Abstract
Evo-devo is not only a field of empirical research but its results also have significant consequences for evolutionary theory. Predominantly, these address the evolution of the phenotype, a topic sidelined by population theoretical accounts of evolution. Original contributions to this domain concern the generative principles of phenotypic variation, the development-environment interaction, the construction of organismal complexity, and the origination of novelty. The theoretical corollaries of evo-devo have become part of an ongoing reform project in evolutionary theory, a particular version of which is termed the “extended evolutionary synthesis.” The logical structure of this revised evolutionary framework differs from the classical population-theoretical account, opening up new kinds of questions and establishing a distinct set of empirically testable predictions. Beyond improving our understanding of evolvability, evo-devo’s contribution to the extended synthesis can be epitomized in the principle of inherency, the notion that physical development, both in its material properties and its dynamical processes, guides phenotypic evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberch P (1982) Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. In: Bonner JT (ed) Evolution and development. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 313–332
Badyaev AV (2011) Origin of the fittest: link between emergent variation and evolutionary change as a critical question in evolutionary biology. Proc Biol Sci 278:1921–1929. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0548
Charlesworth D, Barton NH, Charlesworth B (2017) The sources of adaptive variation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284:20162864. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2864
Fábregas-Tejeda A, Vergara-Silva F (2018) The emerging structure of the extended evolutionary synthesis: where does Evo-devo fit in? Theory Biosci 137:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-018-0269-2
Foty RA, Pfleger CM, Forgacs G, Steinberg MS (1996) Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behavior. Development 122:1611–1620
Hallgrímsson B, Jamniczky H, Young NM, Rolian C, Schmidt-Ott U, Marcucio R (2012) The generation of variation and the developmental basis for evolutionary novelty. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 318:501–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22448
Hendrikse JL, Parsons TE, Hallgrímsson B (2007) Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evol Dev 9:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00176.x
Jablonka E (2006) Genes as followers in evolution – a post-synthesis synthesis? Biol Philos 21:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-0319-7
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kondo S, Miura T (2010) Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329:1616–1620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1179047
Koonin EV (2011) The logic of chance: the nature and origin of biological evolution. FT Press, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A, Jablonka E, Odling-Smee J, Wray G, Hoekstra HE, Futuyma DJ, Lenski RE, Mackay TFC, Schluter D, Strassmann JE (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/514161a
Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A, Jablonka E, Odling-Smee J (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
Lange A, Nemeschkal HL, Müller GB (2014) Biased polyphenism in polydactylous cats carrying a single point mutation: the Hemingway model for digit novelty. Evol Biol 41:262–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-013-9267-y
Lange A, Nemeschkal HL, Müller GB (2018) A threshold model for polydactyly. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 137:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.04.007
Mayr E (1960) The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In: Tax S (ed) Evolution after Darwin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 349–380
Moczek AP (2008) On the origins of novelty in development and evolution. BioEssays 30:432–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20754
Müller GB (2017) Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary. Interface Focus 7:20170015–20170011. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0015
Newman SA (2016) “Biogeneric” developmental processes: drivers of major transitions in animal evolution. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371:20150443–20150410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0443
Newman SA, Bhat R (2008) Dynamical patterning modules: physico-genetic determinants of morphological development and evolution. Phys Biol 5:015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/5/1/015008
Newman SA, Müller GB (2006) Genes and form: inherency in the evolution of developmental mechanisms. In: Neumann-Held EM, Rehmann-Sutter C (eds) Genes in Development. Duke University Press Books, Durham, pp 38–73
Niklas KJ (2000) The evolution of plant body plans—a biomechanical perspective. Ann Bot 85:411–438. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.1100
Nuño de la Rosa L (2017) Computing the extended synthesis: mapping the dynamics and conceptual structure of the evolvability research front. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 37:73–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22741
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Peterson T, Müller GB (2016) Phenotypic novelty in EvoDevo: the distinction between continuous and discontinuous variation and its importance in evolutionary theory. Evol Biol 43:314–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9372-9
Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010) Evolution – the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Wagner GP, Altenberg L (1996) Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967–976
Wagner GP, Lynch VJ (2010) Evolutionary novelties. Curr Biol 20:R48–R52
Walsh D, Huneman P (2017) Challenging the modern synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Müller, G.B. (2020). Evo-Devo’s Contributions to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_39-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_39-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences