Skip to main content

Learning About Systems

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Technology Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

Technological systems are established in relation to theories and philosophical traditions within technological practice. The question is whether and how this tradition can help to shape technological systems as a field of knowledge for compulsory schooling. From a literacy perspective, knowledge about technological systems is essential in today’s society. In order to create good conditions for students to learn about technological systems, the theoretical and philosophical traditions must be supplemented with an educational tradition, an understanding of how, what, and why to work with technological systems in schools, on different levels. Research concerning technological systems in education focuses to a great extent on students and teachers’ understanding of system-relevant concepts such as input and output, components, and subsystems. By reviewing relevant theories of technological systems, educational research of technological systems and technology, qualities emerged as a basis for constituting technological systems as a field of knowledge for students, thus enabling the identification of strategies for further development within this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, C., Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2014). Societal systems–Complex or worse?. Futures, 63, 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreucci, C., Chatoney, M., & Ginestie, J. (2012). The systemic approach to technological education: Effects of transferred learning in resolving a physics problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Williams, P. (2007). Learning elemental structures and dynamic processes in technological systems: A cognitive framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, H., & Tillman, A-M. (2004). The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA. An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-zvi-Assarf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). A study of junior high students’ perceptions of the water cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijke, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (1989). The social construction of technological systems. New directions in sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: First MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1967). The system approach. New York: Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V., & Compton, A. (2013). Teaching the nature of technology: Determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V., & France, B. (2007). Towards a new technological literacy: Curriculum development with a difference. Curriculum Matters, 3, 158–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer, R. L., Daugherty, J. L., & Meyer, J. P. (2010). Formulating a concept base for secondary level engineering: A review and synthesis. Journal of Technology Education, 22(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of technology: An introduction (Vol. 90). Malden/Oxford/Carlston: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). World dynamics. New York: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. (2005). A system approach for developing technological literacy. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis, P., & Besiou, M. (2008). Sustainability in electrical and electronic equipment closed-loop supply chains: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1665–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, I., Norton, S., & McRobbie, C. (2005). Adding value to the teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T. E., & Lifset, R. J. (2016). Industrial ecology’s first decade. In R. Clift & A. Druckman (Eds.), Taking stock of industrial ecology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J. & Klasander, C. (2016). Visible parts, invisible whole: Swedish technology student teachers’ conceptions about technological systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. (1989). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingelstam, L. (2012). System– att tänka över samhälle och teknik. (Energimyndigheten). Kristianstad: Kristianstads Boktryckeri AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. (2010). Systems practice. How to act in climate-change world. London: Springer & The Open University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2003). The development of a national curriculum in technology for New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klasander, C. (2010). Talet om tekniska system – förväntningar, traditioner och skolverkligheter. Vol (32), Studies in Science and Technology Education, Linköpings universitet. Linköping: LiU-Tryck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. J. (1985/2003). What is technology. In R. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology. The technological condition (pp. 210–212). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski, M.-I., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). An exploratory study on how primary pupils approach systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. J. (1990). Stages in systems thinking, modelling and realisation in school electronics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1(1), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing White River Junction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mioduser, D., Venezky, R. L., & Gong, B. (1996). Students’ perceptions and designs of simple control systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(3), 363–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öquist, O. (2008). Systemteori i praktiken: konsten att lösa problem och nå resultat. Stockholm: Gothia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Weber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, A., Hacker, M., & de Vries, M. J. (2011). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Double day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (1991). A skeptic’s guide to computer models. In G. O. Barney et al. (Eds.), Managing a nation: The microcomputer software catalog (pp. 209–229). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M. (2011). Att urskilja tekniska system. Didaktiska dimensioner i grundskolan. [Discerning technological system. Pedagogical possibilities in compulsory school. Authors translation]. Ph.D. Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Norrköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M., & Ingerman, Å. (2010). Discerning technological systems related to everyday objects: Mapping the variation in pupils’ experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M. & Klasander, C. (2012). Teacher’s professional growth in planning and teaching technological systems. Technology Education Research Conference, Surfers Paradise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnberg, P. (2017). Worse than Complex (Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: M.I.T Press/Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Svensson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Svensson, M. (2016). Learning About Systems. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_34-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_34-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics