Abstract
In view of growing pollution of water, the innovative alternatives to sustainable maintenance of water quality are of pivotal importance. One such alternative is the use of constructed wetlands over past few decades. Constructed wetlands are engineered systems that tend to put to use the natural wetland processes of wetlands and its different components, such as macrophytes, sediments, and water for the treatment of wastewaters. While the use of constructed wetlands in wastewater treatment and water quality improvement is relatively common in the developed world, this practice is still far from being exploited to its potential in the context of developing countries. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the importance of the constructed wetlands especially in the context of growing pollution in developing nations, in general, and Kashmir Himalayan region of India, in particular, for remediation of heavy metals. Using some case studies that have explicated the role of wetland macrophytes in remediation of in the Kashmir Himalaya, we stress upon proper identification and use of suitable hyperaccumulators for removal and sequestration of heavy metals. The gaps that exist in our knowledge about constructed wetlands and their use in remediation are pointed out and a framework to overcome these gaps is briefly discussed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Constructed Wetlands: Importance and Types
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are engineered systems that are designed and constructed to utilize the natural processes, involving wetland vegetation, soils, and their associated microbial assemblages to assist in treating wastewater [1]. According to the Interstate Technology Regulatory Council Wetlands Team, USA (ITRC) [2], constructed wetlands (CWs) are “engineered systems, designed and constructed to utilize the natural functions of wetland vegetation, soils and their microbial populations to treat contaminants in surface water, groundwater or waste streams.” Synonymous terms for constructed wetlands include man-made, engineered, and artificial wetlands. The first full-scale constructed wetland (CW) for wastewater treatment was built at Petrov near Prague in May 1989. Constructed wetlands are a cost-effective and technically feasible approach to treating wastewater and runoff. The constructed wetland provides a natural environment of warm climate, high water table, and high organic matter for microbes to break down contaminants [3].
The use of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment is becoming more and more popular in many parts of the world. Today, subsurface flow constructed wetlands are quite common in many developed countries, such as Germany, the UK, France, Denmark, Austria, Poland, and Italy [4]. Constructed wetlands are also appropriate for developing countries but due to lack of awareness their use is not widespread [5–7]. Constructed wetlands can be less expensive to build than other treatment options. Operation and maintenance expenses (energy and supplies) are low and require only periodic, rather than continuous monitoring. Constructed wetlands are primarily used to treat domestic municipal wastewaters, but their use for other types of wastewaters such as agricultural and industrial wastewaters, various runoff waters, and landfill leachate have become more frequent [8–10].
Mitsch [11] suggests the following guidelines for creating successful constructed wetlands:
-
1.
Keep the design simple. Complex technological approaches often invite failure.
-
2.
Design for minimal maintenance.
-
3.
Design the system to use natural energies, such as gravity flow.
-
4.
Design for the extremes of weather and climate.
-
5.
Design the wetland with the landscape , not against it.
-
6.
Integrate the design with the natural topography of the site.
-
7.
Avoid over-engineering the design with rectangular basins, rigid structures and channels, and regular morphology. Mimic natural systems.
1.1 Types of Constructed Wetlands
The classification of constructed wetlands is based on various factors, such as the vegetation type, hydrology, and flow of direction (vertical or horizontal) [12]. There are mainly three types of constructed wetlands: surface flow wetlands, subsurface flow wetlands, and hybrid systems.
1.1.1 Surface Flow Wetlands
In case of surface flow wetlands, water level is above the ground surface; vegetation is rooted and emerges above the water surface: water flow is primarily above ground. The different macrophytes that are used in this type of constructed wetlands include Phragmites australis, Typha ungustifolia, Sparganium erectum etc.
1.1.2 Free Floating Macrophyte-Based Wetlands
In this type of constructed wetlands, floating macrophytes are used. The main floating macrophytes used in these systems are Azolla cristata, Salvinia natans, water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes and duckweeds [13]. The different submerged species used in these constructed wetlands prevent entry of light into the system thereby inhibiting the growth of different algal groups. Hence the macrophytes need to be periodically removed from the wetland. The floating plant mat blocks out sunlight, thereby preventing photosynthesis and inhibiting algae growth hence the macrophytes need to be periodically removed from the system [14]. Duckweeds are extremely invasive and grow in most environments [15].
1.1.3 Submerged Macrophyte-Based Wetlands
In these constructed wetlands there are used different kinds of submerged macrophytes. The main submerged species used in these constructed wetlands include Ceratophyllum demersum, Hydrilla sp., Potamogeton sp. etc. They have been proposed as final polishing steps following primary and secondary treatment [16].
1.1.4 Emergent Macrophyte-Based Wetlands
In this type of constructed wetlands, emergent macrophytes are used. Emergent macrophyte-based wetlands are the most common type of constructed wetlands. The different emergents used in these constructed wetlands include Juncus effusus, Phregmites australis, Typha ungustifolia, Sparganium erectum etc . [17, 18, 19]. A slow flow rate is applied so that a shallow depth is maintained [20].
1.1.5 Subsurface Flow Wetlands
They are also called vegetated submerged beds, or plant-rock filter systems. They have below ground water level. The basin mainly consists of sand or gravel. The different macophytes used in this type of constructed wetlands include Glyceria maxima, Iris pseudacorus, Phragmites australis, Typha ungustifolia, Sparganium erectum etc.
1.1.6 Horizontal Flow Constructed Wetland (HF CWs)
This type of constructed wetland was developed in the 1950s in Germany by Käthe Seidel [12]. This type of constructed wetland consists of rock or gravel beds, impermeable layer and wetland vegetation. Waste water afer entering through the inlet passes through the horizontal path before it is discharged through the outlet. Hence the name horizontal flow constructed wetland.
1.1.7 Vertical Flow Constructed Wetlands (VF CWs)
In this type of constructed wetland water percolated down through sand medium. Among different kinds of constructed wetlands this type of constructed wetland has very high operational costs.
1.1.8 Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland (FWS CW)
This type of constructed wetland consists of a series of impermeable bains about 20–40 cms deep. In this type of constructed wetland the main macrophytes planted include emergents like Phragmites australis, Typha ungustifolia, Sparganium erectum etc.
1.1.9 Constructed Wetlands with Floating Leaved Macrophytes
Constructed wetlands with floating leaved macrophytes are very rare, and there are no guidelines to design, operate, and maintain these systems [1]. In these systems, the different plants used are Nelumbo nucifera [21, 22] and Nuphur lutea [23].
1.1.10 Hybrid Systems
Different types of constructed wetlands may be combined with each other in order to exploit the specific advantages of the different systems. In hybrid or multistage systems, different cells are designed for different types of reactions. During the 1990s, HF-VF and VF-HF hybrid systems were introduced [24]. Hybrid systems are used especially when removal of ammonia-N and total-N is required [1].
1.2 How Constructed Wetlands Work
Constructed wetlands are made up of a series of ponds each designed to perform a particular function. Solids are allowed to settle in the primary storage ponds. The water then enters another pond containing vegetation. Here physical, chemical, and biological reactions reduce contaminants. Nitrogen and phosphorus are used by aquatic vegetation. Heavy metals are also removed by different plants which show tolerance for these metals. Water then enters the tertiary cell. It serves as a habitat for wildlife.
1.3 Costs for Creating Constructed Wetlands
The main requirements for establishing constructed wetlands include land, design, vegetation, hydraulic control system and fencing. The total investment costs for establishing constructed wetlands vary from county to country and could be as low as 29 USD per m2 in India [25] or 33 USD per m2 in Costa Rica [26], or as high as 257 EUR per m2 in Belgium [27].
For the development of constructed wetlands, the basic requirements are containers, plant species, sand, and gravel media in certain ratio. In different types of constructed wetlands microbes and other invertebrates develop naturally [28]. The three types of macrophytes that are used in constructed wetlands are floating macrophyte (i.e., Azolla sp., Salvinia natans, Lemna spp. or Eichhornia crassipes), submerged macrophyte (i.e., Ceratophyllum demersum, Potamogeton sp. Elodea canadensis) and rooted emergent macrophyte (i.e., Phragmites australis, Typha spp. Sparganium erectum [29]). Plants (free-floating, emergent or submergent vegetation) are the part of constructed ecosystem to remediate contaminants from municipal, industrial wastewater, metals, and acid mine drainage [30]. The different macrophytes that are used in subsurface flow CWs in warm climates are Papyrus sedge (Cyperus papyrus), Umbrella sedge (Cyperus albostriatus and Cyperus alternifolius), Dwarf papyrus (Cyperus haspens), Bamboo, smaller ornamental species, Broad-leaved cattail (Typha latifolia), Species of genus—Heliconia: lobster-claws, wild plantains—Canna: Canna lily—Zantedeschia: Calla lily Napier grass or Elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum).
2 Heavy Metals: Sources and Impacts
Constructed wetlands are designed for the removal of different kinds of pollutants including heavy metals from the wastewater. Heavy metals released from different sources enter into the water bodies and pose serious threats to different trophic levels of the food chain including human beings. Heavy metals are metals having a density of 5 g/cm3 [31]. Heavy metals include a category of 53 elements with specific weight higher than 5 g/cm3 [32, 33]. Heavy metals are elements with metallic properties and an atomic number >20. Heavy metals mainly include the transition metals, some metalloids, lanthanides, and actinides. The most common heavy metal contaminants are As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn.
Over population, industrialization, rapid urbanization, overuse of pesticides, detergent and agricultural chemicals, liquid and solid waste products, and discharge of municipal wastes resulted in heavy metal pollution of natural water resources [34]. Man-made activities such as mining and smelting of metal ores, industrial, commercial, and domestic applications of insecticides and fertilizers have all contributed to elevated levels of heavy metals in the environment [35, 36].
The primary sources of metal pollution are the burning of fossil fuels, mining and smelting of metalliferous ores, municipal wastes, sewage, pesticides, and fertilizers [37] oil, gasoline and coal combustion, smelting, and refuse incineration [38]. In uncontaminated soil, the average concentrations of heavy metals vary in orders of magnitudes, but on average the concentrations are, e.g., Zn: 80 ppm, Cd: 0.1–0.5 ppm and Pb: 15 ppm. However, in polluted soil dramatically higher concentrations are found, e.g., Zn: >20,000 ppm, Cd: >14,000 ppm and Pb: >7000 ppm (http://www.speclab.com/elements/). Heavy metals are ubiquitous environmental pollutants that arise from a variety of industrial, commercial, and domestic activities [36]. Increasing industrial activities have led to an increase in environmental pollution and the degradation of several aquatic ecosystems with the accumulation of metals in biota and flora [39]. According to Phuong et al. [40], most heavy metal contaminants originate from anthropogenic sources such as long-term discharge of untreated domestic and industrial wastewater runoff, accidental spills, and direct soil waste dumping. In addition, heavy metals can enter the water bodies through atmospheric sources [41] and nearby rice fields [42]. Due to innovations in mining and metal-working techniques during ancient times, the close relationship between metals, metal pollution, and human history was formed [43]. Energy intensive and chlor-alkali industries for the manufacture of agrochemicals deteriorate the water quality of lakes and reservoirs due to the discharge of various pollutants, especially a range of heavy metals [44]. Coal mining [45] and its allied/dependent industries (thermal power plants) are major sources of heavy metals in the industrial belts of developing countries such as India [44, 46]. Metals are natural components in soil [47]. Lead is a common pollutant from road runoff. Zinc is a common metal present in variable amounts and if found in appreciable amounts can be an indicator of industrial pollution. While copper is also an indicator of industrial contamination of urban waters [48, 49]. The different macrophytes have a potential to sequester heavy metals from the soils contaminated with these metals. Colonization of macrophytes on the sediments polluted with heavy metals and the role of these plants in transportation of metals in shallow coastal areas are very important [50].
Contamination of aquatic environment by heavy metals is a serious environmental problem, which threatens aquatic ecosystems, agriculture, and human health [51]. Accumulation of metals and their toxic effects through the food chain can lead to serious ecological and health problems [52]. Heavy metals are the most dangerous contaminants since they are persistent and accumulate in water, sediments and in tissues of the living organisms, through two mechanisms, namely “bioconcentration” (uptake from the ambient environment) and “biomagnification” (uptake through the food chain) [53]. Trace elements such as Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn are essential for normal growth and development of plants. They are required in numerous enzyme catalyzed or redox reactions, in electron transfer and have structural function in nucleic acid metabolism [54]. Metals like Cd, Pb, Hg, and As are not essential [55]. High levels of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Fe can act as ecological toxins in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems [56, 57]. Excess metal levels in surface water may pose a health risk to humans and to the environment [50]. Since HM are not biodegradable and may enter the food chain, they are a long-term threat to both the environment and human health [58]. Some of these metals are micronutrients necessary for plant growth, such as Zn, Cu, Mn, Ni, and Co, while others have unknown biological function, such as Cd, Pb, and Hg [59]. Metal pollution has harmful effect on biological systems and does not undergo biodegradation. Toxic heavy metals such as Pb, Co, and Cd can be differentiated from other pollutants, since they cannot be biodegraded but can be accumulated in living organisms, thus causing various diseases and disorders even in relatively lower concentrations [60]. Heavy metals, with soil residence times of thousands of years, pose numerous health dangers to higher organisms. They are also known to have effect to plant growth, ground cover, and have a negative impact on soil microflora [61]. It is well known that heavy metals cannot be chemically degraded and need to be physically removed or be transformed into nontoxic compounds [59]. Table 10.1 shows the harmful effects of different heavy metals on living organisms.
3 Role of Constructed Wetlands in Phytoremediation
The use of wetlands for quality improvement of wastewater, referred to as rhizofiltration , is the best known and most researched application of constructed wetlands. Flooding of wetland sediments leads to rapid denitrification because of anoxic conditions; therefore, wetland soils contain low levels of nitrate [62]. CWs have proven successful for remediating a variety of water quality issues, with advantages over the natural wetland, Constructed wetland (CWs) thus designed to take advantage of natural wetland systems, but do so within a more controlled way. The plants most often used in CWs are persistent emergent plants, such as bulrushes (Scirpus), spikerush (Eleocharis), and other sedges (Cyperus), Rushes (Juncus), common reed (Phragmites), and cattails (Typha). Plants for CWs must be able to tolerate continuous flooding and exposure to waste streams containing relatively high and often variable concentrations of pollutants. The functions of wetland plants make them an important component of CWs. Plants contribute to contaminant removal by altering hydrology, sequestering particulates, and accumulating pollutants [63]. These processes can be utilized to design CWs with a number of treatment approaches , which are mainly phytoextraction, rhizofiltration, and phytostabilization.
Some other macrophytes that are used in wetlands for the removal of heavy metals include Acorus calamus, Carex spp. (sedges), Cyperus (sweet manna grass), Juncus sp. (Rushes), Phalaris arundinacea (reed canary grass), Phragmites australis (common reed), Sagittaria (arrow heads), Scirpus sp. (Balrushes), Sparganium sp. (bur reeds), Spartina spp. (cordgrasses), Typha sp. (cattails), Ziznia aquatic (wild rice), Ceratophyllum sp. (coontails), Eggeria densa (Brazilian waterweed), Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrilla), Isoetes sp. (Quillworts), Myriophyllum spp. (water milfoils), Najas spp. (water nymphs), Potamogeton sp. (pond weeds), Urticularia spp. (bladderworts), Lemna spp. (duckweed), Azolla (aquatic fern) and Hydrocharis (frog bit). These macrophytes are highly beneficial to aquatic ecosystems because they provide food and shelter for fish and aquatic invertebrates, wildlife also produce oxygen, which helps in overall lake functioning [50]. Macrophytes are considered as important components of the aquatic ecosystems not only as food source for aquatic invertebrates, but they also act as an efficient accumulator of heavy metals [64, 65]. Aquatic plants sequester large quantities of metals [66–68]. Trace element removal by wetland vegetation can be greatly enhanced by the judicious selection of appropriate wetland plant species. Selection is based on the type of elements to be removed, the geographical location, environmental conditions, and the known accumulation capacities of the species.
Macrophytes are unchangeable biological filters and play an important role in the maintenance of the aquatic ecosystem. Aquatic macrophytes are taxonomically closely related to terrestrial plants, but are aquatic phanerogams, which live in a completely different environment. Their characteristics to accumulate metals make them an interesting research objects for testing and modeling ecological theories on evolution and plant succession, as well as on nutrient and metal cycling [69]. Many industrial and mining processes cause heavy metal pollution, which can contaminate natural water systems and become a hazard to human health. Therefore, colonization of macrophytes on the sediments polluted with heavy metals and the role of these plants in transportation of metals in shallow coastal areas are very important. [50]. Despite this, roots of wetland plants may accumulate heavy metals and transport them to aboveground portions of plants [70, 71].
The extent of metal accumulation within aquatic macrophytes is known to vary significantly between species. For example, the emergent aquatic plants usually accumulate lower amount of metals than submerged aquatic vegetation [72]. The emergent macrophytes growing in constructed wetlands designed for wastewater treatment have several properties in relation to the treatment processes that make them an essential component of the design. Several of the submerged, emergent, and free-floating aquatic macrophytes are known to accumulate and bioconcentrate heavy metals [73, 74]. Aquatic macrophytes take up metals from the water, producing an internal concentration several fold greater than their surroundings. Many of the aquatic macrophytes are found to be the potential scavengers of heavy metals from water and wetlands [75]. Yet research has focused mainly on the interaction between biological factors such as competition, coexistence, grazing, life cycles, adaptation, and environmental factors (salinity, depth, wave exposure) of importance for structuring brackish water macrophytes and algal communities [76].
4 Heavy Metal Pollution in Kashmir Himalayan Wetlands
Though a number of studies pertaining to the ecology of Kashmir Himalayan wetlands have been carried out, there are only a few attempts related to heavy metal analysis in these ecosystems. Of these studies, worth mentioning are the attempts by Ahmad et al. [77] in recent past. According to Ahmad et al. [77], the main source of heavy metals in the Kashmir Himalayan wetlands is use of pesticides in the rice fields and orchards of Kashmir and use of lead shots for hunting/poaching of birds.
In a series of studies, Ahmad et al. [77, 78] and other unpublished data heavy metal dynamics in different components of the wetland systems including water, sediments, and macrophytes have been worked out. In Phragmites australis, the accumulation of the different heavy metals was in order of Al > Mn > Ba > Zn > Cu > Pb > Mo > Co > Cr > Cd > Ni. Translocation factor, i.e., ratio of shoot to root metal concentration revealed that metals were largely retained in the roots of P. australis, thus reducing the supply of metals to avifauna and preventing their bioaccumulation. Moreover, the higher retention of heavy metals in the belowground parts of P. australis reduces the supply of metals to avifauna, which mainly feed on aboveground parts of the plant, thereby preventing bioaccumulation of heavy metals in higher trophic levels. This further adds to the desirability of P. Australis as a phytoremediation species [77]. Ahmad et al. [78] also assessed the heavy metal accumulation capability of two dominant species (Ceratophyllum demersum and Potamogeton natans) in a Kashmir Himalayan Ramsar site. The accumulation of the different metals in P. natans was in the order of Al > Mn > Pb > Cu > Zn > Ni > Co > Cr > Cd, while in C. demersum it was Al > Mn > Zn > Co > Cu > Pb > Cr > Ni > Cd. In C. demersum, the highest bioconcentration factor (BCF) was obtained for Co (3616) and Mn (3589) while in P. natans the highest BCF corresponded to Cd (1027). Overall Potamogeton–Ceratophyllum combination provided a useful mix for Co, Mn, and Cd removal from contaminated sites. Beside Phragmites australis some other macrophytes that showed good phytoremediation potential were Azolla cristata, Hydrocharis dubia, Myriophyllum spicatum, Nymphaea alba, Nymphoides peltata, Salvinia natans, Typha angustata, Sparganium erectum, and Trapa natans. Ahmad et al. [77] reported that Hokersar an important Ramsar site of Kashmir Himalayas filters 73 % of Co, 88.24 % of Cu, 65.13 % of Pb, 51.98 % of Zn, 40.93 % of Mn, 58.36 % of Fe, 41.02 % of Cd, 75.07 % of Cr, and 86.59 % of Ni.
5 Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions
Kashmir Himalayas are gifted with a number of wetlands like Hokersar wetland, Haigam wetland, Malangpora wetland, Mirgund wetland, Narkura wetland, etc. These Kashmir Himalayan wetlands are presently subjected to various anthropogenic pressures like encroachment, rapid urbanization and industrialization, dumping of solid waste, sites of gunshots for hunting/poaching, etc. There have been scanty studies of heavy metals in Kashmir Himalayan wetlands except a few attempts in recent past by Ahmad et al. [77, 78]. Constructed wetlands are not common in Kashmir Himalayas. Realizing the important role played by the constructed wetlands, it is expected that constructed wetlands will also become popular in Kashmir Himalayas.
References
Vymazal J, Kropfelova L (2008) Is concentration of dissolved oxygen a good indicator of processes in filtration beds of horizontal-flow constructed wetlands? In: Vymazal J (ed) Waste water treatment, plant dynamics and management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 311–317
ITRC (2003) Technical and regulatory guidance document for constructed treatment wetlands. The Interstate Technology Regulatory Council Wetlands Team, Washington, DC
TOOLBASE (2001) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. http://www.toolbase.org/Technology‐Inventory/Sitework/constructed‐wetlands. Accessed 30 Jan 2012
Hoffmann H, Platzer C, Winker M, Muench EV (2011) Technology review of constructed wetlands: subsurface flow constructed wetlands for greywater and domestic wastewater treatment. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Germany
Mohamed A (2004) Planung, Bauund Betriebeiner Pflanzenkläranlage in Syrien (Planning, construction and operation of a constructed wetland in Syria, in German). PhD thesis, University Flensburg, Germany
Heers M (2006) Constructed wetlands under different geographic conditions: evaluation of the suitability and criteria for the choice of plants including productive species. Master thesis, Faculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
Kamau C (2009) Constructed wetlands: potential for their use in treatment of grey water in Kenya. M.Sc. thesis, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2008) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper PF, Green MB, Haberl R (eds) (1998) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden
Mitsch WJ (1992) Landscape design and the role of created, restored and natural riparian wetlands in controlling nonpoint source pollution. Ecol Eng 1:27–47
Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water 2:530–549
USEPA (1988) Constructed wetlands and aquatic plant systems for municipal wastewater treatment. EPA/625/1-88/022
Lemna Corporation (1994) Innovations in Lagoon-based treatment. Retention Times, Spring/Summer (Promotional literature)
USEPA (2000) Manual, Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters. EPA/625/R-99/010. United States Environment Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati
Brix H (1994) Use of wetlands in water pollution control: historical development, present status, and future perspectives. J Water Sci Technol 30(8):209–223
Stottmeister U, Weibner A, Kuschk P (2003) Effect of plants and microorganisms on constructed wetlands for waste water treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22(1–2):93–117
Brix H (2003) Plants used in constructed wetlands and their functions. 11th international seminar on the use of aquatic macrophytes for wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands
Shtemenko NI, Shepelenko VN, Richnow H, Kuschk P (2005) Surface lipid composition of two emergent water plants used in constructed wetlands, vol 48, Modern tools and methods of water treatment for improving living standards NATO science series. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 325–330
Hamilton H, Nix PG, Sobolewski Y (1993) An overview of constructed wetlands as alternatives to conventional waste treatment systems. Water Pollut Res J Canada 28(3):529–548
Wang J, Cai X, Chen Y, Liang M, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Li Q, Liao X (1994) Analysis of the configuration and treatment effect of constructed wetland waste water treatment system for different waste waters in China. In: Proceedings of fourth international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control. ICWS ($ Secreteriat Guangzhou, P. R. China, pp 114–120)
Yang Z, Goldman N, Friday A (1994) Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol Biol Evol 11:316–324
Twilley RR, Brindson MH, Davis GJ (1977) Phosphorus absorption, translocation and secretion in Nuphar luteum. Limnol Oceanogr 22:1022–1032
Vymazal J (2013) The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen removal: a review of a recent development. Water Res 47(14):4795–4811
Billore SK, Singh N, Sharma JK, Dass P, Nelson RM (1999) Horizontal subsurface flow gravel bed constructed wetland with Phragmites karka in central India. Water Sci Technol 40:171–173
Dallas S, Scheffe B, Ho G (2004) Reedbeds for greywater treatment—case study in Santa Elena—Monteverde, Costa Rica, Central America. Ecol Eng 23:55–61
Rousseau DPL, Vanrolleghem PA, De Pauw N (2004) Constructed wetlands in Flanders: a performance analysis. Ecol Eng 23:151–163
American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Masi F, Martinuzzi N (2007) Constructed wetlands for the Mediterranean countries: hybrid systems for water reuse and sustainable sanitation. Desalination 215:44–55
Schroder P, Avino JN, Azaizeh H, Goldhirsh AG, Gregorio SD, Komives T, Langergraber G, Lenz A, Maestri E, Memon AR, Ranalli A, Sebastiani L, Smrcek S, Vanek T, Vuilleumier S, Wissing F (2007) Using phytoremediation technologies to upgrade waste water treatment in Europe. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(7):495
Nies DH (1999) Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:730–750
Holleman D, Wiberg E (1987) Lehrbuch deranorganischen chemie. Springer, Berlin
Weast RC (1984) CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics, 64th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Baruah S, Hazarika K, Sarma PK (2011) Uptake and localization of lead in Eichorniacrassipes grown within a hydroponic system. Adv Appl Sci Res 3(1):51–59
Alloway BJ (1997) The mobilisation of trace elements in soils. In: Prost R (ed) Contaminated soils. Proceedings of the third international conference on the biogeochemistry of trace elements, Paris 15–19 May 1995. INRA, Paris, pp 133–145
Gorsberg RM, Elkins BV, Igon SR, Goldman CR (1984) The removal of heavy metals by artificial wetlands. In: Proceedings of water reuse symposium III, future of water reuse, San Diego, vol. 2, pp 639–648
Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Nriagu JO (1989) A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals. Nature 338:47–49
Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Zacarkim CE, Palacio SM, Obregón CLD, Zenatti C, Galante RM, Rossi N, Rossi FL, Pereira IRA, Welter RA, Rizzutto MA (2005) Removal of heavy metal from polluted river water using aquatic macrophyte Salvinia sp. Brazilian J Phys 35:44–746
Phuong PK, Son CPN, Sauvian JJ, Terradellas J (1998) Contamination of PCB’s, DDT’, and heavy metals in sediments of Ho Chi Minh city’s canals, Vietnam. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 60:115–131
Batty J, Pain D, Caurant F (1996) Metal concentrations in eels 471 Anguilla Anguilla from the Camargue region of France. Biol Conserv 76:17–23
Tavecchia G, Pradel R, Lebreton JD, Johnson AR, Mandain-Monval JY (2001) The effect of lead exposure on survival of adult mallards in the Camargue, southern France. J Appl Ecol 38:1197–1207
Nriagu JO (1996) A history of global metal pollution. Science 272:223–224
Rai PK, Sharma AP, Tripathi BD (2007) Urban environment status in Singrauli industrial region and its eco-sustainable management: a case study on heavy metal pollution. In: Lakshmi V (ed) Urban planning and environment, strategies and challenges. Macmillan Advanced Research Series, pp 213–217
Finkelman RB, Gross PMK (1999) The types of data needed for assessing the environmental and human health impacts of coal. Int J Coal Geol 40:91–101
Sharma PD (2003) Environmental pollution. In: Ecology and environment, 7th edn. Rastogi Publication, Meerut, India, pp 415–489
Lasat MM, Pence NS, Garvin DF, Ebbs SD, Kochian LV (2000) Molecular physiology of zinc transport in the Zn hyperaccumulator (Thlaspicaerulescens). J Exp Bot 51:71–79
Cardwell AJ, Hawker DW, Greenway M (2002) Metal accumulation in aquatic macrophytes from southeast Queensland, Australia. Chemosphere 48:653–663
Uka UN, Mohammed HA, Aina A (2013) Preliminary studies on the phytoremediation potential of Phragmites karka (Retz.) in Asa River. J Fisheries Aquatic Sci 8:87–93
Vardanyan LG, Ingol BS (2006) Studies on heavy metal accumulation in aquatic macrophytes from Sevan (Armenia) and Carambolim (India) lake systems. Environ Int 32:208–218
Sasmaza A, Obekb E, Hasarb H (2008) The accumulation of heavy metals in (Typhalatifolia L.) grown in a stream carrying secondary effluent. Ecol Eng 33:278–284
Malik A (2004) Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Chemosphere 30:261–278
Chaphekar SB (1991) An overview on bioindicators. J Environ Biol 12:163–168
Zenk MH (1996) Heavy metal detoxification in higher plants—a review. Gene 179:21–30
Mertz W (1981) The essential trace elements. Science 213:1332–1338
Balsberg-Pahlsson AM (1989) Toxicity of heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Cd, Pb) to vascular plants. A literature review. Water Air Soil Pollut 47:287–319
Gullizzoni P (1991) The role of heavy metals and toxic materials in the physiological ecology of submerged macrophytes. Aquatic Bot 41:87–109
Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 68:167–182
Gaur A, Adholeya A (2004) Prospects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Curr Sci 86(4):528–534
Pehlivan E, Ozkan AM, Dinc S, Parlayici S (2009) Adsorption of Cu2+ and Pb2+ ion on dolomite powder. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):1044–1049
Roy S, Labelle S, Mehta P (2005) Phytoremediation of heavy metal and PAH-contaminated brownfield sites. Plant and Soil 272(1–2):277–290
Otte ML, Jacob DL (2006) Constructed wetlands for phytoremediation. In: Mackova M (ed) Phytoremediation, rhizoremediation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–67
Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Chung IH, Jeng SS (1974) Heavy metal pollution of Ta-Tu river. Bullet Inst Zool, Acad Sci 13:69–73
Devlin RMR (1967) Plant physiology. Reinhold, New York, p 564
Baldantoni D, Alfani A, Tomansi DI, Bartoli G, Santo AVD (2004) Assessment of macro and microelement accumulation capability of two aquatic plants. Environ Pollut 130:149–156
Mays PA, Edwards GS (2001) Comparison of heavy metal accumulation in natural wetland and constructed wetlands receiving acid mine drainage. Ecol Eng 16(4):487–500
