Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

In this chapter I outline and develop the key principles of relational sociology, as I conceive of it, showing how this approach affords a ‘third way’ between methodological individualism and unhelpful forms of holism. The chapter is theoretical in orientation and argues that the concepts ‘interaction’, ‘tie’ and ‘network’ should be at the forefront in our attempt to understand the social world. I argue that theoretical innovation must be mirrored in the domain of methodology, however; that relational theory calls for relational methodologies and methods. To this end I offer a brief introduction to social network analysis (SNA), an approach to data gathering and analysis (albeit one amongst others) which, in my view, allows us to translate theoretical ideas regarding relationality into research practice. The chapter concludes with a reflection upon relational sociology’s capacity to deal with issues of both agency/structure and the so-called micro/macro divide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Actually she said ‘… individuals and families …’ but her politics was a clear manifestation of this individualism. The quote is from an interview in Womens Own magazine 31/10/87.

  2. 2.

    As critique of empiricist accounts of causation have noted, the tendency to conceptualize causation as a succession of two events (constant conjuncture) avoids reference to any connection between them (Keat and Urry 1975).

References

  • Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and the ideological state apparatus, in his essays on ideology (pp. 1–60). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, P. (1993). Relations into rhetorics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1974). Parameters of social space. American Sociological Review, 39(5), 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. (2013). Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (2005). Brokerage and closure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2007). Social networks and extra-parliamentary politics. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2010). The social world of the network: Qualitative aspects of network analysis. Sociologica (1). http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/main

  • Crossley, N. (2011). Towards relational sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2013). Interactions, juxtapositions and tastes. In F. Depelteau & C. Powell (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2015a). Networks of sound, style and subversion: The punk and post-punk worlds of Manchester, London, Liverpool and Sheffield, 1975–1980. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2015b). Relational sociology and culture: A preliminary framework. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N., & Krinsky, J. (Eds.). (2015). Social networks and social movements. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depelteau, F., & Powell, C. (2013a). Conceptualizing relational sociology. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Depelteau, F., & Powell, C. (2013b). Applying relational sociology. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (Eds.). (2003). Social movements and networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (1988). Choice, rationality and social theory. London: Unwin-Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. (1994). The philosophy of the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1973). Bringing men back. In A. Ryan (Ed.), The philosophy of social explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keat, R., & Urry, J. (1975). Social theory as science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H., Savage, M., & Harvey, P. (2006). Social networks and the study of relations: Networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35(1), 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laver, M. (1997). Private desires, political action. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1964). Friendship as social process. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). Adventures of the dialectic. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1957). Manifest and latent functions, in his social theory and social structure. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. In G. Carter (Ed.), Empirical approaches to sociology (pp. 111–118). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A. (2003). Cross-talk in movements. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A. (2011). Relational sociology, culture and agency. In J. Scott & P. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 80–97). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A., & White, H. (1998). Between conversation and situation. Social Research, 65, 295–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M., Barabási, L., & Watts, D. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1985). New social movements. Social Research, 52(4), 817–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P., & Marwell, G. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (2002). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society. London: Cohen and West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1972). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the form of the group (I & II). American Journal of Sociology, 8(1), 1–46 & 8(2), 158–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & White, D. (1992). Structure and dynamics of the global economy. Social Forces, 70(4), 857–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D., & Kick, E. (1979). Structural position in the world system and economic growth. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1096–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. New Jersey: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. (1999). Small worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man. American Sociological Review, 26(2), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Crossley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crossley, N. (2016). Social Networks and Relational Sociology. In: Abrutyn, S. (eds) Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32250-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics