Abstract
This chapter considers some of the ways in which the chapters in this volume contribute to ongoing debates on semantics and pragmatics and some of the directions they suggest for future research. Many of the contributions can be understood as being about exploring existing connections and developing new ones. Some of the chapters explore and develop understanding of existing connections, some make new connections, and some explore contrasting views. All of the work demonstrates the benefits of bringing theorists from different backgrounds together and developing a fuller conversation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language, 9, 124–162.
Bach, K. (2001). You don’t say. Synthese, 128, 15–44.
Bach, K. (2010). Impliciture vs. explicature: What’s the difference?. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (pp. 126–137). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Borg, E. (2004). Minimal semantics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. (2005). Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Carston, R. (2010). Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (pp. 217–285). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chapman, S. (2013). Grice, conversational implicature and philosophy. In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 153–188). New York: Springer.
Clark, B., & Owtram, N. (2012). Imagined inference: Teaching writers to think like readers. In M. Burke, S. Czabo, L. Week, & K. Berkowitz (Eds.), Current trends in pedagogical stylistics (pp. 126–141). London: Continuum.
Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation. The William James lectures. Harvard University. Published in Grice 1975, 1989.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Grice 1989: 86–116).
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD thesis, UCLA.
Horn, L. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 11–42). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1989). A review of ‘relevance’. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 455–472.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalised conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Noveck, I., & Sperber, D. (2004). Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Noveck, I., & Sperber, D. (2007). The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar inferences’. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 184–212). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recanati, F. (2007). Perspectival thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saul, J. (2002). What is said and psychological reality: Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 347–372.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed. 1995). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31–95.
Wason, P. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Wharton, T. (2003). Natural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind & Language, 18(5), 447–477.
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D., & Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559–1579.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, B. (2017). Drawing Things Together: Concluding Remarks. In: Depraetere, I., Salkie, R. (eds) Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32245-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32247-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)