Stoltz E, Greger M (2002) Accumulation properties of As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn by four wetland plant species growing on submerged mine tailings. Environ Exp Bot 47:271–280
Forstner U, Whittman GTW (1979) Metal pollution in the aquatic environment. Springer, Berlin, p 486
Dunstan WM, Windom HM (1975) The influence of environmental changes in heavy metal concentrations of Spartina alterniflora. In: Cronin LE (ed) Estuarine research, vol. II. Geology and engineering. Academic Press, New York, pp 393–404
Mudroch A, Capobianco J (1978) Study of selected metals in marshes on Lake St. Clair. Ontario Arch Hydrobiol 84:87–108
Albers PH, Camardese WN (1993) Effects of acidification on metal accumulation by aquatic plants and invertebrates in Constructed wetlands. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:959–967
Bryan GW (1971) The effects of heavy metals (other than mercury) on marine and estuarine organisms. Proc R Soc London B 177:389–410
Chow TJ, Snyder CB, Snyder HG, Earl JL (1976) Lead content of some marine organisms. J Environ Sci Health A11:33–44
Gulati KL, Nagpaul KK, Bukhari SS (1979) Uranium, boron, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in leaves of mangroves, Mahasagar. Bullet Natl Inst Oceanogr 12:183–186
Alloway BJ, Davis BE (1971) Heavy metal content of plants growing on soils contaminated by lead mining. J Agric Sci 76:321–323
Ahmad SS, Reshi ZA, Shah MA, Rashid I, Ara R, Andrabi SMA (2014) Phytoremediation potential of Phragmites australis in Hokersar wetland—a Ramsar site of Kashmir Himalaya. Int J Phytoremed 16:1183–1191
Ahmad SS, Reshi ZA, Shah MA, Rashid I, Ara R, Andrabi SMA (2015) Heavy metal accumulation in the leaves of Potamogeton natans and Ceratophyllum demersum in a Himalayan RAMSAR site: management implications. Wetland Ecol Manage doi:10.1007/s11273-015-9472-9
Tripathi RD, Srivastava S, Mishra S, Singh N, Tuli R, Gupta DK, Maathuis FJM (2007) Arsenic hazards: strategies for tolerance and remediation by plants. Trends Biotechnol 25:158–165
Salem HM, Eweida EA, Farag A (2000) Heavy metals in drinking water and their environmental impact on human health. ICEHM 2000, Cairo University, Egypt, pp 542–556
Awofolu O (2005) A survey of trace metals in vegetation, soil and lower animal along some selected major roads in metropolitan city of Lagos. Environ Monit Assess 105:431–447
Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL, Mowat FS, Kerger BD (2003) Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water. J Toxicol Environ Health 66:1295–1339
Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol, pp 1–20
Sandstead HH (1995) Requirements and toxicity of essential trace elements, illustrated by zinc and copper. Am J Clin Nutr 61(3):621–624
Neustadt J, Pieczenik S (2007) Toxic-metal contamination: mercury. Integr Med 6:36–37
Ainza C, Trevors J, Saier M (2010) Environmental mercury rising. Water Air Soil Pollut 205:47–48
Gulati K, Banerjee B, Bala Lall S, Ray A (2010) Effects of diesel exhaust, heavy metals and pesticides on various organ systems: possible mechanisms and strategies for prevention and treatment. Indian J Exp Biol 48:710–721
Clifton JC (2007) Mercury exposure and public health. Pediatr Clin North Am 54(2):237–269
Bjørklund G (1995) Mercury and Acrodynia (PDF). J Orthomol Med 10(3&4):145–146
Tokuomi H, Kinoshita Y, Teramoto J, Imanishi K (1977) Hunter-Russell syndrome Nihon rinsho. Jpn J Clin Med 35(1):518–519
Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Weiss B (2004) Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics 113(4):1023–1029
Flora G, Gupta D, Tiwari A (2012) Toxicity of lead: a review with recent updates. Interdiscip Toxicol 5(2):47–58
Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY (2007) Phytoremediation technology: hyperaccumulation metals in plants. Water Air Soil Pollut 184:105–126
Iqbal MP (2012) Lead pollution—a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in Asian developing countries. Pakistani J Pharmaceut Sci 25:289–294
Hess R, Schmid B (2002) Zinc supplement overdose can have toxic effects. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:582–584
Fosmire GJ (1990) Zinc toxicity. Am J Clin Nutr 51(2):225–227
US EPA (2004) Drinking water health advisory for Manganese. EPA-822-R-04-003. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Washington, DC
Kawamura R, Ikuta HS, Fukuzumi S (1941) Intoxication by manganese in well water, Kitasato. Archiv Exp Med Biol 18:145–169
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmad, S.S., Reshi, Z.A., Shah, M.A., Rashid, I. (2016). Constructed Wetlands: Role in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals. In: Ansari, A., Gill, S., Gill, R., Lanza, G., Newman, L. (eds) Phytoremediation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40148-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40148-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40146-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40148-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)