilization of chitosan/hyaluronan colloidal polyelectrolyte complexes in physiological conditions. Carbohydr Polym 119:149–158. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.042
Yan Y, Bjommalm M, Caruso F (2014) Assembly of layer-by-layer particles and their interactions with biological systems. Chem Mater 26:452–460. doi:10.1021/cm402126n
Yordanov G (2012) Poly(alkylcyaoacrylate) nanoparticles as drug carriers: 33 years later. Bulg J Chem 1:61–73
Zhou Q, Sun X, Zeng L, Liu J, Zhang Z (2009) A randomized multicenter phase II clinical trial of mitoxantrone-loaded nanoaprticles in the treatment of 108 patients with unresected hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanomedicine NBM 5:419–423. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2009.01.009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vauthier, C. (2016). Polymer Nanoparticles for In Vivo Applications: Progress on Preparation Methods and Future Challenges. In: Vauthier, C., Ponchel, G. (eds) Polymer Nanoparticles for Nanomedicines. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41421-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41421-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41419-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41421-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)