Abstract
Contributing to a critical re-examination of multi-stakeholder governance, this chapter conducts an in-depth analysis of business-civil society interaction in the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB). Inquiring into the causes of a deliberation failure, the chapter identifies a high level of politicization as well as the background role of the state as the underlying factors. It is uncovered how deep-seated divisions and ideologically charged conflicts limited the opportunity for meaningful deliberative governance in the biofuels arena. In addition, it is shown how the European Union undermined the position of the RSB through endorsing a non-participatory model of private sustainability governance in this policy area. This reduced the pressure on biofuel companies to engage in difficult interactions with critical NGOs in the RSB.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, K. W. (2012). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88(3), 543–564.
Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (Eds.). (2010). Environmental politics and deliberative democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bexel, M., & Mörth, U. (Eds.). (2010). Democracy and public-private partnerships in global governance. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
BioenergyWiki. (2009). RSB working groups. http://www.bioenergywiki.net/RSB_working_groups. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Biofuels International. (2010). Roundtable on sustainable biofuels responds to European biodiesel board resignation. http://biofuels-news.com/display_news/2049/RSB_responds_to_EBB_resignation/. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Biofuelwatch. (2007). Agrofuels: Towards a reality check in nine key areas. www.carbontradewatch.org/pubs/Agrofuels.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Bohman, J., & Regh, W. (Eds.). (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reasons and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cheyns, E. (2011). Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture: Limits of the “inclusiveness”paradigm. In S. Ponte, J. Vestergaard, & P. Gibbon (Eds.), Governing through standards: Origins, drivers and limitations (pp. 318–354). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighbourhood: The report of the commission on global governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory. London: UCL Press.
Elster, J. (Ed.). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esty, D. C. (2007). Good governance at the World Trade Organization: Building a foundation of administrative law. Journal of International Economic Law, 10(3), 509–527.
EU Commission. (2011). First EU sustainability schemes for biofuels get the go-ahead, Press Release. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-11-901_en.htm?locale=fr. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
European Bio diesel Board. (2010). EBB resignation letter. http://www.ascension-publishing.com/BIZ/EBB-RSB.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
European Union. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC: On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L140(16), 16–62.
FAO. (2012). World agriculture toward 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. ESA working paper,12(3).
Fransen, L., & Kolk, A. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14(5), 667–684.
Friends of the Earth Europe. (2008). Sustainability as a smokescreen: The inadequacy of certifying fuels and feeds Brussels. http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2008/sustainability_smokescreen_fullreport_med_res.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 1–15.
Global Renewable Fuels Alliance. (2016). Biofuels map. http://globalrfa.org/biofuels-map/. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Grant, R. W., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43.
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2008). Organizing accountability in Transnational Standards Organizations: The forest stewardship council as a good governance model. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 61–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
KluyverCentre. (2008). Feedback report to RSB, 4th international Kluyver focus workshop. http://rsb.org/archives/. Date Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
Kronsell, A., & Bäckstrand, K. (2010). Rationalities and forms of governance: A framework for analysing the legitimacy of new modes of governance. In K. Bäckstrand, J. Khan, A. Kronsell, & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance (pp. 28–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lövbrand, E., & Khan, J. (2010). The deliberative turn in green political theory. In K. Bäckstrand, J. Khan, A. Kronsell, & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance (pp. 47–65). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2011). Biofuels: Ethical issues London. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/biofuels-0. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
OECD-FAO. (2012). Agricultural outlook 2012. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/COMM_MARKETS_MONITORING/Oilcrops/Documents/OECD_Reports/biofuels_chapter.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Oxfam International. (2008). Another inconvenient truth: How biofuel policies are deepening poverty and accelerating climate change. Oxfam briefing paper. http://www.oxfam.org/en/grow/policy/another-inconvenient-truth.Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Ponte, S. (2014). ‘Roundtabling’ sustainability: Lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum, 54(0), 261–271.
Renewable Fuels Agency. (2008). The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/remea/gallagher-review-indirect-effects-biofuels-production. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Risse, T. (2000). Let’s argue!: Communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39.
Risse, T. (2004). Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 288–313.
Risse, T., & Kleine, M. (2010). Deliberation in negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 708–726.
RSB. (2006). Minutes of sustainable biofuels stakeholder meeting, 28 November 2006. http://rsb.org/archives/rsb-1st-phase-2006-2009/. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2007a). Minutes of first environment and GHG working group meeting, 28 June 2007. http://rsb.org/archives/rsb-1st-phase-2006-2009/. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2007b). Minutes of steering board meeting, 6–7 November 2007 Lausanne. http://rsb.org/steering_board_pdfs/Draft2MinutesofSB-meetingNov2007_2.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2007c). Minutes of the first social impact and implementation working group meeting, 23 July 2007,10 January 2016. http://www.bioenergywiki.net/images/c/c2/Minutes_First_Meeting_SOC_IMP23_July_07.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2008a). Global principles and criteria for sustainable biofuels production (Version Zero).
RSB. (2008b). Minutes of steering board meeting, 9–10June 2008. http://rsb.org/archives/rsb-1st-phase-2006-2009/. Date Accessed 10 Janary 2016.
RSB. (2008c). Minutes of steering board meeting, 20 October 2008 (on record with author).
RSB. (2009). Version zero of the RSB sustainability standard: List of participants in feedback activities (on record with author).
RSB. (2010a). Minutes of chamber 1 meeting, 20 December 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2010b). Minutes of chamber 2 meeting, 10 December 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2010c). Minutes of chamber 2 meeting, 30 November 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2010d). Minutes of chamber 4 meeting, 25 November 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2010e). Minutes of steering board meeting, 3–5November 2010,http://rsb.org/steering_board_pdfs/10-12-07-SummaryReport-SBmeeting-Nov2010.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2010f). Minutes of steering board meeting, 11 February 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2010g). Minutes of steering board meeting, 23 December 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2010h). RSB terms of reference (on record with author).
RSB. (2011a). Minutes of chamber 2 meeting, 31 May 2010 (on record with author).
RSB. (2011b). Minutes of chamber 3 meeting, 30 May 2011 (on record with author).
RSB. (2011c). Minutes of steering board meeting, 12–13 June, 2011. http://rsb.org/steering_board_pdfs/11-08-02-SteeringBoard_ReportJune%2015-17-2011.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2011d). RSB stakeholder mapping, January 2011. http://rsb.org/documents_and_resources/11-01-20RSB_Stakeholder_Mapping.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
RSB. (2016). Board of directors meetings. http://rsb.org/steering-board-meetings/. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
Schaller, S. (2007). The democratic legitimacy of private governance: An analysis of the ethical trading initiative, INEF report 91/2007. Duisburg, Institute for Development and Peace, University Duisburg-Essen.
Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: The case of European Union biofuel governance. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 533–546.
Schouten, G., Glasbergen, P., & Leroy, P. (2012). On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 83, 42–50.
Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative democracy and the environment. London: Routledge.
The Guardian. (2008).UN chief calls for review of biofuels policy, 5 April 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/05/biofuels.food. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2016). International Energy Statistics. http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=79&pid=79&aid=1&cid=regions&syid=2000&eyid=2011&unit=TBPD. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21, United Nations conference on environment and development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Date Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
USDA. (2013). EU 27 – Biofuel annual. GAIN report number NL 3034. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Biofuels%20Annual_The%20Hague_EU-27_8-13-2013.pdf. Date Accessed10Jan 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schleifer, P. (2017). Let’s Bargain! Setting Standards of Sustainable Biofuels. In: Esguerra, A., Helmerich, N., Risse, T. (eds) Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood. Governance and Limited Statehood. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39871-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39871-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39870-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39871-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)